[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

to me, isiah gets an "A" for this draft...
Author Thread
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
6/29/2005  1:46 AM
Posted by Rich:

I give Isiah a B. An A is reserved for getting great value picks. I don't think the Knicks did that.
I think you make a good point. None of those guys were more valuable than their picks. Chaniing Frye was on time, but Nate was way early and Lee was about on target or a little early.

Isiah picks the player he wants wherever he has a pick. I respect that about him because he knows talent.
AUTOADVERT
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
6/29/2005  2:00 AM
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by Rich:

I give Isiah a B. An A is reserved for getting great value picks. I don't think the Knicks did that.
I think you make a good point. None of those guys were more valuable than their picks. Chaniing Frye was on time, but Nate was way early and Lee was about on target or a little early.

Isiah picks the player he wants wherever he has a pick. I respect that about him because he knows talent.

I agree that Isiah didn't get any "steals" aka guys who fell out of their projected range, but that doesn't mean he didn't draft well. Lee may well end up a steal if he plays like he did at Chicago.

Just curious, who do you feel was better than Nate Robinson at 21? Garcia? Blatche? Jack? Just wondering. I like the Nate pick a lot. I think it fits the style we want to play EXTREMELY well. So does Lee. So does Frye. So does Q. Isiah is finally building a team.
¿ △ ?
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
6/29/2005  2:56 AM
Posted by Rich:

I give Isiah a B. An A is reserved for getting great value picks. I don't think the Knicks did that.
Didn't you kill the first two picks. How can you give him that grade now.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
DarkKnicks
Posts: 21064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/29/2005
Member: #882
Spain
6/29/2005  4:36 AM
Just for the #30 pick, I give Isiah a -D. worst.pick.ever.
firefly
Posts: 23229
Alba Posts: 17
Joined: 7/26/2004
Member: #721
United Kingdom
6/29/2005  5:30 AM
I am very happy with this draft. I stayed up till 3.45am to hear it and I wasn't disappointed. Isiah got this teams needs spot on.

We needed a Center? Got it. Shotblocking? Got that too. Scorer in the post? Yup.

Backup point? Got it. (and what a pick by the way. You guy know I dont normally make predictions, but Nate is gonna be a star in New York, Im telling you). Needed heart, fire and defense? Can you spell Nate?

Depth at SG? Got that too. Serious 3 threat? Yup. SG with size who can rebound, with a mid-range game? Got that too.

Needed someone taller then 6'8" to crash the board and apply pressure at back-up C? I dont know much about David Lee, but it sounds like we got that too.

If we would have picked Green at the 8, we would have had 2 pgs, 4 sgs and 3 sfs. Thats 9 players on an active roster of 12. Plus noone over 6'8", Bruno excluded.

And yes, Im gonna say it. Im happy we took Frye, and not some pimply 16 year old with the highest pick weve had in decades. YOu damn right i am!! What, you expect a 17 year old kid who weighs 290 pounds NOW, - and a knee that can only handle 260 - to sit on the bench for 2 years, and not expect any repercussions on his physical and mental state? Bynum would have been a mistake here, big time. Not that hes a bad player, just not in this town, not at 8. I think that not only was Frye the safe pick, he was the RIGHT pick as well.

But most of all, I LOVE the Nate Robinson pick. Maybe its just the little guy mentality, but this guy is the truth. I may be overhyping a bit here, but im talking Iverson and Wade type of player. He will be great. And the man most willing to take a chance on vertically-challenged players is his GM.

Sorry about your own feelings on the matter Guns, but I'm very excited about next year.


I give him an A!
Some men see things as they are and ask why. I dream things that never were and ask why not?
bigpimpin
Posts: 22176
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 11/17/2004
Member: #801
USA
6/29/2005  6:18 AM
Posted by djsunyc:

we got a center - frye
we got a game changing backup point guard - nate
lee - i'm not sure where he fits but i think he's nbdl for a year then jyd will be traded
42" vertical!?!?!?!?

but this team's style of play is finally taking shape.

guards: marbury, crawford, q, nate
forwards: ariza, sweetney, lee
center: frye

so that's the CORE of the team over the next 3 years.

this now let's us make a big time POWER move with tim and penny's deal.

hey - i was DOWN DOWN DOWN DOWN DOWN on this team as recent as 6 weeks ago. i wanted to get rid of the big $$$'s contract. but after the q&a, i accepted the fact that it will never happen. so now, i look at our young core and i LIKE IT. i LOVE the nate pick. LOVE IT. i think frye is going to be good for us. does he have the upside of bynum? maybe not. but i think he will be a solid player for us and if we get someone like curry or a bigger player and slide him over the the 4, then we got something cooking.

did they slip me kool-aid at the q&a - it's possible but it's in me now and let's keep it coming...

[Edited by - djsunyc on 06/28/2005 23:57:26]

could everyone please allow these players to do something with the Knicks before we start handing out apprasials. please. it will make your posts seem more believable.

i mean, think about it. it's like handing out report cards on the 1st day of school.

what are the grades based on?

how can you say nate robinson is a game changing back-up point guard when he hasn't played not 1 second in the nba. oh, i get it cause you see the similarities between nate and the little midget in denver.

oh god



"Anyone who sits around waiting to hit the lottery, whether basketball or real life, in order to better their position is a loser."
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
6/29/2005  7:10 AM
Dude!!! You must be Layden in disguise...This was the best draft in years by the Knicks...Even Spike approved of the choices....

Posted by sbensol74:

I give isiah a C- for this draft only for the fact that I dont believe we're any better now than we were yesterday.
The true Knickabocker..........
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
6/29/2005  7:15 AM
Stay away from Kwame....I much prefer Curry or James, because they can both provide the size or weight that Frye may be lacking..

Posted by Silverfuel:
Posted by djsunyc:

curry is a STRONG possibility as is kwame.

now that we have lee, malik + 2006 spurs #1 for kwame in a S&T.
I think we should stay away from Kwame bro. I dont think this guy will ever become anything. He doesnt seem to be motivated. I agree with all your other posts though.
The true Knickabocker..........
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
6/29/2005  7:18 AM
Dude, you hit it right in the head...I agree with you a 100%.
Frye will be ten times the player Petro is. I don't understand why people are intrigued with the prospect of teaching someone who doesn't know how to play. How is that better than grabbing someone who already knows how to play? What is the fascination? Picking players who win in college is a good formula. It worked for the Bulls last year, getting Deng and Gordon. Knowing how to win is a big deal in basketball, and people here are obsessed with guys who not only don't know how to win, they don't know how to play. That strikes me as ridiculous.
The true Knickabocker..........
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
6/29/2005  7:32 AM
Posted by bigpimpin:

could everyone please allow these players to do something with the Knicks before we start handing out apprasials. please. it will make your posts seem more believable.

i mean, think about it. it's like handing out report cards on the 1st day of school.

what are the grades based on?

how can you say nate robinson is a game changing back-up point guard when he hasn't played not 1 second in the nba. oh, i get it cause you see the similarities between nate and the little midget in denver.

oh god


aw BP c'mon, that's like saying could everybody please not get excited about their christams presents they just opened until everyone gets a chance later to see how they work.

ya gotta celebrate and talk some positive trash at a time like this, wouldn't ya think a little anyway? maybe at least a little egg nog if the kool-aid's a little too sweet in the morning?
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
6/29/2005  7:37 AM
You are kidding me with this quote right? I usualy agree with you, but to ask us to refrain from giving a draft grade is really being a wet blanket.

Espn has grades, Sports Illustrated grades...should no draft ever be graded until after they play a full season?

Seriously...someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning.

I say B+, only because I have no idea who the last guy we picked is...we got everything we said we needed AND wanted after yesterday.

Lineup:
Marbs, Craw, Nate
Q, Craw
TT, Ariza, Q
Sweets, MoT/Rose
Frye, Rose, Butler

Just a guess
Posted by bigpimpin:
Posted by djsunyc:

we got a center - frye
we got a game changing backup point guard - nate
lee - i'm not sure where he fits but i think he's nbdl for a year then jyd will be traded
42" vertical!?!?!?!?

but this team's style of play is finally taking shape.

guards: marbury, crawford, q, nate
forwards: ariza, sweetney, lee
center: frye

so that's the CORE of the team over the next 3 years.

this now let's us make a big time POWER move with tim and penny's deal.

hey - i was DOWN DOWN DOWN DOWN DOWN on this team as recent as 6 weeks ago. i wanted to get rid of the big $$$'s contract. but after the q&a, i accepted the fact that it will never happen. so now, i look at our young core and i LIKE IT. i LOVE the nate pick. LOVE IT. i think frye is going to be good for us. does he have the upside of bynum? maybe not. but i think he will be a solid player for us and if we get someone like curry or a bigger player and slide him over the the 4, then we got something cooking.

did they slip me kool-aid at the q&a - it's possible but it's in me now and let's keep it coming...

[Edited by - djsunyc on 06/28/2005 23:57:26]

could everyone please allow these players to do something with the Knicks before we start handing out apprasials. please. it will make your posts seem more believable.

i mean, think about it. it's like handing out report cards on the 1st day of school.

what are the grades based on?

how can you say nate robinson is a game changing back-up point guard when he hasn't played not 1 second in the nba. oh, i get it cause you see the similarities between nate and the little midget in denver.

oh god

all kool aid all the time.
GoNyGoNyGo
Posts: 23559
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/29/2003
Member: #411
USA
6/29/2005  7:40 AM
Isiah players who are ready to play. That is really important to consider. It allows him to move some more dead weight around. Correct me if I am wrong, but I think all 3 guys were seniors? That means they are ready to play! No waiting around for development.


Frye will not be alone in the front court. IT will make a move with, Pennyt, TT and the MLE that will bring in a young guy who can play C.

Robinson will be a Garden favorite. He has ridiculous SPEED. NY Needs it. They will wreak havoc on the D now.

Lee - Let's see. He has the ability to be a Pollard or Foster. Nice role guys with good bounding. NY needs that too.


A team is made up of stars and role players. NY got a potential star in FRye. I like ARIZONA players. They do better than expected usually.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/29/2005  8:17 AM
I'd give him an A too because we added four very nice young athletes who fill needs. I would have given him an A+ if he had drafted Bynum instead of Frye.
Knixkik
Posts: 35480
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
6/29/2005  8:31 AM
It was clear what Isiah's plan was for this draft. He wanted to take players who are athletic, experienced, hard workers. You know all these players can come in right away and be very productive. He took Frye, who will be our starting center possibly for years to come, and i do believe he will improve a lot. We got Robinson, who is an athletic, energy guy, and will do all the little things(no pun intended) and make a nice impact off the bench. We also got David Lee, who was the most athletic PF in the draft, and will be a nice role player in the Chris Andersen mold, except maybe better. It's also not a stretch to think he's already as good or better than all our other PFs, maybe even Sweetney. Despite some solid prospects dropping, Isiah clearly didn't see enough potential to outweigh what these guys will bring to the team, so i think they were the right picks.

Draft Grade: A.
Panos
Posts: 30131
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
6/29/2005  8:36 AM
Posted by fishmike:

I'm not sure we are much better either, but we are much younger and much closer to a style of play. Thats good. Whats not good is with 3 first rounders what we come away with is 3 role players. I like them all, but I also think we could have done better at every spot, except 30, where I think Isiah just took the BPA and I agree Lee was the BPA.

I give him a C+ also. I would say this draft helps rebuild the team with youth, but the talent level isnt impressive.

Had he drafted Green at 8 I think he would have been giving us a shot at a real franchise player.

How would you feel if our draft was Green, Petro and Lee?

I'm not down on this draft, but I'm hardly impressed either.

Fish, you've summed it up for me. I agree totally.
Panos
Posts: 30131
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
6/29/2005  8:53 AM
Posted by GoNyGoNyGo:

Lee - Let's see. He has the ability to be a Pollard or Foster. Nice role guys with good bounding. NY needs that too.

Posted by Knixkik:

We also got David Lee, who was the most athletic PF in the draft, and will be a nice role player in the Chris Andersen mold, except maybe better.

Yo, why does everybody have to compare Lee to another white guy
around here? Why can't he be the next Antonio Davis, or Kevin Willis
or Chris Wilcox, or any other black player that you think matches
his skills?
You're all a bunch of racists. Everybody calling him a token white
boy. Isiah is the one guy that would never pick somebody cuz he's
white. Y'all racists.
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
6/29/2005  9:18 AM
Posted by GoNyGoNyGo:

Frye will not be alone in the front court. IT will make a move with, Pennyt, TT and the MLE that will bring in a young guy who can play C.
Man, this is KEY! Once we get that Center, we can finally have a complete team.
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
MS
Posts: 27060
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
6/29/2005  9:32 AM
I really don't know why anyone is excited about this draft especially people that know the game....

What are Fryes numbers going to be, not better than Kurt Thomas thats for sure, he averaged 7.4 rebounds in college why are his numbers going to go up. Sweetney average 10 is 3 inches shorter than him.....And Blocking shots in college isn't as challenging as you think if you have the size...Green and Granger would have been the better pick in all honesty, even taking a chance on Brynum

The Suns pick for us I just don't understand, Robinson was not going in the first round, and you have a chance to take Jack (leader, tough defender took his team to the final four, at 6'4) or Hodge who is versatile can handle the ball and create mismatches, or even Petro, who we could leave in France and let him develop....We are rebuilding not reloading......

And the 30th made no sense, Lee is a good player but no for this team, we should have went big, Blachte, Taft, Martinas A, or someone...

Take a chance, Isiah will you instead of adding mega contracts for guys that don't play D, use you head for once

I think a C is in order for this draft

We could have had a future star, and a couple of nice role players, now we just have a couple of role players
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
6/29/2005  9:38 AM
Dude!!! we all know that you are an Isiah hater...Be a fan for once in you life...If the man does well, give him props...He did an excellent job, considering how we have done in the past.

Posted by MS:

I really don't know why anyone is excited about this draft especially people that know the game....

What are Fryes numbers going to be, not better than Kurt Thomas thats for sure, he averaged 7.4 rebounds in college why are his numbers going to go up. Sweetney average 10 is 3 inches shorter than him.....And Blocking shots in college isn't as challenging as you think if you have the size...Green and Granger would have been the better pick in all honesty, even taking a chance on Brynum

The Suns pick for us I just don't understand, Robinson was not going in the first round, and you have a chance to take Jack (leader, tough defender took his team to the final four, at 6'4) or Hodge who is versatile can handle the ball and create mismatches, or even Petro, who we could leave in France and let him develop....We are rebuilding not reloading......

And the 30th made no sense, Lee is a good player but no for this team, we should have went big, Blachte, Taft, Martinas A, or someone...

Take a chance, Isiah will you instead of adding mega contracts for guys that don't play D, use you head for once

I think a C is in order for this draft

We could have had a future star, and a couple of nice role players, now we just have a couple of role players
The true Knickabocker..........
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
6/29/2005  9:53 AM
when you look at the skillset for the young core of the team, you definitely see a style of play. guys that cause a frantic pace and now guys that can play that style both ways. there's an identity forming when we had NONE 48 hours ago.

have any of these players done jack in the nba? nope.

but what's different about taking frye than drafting melo last year? melo's never played an nba game but everybody here would've hooting and hollering.

we have a LONG LONG LONG way to go but look at this young core fellas:

craw
nate
Q
ariza
sweets
lee
frye

there's some freakin' hope for the future. as as gony stated, these 3 picks are ready to play NOW. this lets us move mo, jyd, malik RIGHT NOW.

did we draft a player with sky high potential? on paper, no we didn't. but i look at it like this - the nets drafted eddie griffin, who at #8 (i believe) was expected to do great things. they then traded down to get RJ and collins - two solid players that gave them help at multiple positions to add to kmart and kidd.

that's what we just did. did we take bynum, who may or may not have a higher ceiling? nope but we brought in 3 VERY solid players that will be a part of this rotation as soon as november.

i don't see ANY negatives about this draft.

now that we have ZERO plans to get under the cap and with the HUGE relief we get from h20, zeke can really make a big time POWER move with penny and tim.

there are similarities here between isiah and dumars. dumars brought in these players like billups (wtf??), rip (all star for role playing SG??!?!), ben and chucky (for grant F'N hill!?!??!), and raped atlanta for sheed and it all fit together perfectly.

will that happen here? who the F knows. but there is a PLAN now, and we can FINALLY see it.
to me, isiah gets an "A" for this draft...

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy