[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

dmiles or harrington?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum


Author Poll
djsunyc
Posts: 24929
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
who would you rather have on this team, dmiles or harrington?
dmiles
harrington
neither
View Results


Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
3/17/2006  11:03 AM
derrick mckey, tayshaun prince, george lynch, etc.

lb likes to have a defensive guy at the 3 spot. i think dmiles can flourish defensively under larry brown. but we may have enough to get both.
AUTOADVERT
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
3/17/2006  11:16 AM
Jumaine, and he'll cost half of what Jerome did
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/17/2006  11:20 AM
Posted by McK1:

Jumaine, and he'll cost half of what Jerome did

agreed... Jumaine Jones would be a nice addition... but first we need to unload Jalen Rose.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/17/2006  1:02 PM
Miles has baggage and a questionable knee, but his toughness and good perimeter and interior defense, shot-blocking, and steals are what we need. I'd love to have both players actually but for this team I'd rank D-Miles higher because of his defense.
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
3/17/2006  4:27 PM
Harrington sucks. He is way overrated on this board, he is a tweener, I dunno why anybody would want him as a starter. As a 6th man sure, he would be great. But he wants to start. No thanks.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/17/2006  4:32 PM
Posted by simrud:

Harrington sucks. He is way overrated on this board, he is a tweener, I dunno why anybody would want him as a starter. As a 6th man sure, he would be great. But he wants to start. No thanks.
On our team he'd start. If you're starting SF and PF are both better than Harrington and you're forced to play him as a 6th man, you probably have an oustanding frontcourt.
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
3/17/2006  4:38 PM
the only correct answer to this question is neither. miles is inconsistent, and unmotivated, and only thing harrington cares about is money, and being the "star".
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/17/2006  4:42 PM
Harrington's better than any SF or PF we have right now, including Channing Frye... i don't get where that comment comes from... & he's all of 26 years old... i'll take him in a heartbeat.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
bigbeast
Posts: 22333
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/21/2005
Member: #1060
3/17/2006  6:07 PM
Posted by Nalod:

Seems we stick our SF in the corner anyway! I think QDog and DLee make a hell of a tandam. They can improve. Players get better.

We need a:

Shot blocker defensive stopper who can hit a foul shot.

Real ball handler point.

Spot Shooter.

Thats it, we have most of the pieces.

We need to move out Mo. T, Jaelen, and either Butler or James. I like Butler a lot, but can we carry 3 centers and give them minutes?

Keep Malik Rose. Larry needs some help in the locker room. He can be our mascot player, aka Junk yard dog.

Send Statbury to charm school.

Players also regress (see Q Rich)
"Man, who knows with this team." Aguirre.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
3/18/2006  10:12 PM
dmiles would be GREAT for us. i'm watching him again vs. the bucks - he plays defense and makes an impact. he blocks shots and his athleticism is out of this world. he has nice length and would be an IDEAL 3 man under lb.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/18/2006  11:17 PM
We don't need wither, just let Q, Woods and Lee play the position. LB said that this is what a good team needs:

"You've got to have three guards that can bring the ball up against the press. You have to have two small forwards one who can play big guard and one who can play power forward if you need it. And you have to have four guys who can guard the post."

We've got 4 guards with exceptional ball handling skills and quickness. We don't need another PG as long as the all continue to develop and play the way LB wants. I'm sure they all can. We're already starting to see that happen.

As far as a SF who can play big guard that's Q, Woods is the true SF and Lee is the SF/PF that we need. I think we're covered in that dept.

The bigs is where we have some work to do. JJ was supposed to be our shotblocking presence, but he's too fat to do his job well. If we replaced him with an athletic shotblocker/rebounder then we'd be set, Cuz I like what Curry, Frye and Butler can bring as they continue to develop.
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
3/18/2006  11:19 PM
What part of he is a tweener is not easy to understand? He has no real position, to small to play PF, and not skilled enough for SF. He is a 6th man. He will only start on a bad team. If he is your starter, you have a mismatched roster. Oh wait, he fits right in.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
3/19/2006  1:31 PM


(Superman theme) duh duh duh duh ......duh duh duh...duh duh duh duh duh ......DUH DUh DUH DUH !!!!!

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
dmiles or harrington?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy