knowledgeable management knows that if there is a possibility you are going to be horrible you dont trade away a #1 pick with no lottery protection.
So if we miss the playoffs, would you really prefer a pick around #8 in a weaker draft over Curry? Curry's playing hard on both ends of the court and has upside that you probably won't get from a #8 pick. I would not have let the lottery protection on the pick be the deal breaker.
When you give a guy thats 30 a 5 year deal for the max you can offer you arent rebuilding.
So you aren't rebuilding if you make a lot of good decisions and one bad one? To rebuild successfully, you DON'T have to get 100% of your decisions correct. That's a concept few understand. The Grizzlies have rebuilt quite nicely and they just gave a much bigger max deal that they could offer to a mediocre 28 year old with no upside (BC).
Look how our offseason aquisitions have performed so far.
What's that supposed to mean? I'm happy with how Frye, Lee, Nate, and Curry are playing. Curry looks very promising on both ends of the court. His #s are a little deflated because he played poorly with the calf injury in his last 2 games.
[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 11-25-2005 08:31 AM]