Posted by EnySpree:
I don't get this arguement. Bring in winning players to be mediocre? Wtf? Larry brown is gonna be 66 soon.
I'm sick of the bull aleady. Larry brown is not the god of basketball. He wants a certain type of player. That's all fine and dandy but if you are talking about theo ratliff then you need to be hit in the chest with a sledge hammer. Larry doesn't like any of the players. So the knicks now have to trade the whole team? For winning role players? Who are they playing roles for?
None of this **** makes sense. Yeah the knicks won 20 and change, but the guys on this team are not retards. The mediocre level that people want is aleady here....its just that Larry never have them a fighting chance.
This is so stupid its in believable.
Change with the roster should be made but so should the coach. Makes no sense that Larry hates the guys playing for him. If things were that simple all the coaches in the league would get to do what brown has gotten away with. This is bull****!
i think if lb had a roster of guys that just listened and did what was told, regardless of the results, he would be happy. but since this year was such a challenge getting everybody "on the same page" despite what lb and steph said in their BS exit interviews, we have to make a choice of who should stay, lb or 1/2 the players. i don't think anybody can argue with that. agree or disagree with his methods or how he coached this year, if the players were all good soldiers, we wouldn't have had all this media BS.
so the question now becomes what do we do? is a 66 year old coach the right guy for us? are the players the right players to really build a team with? the answer could be NO to both questions. and in fact, i know for sure, that the answer is NO to the 2nd question.
this has to start with isiah. we need to remove him and bring in another guy with NO ties and let that person decide who stays and who doesn't. that's the ONLY resolution to this dilemma b/c if lb's gone, and the players stay, we are going to perpetuate the mediocrity that's been widely accepted. is mediocrity better than 23-59? imho, no. to me, it's the same thing but i'm in the minority.