[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Starting 5 revisited...
Author Thread
Panos
Posts: 30444
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
10/19/2005  11:06 AM
Posted by efw:

I still think Q starts at the 3. But I don't think Lee is ahead of Ariza on the depth charts. When Crawford went down last year, Ariza started a number of games for us. Now, I'm not saying he was ready, but he was baptized by fire anyways. There's a lot to be said for real game experience. He's learned how to play under last minute pressure. Remember when he defended Wade on that last shot last year? That's an experience Lee doesn't have. Remember when he was forced to take the game tying shot but had it blocked? He learned from that to do a pump fake first.

I think you guys are going to be surprised by the Lineup LB puts on the floor for the first couple of months. This is how I see it:

Marbury, Crawford, Nate, Penny
Crawford, Marbury/Penny, Q
Q, Ariza, Penny/Lee
AD, Mo (for offense), Rose, Frye, Lee
Curry, James, Butler

As you can see, there are guys left out and guys who aren't going to get a lot of minutes. But that's the way LB does things and I'm not about to question his MO.

We'll see about Lee vs. Ariza. I'm still sticking to my guns.

As for Mo, what's all this crap about his offense? Haven't been impressed yet.

I'm glad you are so in tune with the way LB does things. Are you one of his assistants?

AUTOADVERT
TheSage
Posts: 21039
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/20/2003
Member: #386
10/19/2005  11:09 AM
From what I've seen Lee and Frye complement each other nicely, speed. What one lacks in shooting ability is made up by the other. I believe that both can become solid rebounders (Frye just needs to learn to stay on the ground). Add Robbie to move the pack and Q for long range bombing, Reezy for defense, boards and havoc and the second unit could be devastating.

The starting unit of Marbs Craw AD Curry (Mo-Rose)provides a slower pace, solid wer down unit witha bit of everything.
Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
10/19/2005  11:10 AM
can Allan Houston be the knicks' shooting coach? Teach Ariza how to shoot? Maybe Jamal?
Knight
Posts: 22775
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/21/2005
Member: #968
10/19/2005  11:11 AM
It's not about who starts the game, it's about who finishes the game.
"He only went to Georgia Tech for one year, and that's an engineering school." -LB
TheSage
Posts: 21039
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/20/2003
Member: #386
10/19/2005  11:11 AM
Posted by Caseloads:

can Allan Houston be the knicks' shooting coach? Teach Ariza how to shoot? Maybe Jamal?
You left out Lee

Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
10/19/2005  11:11 AM
also, no GM in the league "blew" granger. Granger was on everyone's radar but had a SERIOUS knee injury that he was coming back from and didnt want to risk it. If Granger ever gets microfracture surg, we'll talk then.
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
10/19/2005  11:15 AM
2 reasons why Lee will get more burn than Reezy: Lee is more NBA ready (4 years of College) and most of all, because Brown likes the kid.
Posted by Panos:

I guess I'm clearly in the minority here. But I'm willing to stick by my words, and I'll either be happy to eat crow, or say I told you so, that Lee gets more burn this year than Reezy.


The true Knickabocker..........
efw
Posts: 20668
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/10/2005
Member: #1002

10/19/2005  11:16 AM
I'm glad you are so in tune with the way LB does things. Are you one of his assistants?

yes. yes I am. I am one of Larry Brown's assistants.
jazz74
Posts: 22318
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/24/2002
Member: #371
10/19/2005  11:33 AM
my lineup from now to all-star break:

c- curry
pf-ant.davis
sf-q-rich
sg-craw
pg-marbs

rotation: james, nate the great, rose, ariza

reason: this lineup is our most balanced with experience. q and craw will spread the floor as the paint is secured by curry and davis. davis is our best all around pf for now since he has a nice 15ft. jumper and loves to bang for rebounds. a perfect compliment for curry. curry is a bull who needs the paint all by himself to do what he likes on the offensive end. starting malik, another inside worker on both ends, could complicate things. marbury has multiple targets to choose from. the floor would be spread and the offense would flow more fluidly with two outside shooters. it is good to have a sf who likes to score multiple ways and effectively like q-rich. i still think the craw and marbs backcourt has the potential to be one of the best in the east. defensively, davis is a solid defender in the paint. spelling curry with james periodically can help with interior defense also.

lineup after all-star break:

c- curry
pf-frye
sf-q-rich
sg-craw
pg-marbs

rotation:james,davis,nate,ariza,lee

reason: avoid the rookie wall and give the rookies experience before the possible playoff run. good mixture of vets and rookies. not to say we should compare with them but the 94 houston rockets did the same thing. they started mostly vets in the beginning then eventually let the rookies play in mid-season. then in the playoffs they offered another dimension to that team. those rookies were none other than robert horry and sam cassell. frye is a decent rebounder who hustles like davis. but he is more athletic which is a plus.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
10/19/2005  11:57 AM
Posted by diderotn:

2 reasons why Lee will get more burn than Reezy: Lee is more NBA ready (4 years of College) and most of all, because Brown likes the kid.
Posted by Panos:

I guess I'm clearly in the minority here. But I'm willing to stick by my words, and I'll either be happy to eat crow, or say I told you so, that Lee gets more burn this year than Reezy.

I guess you missed the sit down that LB had with Al. He said he has liked Ariza since last season as Pistons coach. Thinks that he is the team best defender. That's why LB has used him as his 6th man in all these games. Ariza has already made a little name for himself in the NBA, Kobe, Wade, Lebron all know who he is. All I know is Lee vs Nailon last nite, Nailon looked like an all-star a quick stepper. Ariza vs. Korver, Korver turnover the ball to him and found a hand in his face everytime he wanted to take the 3. Ariza has guarded Kobe, Lebron, Carter, Wade, Marion to name a few is going to get squeeze by Lee who guarded SL guys for the most part. I would love to give him credit for Dirk but looking at the boxscores Dirk got his points, Lee damaged came when Dirk was resting on the bench. And I already mentioned the resurrection of Lee Nailon.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
10/19/2005  12:04 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by fishmike:

Lee, Curry, Frye and JJ all suck on the boards. Not from lack of effort, but the group as a whole has absolutely ZERO technique. None of them box out or know how to put a body on guys. They all rely on height, size or athleticism to board, and at this level good technique is more effective.


WOW. Lee is a very good rebounder from what I have seen and Frye is not that bad. Watch those 2 more closely.


yeah have you been watching the games Fish! Lee is a rebounding machine and Frye has been a pleasant surprise! I definitely agree that Lee is more suited for the running 2nd unit with Crawford and Nate. Frye is going to have to become a good rebounder playing next to Curry but I think he will be. He did average 7 in fewer minutes in College. JJ replaces Currry and Lee & AD replaces Frye. I really do not want Crawford and Marbury starting together! We need shooting and Q is our best option. Hell I would go Nate, Marbury, Q before I start Crawford!

PG-Marbury
SG-Q
SF-Ariza
PF-Frye
C-Curry

or

PG-Nate
SG-MArbury
SF-Q
PF-Frye
C-Curry
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
10/19/2005  12:30 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by martin:
Posted by fishmike:

Lee, Curry, Frye and JJ all suck on the boards. Not from lack of effort, but the group as a whole has absolutely ZERO technique. None of them box out or know how to put a body on guys. They all rely on height, size or athleticism to board, and at this level good technique is more effective.


WOW. Lee is a very good rebounder from what I have seen and Frye is not that bad. Watch those 2 more closely.

I don't like Lee rebounding technique. If you watch him more carefully he actually battles with his teammates more for rebounds than the opposition. I don't know how many times in both the SL and now preseason, that Lee hasn't try to battle Jackie or Frye for a rebound, only to have the ball go out of bounds. I counted 6 last nite. I only hope it is his high energy that causes it but it is wasted opportunities. Frye has gotten smart when he sees Lee going for a rebound he steps back and tries to box out for him. Lee needs to learn how to do that too.



[Edited by - pharzeone on 10-19-2005 11:05 AM]


he'll learn. at least he's going for rebounds
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
10/19/2005  12:48 PM
I think the smart start the season starting lineup is
PG-Marbury
SG-Crawford
SF-Q
PF-Frye
C-Curry
Ariza 6th man

I just don't see Reezy starting under brown at 20 years old and still learning the game...he brought teyshawn off the bench some and I expect the same.

Lee will be spelling the bigs and rose and moT will be the odd vets out.

now don't get me wrong, I still firmly believe LB will go with a vet at the PF position, where everything points to Rose (AD is here too late, need someone that's been camp)

But I'm a betting man, and I've liked what I read about the human frye swatter (no NBA preseason in switzerland)
all kool aid all the time.
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
10/19/2005  12:58 PM
I think our starting lineup will be:

Curry
Antonio Davis
Quentin Richardson
Jamal Crawford
Stephon Marbury

Off the bench, we'll have:
Jerome James
Channing Frye
David Lee
Trevor Ariza
Penny Hardaway (with Houston retiring, I think Penny will get some minutes)
Nate Robinson

I'm not sure Malik Rose, Mo Taylor or Jackie Butler will have much of a role this season. We shall see.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
10/19/2005  1:00 PM
After watching last night, I realized that Jamal Crawford just cannot be the starting shooting guard. He gets destroyed on the defense and it's just too tempting for him to jack up a back shot. He did it a couple of times. He's much better suited as the backup combo guard in general, or the starting PG. I also realized how much we need Q in there. He's got to be in the starting rotation. So I want to see a lineup of, TO START THE SEASON!:

C: Curry
PF: Davis
SF: Ariza
SG: Richardson (Unless healthy proves otherwise)
PG: Marbury

If Curry continues to be out of shape and mainly just scores but hurts the team on defense, then take him out of the starting lineup, move Davis to center and make Frye the starting power foward. Curry gets all the sympathy in the world for his heart problems, but I don't ignore bad play or ugly defense or loafing and ball hogging. I never saw him pass the ball yet.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
10/19/2005  1:01 PM
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by martin:
Posted by fishmike:

Lee, Curry, Frye and JJ all suck on the boards. Not from lack of effort, but the group as a whole has absolutely ZERO technique. None of them box out or know how to put a body on guys. They all rely on height, size or athleticism to board, and at this level good technique is more effective.


WOW. Lee is a very good rebounder from what I have seen and Frye is not that bad. Watch those 2 more closely.


yeah have you been watching the games Fish! Lee is a rebounding machine and Frye has been a pleasant surprise! I definitely agree that Lee is more suited for the running 2nd unit with Crawford and Nate. Frye is going to have to become a good rebounder playing next to Curry but I think he will be. He did average 7 in fewer minutes in College. JJ replaces Currry and Lee & AD replaces Frye. I really do not want Crawford and Marbury starting together! We need shooting and Q is our best option. Hell I would go Nate, Marbury, Q before I start Crawford!

PG-Marbury
SG-Q
SF-Ariza
PF-Frye
C-Curry

or

PG-Nate
SG-MArbury
SF-Q
PF-Frye
C-Curry
Guns, Martin.. I have watched very closely. I have no concern about Frye and Lee becoming good rebounders. Both work VERY hard and attack the ball, but I dont think either are any good right now. They are often out of position. They dont box out well, they let opposing players get hip to hip to them, putting them at the mercy of the bounce.

Watch this next time. Watch how many times balls go up, yet there is a crowd under the basket. Watch how many times those guys jump but can only get one hand on the ball, or they wind up jumping away from it. We have been spoiled by guys like Oak, Ewing and even Kurt, who was a GREAT technique rebounder on the defensive glass.

I'm not knocking their effort but there were a ton of boards they missed last night because of bad technique that turned into 2nd opportunities for Phili.

Those guys rebound like guys that are used to being bigger, quicker and taller than most of the competition. If you hustle and work you will get the board. Doesnt work in the NBA


"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
10/19/2005  1:04 PM
Ooohah style...
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by martin:
Posted by fishmike:

Lee, Curry, Frye and JJ all suck on the boards.
you must be going by history, but looking at the boxscore, lee had almost 10 boards...can't argue with results
Not from lack of effort, but the group as a whole has absolutely ZERO technique. None of them box out or know how to put a body on guys. They all rely on height, size or athleticism to board, and at this level good technique is more effective.
Once again, you can't argue results
http://www.nba.com/knicks/stats/
Lee is leading the team in boards...I know, I know, it's only preseason...
I'm still trying to figure out why you're so down on the knicks.
WOW. Lee is a very good rebounder from what I have seen and Frye is not that bad. Watch those 2 more closely.
No Doubt, I agree 100%, but I can only go by what I've seen in preseason and in highlights, not from last nights game, but no arguing results

yeah have you been watching the games Fish!
I've been asking myself that same thing ALL SUMMER.
Lee is a rebounding machine and Frye has been a pleasant surprise! I definitely agree that Lee is more suited for the running 2nd unit with Crawford and Nate. Frye is going to have to become a good rebounder playing next to Curry but I think he will be. He did average 7 in fewer minutes in College. JJ replaces Currry and Lee & AD replaces Frye. I really do not want Crawford and Marbury starting together! We need shooting and Q is our best option. Hell I would go Nate, Marbury, Q before I start Crawford!

No Doubt

(sorry oohah...nobody can do it like you...hope the surgery went well)

No Doubt
all kool aid all the time.
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
10/19/2005  1:09 PM
Posted by fishmike:


Those guys rebound like guys that are used to being bigger, quicker and taller than most of the competition. If you hustle and work you will get the board. Doesnt work in the NBA

You should give LB or Herb a call and give them some pointers. Looks like it's working to me...keeping in mind all managed to become first round draft picks and play really well.

how come you are always so down on the knicks...when do they begin to get kudos? After we win a ring? Or do they only get praise when we tank the season and hit the lottery?

I'm just asking...when I joined you were all knicks all the time (I think your signature had kool aid in it and it's basically the only reason I use the term now), but now you can't force yourself to give praise...kind of why marv albert got canned.

I just want to know if you really are a knick fan or trying to be a professional unbiased sports reporter and using Ultimate knicks to get your unbiased journalism out to the masses.

I'm just wondering, why you so down on my knicks?!?!?!

NO DOUBT.

all kool aid all the time.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
10/19/2005  1:41 PM
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by martin:

[quote]Posted by fishmike:

I don't like Lee rebounding technique. If you watch him more carefully he actually battles with his teammates more for rebounds than the opposition. I don't know how many times in both the SL and now preseason, that Lee hasn't try to battle Jackie or Frye for a rebound, only to have the ball go out of bounds. I counted 6 last nite. I only hope it is his high energy that causes it but it is wasted opportunities. Frye has gotten smart when he sees Lee going for a rebound he steps back and tries to box out for him. Lee needs to learn how to do that too.



[Edited by - pharzeone on 10-19-2005 11:05 AM]


he'll learn. at least he's going for rebounds

I hope so. But the point is that everyone is going for the ball. I can't Lee brownie points for fighting Butler for a rebound, or Frye for a rebound just to see the ball go out of bounds or the opposition just take the ball away as Lee is fighting one of his guys. All I am saying I just don't see playing Lee at the 3 spot. He will get abused by faster players. He is more suited for the post not playing on and off the perimeter. I already know what Trevor can give me on defense playing the 3 and I like it alot.

I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
10/19/2005  1:51 PM
Posted by rvhoss:

Ooohah style...
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by martin:
Posted by fishmike:

Lee, Curry, Frye and JJ all suck on the boards.
you must be going by history, but looking at the boxscore, lee had almost 10 boards...can't argue with results
Not from lack of effort, but the group as a whole has absolutely ZERO technique. None of them box out or know how to put a body on guys. They all rely on height, size or athleticism to board, and at this level good technique is more effective.
Once again, you can't argue results
http://www.nba.com/knicks/stats/
Lee is leading the team in boards...I know, I know, it's only preseason...
I'm still trying to figure out why you're so down on the knicks.
WOW. Lee is a very good rebounder from what I have seen and Frye is not that bad. Watch those 2 more closely.
No Doubt, I agree 100%, but I can only go by what I've seen in preseason and in highlights, not from last nights game, but no arguing results

yeah have you been watching the games Fish!
I've been asking myself that same thing ALL SUMMER.
Lee is a rebounding machine and Frye has been a pleasant surprise! I definitely agree that Lee is more suited for the running 2nd unit with Crawford and Nate. Frye is going to have to become a good rebounder playing next to Curry but I think he will be. He did average 7 in fewer minutes in College. JJ replaces Currry and Lee & AD replaces Frye. I really do not want Crawford and Marbury starting together! We need shooting and Q is our best option. Hell I would go Nate, Marbury, Q before I start Crawford!

No Doubt

(sorry oohah...nobody can do it like you...hope the surgery went well)

No Doubt


You say you can't argue stats. Well let me try. Player A goes out boxes out the opposition and secures a rebound and converts it for 2 points. Player B goes out and attempts a shot but could not convert it, attempts another shot but its partially block, the player gets back the ball but was still unable to convert but was foul in the 2nd put back attempt and goes to the free throw line to attempt to earn two points. Who is the better rebounder and who has really help his team? I think that is how you can argue stats.


I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Starting 5 revisited...

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy