[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Now that we finally got rid of that lame Allan Houston...........
Author Thread
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
12/16/2005  3:21 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:

Last year, the team went 3 games above .500 just b/c of his presence alone. If he were healthy, the Knicks would have been in the playoffs. That says a lot.

Houston is missed alot. Acquiring made sense when you had Houston, and I agree with Isiah about that duo would probably be the best in the NBA and at least the east. But it didn't work out. Craw was an insurance policy. The guy has a boatload of talent but a limited amount of intelligence. I personally believe that this team would be close to 500 or above if someone else was coaching this team. I won't debate that Larry Brown is a legend but some of the things this guy has done with the Knicks has been strange. Like his whole rotation issue, playing guys who may not be apt to playing at a decent level anymore, many teams have veterans that they know shouldn't be allow on the BB court, the difference is that other teams don't play those guys win or lose. Brown plays everyone except for Lee (still wondering what the young kid to Brown).
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
AUTOADVERT
Now that we finally got rid of that lame Allan Houston...........

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy