If I were the GM for the Bucks, yeah, BOGUT all the way.

Frye has played well, but so has Bogut. Both are fresh out of college, and expecting them to dominate games against NBA vets right away is unrealistic.

GMs select players thinking long-term (for the most part). I dunno if Darko will be a superstar in the future, but Dumars picked him over Carmelo, Wade, or Bosh. I think Bogut will be a better player than Darko. He's got the skill sets & heart to be a superstar C.

Posted by crzymdups:

A lot can change throughout the season. Channing, Chris Paul, Charlie V, every rookie is going to go through ups and downs. It's ridiculous to judge the draft right now.

Who said we should judge the draft right now? AGAIN, the question was what would you have done as GM on draft night.

I think Frye is better than Bogut, but voted bogut.

Frye is the real deal...as is Curry. We made out like bandits this off season. In two years we are a pretty interesting team.

Can't wait till we play the sixers saturday!

Posted by rvhoss:

Frye is the real deal...as is Curry. We made out like bandits this off season. In two years we are a pretty interesting team.

Can't wait till we play the sixers saturday!

wait a sec. I thought we would compete THIS year. Are you changing your mind after just 10 games? Dont you BELIEVE???????

Nope, we are competing this year, or had you not noticed.

OH...you just were feeling bored and figured you would jump on an RV post.

No worries. punk.

Posted by fishmike:

Posted by rvhoss:

Frye is the real deal...as is Curry. We made out like bandits this off season. In two years we are a pretty interesting team.

Can't wait till we play the sixers saturday!

wait a sec. I thought we would compete THIS year. Are you changing your mind after just 10 games? Dont you BELIEVE???????

[Edited by - rvhoss on 11-22-2005 1:16 PM]

Nothing wrong with changing your opinion. I know mine changes from time to time. For example, I wasn't really thrilled about getting Curry when we first got him, but I'm looking at the progress he is making and it's been refreshing, so now I am pretty excited.

I guess it's better than some of the stubborness I witness on the boards.

Nope, I think second round of playoffs this year and 50 wins.
I think (even with Philly playing so well) that we should win the Atlantic and secure the number 3 seed.

We are getting better and better with each game. The losses proved to be actual loses to bona fide teams (washington, GS twice).

With the team getting better with each possession, quarter, game I see us being better than a .500 team.

What good are predictions if you can't be wrong, so 50 wins may be a little bit much, but with all the 0-9 (or is it 7) bulls comparisons, and seeing how many games they won last year, and this year's team clearly better than last year's bulls team (once again IMHO) I'd say that 50 wins and second round is a distinct possibility.

And yes, i would call you punk to your face.
You don't scare me. punk.
Now go dry hump islesfan and stick to the subject of the thread. punk!

you wanna come at me, start a new thread, otherwise, go about your business, there is nothing to see here.

ps. punk.

[Edited by - rvhoss on 11-22-2005 1:33 PM]

Which I would also like to point out, I proposed that trade a month or 2 before it was brought to the medias attention. Hence, I am a major influence on the media of NY and am the next Howard Stern.