[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Knicks want Jeffries!
Author Thread
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
7/18/2006  10:43 AM
Posted by metra:
Posted by McK1:

get Jeffries

Why?

has a good attitude.

he can defend the 3 position 1 on 1 - matches up size wise and lengthwise with everyone including Lebron

he has the length and speed to help the guards on the perimeter.

he has the length and size to help Jake and the Fat Man inside.

he can pass.

he can handle the ball adequately on the perimeter.

no he is not a star.
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
AUTOADVERT
bigbeast
Posts: 22333
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/21/2005
Member: #1060

7/18/2006  10:46 AM
Remember that Jeffries started at Indiana (Isiah's former school) and he starred in an offense similar to what Isiah is installing here. He carried that Hoosier team to the championship game and beat Jason Williams and Duke in the process.

Jeffries is 6'10, had length, can block shots and rebound from the wing,can handle it like a guard, guarded Lebron about aswell as I've seen anyone guard him, and is a much better scorer than he showed in Washington.
"Man, who knows with this team." Aguirre.
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
7/18/2006  10:47 AM
you guys realize that we will suddenly be stocked defensively to compliment our loaded offense.

18 more wins.
all kool aid all the time.
metra
Posts: 20743
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/11/2003
Member: #473
7/18/2006  10:48 AM
Besides things related to personality, only a few of a player's skills aren't shown in the stats. Defense is one of them. JJ better be a SOLID defender to warrant MLE money because he can't do anything else. It seems like he IS one dimensional.

And to the arguments starting with "Well if you paid MoT and Jerome this and that.." Knicks management have to start being smart with money sometime. Now is a good a time as any considering all the FA talent that will be available in 3-4 years.
joec32033
Posts: 30632
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
7/18/2006  10:48 AM
We sign him I figure he starts at SF, because he is more natural there than Lee....I like Jefferies, but now you gotta find room for another guy that deserves to play.

[Edited by - joec32033 on 07-18-2006 10:49 AM]
~You can't run from who you are.~
bigbeast
Posts: 22333
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/21/2005
Member: #1060

7/18/2006  10:52 AM
Posted by joec32033:

We sign him I figure he starts at SF, because he is more natural there than Lee....I like Jefferies, but now you gotta find room for another guy that deserves to play.

[Edited by - joec32033 on 07-18-2006 10:49 AM]


Sign Jeffries buyout Jrose. That clears up some of the clutter.
"Man, who knows with this team." Aguirre.
BigC
Posts: 22672
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/14/2004
Member: #829
7/18/2006  10:52 AM
Exactly how many scorers do we want on this team?

We finally have a chance to get a player that plays d at the sg and sf position and you guys don't want him?

Not for nothing but, when was the last time you guys saw Butler play really good d?

If you guys are wondering why Jeffries did not average more points just ask Arenas and Jamison why they never gave up the ball!







[Edited by - BigC on 07-18-2006 10:58 AM]

[Edited by - BigC on 07-18-2006 11:24 AM]
BigC's Knick blogs and Knicks highlights after every Knicks game http://fromthebaseline.com/
mikesknicks
Posts: 20755
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/17/2004
Member: #684
USA
7/18/2006  11:01 AM
Match-up Nightmare at 6-11 can play the 2,3,4 and 5. Think about it 6-11 being guarded by someone 6-4 to 6-6 @ the 2. Please go get this guy.
In the Knick of time. Knickal for Your thoughts.
metra
Posts: 20743
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/11/2003
Member: #473
7/18/2006  11:10 AM
Posted by nyk4ever:

Wow. This the problem with most Knicks fans who are in support of guys like Marbury and Francis becuase all they look for is stats.

Wow. How many times in my original post was I trying to show that I KNOW stats aren't everything and that I was judging him unfairly. The point of the post was to find out what I missed by not watching him!

Anyway,
Jeffries is one of the best defensive players in the NBA, he can guard every position on the court and always guards the best player on the opposition.

One of the best, huh? Maybe. I haven't seen him play so I wouldn't know. But phrases like "one of the best" should always be subject to a lot of criticism. One of the best according to who?
He might not be a huge offensive player but I can see him finding success in a system like Isiah is trying to implament, based on passing and he wouldn't have to worry about Arenas jacking up 25 shots a game.

"might not be a huge offensive player" is an understatement. Scoring IS one of the things that stats show VERY CLEARLY. The kid takes about 5 shots a game and makes 6-7 points off of them. He's not a scorer, never will be. Has been in the NBA for 4 years and hasn't improved this aspect of his game at all. But a scorer isn't what we need anyway.
Jeffries is just exactly what this team needs.

Defensively, sure. But that's it. Since Balkman needs to develop and probably won't be able to guard 3's well in his first year, JJ should be a solid addition but not for more than the MLE (if Isiah somehow manages to pay more than that for him).
You really have to watch a player to be able to comment on him.

Thanks for the info bud.

My point: Let's not hype this kid up to be more than someone who's gonna play defense and not ask for the ball. That's all he's there to do.

[Edited by - metra on 07-18-2006 11:12 AM]
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
7/18/2006  11:17 AM
He's "one of the best" defensive bench players.

Any chance we can sign and trade butler for jeffries and everybody wins?
all kool aid all the time.
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

7/18/2006  11:48 AM
Posted by joec32033:

The question is do you take Jefferies over Woods?

Exactly, and I say no. Woods is my man. He's got much better upside. He'll come cheaper. He can score it and probably will be a better rebounder than Jefferies despite being much smaller. OK, Jefferies is probably better defensively (although I'm not convinced of that), but I thought we just upgraded our wing defense by drafting Balkman, no? The whole Mid-level for Jefferies? Now way. That's crazy. Bring back Qyntel Woods!!!!
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

7/18/2006  12:10 PM
Well ESPN is reporting that the Wizards just signed Darius Songaila to a 4-year, 23 mil. dollar deal with an option for a 5th yr. Guess that means Jefferies won't be back in Washington...

I just pray Zeke doesn't see this as a chance to jump on Jefferies. He's Timmy Thomas w/o the offensive ability I'm tellin' ya. We don't need him. Not when we got a chance to bring back Woods for a much better deal.

BTW, take a quick look at this little write-up on Woods before the 2002 draft: http://www.nbadraft.net/profiles/qyntelwoods.htm

Now tell me you don't want this guy back.

All Q2 needs is a chance to play. He's averaged only 12 mins/game over his troubled 4-year career so far. Only last year, when it jumped up to 20/game for us did we start to see the flashes. When Larry loon did manage to play the guy a little, he played well. In my mind, he's a talent that the basketball Gods just dropped in our lap, just like when Sprewell became available in GS. 100% worth keeping and taking a chance on considering what we could get him for and his potential. He seems to have his head screwed on straight now, so let's give him a shot. Resign this kid and give him some PT Zeke. You won't regret it.
BigC
Posts: 22672
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/14/2004
Member: #829
7/18/2006  12:56 PM
Posted by Finestrg:

Well ESPN is reporting that the Wizards just signed Darius Songaila to a 4-year, 23 mil. dollar deal with an option for a 5th yr. Guess that means Jefferies won't be back in Washington...

I just pray Zeke doesn't see this as a chance to jump on Jefferies. He's Timmy Thomas w/o the offensive ability I'm tellin' ya. We don't need him. Not when we got a chance to bring back Woods for a much better deal.

BTW, take a quick look at this little write-up on Woods before the 2002 draft: http://www.nbadraft.net/profiles/qyntelwoods.htm

Now tell me you don't want this guy back.

All Q2 needs is a chance to play. He's averaged only 12 mins/game over his troubled 4-year career so far. Only last year, when it jumped up to 20/game for us did we start to see the flashes. When Larry loon did manage to play the guy a little, he played well. In my mind, he's a talent that the basketball Gods just dropped in our lap, just like when Sprewell became available in GS. 100% worth keeping and taking a chance on considering what we could get him for and his potential. He seems to have his head screwed on straight now, so let's give him a shot. Resign this kid and give him some PT Zeke. You won't regret it.

I love Wood's game and have watched him since he first came into the league. As a matter fact people on another board use to think I was crazy for saying he was a good pick up when we first got him. I would pick Woods over Jeffries but I don't think Isiah even has interest in Woods for the mere fact that Isiah never brings his name up.

So if it is a choice between Butler and Jeffries I would sign Jeffries, but not for the full MLE.



[Edited by - BigC on 07-18-2006 1:06 PM]
BigC's Knick blogs and Knicks highlights after every Knicks game http://fromthebaseline.com/
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/18/2006  12:57 PM
Posted by metra:

Wow. How many times in my original post was I trying to show that I KNOW stats aren't everything and that I was judging him unfairly. The point of the post was to find out what I missed by not watching him!

Anyway,
Actually you mentioned it once that you didn't think stats were everything so I'm not sure how that translates into many times like your trying to convey. I don't understand how you can just look at someones stats and see how much they contribute on the court. Look at Marbury's stats, if you look at them they sparkle but in reality his stats all come up empty.

I then told you in my post what you were missing out by not watching him play.
One of the best, huh? Maybe. I haven't seen him play so I wouldn't know. But phrases like "one of the best" should always be subject to a lot of criticism. One of the best according to who?
I don't understand this sentiment. Many people on this board are avid basketball fans and watch more than just the Knicks. If someone on this board thinks that another player excels in a certain area, they are usually pretty close to being right. The fact that there were others in this very thread who backed up my sentiments of Jeffries being a top defensive player should give you a idea what kind of player Jeffries is defensively.
"might not be a huge offensive player" is an understatement. Scoring IS one of the things that stats show VERY CLEARLY. The kid takes about 5 shots a game and makes 6-7 points off of them. He's not a scorer, never will be. Has been in the NBA for 4 years and hasn't improved this aspect of his game at all. But a scorer isn't what we need anyway.
Ok, so we know he's not a bigtime scorer but you try playing in a offense with Gilbert Arenas, Larry Hughes and Antawn Jamsison, all of whom average close to 20 points a game. Does that make Jeffries low scoring output right? No, it doesn't but it does say what kind of mentality the kid has becuase even though he's not getting his offensively, he's busting his ass defensively every game guarding the best player on the opposing team no matter what position they play. Jeffries guards EVERY position on the floor and does so well. How many players can you say that about in the NBA? I would bet almost anything that Jeffries has a better offensive game when/if he switches teams becuase he won't be dealing with Arenas and Jamison and a offense catered to just Arenas. If he comes to the Knicks I have faith that Isiah's offense will find Jeffries alot becuase it's based on passing.
Defensively, sure. But that's it. Since Balkman needs to develop and probably won't be able to guard 3's well in his first year, JJ should be a solid addition but not for more than the MLE (if Isiah somehow manages to pay more than that for him).
I agree.

All in all. Maybe there were a few misunderstandings between the two of us in this thread but I'm telling you, Jeffries will be a huge addition for the Knicks. Jeffries will put my mind at ease knowing that Isiah is thinking about defense because Jeffries will bring with man to man defense on a nightly basis and that will be huge for the Knicks because most fans forget about one side of the court. The Defensive side.




[Edited by - nyk4ever on 07-18-2006 12:58 PM]
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
7/18/2006  1:17 PM
I would go after Jeffries. He's much better than Butler. I'd hope they buy out either Jalen or Mo Taylor to fit him in.

Here's a question - would anyone trade Qrich for Jared Jeffries? I think that's a pretty fair trade at this point (it's not your average Jalen Rose for KG proposal, but I think it's a realistic trade that helps both teams, possibly).
¿ △ ?
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
7/18/2006  1:21 PM
Posted by crzymdups:

I would go after Jeffries. He's much better than Butler. I'd hope they buy out either Jalen or Mo Taylor to fit him in.

Here's a question - would anyone trade Qrich for Jared Jeffries? I think that's a pretty fair trade at this point (it's not your average Jalen Rose for KG proposal, but I think it's a realistic trade that helps both teams, possibly).


why would the Wizards want Qrich's longterm contract? They'd be better off resigning JJ or letting him walk for that matter.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/18/2006  1:22 PM
Posted by crzymdups:

I would go after Jeffries. He's much better than Butler. I'd hope they buy out either Jalen or Mo Taylor to fit him in.

Here's a question - would anyone trade Qrich for Jared Jeffries? I think that's a pretty fair trade at this point (it's not your average Jalen Rose for KG proposal, but I think it's a realistic trade that helps both teams, possibly).

The Wizards could use Q's "shooting." As bad as Q was last year, I still think he's a good shooter and the Wizards have a need for a SG. I would think that if the Knicks agreed to some sort of potential compensation incase Q's back acts up that the Wizards would be interested. Wasn't Q rumoured to be headed there last year around midyear?
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
7/18/2006  1:22 PM
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by crzymdups:

I would go after Jeffries. He's much better than Butler. I'd hope they buy out either Jalen or Mo Taylor to fit him in.

Here's a question - would anyone trade Qrich for Jared Jeffries? I think that's a pretty fair trade at this point (it's not your average Jalen Rose for KG proposal, but I think it's a realistic trade that helps both teams, possibly).


why would the Wizards want Qrich's longterm contract? They'd be better off resigning JJ or letting him walk for that matter.

someone to guard Lebron? a shooter to spread the floor? QRich still has value around the league, people may want him to pass a physical, but he still has value.
¿ △ ?
bigbeast
Posts: 22333
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/21/2005
Member: #1060

7/18/2006  1:26 PM
Posted by crzymdups:

I would go after Jeffries. He's much better than Butler. I'd hope they buy out either Jalen or Mo Taylor to fit him in.

Here's a question - would anyone trade Qrich for Jared Jeffries? I think that's a pretty fair trade at this point (it's not your average Jalen Rose for KG proposal, but I think it's a realistic trade that helps both teams, possibly).

I would do that trade in a heartbeat.

As I stated earlier, Jeffries did a pretty good job defending James. Made him work extrememly hard for everything, and LeBron made alot of tough shots.

As far as Jeffries offense goes, its kind of hard to put up major numbers when your only taking about 5-6 shots per and Gilbert, Antione and Butler are jacking up the ball as soon as they cross the mid-court line.


The fact that he starred at Indiana U. tells me that he can excell in the motion offense Isiah is installing since its basically the same offense Bob Knight runs. He's better offensively than he showed at Wash and I think he can be a nice fit.

Picture this front line:
Frye C
Lee PF
Jeffries Sf

That is a very versatile/balanced frontline. Scoring (Frye) Rebounding (Lee), Defense on the wing (Jeffries). This would be a very athletic, quick, interchangeable frontline. Frye can guard the 5's and 4's, Lee can guard the 4's and 3's and Jeffries can guard the 2, 3, 4 and depending on what team they are playing can guard the 5. Jeffries is also a high IQ player which is somehting everyone has been screaming for for this team.
"Man, who knows with this team." Aguirre.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
7/18/2006  1:28 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by crzymdups:

I would go after Jeffries. He's much better than Butler. I'd hope they buy out either Jalen or Mo Taylor to fit him in.

Here's a question - would anyone trade Qrich for Jared Jeffries? I think that's a pretty fair trade at this point (it's not your average Jalen Rose for KG proposal, but I think it's a realistic trade that helps both teams, possibly).

The Wizards could use Q's "shooting." As bad as Q was last year, I still think he's a good shooter and the Wizards have a need for a SG. I would think that if the Knicks agreed to some sort of potential compensation incase Q's back acts up that the Wizards would be interested. Wasn't Q rumoured to be headed there last year around midyear?

yeah, I believe there was a rumor at one point. it wouldn't be a bad deal.

rotating Lee, Frye, Balkman and Jeffries at the small and power forwards gives us big defensive forwards who compliment the hell out of Curry.

If we traded Qrich for Jeffries, I'd like to re-sign Qyntel, too, for a little diversity.
¿ △ ?
Knicks want Jeffries!

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy