do you see the IF there?? they are currently 1-1 i believe,
Holy smoke this is getting ridiculous!
The Knicks are 1 and 1 against the Suns by the grace of a skin-of-their-teeth triple overtime win.
If or no if, the Knicks as presently configured are not better than the Suns with or without Amare Stoudamire! Come on already! Are you serious?
but if the knicks go on to beat them again, then yes they are a better team than the suns, but not necessarily better than another team who plays differently.
It is not about another team that "plays differently", we are talking about performance vs. the entire NBA!
Second, We won't go on to beat them again this year because Western/Eastern conference teams only play 2 times a year, one game at either team's home court. So in order for the Knick's record against the Suns to be of any relevance at all, the Knicks would have to be good enough to get to the finals. The Knicks aren't even good enough to make the playoffs, no matter how well they do vs. the Suns.
Barring a disaster the Suns will be in the playoffs, so you tell me who is better.
It does not matter if one team sweeps another or what their records are vs. any single given team. That is a sidebar that means nothing, except maybe in the playoffs. What counts is your overall record!
Geez louise!
oohah
[Edited by - oohah on 01-04-2006 6:35 PM]