[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

marbury asks to be the SG...and brown says NO (article)
Author Thread
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
11/18/2005  1:42 AM
Doubt it.

Marbury's game changes so drastically at SG. He's a different player. More comfortable.

DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
AUTOADVERT
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
11/18/2005  1:44 AM
Posted by bobs3304:

Doubt it.

Marbury's game changes so drastically at SG. He's a different player. More comfortable.

i agree...but this is one major question about the transition there...can a guy, who, IN HIS ENTIRE LIFE, has played with the ball in his hands suddenly play off the ball and wait for it? if he can, then the transition will be easy.
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
11/18/2005  1:47 AM
http://www.newsday.com/sports/basketball/knicks/ny-spknix1118,0,1289178.story?coll=ny-sports-headlines
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
11/18/2005  1:48 AM
Posted by djsunyc:


i agree...but this is one major question about the transition there...can a guy, who, IN HIS ENTIRE LIFE, has played with the ball in his hands suddenly play off the ball and wait for it? if he can, then the transition will be easy.


Yes....easily.

Watch the 1st half of the GS game last week?

We were FLOWING with Steph at SG...
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

11/18/2005  2:01 AM
Posted by bobs3304:

Doubt it.

Marbury's game changes so drastically at SG. He's a different player. More comfortable.

We'll see. remember a couple of weeks ago when the question arose of which position would Steph play Steph's response was to shrug his shoulders and reply "I'm a PG".

Problem is, if moved to the 2 and we still lose his position will just become another point of contention, debate and blame between Steph and Brown. For instance, lets assume Larry brings in average Joe PG who gives us 10/5 nightly, with Steph giving us 18/4 at SG, for a total of 28/9. If we're still losing the argument will be made that the Steph/JC backcourt of 04/05 was giving us closer to 39/12, and we will be told that was better production.

And why would I expect only 18 ppg from Steph? Two reasons, a purportedly better balanced team now, and less opportunities to pick his spots through ball domination and setup screens. But regardless, up his ppg to 23 if you like, the same overall dropoff in production still applies, and if losing is a way of life the complaints will remain, just with a new flavor.
PhilinLA
Posts: 24941
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/12/2004
Member: #696
11/18/2005  2:10 AM
It's no big deal. Steph will adjust and have a slightly different version of his game to show for it.
http://amonthhoffundays.blogspot.com/ We got a ringer.
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
11/18/2005  2:33 AM
Actually Blue, at SG I think Steph can easily put up 20-25 a night....within the flow of the offense (and that's whats most important).

At PG, his stats are sometimes considered "padded" b/c his assists in particular aren't in the flow of the offense. Marbury can't freelance like Nash and other PG's. If you watch him, it seems as if every play looks like a set play, even when maybe only half actually are.

Marbury's not really "comfortable" at PG. What I mean by that is that it's not his natural position, which he even remarked himself. Atleast before he was a SG playing PG, but now that LB is in town, there's no way Steph will dominate the offense like that. So the ony way to solve that --- move him to SG.
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
attaboy2005
Posts: 20524
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/24/2005
Member: #992

11/18/2005  2:35 AM
Steph is a PG, he avgs more than 8 APG, that is PG stats, all he wants to do it win and he feels he needs to score for this team to win and the Knicks do need his scoring along with Crawford, Q, Curry, Frye, Lee, Taylor, etc.
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
11/18/2005  2:42 AM
Posted by attaboy2005:

Steph is a PG, he avgs more than 8 APG, that is PG stats, all he wants to do it win and he feels he needs to score for this team to win and the Knicks do need his scoring along with Crawford, Q, Curry, Frye, Lee, Taylor, etc.

Glad you like to see beyond your nose as my mom used to say.



The problem with Steph has never been his stats, it's been the way he plays the point. He dominates the ball, and his assists look more like set plays than plays occuring in the flow of the offense.

To believe Steph is a PG is to believe Steph is a superstar.

B/c if you believe he's a PG, you believe in the way he PLAYS the point.

I regard Steph's talent more than I do his 8 assists per game or his "franchise PG" status.

And it's his talent as a scorer that will help this team in the long run...to force him to stray from his natural talent will, and has been, a mistake.

DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
11/18/2005  2:56 AM
http://www.nypost.com/sports/knicks/31478.htm
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

11/18/2005  3:02 AM
Posted by bobs3304:

Actually Blue, at SG I think Steph can easily put up 20-25 a night....within the flow of the offense (and that's whats most important).

At PG, his stats are sometimes considered "padded" b/c his assists in particular aren't in the flow of the offense. Marbury can't freelance like Nash and other PG's. If you watch him, it seems as if every play looks like a set play, even when maybe only half actually are.

Marbury's not really "comfortable" at PG. What I mean by that is that it's not his natural position, which he even remarked himself. Atleast before he was a SG playing PG, but now that LB is in town, there's no way Steph will dominate the offense like that. So the ony way to solve that --- move him to SG.

Well I agree that the lesser of evils would be with Steph at SG.

(As an aside, the Steph-love was so strong on realgm that I was immediately branded a hater the moment I proposed that a year or so ago there. That was before I felt in the the team mutinied around him and abandoned him after his "I'm the best" comments. Then I became a bona-fide hater, even in my own mind. But boy that hype from fans that Steph really was the best PG so strong just a year ago.)

But the point is that moving steph to SG is no guarantor of success, and I think the larger issue is Steph not getting the whole objective here, of running a structured offense designed for good looks for everyone, good decisions and winning ball. LB was on the money that Steph's best instincts have gotten no one anywhere. And while Steph scorched Kobe for 45 at their prior outing, it still resulted in a 10 point knick loss. Same result, but Steph got to feel better about it cause HE looked good. Steph looking good is not what LB is about.

The other point Larry was making is that 4 points from Steph was not in LB's plans. He wanted Steph to stay aggressive and be taking twice as many shot attempts as he did. He also said he put many more plays in for Steph than he ever did for Billups. Steph needs to use his offense as one tool in his kit to dissecting a defense. When Steph stops scoring that does not serve the offense either. The objective is to make Steph aggressive in a smart way, not in some personal showdown machismo way. Aggressive like a brain surgeon against cancer, not like a lumberjack in some mano-a-mano extreme sports competition.

So I think Steph needs to give LBs methods some time. I understand Steph is being intellectually challenged by this, to grasp the concept of getting his within a structured offense, to keep others involved, and to take a team first approach. Steph needs to develop a new instinct and intuition about all this and thats going to take time. But I think that all applies to either position on the court.

Smart ball is smart ball, and I bet you that after having served under Brown, Rip and Billups could switch positions on the floor tomorrow and adjust quicker to their new positions than Marbury. The reason being that they intellectually understand the game and roles each position serves. They'd understand what was expected of them and just need time for it to feel natural to them, to get into their bodies like a habit.

But I don't think Steph has that same intellectual understanding of team concept and roles yet. Nor does he seem to want to. Best I can tell he just wants to be put somewhere on the floor where he doesn't have to think and doesn't have to get it. Steph just wants to be Steph.



[Edited by - BlueSeats on 11-18-2005 03:24 AM]
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
11/18/2005  3:22 AM
I get what you mean. But I'm trying to be a realist here. Trading Steph would be HARD, so sometimes you have to work with what you got.

I'm not even THAT concerned about Marbury, b/c I don't think he makes or breaks the Knicks. People who view him as having that ability therefore also view him as a superstar (whether they intend to or not -- both the haters and jockers). I view him more as a piece of the puzzle...and not exactly the key that opens the door. So he doesn't necessarily need his entire game to be scrutinized and adapted. Of course LB can/should make appropriate fine tuning to his game, but nothing overboard. Marbury can't be molded into something he's not. This situation is not the same as in Detroit. Marbury is not the same player as Billups. He's just a big piece to the puzzle, that's how I look at it.

I mean, Marbury doesn't have THAT much influence over any team. B/c if he was running the point like he has his entire career, playing out of position and the whole bit, if you surrounded him with Shaq and Lebron we'd still win hands down b/c the talent level would overcome anything bad Steph could do.

I think we just have to stop making assumptions and give it some time. Granted, I still stick with my whole "move Marbury to SG" schtick, and obviously he does too. I think it has less to do with him being lazy and wanting to "get his", and more to do with him filling a role that's comforms to his natural talent as a scorer.

Would LB make AI a pass-first PG?

No.....

So sooner or later he'll probly realize that. Marbury is probly closer to the mold of AI than he is Billups. But of course, he's a completely unique player and can't be "compared" to either really. So right now Marbury is a wild card. No telling what will happen...

[Edited by - bobs3304 on 11-18-2005 03:28 AM]
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

11/18/2005  3:44 AM
Posted by bobs3304:
So sooner or later he'll probly realize that. Marbury is probly closer to the mold of AI than he is Billups.

I understand what you are saying, and I agree that LB's style of PG is a waste of talent for guys like Marbury and Iverson. At the same time many of us feel that Marbury has shown some of his best flashes at PG under brown and even Isiah said he thinks Steph has shown some of his best PG play of his career this year. So, if we need an effective PG, Steph could be that, if he'd put his ego in the backseat.

Having said that, there are certain guys in the league that are supremely talented but hard to situate properly. Steph, Baron, Iverson, Francis, Walker, Perhaps Al Harrington, etc are guys that come to mind. All of them possess skills that on first blush make them versatile enough to lay two positions, but at the same time they seem to master neither, and something in their approach always seems a little off wherever you put them. and most seem a bit headstrong too boot.

They are quintessentially "tweeners", and I'm not really comfortable with any of them in primary positions of power for my imaginary teams.

But yeah, to your larger point, I don't really disagree. All I'm saying is that floor position aside, Larry and Steph have some work to do and 8 games in is a little early for crossroads, power struggles and demands - from either of them. But between the two, Steph is the guy who needs to settle down and dig in and reinvent himself, and it starts with his head.
Knicksfan
Posts: 33542
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
11/18/2005  8:02 AM
Everything that is happening just proves how great of a coach is Larry Brown. He is transforming every piece we have here into a good one for a winning team. The first games of the season still were Training Camp. The next ones we have started to show a true identity as a defensive team that has many scoring options rather than just a one-man show.

Marbury's reaction is normal and after this I admire him even more. He has tried to become the point guard Larry Brown wants him to be and he has done it many games. But for a guy that gets 20 pts. and 8 assists almost every game without trying hard its normnal that he feels he's not helping the team after a 4 pts., 10 assists game. But this is just part of the growing pains and if he can keep trying instead of giving up, he will become a greater player than the one he could be at SG. If he buys into Brown's system, he will become a true leader and will finally be the winner he wants to be. This is just a normal consequence of a drastic change in Marbury's game. Even Isiah was right when he recently said that if Marbury had had a real coach in the early part of his career this would'nt even be an issue.

Im rooting hard for Marbury not to give up and instead become the player Larry sees he can be. Marbury has the talent to be a playmaker, as we have seen already. There is no question he can be a real point guard. Now, its obvious that Marb is a very good scorer, right? What Brown wants him to do is get his players involved in the game early rather than going to Marbury's one man show that will get him 20-30 pts. but another loss and unhappy teammates. Because of Marbury's good scoring, Larry wants him to be that scorer when it really matters the most that your best player scores, with the game on the line. That, IMO, is what Marbury has to learn how to do instead of moving to SG. Larry even mentioned that he would want Marbury to shoot 15-20 shots, and thats ok for Marb. But he wants them to be good shots where the whole team is involved.

Marbury must not forget of Chauncey Billups. His game is very similar to Marbs', he just bought into Brown's system and now is a playmaker as well as the go-to guy with the game on the line. Thats what Marbury has to do. Brown said they ran 25 pick-n-rolls where Marb was supposed to score most of the time but Marbury couldn't get the play right. Do it Marb and you will get your points. Just don't give up on this experiment because its really going to be a career-turining one for you.

I really wondered if Marbury was talented enough to become the player wants him to be, and I have been amazingly surprised that he can. He has been one of our best defenders. He has been the play-maker, getting the best of his players. And we know he can score. If Marbury doesn't give up and gets to integrate his scoring ability to the type of game he has been playing under Brown, he may finally become what he has said to be: the best point guard in the game...
Knicks_Fan
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
11/18/2005  8:35 AM
Posted by bobs3304:

I get what you mean. But I'm trying to be a realist here. Trading Steph would be HARD, so sometimes you have to work with what you got.

I'm not even THAT concerned about Marbury, b/c I don't think he makes or breaks the Knicks. People who view him as having that ability therefore also view him as a superstar (whether they intend to or not -- both the haters and jockers). I view him more as a piece of the puzzle...and not exactly the key that opens the door. So he doesn't necessarily need his entire game to be scrutinized and adapted. Of course LB can/should make appropriate fine tuning to his game, but nothing overboard. Marbury can't be molded into something he's not. This situation is not the same as in Detroit. Marbury is not the same player as Billups. He's just a big piece to the puzzle, that's how I look at it.

I mean, Marbury doesn't have THAT much influence over any team. B/c if he was running the point like he has his entire career, playing out of position and the whole bit, if you surrounded him with Shaq and Lebron we'd still win hands down b/c the talent level would overcome anything bad Steph could do.

I think we just have to stop making assumptions and give it some time. Granted, I still stick with my whole "move Marbury to SG" schtick, and obviously he does too. I think it has less to do with him being lazy and wanting to "get his", and more to do with him filling a role that's comforms to his natural talent as a scorer.

Would LB make AI a pass-first PG?

No.....

So sooner or later he'll probly realize that. Marbury is probly closer to the mold of AI than he is Billups. But of course, he's a completely unique player and can't be "compared" to either really. So right now Marbury is a wild card. No telling what will happen...

[Edited by - bobs3304 on 11-18-2005 03:28 AM]


here's one little point tho...i think we can all see that steph is not a true leader. there may be one in our midst...frye? craw? who knows but as long as steph is around, that leader will have a tough time emerging. so hopefully we all make this a smooth transition and that steph gets to the SG and goes nuts.
efw
Posts: 20668
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/10/2005
Member: #1002

11/18/2005  8:47 AM
Good point blueseats.

I think the answer here really lies with Steph. He can help us much more as a point guard and exploit the matchups that he has for his entire career.

The most important part for Steph is to realize the balance and to take over in the 4th quarter. We don't need him to pass if we're down by 10 in the 4th. He should drive and make the bucket or get fouled. He can do it whenever he wants. I don't understand what's so difficult. Play more like a true point guard for three quarters and then take the leash off.

what's the problem dummy?
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
11/18/2005  9:00 AM
Steph is a PG. He's not AI. He will help us best at PG, BUT he has to find that sweet spot in the offense, between being aggressive and running the team the right way. Don't forget that the Media couldn't wait for this to happen and has been asking probing questions in order to get a response like this from Steph.

Look steph was frustrated at LOSING. People want to make it oiut that he's just selfish, but he kept saying that he wants to WIN. If the Knicks win that game nobody has anything negative to say. They'd be saying how Steph really played a great PURE PG role and the team won because of that. Its really all BS. This thing will die down and once the team starts to win a few games we won't hear about it anymore.

Steph just needs to suck it up and find a way to make it work in this offense and LB who said it was his job to find ways for Steph to be able to score, needs to do just that. Give the kid a little freedom once in a while to do his thing and help the team score when we hit a drought like in L.A.
Nalod
Posts: 71909
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
11/18/2005  9:04 AM
A great point guard knows when he needs to take charge. Marbs is not a that kind of leader, but that does not mean he can't learn it.

He is confused and NOT all alone now!

He needs to learn when to be agressive and when to make it flow.

What he might not like is all the pressure that comes with it.

But at his wages, thats the deal!

joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
11/18/2005  9:10 AM
there are 2 things I don't like with that article posted at the begining of this thread:

1-Steph Basically giving up then shatting on his teammates efforts (that line about why Frye scored 21)....seriously, what great PG says "well, he mady have scored 30 points, but remember I passed him the ball!", instead of saying the rookie had a great game and he looks very talented..

2-Brown shatting on Crawford-I think that line about not having a dependable PG and creating one out of thin air was just stupid. Craw has been playing GREAT ball doing exactly what LB asks and he gets the shaft like that...totally uncool, Larry.

When Steph came out of college I absolutely loved him, my favorite player behind Patrick. Then when he got traded to the Nets and had that immortal line of actually equating the Swamplands....I mean Meadowlands with the Garden and saying the Nets were his "home" I hated his guts, he spoke out his arse. The problem is Steph makes it hard to like him (especially in the media).

I have been calling for Steph to play the 2 since the playoff series against the Nets 2 years ago. He is our best scorer, and I think for us he would be more effective there. We don't have an Amare and a Marion who never needs a play called for him, and a bunch of "role players" (Joe Johnson before his development excluded). We have an offense where he should be the top scorer OR he needs to fluently run this offense. It may be too early to totally expect him to fluently run an offense, but moving him to the 2 would almost insure he would never learn to run an offense. That's the catch 22.
~You can't run from who you are.~
WOODMANnYk
Posts: 22417
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2002
Member: #529
USA
11/18/2005  9:21 AM
Gotta tell all of you this:

I don't know how much truth to this but i worked for an investment company in the city

My head trader speaks to another head trader from a different company daily..
The head trader he speaks to lives 2 houses away from Marbury's and Isiah's home..

The head trader's wife and Marbury's wife tend to mingle together with their kids in the park..
My head trader told me that the head trader told him Marbury's wife is unhappy about their current situation. She says "My husband isn't happy and doesn't think the coach likes him..

She also said "they don't want to move from their current location but might have to relocate soon, possibly in the west coast which is an indication that Marbury will be traded somehow during the season..
little hint: the head trader that lives near marbury works for GOldman Sach & Co.

This is what i was told from my head trader.. We just gonna have to see



[Edited by - WOODMANNyK on 11-18-2005 09:33 AM]
The Future. GO KNICKS!
marbury asks to be the SG...and brown says NO (article)

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy