[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Knicks' Inactive Players for Opener
Author Thread
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
11/1/2005  8:59 AM
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by Panos:
Posted by diderotn:

Well, why not? if the league is allowing a team to have 15 players, we should take advantage of that.


Because inactive players --> don't play! Even 11th and 12th players don't see the floor much.
Better to trade some of our chips for a single good player that can make an impact.

But you can change the inactive list for each and every game.
Is that a new rule? Last season, I thought you had to be on the list for min of 5 games.
AUTOADVERT
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
11/1/2005  9:01 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by Panos:
Posted by diderotn:

Well, why not? if the league is allowing a team to have 15 players, we should take advantage of that.


Because inactive players --> don't play! Even 11th and 12th players don't see the floor much.
Better to trade some of our chips for a single good player that can make an impact.

But you can change the inactive list for each and every game.
Is that a new rule? Last season, I thought you had to be on the list for min of 5 games.


yes- its now an inactive list (like hockey) vs the previous 'injury' list.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
11/1/2005  9:05 AM
Posted by franco12:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by Panos:
Posted by diderotn:

Well, why not? if the league is allowing a team to have 15 players, we should take advantage of that.


Because inactive players --> don't play! Even 11th and 12th players don't see the floor much.
Better to trade some of our chips for a single good player that can make an impact.

But you can change the inactive list for each and every game.
Is that a new rule? Last season, I thought you had to be on the list for min of 5 games.


yes- its now an inactive list (like hockey) vs the previous 'injury' list.

Oh, then this isn't as big a deal, although I assume Larry wants some balance and stability and isn't going to change the inactive list for every game.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
11/1/2005  10:31 AM
Posted by bobs3304:

Why in the WORLD would you bench Lee?


In case you haven't noticed, Lee hasn't been getting any pre season minutes that past few games. The kid plays tough and has some decent skills, but he still has a way to go. Like another poster said, he'll eventually be a good player, but for now, don't be surprised to see him sit on that inactive list for the first part of the season. I expect most of the PF minutes to go to Frye and Davis anyway.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Knicks' Inactive Players for Opener

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy