[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Tim Legler made a good point
Author Thread
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/24/2006  11:33 PM
I like Rose off the bench. he's instant offense. QRich is a better defender and you have to think he's going to play better. they have to find a way to involve him in the offense and not just have him brick threes all night.
¿ △ ?
AUTOADVERT
joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/24/2006  11:52 PM
^I agree....using him on the bench balances out the strings....with him on the 1st there is way too much offense not enough D...with him off the bench he can initiate the offense with Craw and Nate scoring...that is a great role for him.
~You can't run from who you are.~
jaydh
Posts: 23150
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/16/2001
Member: #96
2/24/2006  11:58 PM
Posted by crzymdups:

I like Rose off the bench. he's instant offense. QRich is a better defender and you have to think he's going to play better. they have to find a way to involve him in the offense and not just have him brick threes all night.

one can only hope, he appears as inconsistent as JC, but worse. he never has big games like JC was capable of, and his "defense" isnt really so hot. i'd still prefer Q getting minutes over JC, but i'd really prefer Lee and Nate getting minutes over both JC&Q.

crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/24/2006  11:59 PM
Posted by jaydh:
Posted by crzymdups:

I like Rose off the bench. he's instant offense. QRich is a better defender and you have to think he's going to play better. they have to find a way to involve him in the offense and not just have him brick threes all night.

one can only hope, he appears as inconsistent as JC, but worse. he never has big games like JC was capable of, and his "defense" isnt really so hot. i'd still prefer Q getting minutes over JC, but i'd really prefer Lee and Nate getting minutes over both JC&Q.

Q has been playing a lot better lately and his effort on D is at least consistent. you can tell he hates playing with Marbury though, so you have to think he's gone this summer anyway.
¿ △ ?
joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/25/2006  12:07 AM
There are a few snipers available in the FA market and we have a spot, but who would whoever we sign play over? We'd need a SF/PF who can hit the 3 and there are not alot of those out there.
~You can't run from who you are.~
jaydh
Posts: 23150
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/16/2001
Member: #96
2/25/2006  12:10 AM
Posted by joec32033:

There are a few snipers available in the FA market and we have a spot, but who would whoever we sign play over? We'd need a SF/PF who can hit the 3 and there are not alot of those out there.

i disagree.. i think we need a defender/shotblocker that can rotate with frye&curry at the 4&5.
kevlofton
Posts: 20086
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/4/2002
Member: #317
USA
2/25/2006  12:12 AM
Posted by EnySpree:
Posted by SlimPack:

qyntel woods is a pretty good 3 pt shooter, but I guess becuase quentin plays better d, larry likes him better. also jalen rose is a decent 3 point shooter.

Why did Rose come off the bench? That almost made me rip my balls off....Jalen is getting healthy and I guess sooner or later he is gonna catch fire but when the **** is that gonna happen? He is missing wide open jumpshots.....no one is even running out to him......

Rose should be the starter period.

The best line-up the Knicks had out there was Frye, Rose, Curry, Francis, and Marbs.....when that line-up was out there....there was alot of hugging and smiling going on. Rose had threw a back doo pass to Marbs that Marbs was smiling saying good pass, Rose just hugging him and told him "I see you".

Frye, Rose, Curry, Francis, and Marbs.......<<<<that is the line-up that will start to win the Knicks some games......I bet the Knicks win the next game.

Rose can play 3 (PG, SG or SF) positions coming off the Bench. If you bring Q off the Bench he can only play 1 (SF)

Real Knick Fan
joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/25/2006  12:14 AM
Posted by jaydh:
Posted by joec32033:

There are a few snipers available in the FA market and we have a spot, but who would whoever we sign play over? We'd need a SF/PF who can hit the 3 and there are not alot of those out there.

i disagree.. i think we need a defender/shotblocker that can rotate with frye&curry at the 4&5.

I believe we have that in Butler if he ever got minutes....he is impressive in both the areas you mentioned. I personally don't think this team can handle any more youth because we don'e seem to have enough time to develop the youth we have.
~You can't run from who you are.~
Tim Legler made a good point

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy