[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

The Official Balkman/Williams Draft Choice Manup Poll Extravaganza!!!!


Author Poll
oohah
Posts: 6600
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
Who did you prefer and why?
I like the Balkman Pick
I would have preferred Marcus Williams
I would have preffered anoth player entirely
View Results


Author Thread
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
6/29/2006  11:37 AM
Get minutes where and when?
Posted by Solace:
I love the fact that the exact same people who are screaming blue murder at Isiah for not taking Williams, 25 minutes later are making snide remarks when we select Collins because we ha too many guards.

No, we didn't like the Collins pick because if we were going to go with a guard why didn't we go with Marcus Williams? Foolish. Mardy Collins isn't good enough to get minutes. Marcus Williams is. That's the difference.

Anyway, sip the kool aid... all I know is Nets fans are currently having a celebration because we GAVE them Marcus Williams, who they never expected a shot at, at 22.

all kool aid all the time.
AUTOADVERT
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/29/2006  11:39 AM
Posted by Solace:
Originally posted by firefly:
Originally posted by Solace:

Here's a direct quote from a popular Nets board:
We have to thank one guy tonight..
on: June 28, 2006, 11:45:25 PM 
Reply with quote
And let me be the first one to do it...
Dear Isiah,
Thank you for passing up on the best PG prospect in the draft. You have given us Nets fans million reasons to smile but this one takes the cake. I thank you from the bottom of my heart for being the most incompetent GM in the history of the league. We love you and we hope you stay as the GM of the New York Knickerbockers for the rest of your life. Have fun with Renaldo Balkman.
Thanks.
Ok, Ill bite. Youre so smart, and you know, KNOW that Marcus Williams is going to be the greatest thing since Magic, then what exactly does Isiah Thomas have to do with the Nets getting him? He was projected to go top 5! Nets fans, an unimaginative bunch at the best of times, have decided to go with general media direction, which seems to be be kill Isiah as much as possible. All fair and good. So why are they not thanking all the other GM's who passed on him? Isiah has nothing to do with Marcus Williams dropping to the Nets. He was the last in a long line of, according to you, far more qualified GM's to pass on him.
Well done the Nets fans for bringing the average IQ of the tristate area down to beetle level. Lets quote them and join their sad fraternity of patheticdom.
Kool Aid has nothing to do with this. I know were my team is, and I know there is much to do to make them better. In my opinion, drafting a Frank Williams lookalike to make "fans" like you happy has nothing to do with it.
Before the draft, everyone was saying Isiah will draft the BPA in an effort to save his job. Well, he didnt. He drafted someone who he thinks will help the team be more rounded. You know, try and balance offense and defense. But noooo, lets listen to the Nets fans, who dont even have the sense to support a team who are actually good!
Just because BRIGGS says Marcus Williams wil be good, does not make it gospel. Sounds to me like a guy who cant even keep a little weight problem in check before the biggest day of proffessional career. Ah, but Curry sucks.
Generally, I'm finding that people who demand that Isiah drafted Williams are either UConn fans, or in serious need of a little sit down and prioritize time. Whats mote important to you, that Isiah sucks, or that the Knicks grow?

If Isiah drafted Bonn1997, half the board would say it was a good move and defend it. Sip the kool aid slowly... slowly...

Just be honest and call this what it is: Isiah's massive ego.
But as we have learned with Curry and anyone else Isiah works in a vacuum. He could care less what he pays or what the circumstances are, so long as he gets his guy

That's how I feel too, and past precedence proves it, which is why he's a poor GM. If we had the #43 pick this year, we would've made the same pick. Hell we could've packaged the #20 for two second rounders. But, not in Isiah-land. One of the posters made a joke that he was no longer upset about losing the #2, because if we had that, Isiah would've taken Balkman at the #2. I'm starting to think there's some truth to it.

To make the kool-aid issue worse, if Isiah took Balkman at the #2, the same posters would be saying it was a good move.

If we took BUgs Bunny 40% of the people would defend it. Hey this guy ha a chance to look good at times in the SL and he will[which will prompt the geek squad to say we have th e steal of the draft]-when it comes to times to show skills against the big boys who outweigh him and fans will find out he LEGITIMATELY does not have NBDL offensive skills --well see how long the love affair lasts for some people

heck well win 29 games this year and people will still make excuses this guy was hurt the refs our schedule etc...
RIP Crushalot😞
firefly
Posts: 23255
Alba Posts: 17
Joined: 7/26/2004
Member: #721
United Kingdom
6/29/2006  11:42 AM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by Killa4luv:

I don't understand you guys. We have a team with 4 players for whom PG is their position. And all of you clamor for another PG?
I truly don't get it. I guess LB and his "true PG" mantra has you all convinced that thats what we need.

Neither of the teams in the finals had a true PG and it didn't seem to matter.

If you want to be mad at the Balkman pick thats one thing. But to do so in favor of Marcus williams is really crazy to me.
Aren't you guys like all in love with Jamal Crawfords 2 and a half weeks of excellence?

I have a wait and see approach. I remember the exact same problems people had with Frye last year, and I think its clear Frye is the real deal. He deserves the benefit of the doubt, in this area.

I do think we need a back up PG, but in any scenario, if the knicks wanted a 6-5 205 pound athletic defender who can rebound why didnt they take the better athlete in ager who also possess's 40 times the offensive skill that balkman has? I guess the reasoning is he dropped to 28 so he must have a red flag orsomething like josh howard dropped to 29. That particular sentiment is so stupid I dont know how to answer. Anybody who watched that draft and understands drafting of players in any sport, knows that this draft went the way of need. BIg men were the flavor --every team seemed to want to get guys 6-8 and above last year it was PGs this year the PGs came off in the 20s thats why he fell. But the tams with picks in the 20s came in and were smart using their LATER picks as value picks--look at the value the Mavericks, the Lakers the Cavaliers got in the 20s Lowry went in the 20s all the PGs went in the 20s it was a big man draft

we took a player we couldve picked at 50 at 20 maybe he pans out, but it still doesnt take away the same stupid mentality which is why we sck as a franchise. Fans tend to want to believe, have hope, but really I doubt many people have seen his guy play. hes NOT a bad player, hes just smallish he reminds me a lot of pinncock from GW who went 60th same ilk. if they wanted an athlete who can defend they shouldve taken david noel, atleast he has two way skills ranked out as the number 1 athlete in the draft and weighs a solid 230

....and he's back to 6"5! This guys like the human trampoline!! Down and up and down he goes, where he stops noone knows. AND everyone knows Ager's a 7"1 pg. With a 13 foot wingspan. He can dunk while on his knees!!! We really missed a trick there!

[Edited by - firefly on 06-29-2006 11:53 AM]
Some men see things as they are and ask why. I dream things that never were and ask why not?
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
6/29/2006  11:42 AM
hey, the board has spoken, it was a good pick up by zeke. man, I guess the ones that are vocal are the ones that are pissed.
all kool aid all the time.
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
6/29/2006  12:18 PM
We were pissed when we passed on Marcus for a guy we could have gotten at 29....

However, it got even worse when we selected Mardy because we basically chose him over the best PG prospect in the draft.

I usually give Isiah the benefit of the doubt when it comes to drafts and in all honesty, I like Renaldo and I think Mardy could also be a good pick, but there is no way in hell you can justify taking Mardy over Marcus Williams.

"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
Elite
Posts: 26372
Alba Posts: 23
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #510

6/29/2006  12:20 PM
i was killing the pick last night but that was before i learned a little about balkman i think he is just what this team needs but i dont know about our 29th pick... i guess we will see in summer league
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
6/29/2006  12:21 PM
However, it got even worse when we selected Mardy because we basically chose him over the best PG prospect in the draft.

Why is it that Williams was the third PG chosen if he was the best prospect at that position?

oohah



Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
NYKBocker
Posts: 38594
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
6/29/2006  12:23 PM
Me likes the pick!
joec32033
Posts: 30641
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
6/29/2006  12:24 PM
Posted by oohah:
However, it got even worse when we selected Mardy because we basically chose him over the best PG prospect in the draft.

Why is it that Williams was the third PG chosen if he was the best prospect at that position?

oohah

Jordan was the third pick in his draft.....there what scares me is tht guys that fall usually have a better chance of succeeding than guys you reach for and take way ahead of where hey should be...I can name ALOT of successful players that dropped. It is alot harder to think of guys that were reached for and succeeded.
~You can't run from who you are.~
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
6/29/2006  12:25 PM
I think there is a notion around here that with these two picks we just became a good defensive team. You don't become a good defensive team because of two rookies. I like that Isiah targeted defensive guys but come on.

You guys argue that all we need is defense. Its not true at all. We need so many things right now that sometimes you have to take the best talent available. Say what you want about how many PG's we have and how many guys we have in our backcourt, but none of them will ever be a starting PG on a very good team. Marcus has the potential to be just that. He is an excellent decision maker, great passer, clutch player, etc. This guy is a basketball player period. When you have a team like ours that needs help in so many areas, I just don't see how you can pass up on a guy like this.

I've supported Isiah a lot in the past but I just don't see how you can stick up for the guy this time.
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
6/29/2006  12:26 PM
Balkman remains in draft
Gamecocks big man can still return if he does not hire an agent or withdraws by Sunday
By KENT BABB
kbabb@thestate.com
Update 6/16/06 | Balkman signs with agent; won't return to USC
2006 NBA draft
USC coach Dave Odom announced Thursday that forward Renaldo Balkman has indicated he will remain in the NBA draft.

Balkman, who completed his junior season this past April when the Gamecocks won the National Invitation Tournament championship, has not retained an agent, Odom said in a statement released by USC.

The 6-foot-8 power forward still could return for his final season at USC if he enters the draft as an amateur and does not hire an agent, Gamecocks spokeswoman Michelle Schmitt said.

Retaining an agent would end his college eligibility.

Balkman, named most outstanding player of the NIT, also can withdraw his name from the NBA draft; underclassmen must do so by Sunday.

Balkman’s draft status improved this past week after a strong showing at an NBA pre-draft camp at Orlando, Fla. League scouts attended the four-day camp, and Balkman left having made one of the most memorable impressions.

“He played the way he played at the NIT,” said one scout who attended the Orlando camp.

The scout added that Balkman’s high-energy style, which he displayed in the Gamecocks’ final two victories of the NIT, propelled him higher on teams’ draft boards. NBAdraft.net now projects Balkman, who was not listed on most mock drafts before the Orlando camp, to be the No. 43 overall pick in the two-round draft.

Scouts have cited Balkman’s inconsistency this past season as the Tampa, Fla., native’s most glaring weakness. Odom benched Balkman late in the season because he occasionally took plays off and could not avoid turnovers.

Balkman, who made 60.8 percent of his shots this past season, also has been criticized for a lack of shooting range.

Balkman led the Gamecocks this past season with 6.3 rebounds. He averaged 9.6 points.

http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/sports/14830421.htm
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
6/29/2006  12:27 PM
Jordan was the third pick in his draft.....there what scares me is tht guys that fall usually have a better chance of succeeding than guys you reach for and take way ahead of where hey should be...I can name ALOT of successful players that dropped. It is alot harder to think of guys that were reached for and succeeded.

I would have to think about the fall vs. reach thing. I agree with you in principle, I have seen guys fall and beome quite good frequently.

However, I hope you are not drawing a parallel between Jordan and Williams. I think to compare Rick Brunson to Williams is more apt.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
6/29/2006  12:29 PM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by oohah:
However, it got even worse when we selected Mardy because we basically chose him over the best PG prospect in the draft.

Why is it that Williams was the third PG chosen if he was the best prospect at that position?

oohah

Jordan was the third pick in his draft.....there what scares me is tht guys that fall usually have a better chance of succeeding than guys you reach for and take way ahead of where hey should be...I can name ALOT of successful players that dropped. It is alot harder to think of guys that were reached for and succeeded.


Exactly. Oohah, GMs make mistakes, how many good players have been passed up on over the years?

Arenas, Redd, etc.

Funny, I remember a PG named Jameer Nelson who fell just like Marcus did, look at what he's doing now.
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
6/29/2006  12:31 PM
Funny, I remember a PG named Jameer Nelson who fell just like Marcus did, look at what he's doing now.

Jameer Nelson is 5 times better than Williams. Nelson was player of the year. He is an outstanding athlete shooter, ball-handler, defensive player, passer, and he has good character to boot.

Williams was the 5th best player on his own team and he is a fat, slow, average-shooting, poor-defense-playing, thief.

Big difference.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
joec32033
Posts: 30641
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
6/29/2006  12:31 PM
Posted by oohah:
Jordan was the third pick in his draft.....there what scares me is tht guys that fall usually have a better chance of succeeding than guys you reach for and take way ahead of where hey should be...I can name ALOT of successful players that dropped. It is alot harder to think of guys that were reached for and succeeded.

I would have to think about the fall vs. reach thing. I agree with you in principle, I have seen guys fall and beome quite good frequently.

However, I hope you are not drawing a parallel between Jordan and Williams. I think to compare Rick Brunson to Williams is more apt.

oohah

Asolutely not comparing Williams to Jordan, just the principle that the best players aren't always taken #1, and that good players do fall. Also, like I said, players that are reached for usually don't work out, while I can name dozens of players that fall and are good to great players.

[Edited by - joec32033 on 06-29-2006 12:33 PM]
~You can't run from who you are.~
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
6/29/2006  12:34 PM
Posted by oohah:
Funny, I remember a PG named Jameer Nelson who fell just like Marcus did, look at what he's doing now.

Jameer Nelson is 5 times better than Williams. Nelson was player of the year. He is an outstanding athlete shooter, ball-handler, defensive player, passer, and he has good character to boot.

Williams was the 5th best player on his own team and he is a fat, slow, average-shooting, poor-defense-playing, thief.

Big difference.

oohah

kidd beat his wife.
qyntel beat his dogs.

this kid stole a lap top. are we going to bury him now or if we drafted him, would it be "let's cheer for the kid to turn it around?"
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
6/29/2006  12:34 PM
Posted by oohah:
Funny, I remember a PG named Jameer Nelson who fell just like Marcus did, look at what he's doing now.

Jameer Nelson is 5 times better than Williams. Nelson was player of the year. He is an outstanding athlete shooter, ball-handler, defensive player, passer, and he has good character to boot.

Williams was the 5th best player on his own team and he is a fat, slow, average-shooting, poor-defense-playing, thief.

Big difference.

oohah
wow, someone hasn't watched UCONN at all lately


"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
6/29/2006  12:34 PM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by oohah:
Jordan was the third pick in his draft.....there what scares me is tht guys that fall usually have a better chance of succeeding than guys you reach for and take way ahead of where hey should be...I can name ALOT of successful players that dropped. It is alot harder to think of guys that were reached for and succeeded.

I would have to think about the fall vs. reach thing. I agree with you in principle, I have seen guys fall and beome quite good frequently.

However, I hope you are not drawing a parallel between Jordan and Williams. I think to compare Rick Brunson to Williams is more apt.

oohah

Asolutely not comparing Williams to Jordan, just the principle that the best players aren't always taken #1, and that good players do fall. Also, like I said, players that are reached for usually don't work out, while I can name dozens of players that fall and are good to great players.

[Edited by - joec32033 on 06-29-2006 12:33 PM]


Dozens?

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
6/29/2006  12:35 PM
kidd beat his wife.
qyntel beat his dogs.

this kid stole a lap top. are we going to bury him now or if we drafted him, would it be "let's cheer for the kid to turn it around?"

I thought we didn't want to add anymore poor character guys, but I guess that has been flushed, for this guy. WHy? I am not sure.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/29/2006  12:35 PM
Posted by s3231:

I think there is a notion around here that with these two picks we just became a good defensive team. You don't become a good defensive team because of two rookies. I like that Isiah targeted defensive guys but come on.

You guys argue that all we need is defense. Its not true at all. We need so many things right now that sometimes you have to take the best talent available. Say what you want about how many PG's we have and how many guys we have in our backcourt, but none of them will ever be a starting PG on a very good team. Marcus has the potential to be just that. He is an excellent decision maker, great passer, clutch player, etc. This guy is a basketball player period. When you have a team like ours that needs help in so many areas, I just don't see how you can pass up on a guy like this.

I've supported Isiah a lot in the past but I just don't see how you can stick up for the guy this time.


s3231, i always respect your views but i have to disagree with you on 1 thing... everyone on this board agreed that we needed to target defensive minded players... Isiah just went & drafted 2 defensive minded players, & people are complaining because he passed up on the best PG on the board when we already had a glut at that position... who are the ones being unreasonable here? the ones bashing this pick or the ones defending it? think about it... think about the Knicks, their current situation, the fact that Marbury is Isiah's boy & there's no changing that no matter WHO he woulda drafted, let's face it... many other teams passed up on Marcus Williams... he came into the workouts way out of shape & he's had past off the court run ins w/the law... now is that really what Isiah should be targeting when this is his 1 & only season to show a marked improvement in this team? what would you have done in his situation? be honest... i'm not saying think about what you would have done from the very beginning... i'm talking about the current situation as is... i don't see as him having much other choice, except perhaps to have drafted a different swingman defensive player instead... if that's the argument, then it's a legitimate one, but again, we have to wait & see how this guy performs before we say the pick was a bad one imho... it does address a need at the very least.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
The Official Balkman/Williams Draft Choice Manup Poll Extravaganza!!!!

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy