but these guys are also a lot less talented than what they had, and don't you think that totally alters the chemistry?
I will argue that this team is equal if not better than last years Suns. Not in 'physical talent' persay, (yet) but in 'players'. And I don't think they are quite done yet.
First, IMO Stoudemire will probably get better this year! Let us not discount that.
Before I get to the talent aspect, I think the Sun's chemistry begins and ends with the big 3 of Nash, Stoudemire, and Marion. It is up to other players to fit in that game. Of course, Nash brings everyone on the court into the game, so I wouldn't worry about chemistry. I would worry about Nash being able to duplicate his magical season, but who knows? He seems to add something every year, maybe this year he will come back diesel and ready to play D.
Which brings me to Joe Johnson: He left the team because he did not want to be the "Fourth Option" even though that was clearly the right spot for him. He forced the trade to Atlanta. That sounds like a chemistry killer to me. Better they lose him now before he starts making trouble during the regular season.
Talent:
Joe JohnsonI do not think the loss of Joe Johnson is has nearly the impact that many think it will. I find him to be highly overrated. He has not been good for enough time! Joe Johnson (#10 pick 2001) has had precisely 1.55 seasons of strong performances as a professional. This began when Marbury and Penny were traded and he began to shoot much more, and then when Nash got there his numbers improved, as did every player on the Suns due to Nash's distribution and the high-octane offensive style. My point is that I think Joe Johnson, while his physical talent is undeniable, benefited greatly from the team he was on last year. Let's see if he can do it this year on the Hawks. He should get numbers because he will be the main shooter (Maybe) but will they win?
I think the Suns are looking for a shooting guard (Sprewell?), and in the meantime Jimmy Jackson will be just fine.
Joe Johnson CAREER AVERAGES
REBOUNDS PER GAME
YEAR TEAM G GS MPG FG% 3P% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
01-02 BOS 48 33 20.9 .439 .273 .769 .8 2.1 2.9 1.5 .69 .19 .58 1.20 6.3
01-02 PHO 29 27 31.5 .420 .333 .778 1.2 2.9 4.1 3.6 .90 .38 1.48 1.90 9.6
01-02 -- 77 60 24.9 .430 .292 .774 1.0 2.4 3.3 2.3 .77 .26 .92 1.50 7.5
02-03 PHO 82 34 27.5 .397 .366 .774 .7 2.5 3.2 2.6 .76 .23 1.32 1.70 9.8
03-04 PHO 82 77 40.6 .430 .305 .750 1.0 3.7 4.7 4.4 1.13 .32 2.43 2.20 16.7
04-05 PHO 82 82 39.5 .461 .478 .750 1.5 3.7 5.1 3.5 .96 .29 1.80 2.00 17.1
Career 323 253 33.3 .433 .382 .757 1.0 3.1 4.1 3.2 .91 .20 1.63 1.90 12.9
Playoff 15 9 34.6 .438 .449 .658 .9 3.5 4.3 2.5 .93 .40 1.47 2.20 13.4
Stephen HunterStephen Hunter (15th pick 2001) is a bum and a stiff. Give me Mark West anyday! Hunter has not become a regular starter even on bad Orlando teams. Last year the Sun's brought in walter McCarty because of Hunter's lack of game and McCarty promptly beat him out. Hunter's numbers are abysmal, especially when you consider the teams he has played for. He fouls at a very high rate as well. Hunter cannot carry Kurt Thomas' shoes, so I think that is a big upgrade for the Suns.
Stephen Hunter CAREER AVERAGES
REBOUNDS PER GAME
YEAR TEAM G GS MPG FG% 3P% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
01-02 ORL 53 21 9.7 .456 .000 .585 .8 1.1 1.8 .1 .09 .81 .30 1.50 3.6
02-03 ORL 33 5 13.5 .544 .000 .409 1.2 1.7 2.8 .2 .27 1.09 .45 1.70 3.9
03-04 ORL 59 23 13.4 .529 .000 .333 .9 2.0 2.9 .2 .08 1.24 .49 1.70 3.2
04-05 PHO 76 3 13.8 .614 .000 .479 1.3 1.7 3.0 .2 .05 1.34 .58 1.70 4.6
Career 221 52 12.7 .544 .000 .470 1.0 1.6 2.7 .2 .10 1.10 .47 1.70 3.9
Playoff 22 0 11.5 .509 .000 .522 .8 1.0 1.9 .2 .05 .95 .41 1.60 3.0
Quentin RichardsonI like Q. But from an efficiency standpoint he leaves much to be desired. I think adding Bell, Diaw, Padgett will fill the role of 3 point shooter that Q vacated pretty well, and they bring some other dimensions too.
Quentin Richardson CAREER AVERAGES
REBOUNDS PER GAME
YEAR TEAM G GS MPG FG% 3P% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
00-01 LAC 76 28 17.9 .442 .331 .627 1.4 2.0 3.4 .8 .55 .09 .84 1.30 8.1
01-02 LAC 81 0 26.6 .432 .381 .765 1.4 2.7 4.1 1.6 .96 .26 1.26 1.80 13.3
02-03 LAC 59 13 23.2 .372 .308 .685 1.7 3.1 4.8 .9 .59 .17 1.08 1.60 9.4
03-04 LAC 65 64 36.0 .398 .352 .740 2.2 4.1 6.4 2.1 1.03 .29 2.17 2.00 17.2
04-05 PHO 79 78 35.9 .389 .358 .739 1.2 4.9 6.1 2.0 1.22 .34 1.29 2.50 14.9
Career 360 183 27.9 .406 .353 .716 1.5 3.4 4.9 1.5 .88 .20 1.31 1.80 12.6
Playoff 15 15 37.6 .403 .390 .639 1.6 3.5 5.1 1.7 1.27 .20 1.00 3.50 11.9
***
i think they hit on something special last year which isn't going to be duplicated. like one of those deals when everything happens to click right for a team. the chemistry worked, maybe because jj, q and amare were still young enough to not have to be "the"star on the team, nash is a selfless leader, and marion is as versatile and athletic as scottie pippen in picking up every bit of a slack that a team needs.
now all of a sudden nash, amare and marion have to be bigger stars to pick up the loss of the other 2 while the new guys all have to be the scrubs to fit in around them.
i think they would have been much better off keeping q, jj and hunter. then adding nate to that speedster team would have been as dramatic a boost for them as adding gordon was to the bulls. and they still could have tried to add some rebounding in grant, or even made a play for big game or someone else.
I don't think they want to duplicate last year's team. It was entertaining, but flawed. Even with JJ they weren't beating no Spurs! That is why they traded for KT. They needed more inside play. Grant is better than Hunter as well. Nate Richardson is going to be a nice player but point guard isn't a 'need' for the Suns. I mean, Nash did get MVP last year.
Again, remember that JJ forced the trade because he wanted a bigger peice of the pie.
Will the big 3 be better this season? I think Stoudemire will. If Nash and Marion can match or come close to last year's performances, this team will be much better rounded than last years!
Losing Stephen Hunter is virtually addition by subtraction. The shooting guard position will be okay for the Suns, but I do think they are still looking for a shooter.
excellent post. and another thing,Q was a locker room favorite, and lets not forget the fact that he was a big shot maker for the suns. And JJ, well we saw how much they missed him, the only game they won vs the spurs was the game he came back to play, that says a lot...
Losing JJ in the midst of the playoffs hurt the Suns. It will always hurt to lose your starting shooting guard with no compensation. But JJ is far from irreplaceable. By the way did anyone watch the play that put JJ out of the playoffs? I did. He had an open layup and then stupidly decided to go for a tough dunk. Stackhouse blocked the shot absolutely clean! What brought JJ to the floor face first was him hanging on the rim.
No, I think the Suns are better right now.
oohah