Posted by bobs3304:
Posted by djsunyc:
if we're going to make a MEGA $$$ deal, then it should be for a player that fits a bigger need AND gives us an offensive identity in the post. marion is a great player BUT at the end of the day, what he gives us is great defense from the 3 spot. i'm okay with letting ariza develop into that role and going after someone down low...
Ok. I agree. At least you make a valid point.
My point, though, was that beggars can't be choosers. There aren't that many star quality "back to the basket" players that even MIGHT be available this season. At least Marion provides 2 glaring needs -defense and rebounding.
But again, you are right. That said, who do you think (realistically) we can acquire sometime before the trading deadline and for who?
btw: in a Marion deal, I'm assuming Sweetney would be staying. In fact, he could even start. There's your "back to the basket" post player right there...
[Edited by - bobs3304 on 07/22/2005 10:56:34]
i don't buy beggars can't be choosers philosphy. we SHOULDN'T be beggars. i wouldn't mind not doing ANYTHING with tim and penny. sometimes, if you can't get the right player, then NOT MAKING a move is just as good.
we are not in a position of weakness. we have chips and we have young blood.
i'd much rather get boozer than marion.
yeah, i know, boozer is another undersized PF. but what he does do is play defense and rebounds (big time) but at a different spot, PF and can easily play the C spot in the east. and that's only IF we had to make a move.
i mean, i probably will get lambasted for this one, but if we HAD TO make a move with tim and penny, then, jeez, i can't believe i'm saying this, but possibly even dampier b/c he plays center and plays defense. he may help us more than marion. (uggg, that hurt just typing it)
ok, hold up, forget i mentioned dampier. it was a brain lapse...
[Edited by - djsunyc on 07/22/2005 11:29:42]