Posted by TMS:
Posted by BRIGGS:
Boozer is way better than both of those guys. He's a dominating rebounder[top 3 in the league when healthy] and scores 20 points at will. He doesnt block shots but he isnt exactly a chump on the D at 6-9 260
more over the top description of a player you like... the guy's never averaged more than 18 pts. in a single season, yet you rave abot him as if he were a quintessential 20/10 guy after a short stretch of some good games & put down players like Al Harrington, who's shown a steady progression & improvement every year he's been in the league & is right on the cusp of being a legit 20ppg player... i simply don't understand the logic that guides your estimations of some of these players... you seem to randomly get on the jock of 1 guy & on the case of another.
When Boozer is healthy he is a dominating presence, physically imposing. His biggest problem has been staying healthy, BUT the good thing is he never suffered an injury like Harrington or Martin. His have been of the odd variety. But when this guy is 100%, you are looking at a tier 1 NBA all star PF. Some of those yearly numbers are misleading--if you go through game logs--you can see how good this guy is and can be. I mean hes 24 years old