[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Marbs doesn't give a shhhhhh
Author Thread
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
5/16/2006  2:10 PM
TMS-Unless you say that you want LB shot you will be considered a LB lover. You remember the Spree/Houston debates nothing has changed except now it's Marbs/LB. You can't be objective you have to hate one of them.
I just hope that people will like me
AUTOADVERT
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
5/16/2006  2:16 PM
tastes great!
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
5/16/2006  2:48 PM
Posted by Bippity10:

TMS-Unless you say that you want LB shot you will be considered a LB lover. You remember the Spree/Houston debates nothing has changed except now it's Marbs/LB. You can't be objective you have to hate one of them.
Bip thats not true. I respected the way you defended Marb's from a purely objective standpoint. It was needed and people don't get subtletyvery well here.

I guess I am labeled an LB hater, but I don't hate him at all. I just think that it is without question that he did a terrible job here, I mean a horrendous, god-awful job, and there is really no excuse for it. Not the roster, not Steph, not anything, he screwed up royally and thats all there is to it as far as last season was concerned. I'm not saying he's all thats wrong with the org. but I'm saying he has helped to bring us to a new low. Coming into this season, if we had performed how we should have which would have been around .500, your players have value and you can make certain moves for players easily because players have played well, won, and look solid if not better than they are.

Instead, all of our players look like ****, even ones who are considered selfish and go fo theirs. They look like **** because they listened to LB, and their numbers went down and so did those of the team.



[Edited by - killa4luv on 05-16-2006 2:48 PM]
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
5/16/2006  2:52 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by TMS:

if i were the best player on a team that just finished 23 - 59, i'd be taking some accountability for the record too... so far, i haven't heard Marbury say a thing about his own lack of performance this past season... it's always about the system, or the coach... at least LB is man enough to stand up to the piss poor performance the team that he coached turned out last year... Marbury's not man enough to do it... he's a coward as far as i'm concerned.

[Edited by - TMS on 05-16-2006 10:37 AM]

LOL! How typical. LB should own up to this because this is his fault. Knicks could have won 33 games with no coach at all. LB made us -10, Steph was here last year.

the only thing typical here is that you didn't even comprehend what i just wrote & instead chose to jump to the conclusion that i was exhonerating LB in this case... i just got done saying LB took accountability for the bad job he did last year coaching this team... Marbury on the other hand, hasn't taken ANY accountability for his career worst season & instead chooses to blame all that on the system & on the coaching... go ahead & dispute that if u like... let's see how you twist my words this time.

TMS, saying LB was man enough to take accountability is a big crock of BS to me. I am not calling him an LB lover. I just think its laughable for someone to say he took accoutnability. LB didnt take accountability, if he did he wouldn't be calling for a total overhaul of the roster. He wouldn't have complained about trades for players that he requested (steve and jalen). He wouldn't have just said "I take responsibility for this season". Saying it doesn't mean anything. He said "you're the best pg and we have the worst record in the league" in the very same paragraph that he said "I take accountability for the teams performance". Thats my point. He did not, and still has not taken accountability. To me, taking accountability is not demanding that you trade half of the roster because you don't like them, or they aren't your type of players. They didn't perform for him because he coached them poorly, period, not vice versa. He had everyone giving 100% (except JJ) in the beginning of the season, and he bashed guys at the end of every game at some point very early in the season.

Taking accountability to me, means saying that i grossly mismanaged this team, and its talent, and I will take this same team (or practically the same team) and do with them, what I failed to do last season, which is coach them to the best of my ability, and work with Isiah to make any necasary changes along the way. I can get more out of this roster and I should have and I failed at that, and I would like to have another oppurtunity to do that. <---- Thats taking accountability.

I say this as a Knick fan who really doesn't have a problem with LB coming back, I said it before Steph did in the 9 page LB thread. I just think LB needs to tone himself down, he is not bigger or better than the org. and he cannot continue to do what he did last season. He can't think that he can just do, say, and act anyway he wants and he will have a job.

A resume' gets you a job, your performance is what determines whether you keep it or not. You could make the argument either way to keep him or dump him, but if he stays, he MUST change some things, that part is not negotiable, imo.

Thats my beef, its that I don't think LB took accountability.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
5/16/2006  4:57 PM
i've heard him say time & time again that he takes full responsibility for how the team played this season... if that's not taking accountability, i don't know what is... when has Marbury ever taken accountability for anything? does he even know the meaning of the word? i highly doubt it.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
5/16/2006  5:06 PM
Posted by TMS:

i've heard him say time & time again that he takes full responsibility for how the team played this season... if that's not taking accountability, i don't know what is... when has Marbury ever taken accountability for anything? does he even know the meaning of the word? i highly doubt it.

Actually Marbury was the first to take accountability in his response to Brown. While Brown was comparing his career to his pg. Marbury said who cares about that, we stink right now. Brown didn't start to take blame until he start to receive so much negative press. Brown tried to charm the NY media but when they tired of his antics turned on him quicker than a pack of cobras.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
5/16/2006  5:20 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by TMS:

i've heard him say time & time again that he takes full responsibility for how the team played this season... if that's not taking accountability, i don't know what is... when has Marbury ever taken accountability for anything? does he even know the meaning of the word? i highly doubt it.

Actually Marbury was the first to take accountability in his response to Brown. While Brown was comparing his career to his pg. Marbury said who cares about that, we stink right now. Brown didn't start to take blame until he start to receive so much negative press. Brown tried to charm the NY media but when they tired of his antics turned on him quicker than a pack of cobras.

LB was wrong in saying that and should have kept his mouth shut. It hurt the team obviously. But what he said was 100% correct.
I just hope that people will like me
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
5/16/2006  5:28 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by Bippity10:

TMS-Unless you say that you want LB shot you will be considered a LB lover. You remember the Spree/Houston debates nothing has changed except now it's Marbs/LB. You can't be objective you have to hate one of them.
Bip thats not true. I respected the way you defended Marb's from a purely objective standpoint. It was needed and people don't get subtletyvery well here.

I guess I am labeled an LB hater, but I don't hate him at all. I just think that it is without question that he did a terrible job here, I mean a horrendous, god-awful job, and there is really no excuse for it. Not the roster, not Steph, not anything, he screwed up royally and thats all there is to it as far as last season was concerned. I'm not saying he's all thats wrong with the org. but I'm saying he has helped to bring us to a new low. Coming into this season, if we had performed how we should have which would have been around .500, your players have value and you can make certain moves for players easily because players have played well, won, and look solid if not better than they are.

Instead, all of our players look like ****, even ones who are considered selfish and go fo theirs. They look like **** because they listened to LB, and their numbers went down and so did those of the team.



[Edited by - killa4luv on 05-16-2006 2:48 PM]

I think this is what all you "Larry haters" are missing. I know from reading TMS, myself, Nalod, Fish and some of the other guys that support LB that not one of us have said LB did a good job this year. As a matter of fact I'm sure all of us used many of the same adjectives you used. I personally look at a 23 win roster and I know that there is no one associated with it that can remotely say that they weren't a bumb this season. LB was HORRRRIBLE. I've said it 1000 times but some of you guys are so fixated on having him fired that when guys say he should not be fired based on this season it's because we looooooooove him.

I don't love LB. I hate what he did this year. I love the Knicks. And I want the Knicks to discover a direction. This means finding people that have won before in positions of power(GM, coach, president etc) and allow them to make the decisions. If you have never won and you don't like their decisions you suck it up and do what they say anyway. If they say they can turn the franchise around in 5 years and you sign them to do it in 5 years you don't quit after 1 because they aren't doing it your way. If you haven't won before and they have, you must show blind faith or just stay blind.

You don't trade Albert Pujols after one bad season unless you have a clear plan to replace him. Otherwise you are just reacting to his year to year stats not seeing the big picture. You don't get rid of LB after one season unless you have a clear plan to replace him that builds on your current plan that you envisioned when you hired him. Instead IF he is replaced, we will probably replace him with a guy who will be fired after 40 games if he doesn't have a good record. Or some scrub who hasn't figured out how to win because we can't get anyone else. Or we will overpay for another coach and annoit him the new "savior".

The beat goes on and on and too many fans think it's about LB.

[Edited by - Bippity10 on 05-16-2006 5:30 PM]
I just hope that people will like me
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

5/16/2006  5:33 PM
IMO, Brown's fault lies primarily in not selling his approach/system/efforts, what have you, to the team, not for wanting a roster overhaul. Larry could have done all he did and wanted all he wanted and it wouldn't have ended this bad if he had been able to sell it, but he didn't really try.

Perhaps he thought he had an understanding with management above, i don't know.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
5/16/2006  5:38 PM
"I don't know how many coaches in this league can coach a team that won 23 games," Brown said, "and still have a job."

It pretty hard to defend the guilty when they go around shouting I did it now send me to the electric chair.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
5/16/2006  5:41 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by TMS:

i've heard him say time & time again that he takes full responsibility for how the team played this season... if that's not taking accountability, i don't know what is... when has Marbury ever taken accountability for anything? does he even know the meaning of the word? i highly doubt it.

Actually Marbury was the first to take accountability in his response to Brown. While Brown was comparing his career to his pg. Marbury said who cares about that, we stink right now. Brown didn't start to take blame until he start to receive so much negative press. Brown tried to charm the NY media but when they tired of his antics turned on him quicker than a pack of cobras.

saying "We stink" is not taking accountability for his own play... when you do a crappy job at work, coming out & saying "our company sucks" doesn't qualify as being accountable for the pisspoor performance YOU contributed to... that's what you call deflection of blame

not 1 time has Marbury ever said "I take responsibility for how our team stunk last year" or "I'm sorry for how crappy I played last season" or "I would have liked to have set a better example for our young guys to follow this season" or anything even remotely close to that effect... it's always "We stink", or "I don't think the system is taking full advantage of my skills as a scoring G", or "I think we'd be better if we opened up the offense"

given, i realize he's not the type of guy to make rah rah speeches... i'm not even looking for that out of him... i just want him to be responsible for himself & for the role HE played in the debacle of a season they had last year... so far, in all his actions & words, he's done nothing but avoid taking any of the blame unto himself... that's why i call him a coward... tell me why i'm wrong here.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
5/16/2006  5:46 PM
Posted by Bippity10:
I know from reading TMS, myself, Nalod, Fish and some of the other guys that support LB that not one of us have said LB did a good job this year. As a matter of fact I'm sure all of us used many of the same adjectives you used. I personally look at a 23 win roster and I know that there is no one associated with it that can remotely say that they weren't a bumb this season. LB was HORRRRIBLE. I've said it 1000 times but some of you guys are so fixated on having him fired that when guys say he should not be fired based on this season it's because we looooooooove him.

exactly Bip... no one here thinks LB did a good job last year... some of us simply are willing to give him the benefit of the doubt based on his track record for more than 1 year before we dismiss the fact that his philosophy, a tried & tested philosophy at that, was the wrong fit for this organization... why that's so hard to understand, i'll never know... but i guess i'm just a hater (well that part is true, cuz i can't stand Marbury at this point, so if you want to label me as a Marbury hater, knock yourself out)

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
5/16/2006  5:51 PM
Posted by BlueSeats:

IMO, Brown's fault lies primarily in not selling his approach/system/efforts, what have you, to the team, not for wanting a roster overhaul. Larry could have done all he did and wanted all he wanted and it wouldn't have ended this bad if he had been able to sell it, but he didn't really try.

Perhaps he thought he had an understanding with management above, i don't know.

This is why I put the majority of the blame on Brown. The man accepted the position knowing the roster. If you are telling me that he doesn't have the faintest clue about the complexity of changing rosters to fit your specific needs in the league in one season, then yes he should be asked to leave. I mean going to Thomas and giving him ultimatums like he has better get rid of these 5 players if he wants him to coach next season while he is under contract. How would you feel. Now look I don't know the man's health conditions but it seems that he a little problem with self control. If this was a first time thing then it would be a different story, I don't even compare this to any other firing I seen as a Knick fan except one, Nelson.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
5/16/2006  5:59 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by TMS:

i've heard him say time & time again that he takes full responsibility for how the team played this season... if that's not taking accountability, i don't know what is... when has Marbury ever taken accountability for anything? does he even know the meaning of the word? i highly doubt it.

Actually Marbury was the first to take accountability in his response to Brown. While Brown was comparing his career to his pg. Marbury said who cares about that, we stink right now. Brown didn't start to take blame until he start to receive so much negative press. Brown tried to charm the NY media but when they tired of his antics turned on him quicker than a pack of cobras.

saying "We stink" is not taking accountability for his own play... when you do a crappy job at work, coming out & saying "our company sucks" doesn't qualify as being accountable for the pisspoor performance YOU contributed to... that's what you call deflection of blame

not 1 time has Marbury ever said "I take responsibility for how our team stunk last year" or "I'm sorry for how crappy I played last season" or "I would have liked to have set a better example for our young guys to follow this season" or anything even remotely close to that effect... it's always "We stink", or "I don't think the system is taking full advantage of my skills as a scoring G", or "I think we'd be better if we opened up the offense"

given, i realize he's not the type of guy to make rah rah speeches... i'm not even looking for that out of him... i just want him to be responsible for himself & for the role HE played in the debacle of a season they had last year... so far, in all his actions & words, he's done nothing but avoid taking any of the blame unto himself... that's why i call him a coward... tell me why i'm wrong here.

If anything I thought that was the one thing that Brown loved about Marbury was the fact that he was in there supporting his teammates while he watching from the bench in the 4th quarters. I never once saw Marbury sulk on the bench.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
5/16/2006  6:05 PM
Pharzeone this is the main problem with the organization. Everytime we have a poor season instead of searching for things we can do better. We search for who was "more to blame" and then we fire or trade that guy and then start all over again.

You can't function that way. You can't win that way. Instead you must come up with a direction and find players and coach's that fit that plan. If Marbs was 100% to blame for this season but he fits the direction you are going in, you keep him. If he doesn't fit the direction you get rid of him. Year to year blame is reactionary and is not a winning philosophy. That's why we don't win. WE have no plan. We just react to every win and loss and don't look beyond.

It's so sad that some can't see that. Players and coach's are going to have bad years here for a while. And it will be forever if we don't change our methods. 20 years from now guys like you will still be finding out who gets "the majority of the blame". We won 23 games, THEY ARE ALL TO BLAME.
I just hope that people will like me
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
5/16/2006  6:05 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by TMS:

i've heard him say time & time again that he takes full responsibility for how the team played this season... if that's not taking accountability, i don't know what is... when has Marbury ever taken accountability for anything? does he even know the meaning of the word? i highly doubt it.

Actually Marbury was the first to take accountability in his response to Brown. While Brown was comparing his career to his pg. Marbury said who cares about that, we stink right now. Brown didn't start to take blame until he start to receive so much negative press. Brown tried to charm the NY media but when they tired of his antics turned on him quicker than a pack of cobras.

saying "We stink" is not taking accountability for his own play... when you do a crappy job at work, coming out & saying "our company sucks" doesn't qualify as being accountable for the pisspoor performance YOU contributed to... that's what you call deflection of blame

not 1 time has Marbury ever said "I take responsibility for how our team stunk last year" or "I'm sorry for how crappy I played last season" or "I would have liked to have set a better example for our young guys to follow this season" or anything even remotely close to that effect... it's always "We stink", or "I don't think the system is taking full advantage of my skills as a scoring G", or "I think we'd be better if we opened up the offense"

given, i realize he's not the type of guy to make rah rah speeches... i'm not even looking for that out of him... i just want him to be responsible for himself & for the role HE played in the debacle of a season they had last year... so far, in all his actions & words, he's done nothing but avoid taking any of the blame unto himself... that's why i call him a coward... tell me why i'm wrong here.

If anything I thought that was the one thing that Brown loved about Marbury was the fact that he was in there supporting his teammates while he watching from the bench in the 4th quarters. I never once saw Marbury sulk on the bench.

Are you honestly trying to say Marbs is a good leader?
I just hope that people will like me
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
5/16/2006  6:06 PM
"I would have liked to have set a better example for our young guys to follow this season"

TMS-could you imgaine what that would do for our team if he actually said that? If he said that and followed through on that he would have a larger effect on the record than any coach would. Unfortunately it's not going to happen.
I just hope that people will like me
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
5/16/2006  6:18 PM
no doubt, i completely agree Bip... it's sad that our best player can't even see how much of a positive effect he could potentially have on the team, if he just would embrace that leadership role... but i know it's not going to happen, & that's what pisses me off most of all... kinda like how i knew how much talent TT had, but knowing he would never apply himself on a consistent basis to show it every night... how great of a team we could have had if only Marbury would be the leader & star he was brought here to be & TT would have played like he did in the playoffs this year for Phoenix... but hey, how rich i would be if only i'd gone to med school instead of going to art school... hindsight's a bitch.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

5/17/2006  12:09 AM
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by BlueSeats:

IMO, Brown's fault lies primarily in not selling his approach/system/efforts, what have you, to the team, not for wanting a roster overhaul. Larry could have done all he did and wanted all he wanted and it wouldn't have ended this bad if he had been able to sell it, but he didn't really try.

Perhaps he thought he had an understanding with management above, i don't know.

This is why I put the majority of the blame on Brown. The man accepted the position knowing the roster. If you are telling me that he doesn't have the faintest clue about the complexity of changing rosters to fit your specific needs in the league in one season, then yes he should be asked to leave. I mean going to Thomas and giving him ultimatums like he has better get rid of these 5 players if he wants him to coach next season while he is under contract. How would you feel. Now look I don't know the man's health conditions but it seems that he a little problem with self control. If this was a first time thing then it would be a different story, I don't even compare this to any other firing I seen as a Knick fan except one, Nelson.

Phar, lets just look at this 5 players to trade business.

First off, if it was in fact stated as an ultimatum it probably should not have been, but we don't know that it was.

But I would assume LB came in suspecting, based on his olympics experience, that he'd want to lose Steph and Mo. However, he'd also be willing to keep them if they bought in and played D. That's my assumption. No Mo is an expiring contract, so that's not a big deal, so it's really only Steph, who just as well could have been our best Brown player, had he bought in like, say, Billips.

That's what I think he signed on for, expecting to have to move two, one being easy as an expiring, but also willing to keep Steph if he's a good soldier. But then James turns out to be a waste that disappointed isiah as much as anybody, PLUS, rather than adding a couple of "Brown" guys isiah saddles him with Jalen and Francis too.

So there's our possible 5, with Mo and Jalen easy moves, and Steph, Francis and James fairly understandable considering Isiah STILL hasn't gotten him a single defender yet. Instead he lost AD, our best interior presence and best compliment to Eddy Chubby.

So if there were an ultimatum aspect to it I suspect it came out of bitterness that isiah promised he'd get Brown a couple of "his guys" but instead stuck him with more of what he didn't want.
FireIsiah
Posts: 20304
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/10/2005
Member: #1029

5/17/2006  12:35 AM
I still cant believe that Isiah is going to coach this team. UNREAL!!!! By him coaching will it make our team play any defense? Probably not b/c he assembled a roster without 1 and I mean 1 player who can play defense. What a joke!!!!!!
I want to leave something that's going to stand for a long timeI want to leave a legacy,I want to leave tradition.I want to leave an imprint,a blueprint in terms of how people play,and how they coach and how they respond when they put on the Knick uni.
Marbs doesn't give a shhhhhh

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy