[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

What is Wrong with Steve Francis?
Author Thread
NYKBocker
Posts: 38482
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
6/30/2006  3:21 PM
Posted by fishmike:

no way thats the line up. You think with everything he gave up for Curry that he's not starting?

Good point, but I think you need both Lee and Balkman to cover up the Ambiguously Gay Duo. Curry just does not have enough D for this.
AUTOADVERT
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/30/2006  3:30 PM
Posted by NYKBocker:
Posted by fishmike:

no way thats the line up. You think with everything he gave up for Curry that he's not starting?

Good point, but I think you need both Lee and Balkman to cover up the Ambiguously Gay Duo. Curry just does not have enough D for this.
dont worry about it. Francis wont be here. If nothing else he's just going to take minutes from Isiah's hand picked guys

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Travla
Posts: 23532
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/27/2004
Member: #723
USA
6/30/2006  3:44 PM
Francis will be fine if they keep him, the backcourt will be Francis and Marbs with Jamal, Nate backing them up. Collins will get little or no time, in fact Collins, Francis or Nate could be traded. They are carrying 5 guards and 3 other guys (JRose, QWoods, QRich) who can play guard if needed. We'll just have to wait and see what's up!!
https://www.youtube.com/user/RPreston01/videos
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/30/2006  4:06 PM
Posted by Travla:

Francis will be fine if they keep him, the backcourt will be Francis and Marbs with Jamal, Nate backing them up. Collins will get little or no time, in fact Collins, Francis or Nate could be traded. They are carrying 5 guards and 3 other guys (JRose, QWoods, QRich) who can play guard if needed. We'll just have to wait and see what's up!!
then lets go get Zach Randolph and KMart to round out the frontcourt. Should be a good mix
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
6/30/2006  6:02 PM
While I have tried to forget last season, correct me if I am wrong, but I saw no glimps of hope that a Franbury backcourt could work.

I am factoring in a LB-screw factor, but still, I saw no hope.


Now- Isiah is probably going off experience and recalling his days in Detroit with Dumars and Vinnie- three basically short guards.

Granted, Dumars was very strong defensively.

I think Isiah will try to build an offense that attacks and tries to play off of the rules changes that reward offensive drivers.


My big problem with LB was he didn't try to exploit his roster's talent.

EwingsGlass
Posts: 27716
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
6/30/2006  6:07 PM
Posted by franco12:


My big problem with LB was he didn't try to exploit his roster's talent.

Exactly. Without cap flexibility, you need to coach the team you have and create a gameplan that utilizes the teams strengths. Those strengths don't seem to include defense, 3 pt shooting, or free throw shooting (not sure much of what is left...). But, athleticism, open court play, and getting to the basket do seem to be strengths. I dounbt this is a championship caliber team, but they can at least play to their strengths so we aren't embarassed.
You know I gonna spin wit it
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
6/30/2006  8:17 PM
We have some of the most impossible guards to stay in front of on our team. What needs to be done is to find a way to create motion that leads to mismatches. See LB's system made it impossible for our guards to do their thing, cuz he wants a stationary PG. A guy who stays at the top and after making his initial pass is merely an outlet if something goes wrong. With our guards. we need to FEATURE THEM in the offense. To create problems for other teams. Let them chase our quick guards thru and around picks all night. Pick and rolls and pick and pops will keep our bigs involved. We don't need to have so many strict post ups. Where its so easy for teams to double and break up the play. Keep the players moving and make good passes and hand offs and you'll see how potent this team can be. This is why I HATE LB now. Cuz he could've thought of something like this and made an adjustment to fit the players he had.
Elite
Posts: 26372
Alba Posts: 23
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #510

6/30/2006  9:22 PM
i dont want to give up on him yet but i think jamal is really improving and would like to see him out there more, Steve just doesent have a place on the team but i think he will flurish with isiah this yaer if we keep him
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
7/1/2006  10:45 AM
Somebody is going to bitch and complain about minutes and their role. They all want 30+. They all can't get it. Whoever doesn't will use their lack of minutes as an excuse to say they are confused to their role. Meanwhile Mardy Collins will never see a whiff of a minute and will quietly sit on the bench accepting his role.

I like Steve Francis' talent but it's time to rid our roster of some of these guys. They don't help us win.
I just hope that people will like me
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
7/1/2006  12:01 PM
Is Duane Wade a me-first player?
once a knick always a knick
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
7/1/2006  2:30 PM
Posted by misterearl:

Is Duane Wade a me-first player?

Based on his stats, one would have to come to that conclusion. Many sport reporters were not happy at all that Miami won. Because of Wade, MJ, Iverson type of gameplay. I don't mind those type of players because it is a fantasy about all this ball movement. Even on the Championship Knick teams, Clyde still had to dominate the ball to win many games. YOu can only pass the ball so much, you still need someone to score consistently don't you?
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27716
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
7/1/2006  2:55 PM
I actually would be willing to termi-nate (get it!) the Nate Robinson experiment and use him to move somebody like Malik Rose or Jerome James off the roster...or even to package with one of our expiring contracts for someone useful. I see Nate as the least talented of the point guards and physically, the least capable of helping the team. Don't get me wrong, I love his spirit and those dunks, it gives hope to a generation of short people, but he needs to show a lot more improvement in passing the ball to be effective in this league. So, my PG/SG rotation is: Marb/Fran/Craw (32 mins each); Collins can get garbage minutes this year unless he shows some serious ability that we are unaware of.


You know I gonna spin wit it
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27716
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
7/1/2006  3:00 PM
Posted by misterearl:

Is Duane Wade a me-first player?

Yes. But damn if he doesn't do it right. The most awkward part of the season was when our "me-first" players were unnaturally making extra passes in order to appease LB. I don't have a problem with me-first as long as you back it up and it helps the team. Dwayne Wade is a me first player, just like Iverson, but he proved he can carry the team in the moments when it counts. Any Knick who wants to step up like they do, I'll back them up. BUT, if their me-first mentality destroys the game plan, then it is ridiculous. Basically, I want the "me-first" to come from confidence in themselves and the team, not from a belief that no one else on the team can perform.
You know I gonna spin wit it
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30255
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
7/1/2006  7:52 PM
Posted by misterearl:

Is Duane Wade a me-first player?

The thing is you are allowed to be a me first player in the NBA. But if your a me first type of player. It is an absolute MUST that you are cappable of carring a team on you back. If your cappable of taking over games consistantly, hitting clutch shots, making clutch plays & play defense. Then you are allowed to be a me first player.

If you are not cappable of doing those things consistantly. Then you gotta be a player that looks to make everyone else better. If your caught in the middle then your in trouble.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
7/2/2006  12:05 AM
1 loser + 1 loser = 15 losers
Isaih is not counted...
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
7/2/2006  3:28 PM
Pat Ewing was a me first player and damn if he wasn't carrying the Knicks @$$ into the playoffs every year. This bull**** of playing the right way is a load of crap. There is no right way or wrong way as long as the results are wins. I could care less if the kNicks win pretty or ugly as long as the results are Wins.

Problem with the KNicks is that they lack focal points on the team. To much talent isn't a very good thing to have you can only have three very good players at best nowadays. The days of 5 or 6 great players on the team are long gone because players no longer want to put their ego aside and produce less in the statistic dept. In this league stats=Dollars the better the stats the more the money, can't blame players for wanting to shoot more and have the ball in thier hands more than others. Thats why I believe the Balkman pick was a stroke genius on Isiah's part. Role players to place around very good players make it easy for the team to have focal point on offense. Balkman in his right will be a focal point on defense. I think the Knicks need to make a move to a running style and increase shot attempts to keep everyone happy on the team. But if the kNicks are going to be more of a balanced attack then I would suggest getting rid of the clutter at the guard position and the PF position and allow players to grow and play more minutes. For instance I really don't see the need for the Knicks to carry every position three deep. There shouold be a group of 3-5 players that never see the light of day on the team. Last year was an absolute joke because the team had to many players that required Playing time and to appease these players they were getting run for less than 30 minutes a night. Thats absolutely crazy because players like their stats and they like their court time.

Players that need to be gone:
Nate Robinson
Mo Taylor
Malik Rose
Jalen Rose
Steve Francis
Q-Rich

All these guys need to be gone. The starting lineup for next year:
Frye pf
Balkman sf
Curry C
Crawford sg
Marbury pg

Backups:
Collins pg
JJ C
Butler C
Lee PF
Q-Woods sf




[Edited by - Vmart on 07-02-2006 3:41 PM]
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
7/3/2006  3:13 PM
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by misterearl:

Is Duane Wade a me-first player?

The thing is you are allowed to be a me first player in the NBA. But if your a me first type of player. It is an absolute MUST that you are cappable of carring a team on you back. If your cappable of taking over games consistantly, hitting clutch shots, making clutch plays & play defense. Then you are allowed to be a me first player.

If you are not cappable of doing those things consistantly. Then you gotta be a player that looks to make everyone else better. If your caught in the middle then your in trouble.

Vmart please re-read this paragraph. It's fine to shoot 80 times a game if you have the talent to carry your team. But if you don't have the talent or will to do so you are not helping.

My question is if we have decided that we want a me first offense with Francis and Marbury not playing D but getting all the one on one opportunities they want, where does that leave Eddie Curry in the offense?

For those advocating that we design an offense strictly so Stephon, Stevie and Jamal to go one on one ask yourself a question. How much have they won doing this in the past?
I just hope that people will like me
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27716
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
7/4/2006  2:47 AM
It would seem a natural inference from the defense of "me first" players like Dwayne Wade is that he has proven he can carry a team. Unlike Dwayne, none of the current Knick players seem so capable. Neither Marbury nor Francis can do it. Crawford alone seems like the most capable, and I base this remote possibility on his performances in the last 10 or so games of the season. Even then,they didn't win very much so I have my doubts.
You know I gonna spin wit it
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
7/4/2006  10:44 AM
Duane Wade dominates the game. He dominates offensively. He gets steals. He gets big rebounds. When his team needs a basket he gets it. When his team needs a rebound he gets it. The opponents center their entire defense around slowing him down. He scores anyway. When he doesn't he finds the open man. Guys like Shaq and Antoine and JWill who are used to getting their shots have stepped back and accepted their roles as secondary players. They have other role players that only shoot open ones.

Our team is desinged around 6 or 7 "me first players". If Stephon gets all the shots, Stevie and Jamal and Eddie and Mo and Nate will be wondering about their roles and complaining about shots. If Stevie gets all the shots..............

Why can't people figure it out. It's not the talent level on the Knicks. It's the make-up.
I just hope that people will like me
What is Wrong with Steve Francis?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy