[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Mark this post and check back in 2 years
Author Thread
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
6/29/2006  1:58 AM
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by BRIGGS:

[he scored 3 OR LESS points EIGHT times this year and for all of his rebounding prowless he mamaged double figures 6 times. and as for character, well, give him time hes no angel

thats putrid

the LAST thing we need is more offense. we need defense. maybe this guy can help.


but still even Bruce Bowen can hit a shot. There's a good chance this good be Ariza all over again. Actually it won be. he can at least dribble the ball
AUTOADVERT
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
6/29/2006  2:06 AM
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by BRIGGS:

[he scored 3 OR LESS points EIGHT times this year and for all of his rebounding prowless he mamaged double figures 6 times. and as for character, well, give him time hes no angel

thats putrid

the LAST thing we need is more offense. we need defense. maybe this guy can help.


but still even Bruce Bowen can hit a shot. There's a good chance this good be Ariza all over again. Actually it won be. he can at least dribble the ball

Bowen didn't develop a jumper until he'd been in the league for years. this guy is not a perimeter player, he's an active 6'7" interior guy. people were all about Reggie Evans - Balkman could easily be Reggie Evans and more.
¿ △ ?
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
6/29/2006  2:10 AM
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by BRIGGS:

[he scored 3 OR LESS points EIGHT times this year and for all of his rebounding prowless he mamaged double figures 6 times. and as for character, well, give him time hes no angel

thats putrid

the LAST thing we need is more offense. we need defense. maybe this guy can help.


but still even Bruce Bowen can hit a shot. There's a good chance this good be Ariza all over again. Actually it won be. he can at least dribble the ball

Bowen didn't develop a jumper until he'd been in the league for years. this guy is not a perimeter player, he's an active 6'7" interior guy. people were all about Reggie Evans - Balkman could easily be Reggie Evans and more.


true. His lack of offensive skill won't be a problem if he's part of a run & gun 2nd unit
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/29/2006  2:21 AM
if the knicks can get off to a 4-14 start or something of that ilk--hopefully the goodbyes can be quick
the faster isiah is gone, the better
RIP Crushalot😞
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
6/29/2006  3:07 AM
Again, Marcus Williams fell from being projected to be taken at like 6, all the way to 22. That can't be overlooked when considering the Balkman pick. Most GMs must have thought Williams has issues.
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
6/29/2006  3:19 AM
Hey Briggs, in 2 years when you are wrong, are you just going to pretend you never said it and ignore when people ask you about it like you always do?

oohah
Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
6/29/2006  3:55 AM
lol
Posted by oohah:

Hey Briggs, in 2 years when you are wrong, are you just going to pretend you never said it and ignore when people ask you about it like you always do?

oohah

all kool aid all the time.
firefly
Posts: 23253
Alba Posts: 17
Joined: 7/26/2004
Member: #721
United Kingdom
6/29/2006  7:41 AM
This is hilarious. Hey, If we keep this thread going for another 3 or 4 pages, Balkman will be a 6"1 Center. So far he's gone from a 6"8 SF to a 6"5 PF, but hey, the skys the limit.
he scored 3 OR LESS points EIGHT times this year and for all of his rebounding prowless he mamaged double figures 6 times. and as for character, well, give him time hes no angel

What does that mean? You mean you're hoping he turns into a hirrible person? A thief perhaps? Will your opinion change then?

BRIGGS, you're getting so bogged down with your UConn fanship, that you've turned into a raving lunatic.

20 teams passed on some fat Non-shooting PG, and youre taking it personally. A little nonUConn-biased objectivity perhaps?

[Edited by - firefly on 06-29-2006 07:42 AM]
Some men see things as they are and ask why. I dream things that never were and ask why not?
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
6/29/2006  7:44 AM
Originally posted by EwingsGlass:

RONRON was drafter much higher than Renaldo.

4 picks higher actually.

Sugarcoating doesn't work once the season starts.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
VDesai
Posts: 43302
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
6/29/2006  8:00 AM
Check back 2 weeks into the season when your all loving this guy for being everywhere on the court. He's not a scorer, but he'll give you a couple blocks, a couple steals, 8 rebounds and will make hustle plays and saves. NO ONE on the Knicks was willing do that last year. He can run and maybe he'll find himself a niche offensively like Bruce Bowen.
fishmike
Posts: 53903
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/29/2006  8:03 AM
I dont need to check any thread in 2 years to know Isiah fubared this team
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/29/2006  8:09 AM
Posted by firefly:

This is hilarious. Hey, If we keep this thread going for another 3 or 4 pages, Balkman will be a 6"1 Center. So far he's gone from a 6"8 SF to a 6"5 PF, but hey, the skys the limit.
he scored 3 OR LESS points EIGHT times this year and for all of his rebounding prowless he mamaged double figures 6 times. and as for character, well, give him time hes no angel

What does that mean? You mean you're hoping he turns into a hirrible person? A thief perhaps?

LMAO!
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
6/29/2006  8:45 AM
Posted by BRIGGS:


i know who this player is. He a skinny hustle player who has 0 offensive skills other than dunking. he may flash some at SL but when it comes to the big show he will get exposed. there is very little market for this type of player in todays game of advancing skill players.

he scored 3 OR LESS points EIGHT times this year and for all of his rebounding prowless he mamaged double figures 6 times. and as for character, well, give him time hes no angel

Sounds almost like Bruce Bowen and he's managed to stay in the league all these years. Granted, Bruce has been able to knock down threes, but he has always been the guy you didn't need to cover or had to double off, thus, he is wide open.



TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/29/2006  10:01 AM
Posted by EwingsGlass:

What happens if you are wrong?

don't worry... he'll figure out a way to spin it around to claim he's right anyway... that's his MO.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/29/2006  10:06 AM
Posted by franco12:

[quote]Posted by BRIGGS:


i know who this player is. He a skinny hustle player who has 0 offensive skills other than dunking. he may flash some at SL but when it comes to the big show he will get exposed. there is very little market for this type of player in todays game of advancing skill players.

he scored 3 OR LESS points EIGHT times this year and for all of his rebounding prowless he mamaged double figures 6 times. and as for character, well, give him time hes no angel

Sounds almost like Bruce Bowen and he's managed to stay in the league all these years. Granted, Bruce has been able to knock down threes, but he has always been the guy you didn't need to cover or had to double off, thus, he is wide open.




Mark it down. In a league that is heavily reliant upon skills, a player like this is a dinosaur. Unless you are a 7 foot shot blocker the scrapper is a position that is going wayside. But when you take pick 50 at 20 dont you expect backlash?

RIP Crushalot😞
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
6/29/2006  10:43 AM
Originally posted by BRIGGS:

Mark it down. In a league that is heavily reliant upon skills, a player like this is a dinosaur. Unless you are a 7 foot shot blocker the scrapper is a position that is going wayside. But when you take pick 50 at 20 dont you expect backlash?

Normally you would. If Scott Layden made this pick, everyone would've hated it. Since it was Isiah, some take the attitude that it must be good because Isiah did it. Seems like a double-standard. You have to expect backlash for such a reach.

An analogy would be being in a class. Let's say you have a C in the class. The teacher is being nice, though, and offers to bump your grade up if you complete a simple extra credit assignment. Instead, you choose not to do the extra credit and you sleep through the final. You get an F.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/29/2006  11:09 AM
Posted by Solace:
Originally posted by BRIGGS:

Mark it down. In a league that is heavily reliant upon skills, a player like this is a dinosaur. Unless you are a 7 foot shot blocker the scrapper is a position that is going wayside. But when you take pick 50 at 20 dont you expect backlash?

Normally you would. If Scott Layden made this pick, everyone would've hated it. Since it was Isiah, some take the attitude that it must be good because Isiah did it. Seems like a double-standard. You have to expect backlash for such a reach.

An analogy would be being in a class. Let's say you have a C in the class. The teacher is being nice, though, and offers to bump your grade up if you complete a simple extra credit assignment. Instead, you choose not to do the extra credit and you sleep through the final. You get an F.


Solace, the reason some people are keeping an open mind about Isiah's pick is because he's had a good past history of drafting good talent in the recent past for this organization... Scott Layden's draft picks for this organization all have not amounted to jack squat in the NBA... is Mike Sweetney at #9 a value pick in your eyes? it isn't to me... Maciej Lampe? Milos Vujanic? Slavko Vranes? have they done anything in the NBA to date? in comparison, i think Isiah's earned at least the benefit of the doubt from last year's draft... let's see how this guy Balkman turns out before we bash him... he could be a nice player we all end up liking... who knows? if he's a bust, then that's the time you can rag on Isiah for making the pick.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
6/29/2006  11:16 AM
Originally posted by TMS:

[quote]Originally posted by Solace:

Solace, the reason some people are keeping an open mind about Isiah's pick is because he's had a good past history of drafting good talent in the recent past for this organization... Scott Layden's draft picks for this organization all have not amounted to jack squat in the NBA... is Mike Sweetney at #9 a value pick in your eyes? it isn't to me... Maciej Lampe? Milos Vujanic? Slavko Vranes? have they done anything in the NBA to date? in comparison, i think Isiah's earned at least the benefit of the doubt from last year's draft... let's see how this guy Balkman turns out before we bash him... he could be a nice player we all end up liking... who knows? if he's a bust, then that's the time you can rag on Isiah for making the pick.

Unfair comparisons. Sweetney was considered the BPA at the time at #9. I still would take Sweetney back on the Knicks as the backup PF in a heartbeat. I know you hate Sweetney for some reason, but yo'uve consistently hated him since the day he was drafted. That's fine, but others would disagree. The only other option would've been Collison, who hasn't turned into much either. Lampe at #30 was a steal and was a major piece in our trade to get Marbury. Vujanic at #36 was a steal. Vujanic never came over, but that was because he was roadblocked by the Knicks having THREE point guards and then roadblocked by Steve Nash. He was only coming here to be a starter, but he wasn't given an opportunity to even go to a team where he could get minutes.

Slavko wound up being a bad pick, but at #39 it's not unreasonable to take a project and have him bust. If we took Balkman at #39, nobody has any complaints. Again, the bashing isn't against Balkman. It's against Isiah for taking him AT SUCH A REACH.

Layden got guys who could've gone lottery and did it with high second rounders. Isiah used late first rounders and got guys who could've gone late second round. That's the difference and it's a huge one.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
6/29/2006  11:25 AM
I don't like this pick at 20, at all. But I do like this kid. I saw him alot in the NIT games and the championship game what he did to Tommy's team was really bad. This guy has a lot of heart. Something the Knicks are sorely missing the last couple of years. The throw back to 90s Knicks reference isn't far off because the commentators during the NIT were referring to him as a perfect player for the Pistons but at 20, too high. I am just curious why Williams drop so far, I heard his workouts weren't spectualar but just based on his upside you would think that he wouldn't last to 22. Phoenix past on him too! I am not happy with Collins with the 29th pick either, I wanted a defensive shot blocker center with upside.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
firefly
Posts: 23253
Alba Posts: 17
Joined: 7/26/2004
Member: #721
United Kingdom
6/29/2006  11:26 AM
Posted by Solace:
Originally posted by TMS:

[quote]Originally posted by Solace:

Solace, the reason some people are keeping an open mind about Isiah's pick is because he's had a good past history of drafting good talent in the recent past for this organization... Scott Layden's draft picks for this organization all have not amounted to jack squat in the NBA... is Mike Sweetney at #9 a value pick in your eyes? it isn't to me... Maciej Lampe? Milos Vujanic? Slavko Vranes? have they done anything in the NBA to date? in comparison, i think Isiah's earned at least the benefit of the doubt from last year's draft... let's see how this guy Balkman turns out before we bash him... he could be a nice player we all end up liking... who knows? if he's a bust, then that's the time you can rag on Isiah for making the pick.

Unfair comparisons. Sweetney was considered the BPA at the time at #9. I still would take Sweetney back on the Knicks as the backup PF in a heartbeat. I know you hate Sweetney for some reason, but yo'uve consistently hated him since the day he was drafted. That's fine, but others would disagree. The only other option would've been Collison, who hasn't turned into much either. Lampe at #30 was a steal and was a major piece in our trade to get Marbury. Vujanic at #36 was a steal. Vujanic never came over, but that was because he was roadblocked by the Knicks having THREE point guards and then roadblocked by Steve Nash. He was only coming here to be a starter, but he wasn't given an opportunity to even go to a team where he could get minutes.

Slavko wound up being a bad pick, but at #39 it's not unreasonable to take a project and have him bust. If we took Balkman at #39, nobody has any complaints. Again, the bashing isn't against Balkman. It's against Isiah for taking him AT SUCH A REACH.

Layden got guys who could've gone lottery and did it with high second rounders. Isiah used late first rounders and got guys who could've gone late second round. That's the difference and it's a huge one.

All I want to know is..... are you saying that Layden is a better drafter then Isiah? Think about your credibility before you answer.

[Edited by - firefly on 06-29-2006 11:27 AM]
Some men see things as they are and ask why. I dream things that never were and ask why not?
Mark this post and check back in 2 years

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy