Posted by BRIGGS:
[quote]Posted by Killa4luv:
BRIGGS-
in the Nazzy-Rose deal, we gave up the better player AND the expiring contract. We were compensated for taking a less valuable player and a longer contract, so we got picks which are like early first rounders.
In this proposed trade (JYD for DM), we take the more valuable player who makes alot of money, for a less valuable and older player, who also is overpaid but not as much. Its not like we;re giving them an expiring contract. JYD is 32 and has 2-3 years left on his contract, I dont see us getting 2 picks for him, and a 25 year old player who could be a beast. I really think you are way off on this one. Im sure they could get an expiring 5 million dollar contract for him from somone. Houston could have offered Spoon for him. and it aint like they don't need a 3 who plays tough D, JVG could use him. I can't understand where youre coming from on this one.
nazr is not a clear superior player to malik, if anything on the basis of numbers they are even, the only difference between the two is 2 yrs and 13 mm on the contracts and we were compensated for it.
I wouldnt let Portland OUT of 27 MM $ for a player they want off their team--two number 1 picks, same deal as malik for nazr. i wouldnt do it any other way. my goal is for Darius AND the assets to help get me a big. If not, there are other fish to fry. 2 picks or nothing.
Nazr is a clearly the better player.
Malik Rose before the trade: 6 pts 4 rbs
Nazr Mohammed before the trade: 11 and 8.
Thats almost double! Not to mention he is 3 inches taller, there is no one in the NBA who would choose Malik over NAzzy who was top 5 offensive rebounders in the league and a top 10 ranked center at the time. This really isn't even close.
BTW, when are you gonna learn how to quote properly? you are really irking me with that. You have like a quarter of a million posts already!!!!!!!!
Plus what Sim said, SA's first round picks are guaranteed to be 28 or lower.
[Edited by - Killa4luv on 07/28/2005 07:39:31]