[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Definately worth a read Bills Simmons at the All-Star game
Author Thread
Nalod
Posts: 71927
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
2/21/2006  9:29 AM
I saw a TV report on ESPN at one of the parties and there were pleny of white girls dresses as hookers.

That was not mean spirited humor. Cultural satire is different than racism.

I thought Layden was also kinda hated by blacks because he was white. Yeah he sucked, but it got pretty heated.

Isiah's issues are not racial. He has been given opportunities because he was a Black Superstar that might not have gone. First black owner (partial) of an NBA franchise. Yeah, thats Isiah. What he did or did not do with it speaks for itself. He was a head coach with no prior experience. Why, cuz he is Isiah, superstar, and champion! I don't think race was anything, but he got the gig. Got to buy a league. Never ran a league before. Got named GM. Never been that either.
Why do people dislike him? Lots of reasons. Maybe he is not all he presents himself to be. He got left off the olympic team not cuz of race, cuz he crossed Mike.

THe NBA allstar brings out many black entertainment stars and it all comes together. And yeah, its different.

Is Rashards demand to bring in 30 people racist?
Was Oak, whom is loved by many degraded? This man has created an image and enjoys it. We love Oak!

Racism works both ways. Equality has its rewards, and its prices.



AUTOADVERT
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
2/21/2006  10:09 AM


Humor is fine and dandy, but whenever white people make comments whether joking, or not, about black people, the issue of racism HAS to come into play, because of the realities of society.



Come on, when Dave Chappelle jokes about white people, I view it as funny.
maybe there are some white people who don't think so, but that's their problem. same thing with this guy, he's trying to be funny--that his schtick.

Racism is when a white college student from WVU tells Hilton Armstrong to "go back to Africa" or when a black person who has the intent of stealing a car, instead decides to tie up a white family, cut the throats of 2 and 4 year old girls and then set them on fire. The only logical explanation is there is a learned racical hatred to commit such an act.

I really do not think humor,for the MOST part---no matter race creed, color belongs in the same class. I'm Jewish. I took some heat at certain points in my younger years, and of course I have heard many jokes in my life. I try to look at the progressive maturing of our people as a whole instead of focusing on what was in the past. Nothing changes overnight, but we have made great strides and will continue to do so as a whole. Can't have a negative spin on everything.

As far as Isiah, I think that Scottie Layden took it much much harder. I think fans do discriminate, they hate losing
RIP Crushalot😞
joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/21/2006  10:12 AM

Racism is when a white college student from WVU tells Hilton Armstrong to "go back to Africa" or when a black person who has the intent of stealing a car, instead decides to tie up a white family, cut the throats of 2 and 4 year old girls and then set them on fire. The only logical explanation is there is a learned racical hatred to commit such an act.

The degrees of separation on both of those incidents is ridicoulous.....i may be just nit picking here, but how about the go back to Africa incident and A black guy calling a white guy a cracker?
~You can't run from who you are.~
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
2/21/2006  10:48 AM
Posted by joec32033:


Racism is when a white college student from WVU tells Hilton Armstrong to "go back to Africa" or when a black person who has the intent of stealing a car, instead decides to tie up a white family, cut the throats of 2 and 4 year old girls and then set them on fire. The only logical explanation is there is a learned racical hatred to commit such an act.

The degrees of separation on both of those incidents is ridicoulous.....i may be just nit picking here, but how about the go back to Africa incident and A black guy calling a white guy a cracker?

absolutely, no comparison in any terms, whatsoever. Just showing example of true racism--from one extreme--verbal--to the worst extreme-- violence. I dont think reasonable satirical humor needs to be bunched in. BUT let's not downplay verbal racism because it's still a serious subject which can lead to violence.
RIP Crushalot😞
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
2/21/2006  11:52 AM
There we go again with people hate IT cause he is black bs. Personally I almost feel that the only reason he gets any support is because he is black at this point. As in some folk who just assume people who hate on him hate on him cause he is black, so they have to stand up for one of their own. This is really total bs. I dunno how anybody who has a problem with black people could even be a basektball fan in the first place. I mean cmon, the NBA islike 99% black.

And btw, sayin that its ok for black people to make racist jokes but not ok for white people to do the same is pretty lame. If a joke is truly racist, then you know what, maybe nobody should be makin it. However most of the time its some innocent crap, like Shapelle makin fun of white people for some minor stereotype or in this case some white reporter who apparently dared to quoate a black reporter, which I guess he had no right to do because some other white dude 200 hundered years ago owned slaves.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
ultknicks524
Posts: 20267
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/8/2005
Member: #889
2/21/2006  12:26 PM
Posted by simrud:

And btw, sayin that its ok for black people to make racist jokes but not ok for white people to do the same is pretty lame. If a joke is truly racist, then you know what, maybe nobody should be makin it.


Agreed 100%. The double standard in this country is a joke.
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
2/21/2006  12:30 PM
Clearly we cannot have this conversation because the definitions of racism we have here are so far from each other.

The fact that some seem to see racism as any overt act that involves name calling, or something to that extent, based on one's skin color proves why this conversation is going no where.

The fact that some here think a white person can be racist towards a black person today, is another example of how far apart we are in understanding one another.

Also, unless you assume that racism can only be detected by some sort of name calling, or something so obvious that you cannot ignore it, then it's hard to believe that PART OF THE REASON that Isiah may receive such backlash is related to his skin color.

The fact that some hear are so vehemently defensive about this notion, and so focused on so-called "reverse racism" suggests that the definition of racism that I am using may very well be alive and well.

Simply because a white person "likes black people" or Hip Hop or Jazz, or any so-called "black thing" doesn't mean that they cannot be affected by racism. Racism (as I am defining it)affects our society in so many ways and creates fear, tension, hatred, privelage and inequities.

Here is a brief explanation of the difference in definitions of racism we appear to have:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism

...some commentators on racism use the idea more narrowly to refer to a system of oppression, as in institutional racism; a nexus of racist beliefs, whether explicit, tacit or unconscious; practices; organizations and institutions that combine to discriminate against and socially marginalize a class of people who share a common racial designation. For these commentators, "racism" as a term is usefully applied only to the dominant group in a society, because it is that group which has the means to oppress others. The backlash from weaker groups with what would be described, on a broader conception, as "racist" beliefs or attitudes are said to display "racial prejudice", but it is not theoretically appropriate to refer to them as "racist" or as displaying "racism". In short, this view limits racism to the effective repression of “racial” groups due to racial prejudice

[Edited by - PresIke on 02-21-2006 12:31 PM]

[Edited by - PresIke on 02-21-2006 12:32 PM]
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
2/21/2006  12:37 PM
Posted by BigSm00th:

Bro, he called it the black super bowl because thats what JA Adande calls it.

"L.A. Times columnist J.A. Adande e-mailed me just to say, "Have fun at the black Super Bowl.""

JA ADANDE is BLACK. Get over yourself.

I've already commented on why I believe it does not matter if a black writer said it first, and why the way in which Simmons made a joke about it, wondering "who knows what could happen at the black superbowl" smells of racism.

I mean why bother asking that qustion at all? Do we ask those types of questions about the "white superbowl," like "Ohhh..I wonder what could happen there!?"

I think it is clear that the reason he made that joke is to imply that somehow "the black superbowl" was going to be wild, and exotic, or something to that extent, which coming from the pen of a white person (not this black journalist who suppossedly coined the term "black superbowl") is quite reminiscent of how historically white people have refered to blacks as wild animals who have no self control.

Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/21/2006  12:45 PM
bill simmons is passing it off as humor. the thought of anything racist probably didn't even enter his head.

but when you bring up color or race, it effects everyone differently. so guy A will react to it differently to guy B. whatever the case, since it still is somewhat of a sensitive issue, espn probably shouldn't have put it up on the website or edited that portion out.

djsunyc's take: i personally don't care. i ain't white or black so it doesn't effect me personally. now if he called it the "brown superbowl", then i'd get all mahatma gandhi on their ass and like, ummmm, ask them to stop.
Nalod
Posts: 71927
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
2/21/2006  12:54 PM
I am amazed the degredation of women in many a rap video.

What about self exploitation?

Black Superbowl is about the celebration and events speak for themselves.

There are dumb asses in every race.

Can I say dental "grillz" is the stupidest excessive tacky thing I have ever seen without being racist? Just curious.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
2/21/2006  1:24 PM
---->The fact that some hear[here] are so vehemently defensive


I read this thread twice over. First off, nothing personal---
Look at your own postings--you were, by far, the most defensive person in this thread.

--->Simply because a white person "likes black people" or Hip Hop or Jazz


isnt that racist? That was as racist a comment as anything Bill Simmons wrote.


I like to look at things in a pro-active way. There is racism in the world and there will be for a long time. BUT I believe there has been a great deal of progressive movement towards equality for all races in this country--it's a major problem but it's also on the course to repair--
i can laugh with dave chappelle as much as I can laugh at that article, because I choose to. But a peson who is stagnated in their definition or learned beliefs of racism might not. I choose to be progressive, others choose to stagnate or even regress--thats their problem.
RIP Crushalot😞
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
2/21/2006  2:18 PM
Nothing personal either, and I wasn't necessarily pointing you out specifically but I suppose we have a different view of what defensive is. I simply stated an alternative point of view on the issue of racism, and what seemed to me as instead of thinking much about it, it seemed that some were a bit reactionary, and dismissive of this perspective without either knowledge of the view I presented or interest in considering this viewpoint.

I understand the popular view of what racism is defined as, and actually shared that view for many years until I had several eye opening discussions and experiences with those who presented this alternative view of racism.

I'm also not exactly clear about how my saying that when white people say "I like black people" or Hip-Hop or Jazz, or whatever that is racist in nature. My point was that when "liberal" white people often say "I have black friends" or "a black person said the same thing, why can't I say it" that this is seeded in the roots of our racist society.

For example when I was the only white teacher in a school of all non-white children, and all non-white teachers, was my being their an example of paternalism? Where white people think they can show non-whites what's better? I felt a HUGE sense of tension in my school from students and some faculty regarding who they saw me as. People have said the same thing about the Peace Corps, and the Iraq war as a form of Neo-Colonialism, where "We good white people are going to teach you non-whites how to be civilized." This issue exists in many urban schools and with social work as well, which is where, typically, white women work with non-white communities. You may have heard of the tension involving ACS in NYC where many people in poor, non-white communities see ACS as racist white people taking their children away.

Even if this isn't the only thing that's going on, the fact that the perception is there is all that matters. It's there because inequality still exists based on color, and we are a HIGHLY segregated society, even good-ol "liberal" NYC, where my students in the Bronx would refer to Manhattan as "Where all the white people live."


I think pretty much ALL white people and non-whites cannot help but be affected by or involved in supporting rascism, in their behavior, attitudes, workplace, etc. and not in a way that fits the view of racism that involves overt acts of racist behavior.

Sure, some things have improved, and their are people who have and are still working on progress, but I think we are in a more dire situation now because the issue is viewed by most white people, in particular as an issue that only appears in its overt name-calling form, when systematic, deep seeded psychological/societal and institutional racism are quite prevalant.

My way of being progressive is to challenge people, particularly white people, on this issue because I believe it is still a VERY powerful force that is maintaining a system of white supremacy (not in the way the KKK definies this, btw).

[Edited by - PresIke on 02-21-2006 2:19 PM]

[Edited by - PresIke on 02-21-2006 2:19 PM]

[Edited by - PresIke on 02-21-2006 2:26 PM]

[Edited by - PresIke on 02-21-2006 2:27 PM]
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
Definately worth a read Bills Simmons at the All-Star game

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy