I'm not sold on Pierce - he's been inconsistent but based on past history - I think Pierces best years are better then Marbury's best
years.
Overall Pierce is a better scorer and rebounder and when he's in the
mood better on defense.
Marbury is a better assist guy. I definitely do not think Marbury can do everything Pierce can do (nor the other way around) - as players they are not that similar.
Posted by diderotn:
I like Pierce, but he can't do anything that Marb cant. By the way, you are talking about marb's age, how old is Pierce and Walker????
there is nothing wrong with marbury as a player. its just, our team is young. marbs is 28, going on 29 this year. then you are talking about the rest of our core players being 25 and younger. it just makes sense to trade him while he is in his prime and get all of your core players around the same age. By the time our youngstas become 29, reach their prime, marbs will be 32-33, declining, and probably a FA.