[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Why don't we start Ariza & Frye ???
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
11/14/2005  3:22 PM
good point, not too concerned with who starts, more with who finishes.
all kool aid all the time.
AUTOADVERT
trueknicksfan
Posts: 20049
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/13/2004
Member: #646
11/14/2005  5:11 PM
good points, I feel as long as our young talents get minutes it will be fine but when u have two guyz like frye and ariza plus people like nate, lee & crawford all on the bench there is so little room for every1 to get their share of play if u dont make a move at the starting 5. Were looking to make the playoffs and hopefully be somewhat successful... Barnes will make a better bench player than starter as so will AD. Hopefully Larry will make the move when the time is right...
VDesai
Posts: 43299
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
11/14/2005  5:16 PM
At this point, Ariza and Frye are so much better than their counterparts at SF and PF respectively that it doesn't make any sense that the aren't getting the majority of the minutes or the starting roles. I can sort of understand the reasoning of using Ariza as a spark, but he's too much of an asset out there to save just to use as a "spark."
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
11/14/2005  5:30 PM
At this point, Ariza and Frye are so much better than their counterparts at SF and PF respectively that it doesn't make any sense that the aren't getting the majority of the minutes or the starting roles. I can sort of understand the reasoning of using Ariza as a spark, but he's too much of an asset out there to save just to use as a "spark."

^^^
Right on the money.

oohah
Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
boomann
Posts: 20685
Alba Posts: 26
Joined: 6/29/2005
Member: #938
USA
11/14/2005  5:41 PM
At this point, Ariza and Frye are so much better than their counterparts at SF and PF respectively that it doesn't make any sense that the aren't getting the majority of the minutes or the starting roles. I can sort of understand the reasoning of using Ariza as a spark, but he's too much of an asset out there to save just to use as a "spark."

But larry brown is a good coach there has to be a reason for this madness
"We need another shot blocker and we need more girth in the middle, once that happens we have a chance to be a pretty decent team" Isiah on draft night
Knight
Posts: 22775
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/21/2005
Member: #968
11/14/2005  5:43 PM
^Yes, as Channing said yesterday, he is a genius.
"He only went to Georgia Tech for one year, and that's an engineering school." -LB
trueknicksfan
Posts: 20049
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/13/2004
Member: #646
11/14/2005  11:42 PM
i guess genius's tend to overlook the obvious !
time will tell if larry can make them play like that the majoirty of the nights with that hustle we'd have a fun season to watch

[Edited by - trueknicksfan on 11-14-2005 11:45 PM]
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
11/15/2005  12:02 AM
I'm clueless.
terminalone
Posts: 20054
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/23/2005
Member: #917
USA
11/15/2005  12:09 AM
I'm more concerned with who we finish the games with. The starting lineup will works itself out with in the next few weeks. i just dont understand why we cant have Curry and Frye on the florr for extended minutes together.
What happened to Travis Knight? What a waste!
martin
Posts: 79037
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/15/2005  8:59 AM
Posted by terminalone:

I'm more concerned with who we finish the games with. The starting lineup will works itself out with in the next few weeks. i just dont understand why we cant have Curry and Frye on the florr for extended minutes together.

cause they both foul too much?

Acutally I think Brown is putting AD and Rose with Frye/Curry on the floor for defensive purposes. Each of those guys directs the young player and tells them where to be. Teachers. Frye and Curry have too much to learn, although I would say Frye is ahead of the curve for a rook.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
11/15/2005  10:05 AM
Posted by boomann:
At this point, Ariza and Frye are so much better than their counterparts at SF and PF respectively that it doesn't make any sense that the aren't getting the majority of the minutes or the starting roles. I can sort of understand the reasoning of using Ariza as a spark, but he's too much of an asset out there to save just to use as a "spark."

But larry brown is a good coach there has to be a reason for this madness


This is LB's biggest flaw...has been for years. Instead of making the rookies earn their spots he makes the veteran's lose their spots....their is a HUGE difference in that.
~You can't run from who you are.~
Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
Why don't we start Ariza & Frye ???
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy