|
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
|
The plan should be to go all out competing with only contracts for now on that end on or before 2009.
Unless we trade them, we'll still have Robinson, Crawford, Q, James, Frye, Lee, Balkman, and Collins, plus other draft picks & signees.
That year we'll have to re-sign our own players (Frye, Nate, and Lee), so it's of my opinion 1 of those 3 will/should be traded, b/c Frye WONT come cheap. I think it'll come down to Nate or Lee, b/c both will probably call for some or all of the MLE in 3 years.
In order to sign Lebron or Wade or Bosh, we'll need MAX cap space, meaning probably 20 Mill or more, b/c they're anticipating those players to get 150 Mill. on their next contract (150/6 = 25 per......starting at ~ 20 to be safe).
The salary cap by then will probably be atleast 60 Mill. Maybe less, maybe more.
So to be safe, I wouldn't go over 40 Million in total salaries by then.
Player options for JC, James, & Q = 25 Mill.
Re-signing Frye = starting @ 10 Mill (probably)
Re-signing Lee or Nate = starting at 5+ Mill (guesstimating)
Then you have Balkman + Collins, which is maybe 5 mill combined.
So basically we should/will expend most of our future draft picks to save money like Pheonix, and try to win now for the next 3 years. So it's no big deal if Francis stays, b/c he expires like Marbury just in time.
To be safe, I'd really try to get rid of James or Q for shorter contracts, if possible.
Francis, Lee or Nate, Picks, expirings, should/will be used in packages to fill the hole at SF, etc, etc.
That's my feeling. It might not be this year, but def. eventually.
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure.
And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
|