[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Kurt Thomas
Author Thread
tapseer
Posts: 20204
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/13/2004
Member: #698
10/28/2005  12:01 AM
I don't see how a PG who averaged 20+ pts shooting 46% from the field is a scrub? For all the ball hogging and shoot first mentality, he still averaged 8 apg. F**k KT, I'm much happier with the rookies Frye and Lee. I'm positive once Frye and Lee get the hang of the NBA, they'll contribute much more than KT has given us over the years. As far as Marbury bashing goes, it appears to be most people's opinion that Marbury is the WORST PG in the leaugue. I'll take him every time over anybody and I hope that IT and LB don't let him go.

[Edited by - tapseer on 10-28-2005 12:04 AM]
AUTOADVERT
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
10/28/2005  12:08 AM
It's not what's on paper that counts...

It's how it translates in games.

If 8 assists means everyone is getting involved, then awesome.

But if 8 assists means Steph making a single pass to someone with the shotclock winding down....or just 1 pass-shot.....then it's not telling of the whole story (like passes & shots per possession)
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
10/28/2005  12:33 AM
Bla bla bla, is KT on the decline, yes. But was KT a true Knicks and deserves our respect? YES! Who cares what they say. He was a very good player for us and it was too bad he was forced to be our best frontcourt player, and at most times last year, second best on the team. Not his fault. He did his best and gave it his all. That's all you can ask for. It's in the past. Move on.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Ira
Posts: 24692
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
10/28/2005  3:48 AM
Thomas was a good player for us. The trade was necessary because he was getting older and we needed to get younger. He's also right about Marbury wanting to shoot first.
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
10/28/2005  7:46 AM
Screw Kurt....he will be saying the same exact thing about Nash once the Suns trade his slow rear end.

Don't y'all remember the couple of time Lenny gave Kurt the game winning pick and roll play?


The true Knickabocker..........
jazz74
Posts: 22318
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/24/2002
Member: #371
10/28/2005  8:21 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by Bonn1997:

I'd rather have David Lee or Channing Frye than Kurt

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 10-27-2005 10:49 PM]


slow your row, slow your row. so already you are penciling lee and channing avg. 10rpg+? now i rather have channing and lee and think they will have a brighter future than kurt's career. but give props when needed. kurt was one of the few guys to avg. a double- double last season. true, he has slowed down greatly the past two years but to say channing and lee are better than kurt before they even played one regular season game is ludicrous.

Channing is already better than Kurt.
I think Lee is too because he's so versatile and athletic. The only think Kurt can do on offense is shoot jump shots and the only thing he can do on defense is get beaten by opponents' speed. Kurt's a better rebounder than either of those two Knicks but that's the only edge he has.


jazz74
Posts: 22318
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/24/2002
Member: #371
10/28/2005  8:25 AM
slow your row, slow your row. so already you are penciling lee and channing avg. 10rpg+? now i rather have channing and lee and think they will have a brighter future than kurt's career. but give props when needed. kurt was one of the few guys to avg. a double- double last season. he had range and gave his all to the team ever since he was a knick. true, he has slowed down greatly the past two years but to say channing and lee are better than kurt before they even played one regular season game is ludicrous.

[/quote]
I think Lee is too because he's so versatile and athletic. The only think Kurt can do on offense is shoot jump shots and the only thing he can do on defense is get beaten by opponents' speed. Kurt's a better rebounder than either of those two Knicks but that's the only edge he has.


[/quote]



[/quote]


franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
10/28/2005  8:41 AM
the thing you have to admire about kurt is that he doesn't have a lot of talent, but he goes out and hustles. He's not fast or a great jumper, but he has terrific positioning and grabs boards.

and for everyone downplaying his 15fter, unless Frye is able to hit those this season, I worry we're going to be crying for someone who can reliably hit the outside shot during games.

As for the injury prone thing- early on his ankles gave him problems- I worry at some point here he could possibly go down for an extended period of time, just cause he's had such a long streak.

bernard
Posts: 20730
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/17/2003
Member: #475
10/28/2005  8:53 AM
Classless thing to say. I'm surprised and disappointed. It's also just not true.

Marbury is not the passer that Nash or Kidd is. I'll grant that. He just doesn't have that exceptional feel for the game, vision, etc. No shame in that. Only two guys currently in the NBA have it. That doesn't make him selfish. IMO, Marbs was very unselfish last year, perhaps to a fault. He worked very hard to keep others involved, especially in the first half of games. Then, when needed, he'd take over for stretches. In fact, one of my main criticisms of his play last year would be that he was too passive come crunch time. Too often it was Craw or someone else worse than Marbury handling and shooting on our key possessions, when Marbs was clearly our best option.

How does it help Kurtie to take shots at Marbury now? Stupid thing to say.
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
10/28/2005  9:04 AM
Look...how many games has Kurt helped the Knicks win???? the last 4 years, how many times has Kurt helped the Knicks with getting into the playoffs??? I am happy for Kurt, but we will not miss him.
Posted by franco12:

the thing you have to admire about kurt is that he doesn't have a lot of talent, but he goes out and hustles. He's not fast or a great jumper, but he has terrific positioning and grabs boards.

and for everyone downplaying his 15fter, unless Frye is able to hit those this season, I worry we're going to be crying for someone who can reliably hit the outside shot during games.

As for the injury prone thing- early on his ankles gave him problems- I worry at some point here he could possibly go down for an extended period of time, just cause he's had such a long streak.


The true Knickabocker..........
Nalod
Posts: 71906
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
10/28/2005  9:15 AM
Posted by bobs3304:

It's not what's on paper that counts...

It's how it translates in games.

If 8 assists means everyone is getting involved, then awesome.

But if 8 assists means Steph making a single pass to someone with the shotclock winding down....or just 1 pass-shot.....then it's not telling of the whole story (like passes & shots per possession)


Good point, on paper!

Why the sensitivity about steph? THis guy does so many things so well. He is not a Kidd/Nash type point! He is a much better scorer than those two. Steph's 8 assists are largely because he has the ball most of the game. They are not quality assists.

I think Larry will look to emphazise his strengths instead of making him a "playmaker". Actually I don't think, this is what he is saying to the media. If he was a Kidd/Nash, why would he want to move him to the 2 at times? Steph does see the fast break and open up the floor. He is going to the basket unless he is stopped, and then he dumps. Not a thing wrong with that.

There are just a few talents like steph in the league. Likewise there are even fewer elite playmakers.

Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
10/28/2005  10:34 AM
Kobe has the ball most of the game too, and has NEVER avg 8 assists.

Allen Iverson has also NEVER done it but has come close in 2 seasons.

Michael Jordan avged 8 assists once in his career.

Walt Clyde Frazier NEVER avged 8 assists a game.


If it was as easy as you and others would like to make it seem, wouldn't more poeple do it? Certainly there are others who have the ball often. FYI, all of the examples I used are Hall of Fame players btw, so I would say no, even if you have the ball in your hand alot, it is not easy to pick up 8 assists and Steph has a career avg of 8 not one or two seasons, thats every damn season except his rookie season (where he was close) and a season where he was injured and missed a portion of it (he was close there too). Its not an easy thing to do.

I agree, he is not the passer Kidd and Nash are, but your logic for downplaying his passing/assist ability is flawed. It isn't just because he has the ball, he is a good playmaker.
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
10/28/2005  11:11 AM
Posted by diderotn:

Look...how many games has Kurt helped the Knicks win???? the last 4 years, how many times has Kurt helped the Knicks with getting into the playoffs??? I am happy for Kurt, but we will not miss him.
Posted by franco12:

the thing you have to admire about kurt is that he doesn't have a lot of talent, but he goes out and hustles. He's not fast or a great jumper, but he has terrific positioning and grabs boards.

and for everyone downplaying his 15fter, unless Frye is able to hit those this season, I worry we're going to be crying for someone who can reliably hit the outside shot during games.

As for the injury prone thing- early on his ankles gave him problems- I worry at some point here he could possibly go down for an extended period of time, just cause he's had such a long streak.



Replace "Kurt" with "Marbury" in your post and everything still applies. Expect that Marbury didn't help the Knicks get to the Finals like Kurt did.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
10/28/2005  11:17 AM
KT is wrong for saying that Marbury looked to shoot first, because if there was one player on the team that consistently got setup for his shot by Marbury, it was KT.

Ohnestly, many other players on the Knicks last year could say what KT said, but KT def. should not say something like that after getting pass after pass after pass from Steph. I mean cmon, all Marbury 8 dimes came from passing to Kurt on the pick and roll.

A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
10/28/2005  11:47 AM
watching nash last night I noticed that very often he could have taken a shot, but instead passed, and it wasn't necessarialy a pass that led to a shot- merely a pass to keep the ball moving.

Marbury, even with his 8 assists, is a 'shoot first' kind of player. its just the make up of who he is as a player and there is nothing wrong with it.
Nalod
Posts: 71906
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
10/28/2005  11:57 AM
Posted by Killa4luv:

Kobe has the ball most of the game too, and has NEVER avg 8 assists.

Allen Iverson has also NEVER done it but has come close in 2 seasons.

Michael Jordan avged 8 assists once in his career.

Walt Clyde Frazier NEVER avged 8 assists a game.


If it was as easy as you and others would like to make it seem, wouldn't more poeple do it? Certainly there are others who have the ball often. FYI, all of the examples I used are Hall of Fame players btw, so I would say no, even if you have the ball in your hand alot, it is not easy to pick up 8 assists and Steph has a career avg of 8 not one or two seasons, thats every damn season except his rookie season (where he was close) and a season where he was injured and missed a portion of it (he was close there too). Its not an easy thing to do.

I agree, he is not the passer Kidd and Nash are, but your logic for downplaying his passing/assist ability is flawed. It isn't just because he has the ball, he is a good playmaker.

So your saying that Steph is an elite playmaker? Im not hating here, just can't believe that he is on the same page as Kidd and Nash in terms of ball movement? Nobody said Kobe and AI are good playmakers. they are deemed selfish and take way many shots, but forget anyone else, the question might be is STeph a better scorer or playmaker?

I watch plenty of games, and its always amazing how he gets some stats. I do note that he plays a lot of garbage minutes where he can rack up another 5-6 points easy to keep his average up. ALmost seems that he does play for stats SOME of the time. That does not amount to quality.

In a ball movement system like Red Holzman used to run there would be may passes made by all members of the team.

Clyde Had 19 assists and 33pts in game 7 1970. Thats quality assists in a big game. Don't even compare Clyde to Steph! Two rings, should have 2 finals MVP's, an allstar MVP and many years 1st team all Defensive team. Steph is more talanted but its results. Clyde didn't make his mates better? Nash? Kidd? Steph? AI? Kobe? Im not saying Steph is not great, he just is not great at everyting, and I don't care what the stats say.

Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
10/28/2005  1:27 PM
Posted by Nalod:
Posted by Killa4luv:

Kobe has the ball most of the game too, and has NEVER avg 8 assists.

Allen Iverson has also NEVER done it but has come close in 2 seasons.

Michael Jordan avged 8 assists once in his career.

Walt Clyde Frazier NEVER avged 8 assists a game.


If it was as easy as you and others would like to make it seem, wouldn't more poeple do it? Certainly there are others who have the ball often. FYI, all of the examples I used are Hall of Fame players btw, so I would say no, even if you have the ball in your hand alot, it is not easy to pick up 8 assists and Steph has a career avg of 8 not one or two seasons, thats every damn season except his rookie season (where he was close) and a season where he was injured and missed a portion of it (he was close there too). Its not an easy thing to do.

I agree, he is not the passer Kidd and Nash are, but your logic for downplaying his passing/assist ability is flawed. It isn't just because he has the ball, he is a good playmaker.

So your saying that Steph is an elite playmaker? Im not hating here, just can't believe that he is on the same page as Kidd and Nash in terms of ball movement? Nobody said Kobe and AI are good playmakers. they are deemed selfish and take way many shots, but forget anyone else, the question might be is STeph a better scorer or playmaker?

I watch plenty of games, and its always amazing how he gets some stats. I do note that he plays a lot of garbage minutes where he can rack up another 5-6 points easy to keep his average up. ALmost seems that he does play for stats SOME of the time. That does not amount to quality.

In a ball movement system like Red Holzman used to run there would be may passes made by all members of the team.

Clyde Had 19 assists and 33pts in game 7 1970. Thats quality assists in a big game. Don't even compare Clyde to Steph! Two rings, should have 2 finals MVP's, an allstar MVP and many years 1st team all Defensive team. Steph is more talanted but its results. Clyde didn't make his mates better? Nash? Kidd? Steph? AI? Kobe? Im not saying Steph is not great, he just is not great at everyting, and I don't care what the stats say.
Way to ignore everything I said.

I VERY CLEARLY STATED
I agree, he is not the passer Kidd and Nash are, but...he is a good playmaker.
Why are responding as if I said he is equal to them in terms of ball movement/play making/passing?

I said he is a good playmaker, and I believe that should be obvious if you watch Knick games.

I also said dominating the ball does not make it easy to get 8 assists per game, that was my response to your point, and I tried to show some proof of that, using Hall of Fame players (admittedly Clyde wasn't used because he dominated the ball, but because he was a hall of fame PG). Few players avg 8 assists over the course of a season, much less over the course of a career, if it were as easy as you say, wouldn't more players do it? Wouldn't more HOF players do it?

Is he an elite playmaker if Kid and Nash (or for arguments sake 3 or 4 PG's) are the only ones better than him? I would say yes. I would say he has had very little to work with throughout the course of his career and this year he has some good weapons at his disposal although with a new coach and system it is difficult to predict how that will affect his playmaking and assist numbers.

i think he will shine this year though, and more importantly, we will win.

[Edited by - killa4luv on 10-28-2005 1:28 PM]
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
10/28/2005  2:01 PM
Let me help you all settle this argument....wait until the end of this season to see where Marb fits amongst these other PGs that you have mentioned.
The true Knickabocker..........
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
10/28/2005  7:25 PM
Posted by jazz74:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by Bonn1997:

I'd rather have David Lee or Channing Frye than Kurt

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 10-27-2005 10:49 PM]


slow your row, slow your row. so already you are penciling lee and channing avg. 10rpg+? now i rather have channing and lee and think they will have a brighter future than kurt's career. but give props when needed. kurt was one of the few guys to avg. a double- double last season. true, he has slowed down greatly the past two years but to say channing and lee are better than kurt before they even played one regular season game is ludicrous.

Channing is already better than Kurt.
I think Lee is too because he's so versatile and athletic. The only think Kurt can do on offense is shoot jump shots and the only thing he can do on defense is get beaten by opponents' speed. Kurt's a better rebounder than either of those two Knicks but that's the only edge he has.

can't tell where your reply to me is located
OldFan
Posts: 21456
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2003
Member: #446
10/29/2005  12:55 AM
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by Nalod:
Posted by Killa4luv:

Kobe has the ball most of the game too, and has NEVER avg 8 assists.

Allen Iverson has also NEVER done it but has come close in 2 seasons.

Michael Jordan avged 8 assists once in his career.

Walt Clyde Frazier NEVER avged 8 assists a game.


If it was as easy as you and others would like to make it seem, wouldn't more poeple do it? Certainly there are others who have the ball often. FYI, all of the examples I used are Hall of Fame players btw, so I would say no, even if you have the ball in your hand alot, it is not easy to pick up 8 assists and Steph has a career avg of 8 not one or two seasons, thats every damn season except his rookie season (where he was close) and a season where he was injured and missed a portion of it (he was close there too). Its not an easy thing to do.

I agree, he is not the passer Kidd and Nash are, but your logic for downplaying his passing/assist ability is flawed. It isn't just because he has the ball, he is a good playmaker.

So your saying that Steph is an elite playmaker? Im not hating here, just can't believe that he is on the same page as Kidd and Nash in terms of ball movement? Nobody said Kobe and AI are good playmakers. they are deemed selfish and take way many shots, but forget anyone else, the question might be is STeph a better scorer or playmaker?

I watch plenty of games, and its always amazing how he gets some stats. I do note that he plays a lot of garbage minutes where he can rack up another 5-6 points easy to keep his average up. ALmost seems that he does play for stats SOME of the time. That does not amount to quality.

In a ball movement system like Red Holzman used to run there would be may passes made by all members of the team.

Clyde Had 19 assists and 33pts in game 7 1970. Thats quality assists in a big game. Don't even compare Clyde to Steph! Two rings, should have 2 finals MVP's, an allstar MVP and many years 1st team all Defensive team. Steph is more talanted but its results. Clyde didn't make his mates better? Nash? Kidd? Steph? AI? Kobe? Im not saying Steph is not great, he just is not great at everyting, and I don't care what the stats say.
Way to ignore everything I said.

I VERY CLEARLY STATED
I agree, he is not the passer Kidd and Nash are, but...he is a good playmaker.
Why are responding as if I said he is equal to them in terms of ball movement/play making/passing?

I said he is a good playmaker, and I believe that should be obvious if you watch Knick games.

I also said dominating the ball does not make it easy to get 8 assists per game, that was my response to your point, and I tried to show some proof of that, using Hall of Fame players (admittedly Clyde wasn't used because he dominated the ball, but because he was a hall of fame PG). Few players avg 8 assists over the course of a season, much less over the course of a career, if it were as easy as you say, wouldn't more players do it? Wouldn't more HOF players do it?

Is he an elite playmaker if Kid and Nash (or for arguments sake 3 or 4 PG's) are the only ones better than him? I would say yes. I would say he has had very little to work with throughout the course of his career and this year he has some good weapons at his disposal although with a new coach and system it is difficult to predict how that will affect his playmaking and assist numbers.

i think he will shine this year though, and more importantly, we will win.

[Edited by - killa4luv on 10-28-2005 1:28 PM]


The last sentence says it all. If he wins - people won't question the stats and if he doesn't they will.
Kurt Thomas

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy