[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

man in the middle (article)
Author Thread
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
8/25/2005  8:10 AM
I totally agree about the early post feed that we did not do at all. Sweetney would run down the court, be like 5 feet away from the baset, and freakin Marbury would act like he doesnt see him and jus dribble it out on the top of the key before everybody else and their mom got down the court.

And that happened like 2-3 times every game. We need to use the early post offense from Sweetney, it will only help out fastbreak and defensive rebounding as the bigs will have to worry about getting back in time to pevent Sweetney from establishign deep post early on the break.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
AUTOADVERT
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
8/25/2005  8:27 AM
If you want to protest the poster on that webpage, email your concerns to steve.mau@thegarden.com....Nate or Crawfford must be replaced by either James or Frye....

http://www.nba.com/knicks/news/knicks_team_directory.html
The true Knickabocker..........
Nalod
Posts: 71897
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
8/25/2005  9:34 AM
Posted by simrud:

I totally agree about the early post feed that we did not do at all. Sweetney would run down the court, be like 5 feet away from the baset, and freakin Marbury would act like he doesnt see him and jus dribble it out on the top of the key before everybody else and their mom got down the court.

And that happened like 2-3 times every game. We need to use the early post offense from Sweetney, it will only help out fastbreak and defensive rebounding as the bigs will have to worry about getting back in time to pevent Sweetney from establishign deep post early on the break.

Marbs would frequently ignore Reezy in the lane. 20 and 8 seemed more important then anything else.

Reason Marbs numbers were inflated in losses was cuz he wanted in junk minutes to inflate his numbers. I hope winning and team chemistry take priority over Marbs trying to secure Oscar Robertson type numbers.

tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
8/25/2005  9:46 AM
Posted by fishmike:
Posted by djsunyc:

kinda like zach randolph right. funny how all of the sudden he just exploded, you know, when he finally got minutes and was given the ball.

nobody's saying sweetney will become elton brand.
heck, even if he ends up being a 6th man for his career that's fine too.

the thing that irks me is that we have to really see what he is. give him the ball and see what he can do. then it's all on him - either he has the talent or not. he has shown, so far, that he does have the talent but for some odd reason, they let tim keep shooting even though he's been incosistent his entire career yet won't go to sweets down low 10-15 times a game for a good 10 game stretch.

we'll see if he's part of the long term plans and where he fits in this season.
I was really mind numbing to me why at the end of the year we were still featuring KT and only getting Sweetney 20 minutes or so a game. We we eliminated, yet we never took an 8 or 10 game stretch to see what Sweetney would do if featured for 30 minutes, or what Ariza would do with 30 minutes on the floor for a legit 10 game stretch.

I think Sweetney's foul issues a overblown. I think if he actually played more he would foul less. Look at his game log, he certainly has some games where fouls are an issue, but he's got just as many games with 0,1 or 2 fouls and he still only logged 15-20 minutes.

His 30+ minute games
vs. Atl 6-8 16/2 and 6 fouls in 31 minutes
vs. Indy 8-15 20/9 and 2 fouls in 37 minutes
vs. GS 9-12 19/7 and 4 fouls in 28 minutes
vs. LA 9-15 19/12 and 4 fouls in 30 minutes
vs. Phili 2-5 10/9 and 3 fouls in 32 minutes
vs. Bos 5-10 19/5 and 0 fouls in 28 minutes
vs Utah 6-7 15/9 and 6 fouls in 30 minutes
vs Mil 6-13 14/11 and 3 fouls in 37 minutes
vs LAC 4-8 14/9 and 1 fouls in 31 minutes
vs Bos 7-12 18/5 and 2 fouls in32 minutes

those are his 10 games he played the most. I didnt pick his best games, just the ones he got the most minutes.
31.6 minutes, 3.1 fouls 16.4 points, 7.8 boards, shooting 60-105 total and 57% FGs

All I can say is wow. Those are off the charts numbers. Its 10 games but I take something from this, and thats the more time Sweetney is on the floor, the LESS he fouls and more productive he becomes. He played 33 minutes a game at GTown and was double and tripled every time down the floor. If you watched him there his pattern was to hustle down the floor, get immediate position in the post and attack the rim early in the possesion. You could see him doing that with us but the guard simply didnt get him the ball and he would have to do everything from a set offense.

When this guy plays he puts up MAJOR numbers. Look at his game log.. its not like he had all these 10-18 minute games because of fouls. They just didnt play him enough.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/gamelog?statsId=3712


That is impressive fish, It just shows, with minutes sweets is productive, not just another body on the floor, but he is a factor... nice numbers..
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
8/25/2005  10:12 AM
FYI: Knicks were 6-4 in those games, one of which was that blowout loss to the Hawks like 135-131
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
8/25/2005  10:13 AM
I have always liked Sweet's numbers when he is given minutes. Now that Kurt is gone, give him some more minutes and let him earn it. I know for sure that Brown will design plays to take advantage of Sweet's abilities.
The true Knickabocker..........
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
8/25/2005  10:22 AM
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by Bonn1997:

Never heard sweetney and brand called tweeners before. I always thought the term was reserved for undersized AND scrawny guys. I sure hope Mike becomes an impact player this year.

bonn - that's the thing. when he got minutes last year AND got the ball, HE WAS AN IMPACT PLAYER. there were games he was going to the line at will. it was just sad we didn't utilize it enough.

our starting frontcourt this season should be sweetney at PF and frye at C.

they complement each other better than any other combo - almost like cwebb in the post and brad miller at the elbow.

I think conditioning also has alot to do with it last season. I can remember games where Sweetney would have a fantansic first quarter or half and be down right tired in the 3rd and 4th quarter. Like getting 18 points in the first half of a game and finishing the game with 20.


I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
8/25/2005  10:29 AM
Posted by Nalod:
Posted by simrud:

I totally agree about the early post feed that we did not do at all. Sweetney would run down the court, be like 5 feet away from the baset, and freakin Marbury would act like he doesnt see him and jus dribble it out on the top of the key before everybody else and their mom got down the court.

And that happened like 2-3 times every game. We need to use the early post offense from Sweetney, it will only help out fastbreak and defensive rebounding as the bigs will have to worry about getting back in time to pevent Sweetney from establishign deep post early on the break.

Marbs would frequently ignore Reezy in the lane. 20 and 8 seemed more important then anything else.

Reason Marbs numbers were inflated in losses was cuz he wanted in junk minutes to inflate his numbers. I hope winning and team chemistry take priority over Marbs trying to secure Oscar Robertson type numbers.

I love Ariza, but by the end of the season I think every team caught on to him. 'Yeah the kid with no jump shot, so let me just stand right here and draw the charge.' That young man is in desperate need of any sort of jumper.

Also, as far as protesting the banner, my call wouldn't be to include Frye or Sweetney but to find out the marketing genius who replaced "All Ball" with "Click Here For Tickets" Is that suppose to be the team slogan this year? Those guys aren't that bright.

I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
8/25/2005  10:36 AM
Posted by fishmike:

His 30+ minute games
vs. Atl 6-8 16/2 and 6 fouls in 31 minutes
vs. Indy 8-15 20/9 and 2 fouls in 37 minutes
vs. GS 9-12 19/7 and 4 fouls in 28 minutes
vs. LA 9-15 19/12 and 4 fouls in 30 minutes
vs. Phili 2-5 10/9 and 3 fouls in 32 minutes
vs. Bos 5-10 19/5 and 0 fouls in 28 minutes
vs Utah 6-7 15/9 and 6 fouls in 30 minutes
vs Mil 6-13 14/11 and 3 fouls in 37 minutes
vs LAC 4-8 14/9 and 1 fouls in 31 minutes
vs Bos 7-12 18/5 and 2 fouls in32 minutes

31.6 minutes, 3.1 fouls 16.4 points, 7.8 boards, shooting 60-105 total and 57% FGs

looking at #'s like that just reinforces my feelings that he is ready to explode if given the chance.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
8/25/2005  10:40 AM
Notably, the least impressive of those games, but hey, 6-8 is still a good job no matter how he gets the point. You create attention.

This is why the end of last season was such a disaster. We could have gotton Sweetney and Ariza to bigger minutes while the vets rested, but it was absolutely imperitive to win the 3 extra games, shooting away any shot at that #5 spot (Bogut) and just putting a little more rust and sag on Sweetney. It's obvious that when Sweetney is playing a big role, he's helping the team out a lot, but NY just hasn't trusted it's youngies lately, and I think you can point your fingers to the coaching instability. Why should the coach take any risks if he knows his job is on the line. But now we have Brown, so that's no longer an excuse. If we're not gonna ultilize him, we might as well just trade him.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
8/25/2005  10:44 AM
57% FGs and that doesnt include how many fouls he's drawing. Camp him under the basket on both side of the ball, plain and simple. Play him 30 minutes a game and see him take off. The talent is there. Its not the easiest group for a young guy to assert himself with.

If LB pushes for him to get the ball early in the clock and commits to giving him minutes I have no doubt whatsoever he will have a monster year to the tune of the #s I posted.

31.6 minutes, 3.1 fouls 16.4 points, 7.8 boards, shooting 60-105 total and 57% FGs


Those were some teams with very good frontlines. Obviously Sweetney's D will need to improve, but you know he wont get pushed around, and even if his D isnt great to start shooting over 55% AND drawing tons of fouls speaks for itself. Add to that he's a workhorse on the glass and the starting PF (with starters minutes) should be his to lose. No ifs ands or buts.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
8/25/2005  10:44 AM
Posted by Pharzeone:


Also, as far as protesting the banner, my call wouldn't be to include Frye or Sweetney but to find out the marketing genius who replaced "All Ball" with "Click Here For Tickets" Is that suppose to be the team slogan this year? Those guys aren't that bright.

In all honesty, with the amount of attention that this stupid banner is getting, thats probably the best place on the whole Knicks site for there to be anything about "Getting Tickets." This is honestly like the 3rd article I've seen that included talk about no big men being on that stupid banner. WHO CARES, but people obviously do.

"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
8/25/2005  10:48 AM
Posted by Allanfan20:

Notably, the least impressive of those games, but hey, 6-8 is still a good job no matter how he gets the point. You create attention.

This is why the end of last season was such a disaster. We could have gotton Sweetney and Ariza to bigger minutes while the vets rested, but it was absolutely imperitive to win the 3 extra games, shooting away any shot at that #5 spot (Bogut) and just putting a little more rust and sag on Sweetney. It's obvious that when Sweetney is playing a big role, he's helping the team out a lot, but NY just hasn't trusted it's youngies lately, and I think you can point your fingers to the coaching instability. Why should the coach take any risks if he knows his job is on the line. But now we have Brown, so that's no longer an excuse. If we're not gonna ultilize him, we might as well just trade him.
What does the #5 spot have to do with Bogut? Mil was #6 and more importantly, you don't know which one of their ping pong balls was the one that was drawn. It could have been one that they would have had even if they were placed anywhere else in the lottery, meaning that other teams could have been #6 and Mil still would have won.

Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
8/25/2005  10:50 AM
Posted by Allanfan20:

Notably, the least impressive of those games, but hey, 6-8 is still a good job no matter how he gets the point. You create attention.

This is why the end of last season was such a disaster. We could have gotton Sweetney and Ariza to bigger minutes while the vets rested, but it was absolutely imperitive to win the 3 extra games, shooting away any shot at that #5 spot (Bogut) and just putting a little more rust and sag on Sweetney. It's obvious that when Sweetney is playing a big role, he's helping the team out a lot, but NY just hasn't trusted it's youngies lately, and I think you can point your fingers to the coaching instability. Why should the coach take any risks if he knows his job is on the line. But now we have Brown, so that's no longer an excuse. If we're not gonna ultilize him, we might as well just trade him.

I now understand why KT was playing so much down the stretch. The same way I think you will get to see more TT then you probably want to see before Feb. Does anyone know Ariza's contract status? I can see it now, Sweets, Nate and Ariza will be asked for in every trade scenario. And not just for the KGs, I mean even the Eric Snows of the world.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
8/25/2005  10:50 AM
If Kurt gets fewer minutes and lower stats, I wonder if we're still able to trade him for Q and Nate. Maybe, maybe not.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
8/25/2005  10:54 AM
kurt was the starting center down the stretch - sweets the starting PF. it was rose and mo that cut into sweetney's time, not kurt.
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
8/25/2005  10:54 AM
nobody questioned KTs minutes. The question is why with in a toilet season were we seeing TT/Rose/Mo T playing more minutes than Ariza and Sweetney.

Either we are commited to being "young and athletic" or we arent.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
8/25/2005  11:19 AM
Posted by fishmike:

nobody questioned KTs minutes. The question is why with in a toilet season were we seeing TT/Rose/Mo T playing more minutes than Ariza and Sweetney.

Either we are commited to being "young and athletic" or we arent.
Isiah's said he's committed to young and athletic but also been very clear that players have to EARN their minutes. (That's what he said.) Sweetney may have put up nice stats in the games he played a lot of minutes, but he still was giving up a lot of points and a very high FG%. Maybe it's not such a bad thing for Sweetney to go into the summer knowing, "I must get in better shape if I ever want to play more than 20 mpg." Isiah had to earn every minute he got and that's probably the way he believes it should be for all players.


Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
8/25/2005  11:25 AM
nobody questioned KTs minutes. The question is why with in a toilet season were we seeing TT/Rose/Mo T playing more minutes than Ariza and Sweetney.
There's no way to answer that question because the Sweetney part contains too many factual errors. Sweetney started ahead of and played more not fewer minutes than Rose and Mo T once the team was eliminated.

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 08-25-2005 11:25 AM]
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
8/25/2005  11:33 AM
If the Bucks were in the 6 spot, it's all the more to piss you off, but that's for a different thread.

I never said KT took away from Sweets minutes, b/c if anything, he was our second best player and needed to be on the court, and earned every minute of his playing time. But for everyone else we really didn't need to see but did see, is what killed us. Why on EARTH did we see TT play major minutes and there were even a couple of times when Marbury had freaking 48 minute games, and numerous times when he was above 40. LUDICROUS!

Point is, Sweetney needs more PT, and now that we don't have KT there's no excuse WHATSOEVER. He needs to be on the court along with Frye, b/c like dj said, they are the perfect compliment to eachother. If they can't get major minutes, then we are screwed, b/c haha, we don't even have anyone else.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
man in the middle (article)

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy