[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

one big thing that i think can help is moving jc to PG
Author Thread
OAK
Posts: 20517
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/11/2005
Member: #957
Japan
7/28/2005  11:51 AM
Posted by tkf:

I remember the Cleveland cavs had two nice young PG's, in mark Price and Kevin Johnson, they had to make a choice because clearly neither was a back up PG or a SG. So they made the decision to keep the one best for their team and not necessarily the one with the most talent. So they kept price and traded KJ. We know the nice career price had in cleveland before the injuries and we know what KJ did in pheonix. Sometimes you have to trade the more talented player to have the player that best fits your team to play the position he needs to play. Is crawford the better fit for the knicks? that is the question...

yes, indeed.

let's follow BRIGGS' lead and say that Craw is a better fit. But what to do with Marbury? Whose gonna take him? Atlanta? for Al Harrington straight up? But that's not a fair trade and we don't really need a tweener who doesn't play much defense, do we? really, whose gonna take Marbury???

Are we going to play him at SG? Then what happens to Q-Rich? Back court starters of Craw/Marb/Q-Rich would be too weak defensively even though we've added shotblockers in JJ & Frye.
AUTOADVERT
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
7/28/2005  11:57 AM
Marbury's not getting traded. With Larry Brown in town, it's just no happening. I think Crawford would be the first to go, but Isiah is really stubborn and I doubt he'd deal him even if it was the best option.

DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/28/2005  12:16 PM
Posted by diderotn:

Marb is not considered a talented scorer as Allan mainly because he doesn't take as many shots as Allan. Allan takes as many as 30 shots per game...while Marb only average 15 to 20 shots..and he is also asked to play the point...

Marbury isn't as talented a scorer as an Allen Iverson for example, so we're better off taking advantage of his ability to dish & find the open man & allow him to orchestrate as he's been doing since he came into the NBA...he's not the classic PG in the mold of a John Stockton or Jason Kidd, but Marbury is the best ball distributor we have...unless you're trading him to get a bigman, it doesn't make any sense to move him to SG & weaken 2 spots in the starting rotation.
I agree with you (diderton) but it's not worth getting into this debate again!

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 07/28/2005 12:16:18]
one big thing that i think can help is moving jc to PG

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy