[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Who Would Memphis Rather Have?
Author Thread
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
5/9/2006  4:21 PM
not really. the kings were actually more of a half set team, so was portland.

anyway, if u think about it --- west might have more interest in francis b/c of the fact that he can actually create his own shot when the game is on the line, whereas Stephon.................cant.
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
AUTOADVERT
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
5/9/2006  4:22 PM
i think itll come down to francis or baron davis.


with francis coming cheaper for them.


if west is concerned about character guys, why would he bring in me-bury?

francis can be a nuthead sometimes, but he doesnt create lockerroom turmoil.
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
5/9/2006  5:07 PM
Sac ran a ton when Bobby Jax came in the game. Stoudamire and Reeves ran teams out the building in Arizona. He had to adjust in Portland because Dunleavy had alot of cred at the time.

Hack a Shaq turned out becoming the dumbest game 6 & 7 strategy in conference finals history.
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
Who Would Memphis Rather Have?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy