[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

ESPNclassic is talking about you know who
Author Thread
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

5/19/2006  5:12 PM
Posted by Bippity10:

Everyone on the planet knows the best thing for this organization to do is tear it down. Stick with the young guys and gut the team. We all know this and say we would be patient and build with this. But when the coach wants to do exactly that we cry about this "unauthorized coup"



That is exactly my point...Larry is not about the young players or I would be in his corner...It's the only reason I defend Isiah the way I do...Just for a chance to rebuild with youth...Larry is about winning now with vets...Larry has his way and we start importing guys like KMart and Ratliff...that amounts to more of the same...Larry is concerned about building on his legacy...In camp Cablevision the protocol is to make the playoffs at all cost...The team isiah assenbled could have done that with youth that we could have built something around...Curry, Frye, Lee, Butler and Nate...Most people in these forum are fixated on JJ,MoT,Jalen and Francis...these guys won't be here when the Knicks matter again, they are pawns to get what we want...To me that's Isiah's vision in a nutshell...I'm with that, that is the best that Dolan will allow...Now you are endorsing a coup by Larry and Larry is talking about KMart and Ratliff...Early in the season he spoke about Snow...Thats not rebuilding, thats win now....I'm against that...For the life of me, I don't understand why you guys would endorse Brown under those circumstances?...I'm at a loss...

AUTOADVERT
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

5/19/2006  5:22 PM

I will preach against Larry forever, if it means we won't build around our young players....It's the only way we can get out of this mess...Dolan's message to Larry was to make Curry into a player...I agree with that...For that matter, make Frye, Lee and Q2 into players are well...i give him credit for Craw's turn around...But please, no KMart, Ratliff and older player that takes time from our kids....When will the madness end???



[Edited by - holfresh on 05-19-2006 5:26 PM]
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

5/19/2006  5:31 PM


It's called blind faith...Close your eyes and hopefully it will work out..Because it's Larry Brown and he has won before...He may want some older guys but he know what he is doing...I trust him, Blah blah blah...that's what I take from this forum and all these posters..

Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
5/19/2006  6:40 PM
Posted by Bippity10:

Everyone on the planet knows the best thing for this organization to do is tear it down. Stick with the young guys and gut the team. We all know this and say we would be patient and build with this. But when the coach wants to do exactly that we cry about this "unauthorized coup"

Coach Brown is advocating that at all just the opposite, he wants proven veterans in here. I don't know where you are getting that impression. He said back in December that the team has enough young players, they don't need anymore. He said (I guess now it was Isiah telling him) that they want to trade both picks maybe for some proven veterans. That was back in December. I know Briggs had a thread about it too.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
OldFan
Posts: 21456
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2003
Member: #446
5/19/2006  7:37 PM
Posted by holfresh:


I will preach against Larry forever, if it means we won't build around our young players....It's the only way we can get out of this mess...Dolan's message to Larry was to make Curry into a player...I agree with that...For that matter, make Frye, Lee and Q2 into players are well...i give him credit for Craw's turn around...But please, no KMart, Ratliff and older player that takes time from our kids....When will the madness end???



[Edited by - holfresh on 05-19-2006 5:26 PM]


It's ok to think a coach can improve some of his players. But you just pointed out the main problem with our GM - he gave us a team - where everyone on the team needed to improve a LOT. You need a couple of guys who can play - this team had NO ONE. Not one player who was a quality starter - and did not come with a ton of baggage.

BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
5/19/2006  8:13 PM

Kincks Players' Baggage
https:// It's not so hard.
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

5/19/2006  8:34 PM
Posted by OldFan:
Posted by holfresh:


I will preach against Larry forever, if it means we won't build around our young players....It's the only way we can get out of this mess...Dolan's message to Larry was to make Curry into a player...I agree with that...For that matter, make Frye, Lee and Q2 into players are well...i give him credit for Craw's turn around...But please, no KMart, Ratliff and older player that takes time from our kids....When will the madness end???



[Edited by - holfresh on 05-19-2006 5:26 PM]


It's ok to think a coach can improve some of his players. But you just pointed out the main problem with our GM - he gave us a team - where everyone on the team needed to improve a LOT. You need a couple of guys who can play - this team had NO ONE. Not one player who was a quality starter - and did not come with a ton of baggage.



So what is you feeling on the direction that Larry Brown wnat to take the team...Do you think the Knicks should get vets to win now or do you believe that we should focus on the young players...I'm really surprised...I would have thought supporters of Larry Brown would give me their view points on supporting Larry Brown's direction...Instead I'm getting fingers point in other direction which has been the case with this team all year...

djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
5/19/2006  8:41 PM
this is what larry said before the season - the plan was to start the vets and bring the kids along slowly. then as the season went along, they would get more time. they will be developed (which doesn't necessarily mean getting major minutes). that's what he said. the problem is that not only do our veterans suck, but some of them are just not good lockerroom presences. and along the way, everything went nuts.

for all the vets/young players talk - these group of kids received more minutes than knicks rooks of the past. sweetney, who was a 2nd year player and after the season was over, still only managed to log 20 mins a night...as did ariza. but frye, nate, and lee got some serious minutes this year. it's OK they don't get 30 mins a night their rookie year. what's more important is what they've learned and how they develop this summer.

and after this season, they are no longer rookies. one thing we know so far, nate isn't a starter. lee isn't a starter. maybe channing but he has a way to go before he can start. curry started every game and conditioning and foul problems kept him off the court. what i think lb wants are some vets to help stay competetive with the rooks coming off the bench. i don't think there's anything wrong with that. but if the organization wants the kids to get major minutes right away, whether they've earned them or not, then they should get another coach.
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
5/19/2006  8:41 PM
Posted by holfresh:





So what is you feeling on the direction that Larry Brown wnat to take the team...Do you think the Knicks should get vets to win now or do you believe that we should focus on the young players...I'm really surprised...I would have thought supporters of Larry Brown would give me their view points on supporting Larry Brown's direction...Instead I'm getting fingers point in other direction which has been the case with this team all year...


can you please find 1 quote where Larry said he wishes to ONLY coach veterans then we can go from there.

the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
5/19/2006  8:45 PM
This idea that Larry doesnt play young players is pretty ridiculous.

I remember in 1998 he was not only playing but starting Tim Thomas and Allen Iverson for major minutes. In Detroit he started and played Tayshaun major minutes who was in his 2nd year. This is just off the top of my head. Based on that, I'm sure theres more.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
5/19/2006  8:49 PM
mere conjecture.

not being enamored with Isiah's young not too sharp athletes means Larry hates kids.

the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30255
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
5/19/2006  8:53 PM
It all depends.

Did Brown and Isiah go over the plan at the begining of the season and then Brown just decdided to do things his way and try and pull a power play?

Or was Brown under the assumption that he would be able to do things his way from the begining and then found out later that Isiah has his own plan?

The first one would be mostly Brown fault with Isiah still having to take some of the blam for not figuring Brown would do something like this knowing his past. The second one would be mostly Isiahs fault with Brown having to take some of the blame for doing such a horrible job this season.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

5/19/2006  11:02 PM
Posted by holfresh:

That is exactly my point...Larry is not about the young players or I would be in his corner...It's the only reason I defend Isiah the way I do...Just for a chance to rebuild with youth...Larry is about winning now with vets...

If I really thought it was so simple I'd agree with you. One of our kids is a lottery pick and only due to isiah's failed effort to make the playoffs last year.Nate was a last minute add-on over an insurance dispute, and Lee was the number 30 pick, the other guys are from the NBDL. Meanwhile Isiah has traded away three first round picks. This years may be the #1 pick. Of the two picks from the marbury trade, the first could have been a lottery pick if Isiah didn't charge to "win now" and the second of those picks will likely be unprotected when we convey it.

So if Isiah's direction were really youth and a slow rebuild it's inconsistent with trading 3 1st rd picks in 3 years, all of which might have been lottery picks. We essentially traded high picks for low.


Last year our future was supposedly Sweets and Ariza and both are gone now in starphucking trades. Curry and Frye are the only guys considered core, the rest the GM calls assets.

So we not only traded draft picks for veterans, and high picks for low, we then proceeded to trade our "future" for Curry and "assets" to use for a chance at a star veteran (KG, JO) you just know Isiah and Dolan are creaming for.

The GM and owner were both widely considered big splash, immediate results guys, long before the arrival of Brown and our "rebuild" has been consistent with that reputation, again, all above and beyond Larry Brown.

For what it's worth:

The '81 Nets went 24-58 without Brown. In Brown's 1st season the '82 Nets went 44-38. These were the 5 greatest minute getters in order of minutes with ages:

Buck Williams - 21
Ray Williams - 27
Len Elmore - 29
Darwin Cook - 23
Mike O'Koren - 23


The '89 Spurs went 21-61 in Brown's 1st season. 1990 Spurs in Brown's second season went 56-26. Again, in sequence of minutes and ages:

David Robinson - 24 (Rookie)
Terry Cummings - 28
Willie anderson - 23
Sean Elliot - 21
David Wingate - 26

The point being Brown can coach youth effectively.

And this, from the off-season prior to Larry taking the Pistons to two consecutive Finals:

Ten NBA teams hired a new head coach this offseason. Of those 10, the
Pistons had the best record last season at 50-32, making Detroit the
choice job when Larry BroWn was looking for employment. But did the
team make the right choice with him? A recent poll of NBA general
managers suggets it Did.

1. Which head coach is the best at developing young players?
Larry Brown 24%

Eric Musselman 14%
Jeff Bzdelik 10%
Paul Silas 10%

2. Which head coach is the best manager/motivator of people?
Phil Jackson 41%
Pat Riley 21%
Larry Brown 19%

3. Who is the best X's and O's coach?
Larry Brown 33%

Jeff Van Gundy 14%
Rick Carlisle 10%
Pat Riley 10%

4. Who is the best head coach in the NBA?
Larry Brown 43%

Gregg Popovich 19%
Phil Jackson 19%



Larry can coach, and Larry can coach kids. But Larry can also bring wins quick, and that's why isiah and Dolan hired him. That's what they want. That's what's consistent with Isiah's trades with regard to draft picks and our youth.

When Larry says we have too many kids I believe it's a euphemism for "we don't have enough vets who are winners." It's not that we need to add veterans, it's that we need to change them.

As far as coaching our young guys I think Larry's doing a good job. I think he's helping Nate settle down, he's making Frye learn to put it on the floor and take it in, so he wont just be a Jawan Howard clone. I think he's right to try to get lee to play SF so that if he sticks around he wont be buried behind Frye or a stronger PF defender. I think Butler's doing far better than I'd expect from his Sweetney-like body. I think Woods can be a nice natural SF when he plays D for Larry.

Here's the deal though, if the coach and GM are not on the same page it can't work out. I don't want larry here in a constant position of conflict. However, we're on the 4th coach of Isiah's tenure and the way he's dealt with each of them gives me serious concerns of isiah's ability to get along with coaches. I'm not attached to Brown, but I see no reason to swap him out just too repeat the process.
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

5/19/2006  11:18 PM

Brown is not an Isiah decision, It's Dolan decision....If Brown was such a coach for the young player, why would he even think about getting a player like KMart to play ahead of Frye...What do they mean by X and O..because Jeff and Larry and two of the worst offensive minds in the league...They must mean on defense...

It's well documented that Larry has no interest playing young players...There is no way in hell you could make a case for Malik getting the kind of minutes he got ahead of Frye..Now he is looking at KMart....Frye will be a better player than KMart when it's all said and done...I jsut cant wait til we get rid of him, that way the organization could get back to trying to win games instead of trying to please their diva coach...



[Edited by - holfresh on 05-19-2006 11:19 PM]
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
5/19/2006  11:53 PM
Posted by holfresh:


It's well documented that Larry has no interest playing young players...There is no way in hell you could make a case for Malik getting the kind of minutes he got ahead of Frye..Now he is looking at KMart....Frye will be a better player than KMart when it's all said and done...I jsut cant wait til we get rid of him, that way the organization could get back to trying to win games instead of trying to please their diva coach...



[Edited by - holfresh on 05-19-2006 11:19 PM]

You keep saying this but where is your proof? Both myself and Blueseats have given you many occurances where Larry has played young players and you seem to be disregarding it. Where are your facts or are you making factless claims?

"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

5/20/2006  12:01 AM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by holfresh:


It's well documented that Larry has no interest playing young players...There is no way in hell you could make a case for Malik getting the kind of minutes he got ahead of Frye..Now he is looking at KMart....Frye will be a better player than KMart when it's all said and done...I jsut cant wait til we get rid of him, that way the organization could get back to trying to win games instead of trying to please their diva coach...



[Edited by - holfresh on 05-19-2006 11:19 PM]

You keep saying this but where is your proof? Both myself and Blueseats have given you many occurances where Larry has played young players and you seem to be disregarding it. Where are your facts or are you making factless claims?



While it would seem a gigantic financial hit to the Knicks, a league source pointed out keeping Brown would cause the player payroll to expand even more. One of Brown's wishes in upgrading the roster is trading for Kenyon Martin and his $70 million contract, despite his bad knees and bad attitude.

According to a source, Thomas feels he cannot satisfy Brown's demands of making major trades, despite a serious inquiry into Chicago's Ben Gordon. "Look at their roster, who can they trade other than the young guys and get something good back," said another league source who has spoken to Thomas about the matter.

That source said Thomas does not want to trade his three first-round selections from last year - Nate Robinson, David Lee and Channing Frye, nor Eddy Curry. He also does not believe he can get close to value on Stephon Marbury, whom Brown also wants dealt. That Marbury and Brown had a bitter feud doesn't help Brown's cause. Plus, several players quit on Brown during the season. Bringing roughly the same crew back could spell disaster. The Knicks have two late first-round picks. Brown said in March he'd rather package them because they had enough young players


Why would youb need to trade for KMart when you have Frye...Frye rebounds just as KMart does..
Bro there are many more article out there about Brown not wanting to play young players...I jsut don't have the time now to seek them out...

But I will for you and start a new thread so you won't miss it...It time to put this baby to rest...
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
5/20/2006  12:05 AM
Posted by holfresh:


While it would seem a gigantic financial hit to the Knicks, a league source pointed out keeping Brown would cause the player payroll to expand even more. One of Brown's wishes in upgrading the roster is trading for Kenyon Martin and his $70 million contract, despite his bad knees and bad attitude.

According to a source, Thomas feels he cannot satisfy Brown's demands of making major trades, despite a serious inquiry into Chicago's Ben Gordon. "Look at their roster, who can they trade other than the young guys and get something good back," said another league source who has spoken to Thomas about the matter.

That source said Thomas does not want to trade his three first-round selections from last year - Nate Robinson, David Lee and Channing Frye, nor Eddy Curry. He also does not believe he can get close to value on Stephon Marbury, whom Brown also wants dealt. That Marbury and Brown had a bitter feud doesn't help Brown's cause. Plus, several players quit on Brown during the season. Bringing roughly the same crew back could spell disaster. The Knicks have two late first-round picks. Brown said in March he'd rather package them because they had enough young players


Why would youb need to trade for KMart when you have Frye...Frye rebounds just as KMart does..
Bro there are many more article out there about Brown not wanting to play young players...I jsut don't have the time now to seek them out...

But I will for you and start a new thread so you won't miss it...It time to put this baby to rest...

So if you believe that source you believe the one who said Isiah created that rumor about trading for Ben Gordon in order to generate hype and dupe the New York fans? I think thats what your saying.

Another thing Holfresh, I don't care about articles saying Brown doesnt want to play young players, I've looked at the FACTS and seen that Brown HAS played young players. Your believe articles over facts? Myself and Blueseats have given you PLENTY examples of young players that Brown has played and your still refuting the point.

By the way, I'm still waiting for your post in that thread. You've been unusually quiet in that thread.

[Edited by - nyk4ever on 05-20-2006 12:06 AM]
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

5/20/2006  12:15 AM
Posted by holfresh:


Brown is not an Isiah decision, It's Dolan decision....

You don't know that and it's splitting hairs anyway. We are talking about larry vs the direction you presume the organization would be headed without him. That organization is comprised of mills, isiah and Dolan, and who are you to pretend to know exactly who of them is responsible for what, and what difference does it really make.

A more useful endeavor would be for you to answer why brown was hired in the first place. it might be the most useful thing you could do in this entire conversation.
If Brown was such a coach for the young player, why would he even think about getting a player like KMart to play ahead of Frye...

Could it be related to the reason that the 2 coaches before Larry played Kurt over Sweetney? And who says he would start over frye? And who says Frye might not get time at center? You really like the defensive liability in the middle that Frye and curry constitute without even a suitable backup?
What do they mean by X and O..because Jeff and Larry and two of the worst offensive minds in the league...They must mean on defense...

Your guess is as good as mine, but X&Os generally refers to the ability to prepare a team for their opponent,t o make in-game and game-to-game adjustments, and to devise sound plays coming out of time-outs. Things like that.

It's well documented that Larry has no interest playing young players...

Care to share your documentation? I shared mine but you ignore it.
There is no way in hell you could make a case for Malik getting the kind of minutes he got ahead of Frye..

Frye averaged 24 mpg to Rose's 15 mpg, and many of Rose's minutes came at SF. And Rose was our ONLY interior defender.

I also believe Frye's minutes would have gone up as the season progressed, as did Butlers and Nate's, but he got injured.
Now he is looking at KMart....Frye will be a better player than KMart when it's all said and done...

First of all, I'm sure they are "looking at" a lot of players, the roster has serious holes, particularly defensively. The problem is that to move our unmovable contracts (thanks isiah) without adding the kids requires swapping them for different bad contracts.

For instance, one scenario proposed was to trade francis for Kmart. Are you so certain we're better off keeping Francis while he demands to start? What does that do to Nate and/or chemistry? You're so certain we're set to stand pat as is?
I jsut cant wait til we get rid of him, that way the organization could get back to trying to win games instead of trying to please their diva coach...

Yeah, I can't wait till we can get back to lame disempowered coaches forced to appease our diva players, GM, and owner.



[Edited by - BlueSeats on 05-20-2006 12:25 AM]
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

5/20/2006  12:48 AM


No one is a bigger diva in this town than Larry Brown...He was bought here to coach winning basketball...Teach the players the game..Instead he used the team and it's players to better position himself for a coup... I am convinced this was his gameplan from day one...It didn't work and now he must go...Now we can concentrate on whats important, the team, not the coach...This guy has had a bug up his arse for every star player that has played for him...Just imagine he even got into it with David Robinson, one of the finest gentlemen that ever put on a basketball uniform...Imagine that...The guy needs first billing to exist, we now he can have it somewhere else...There is a God...

simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
5/20/2006  1:30 AM
Even if you are right, a coup agsint IT is a good thing. Why not make him the GM too. IT has done a terrible job, so why not try something new?
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
ESPNclassic is talking about you know who

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy