SupremeCommander wrote:

loweyecue wrote:

holfresh wrote:

nixluva wrote:

Syniko wrote:I don't pay attention to Melo anymore with or without the ball. My focus is on Lin/Novak/J.R/Chandler/Shump/JJ and Landry. Couldn't care any less if Melo gets traded from the Knicks. If Melo goes, so will Stephen A. Smith. Anyway, we're stuck with Melo so I guess I'll just have to cheer for him.

IMO the Knicks already proved they could win without Melo. I'm glad that he's finally pitching in on D, but really the team has a better record without him and even stat wise they play better without him. My main reason for wanting Melo was his crunchtime shot making, not his middle of the game effectiveness. He's always been a very inefficient scorer. What you hope is that he does the little things like he's doing now so the team isn't hurt by his lack of D and inefficient scoring. That's been the good thing so far is that he's really fighting hard on D now. I hope it continues.

What have the Knicks won?

What has Melo won?

you mean, besides the Olympics and the NCAA Tournament?

Great; all we have to do now is either surround him with 11 other Olympians or start playing college teams!

loweyecue wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

nixluva wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:Great job by the Knicks. Great coaching in particular. Great subbing, use of timeouts, and holding players accountable. I really liked how Lin choose when to attack the rim, and I'm loving that pull up of his in the paint. They're expecting him to plow into the rim and he's using that against them. He's used it at times but his shot wasn't as crisp as it looked tonite, for the most part. Liked how Melo found other ways to contribute. I think Bibby made a case for limited minutes. lets not let up against the Raps!

I think this time the Knicks will be alright. I don't get the sense that they will backslide again. Woody and the players seem to be on the same page and I think they like what's going on now. This reminds me a bit of how the team looked during Linsanity in terms of the players keeping the same intensity on D.

This kind of staying power is what we're going to need against top seeds. The great thing is that we did it with our stars and Novak not having a particularly good game offensively and the bench not only keeping us in the game but pulling us ahead.

When was the last time our "stars" had a good game?

One of the best wins this season, on the road, try to enjoy it. I know I am.

Bonn1997 wrote:

SupremeCommander wrote:

loweyecue wrote:

holfresh wrote:

nixluva wrote:

Syniko wrote:I don't pay attention to Melo anymore with or without the ball. My focus is on Lin/Novak/J.R/Chandler/Shump/JJ and Landry. Couldn't care any less if Melo gets traded from the Knicks. If Melo goes, so will Stephen A. Smith. Anyway, we're stuck with Melo so I guess I'll just have to cheer for him.

IMO the Knicks already proved they could win without Melo. I'm glad that he's finally pitching in on D, but really the team has a better record without him and even stat wise they play better without him. My main reason for wanting Melo was his crunchtime shot making, not his middle of the game effectiveness. He's always been a very inefficient scorer. What you hope is that he does the little things like he's doing now so the team isn't hurt by his lack of D and inefficient scoring. That's been the good thing so far is that he's really fighting hard on D now. I hope it continues.

What have the Knicks won?

What has Melo won?

you mean, besides the Olympics and the NCAA Tournament?

Great; all we have to do now is either surround him with 11 other Olympians or start playing college teams!

CrushAlot wrote:

holfresh wrote:

loweyecue wrote:

holfresh wrote:

nixluva wrote:

Syniko wrote:I don't pay attention to Melo anymore with or without the ball. My focus is on Lin/Novak/J.R/Chandler/Shump/JJ and Landry. Couldn't care any less if Melo gets traded from the Knicks. If Melo goes, so will Stephen A. Smith. Anyway, we're stuck with Melo so I guess I'll just have to cheer for him.

IMO the Knicks already proved they could win without Melo. I'm glad that he's finally pitching in on D, but really the team has a better record without him and even stat wise they play better without him. My main reason for wanting Melo was his crunchtime shot making, not his middle of the game effectiveness. He's always been a very inefficient scorer. What you hope is that he does the little things like he's doing now so the team isn't hurt by his lack of D and inefficient scoring. That's been the good thing so far is that he's really fighting hard on D now. I hope it continues.

What have the Knicks won?

What has Melo won?

All the hate has become tiresome...Start a hate tread and post there...It's old..

+1. This was a great win.

Seconded.

Bonn1997 wrote:

crzymdups wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

SupremeCommander wrote:

loweyecue wrote:

holfresh wrote:

nixluva wrote:

Syniko wrote:I don't pay attention to Melo anymore with or without the ball. My focus is on Lin/Novak/J.R/Chandler/Shump/JJ and Landry. Couldn't care any less if Melo gets traded from the Knicks. If Melo goes, so will Stephen A. Smith. Anyway, we're stuck with Melo so I guess I'll just have to cheer for him.

IMO the Knicks already proved they could win without Melo. I'm glad that he's finally pitching in on D, but really the team has a better record without him and even stat wise they play better without him. My main reason for wanting Melo was his crunchtime shot making, not his middle of the game effectiveness. He's always been a very inefficient scorer. What you hope is that he does the little things like he's doing now so the team isn't hurt by his lack of D and inefficient scoring. That's been the good thing so far is that he's really fighting hard on D now. I hope it continues.

What have the Knicks won?

What has Melo won?

you mean, besides the Olympics and the NCAA Tournament?

Great; all we have to do now is either surround him with 11 other Olympians or start playing college teams!

ugh. seriously? what part of anything melo did tonight was not indicative of winning basketball. dude played a team game, defended and won a big game on the road. he let lin take over when lin was cooking.

You're asking me about tonight? Wrong discussion - the topic is what Melo has won in his career. There were some good and bad things from him tonight but it's myopic to spend much time analyzing one game.

oh, okay, what's his career winning percentage then?

holfresh wrote:

loweyecue wrote:

holfresh wrote:

nixluva wrote:

Syniko wrote:I don't pay attention to Melo anymore with or without the ball. My focus is on Lin/Novak/J.R/Chandler/Shump/JJ and Landry. Couldn't care any less if Melo gets traded from the Knicks. If Melo goes, so will Stephen A. Smith. Anyway, we're stuck with Melo so I guess I'll just have to cheer for him.

IMO the Knicks already proved they could win without Melo. I'm glad that he's finally pitching in on D, but really the team has a better record without him and even stat wise they play better without him. My main reason for wanting Melo was his crunchtime shot making, not his middle of the game effectiveness. He's always been a very inefficient scorer. What you hope is that he does the little things like he's doing now so the team isn't hurt by his lack of D and inefficient scoring. That's been the good thing so far is that he's really fighting hard on D now. I hope it continues.

What have the Knicks won?

What has Melo won?

All the hate has become tiresome...Start a hate tread and post there...It's old..

Are you suggesting I hate Melo or you hate the Knicks?
If you don't like my posts don't read them.

Bonn1997 wrote:

crzymdups wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

crzymdups wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

SupremeCommander wrote:

loweyecue wrote:

holfresh wrote:

nixluva wrote:

Syniko wrote:I don't pay attention to Melo anymore with or without the ball. My focus is on Lin/Novak/J.R/Chandler/Shump/JJ and Landry. Couldn't care any less if Melo gets traded from the Knicks. If Melo goes, so will Stephen A. Smith. Anyway, we're stuck with Melo so I guess I'll just have to cheer for him.

IMO the Knicks already proved they could win without Melo. I'm glad that he's finally pitching in on D, but really the team has a better record without him and even stat wise they play better without him. My main reason for wanting Melo was his crunchtime shot making, not his middle of the game effectiveness. He's always been a very inefficient scorer. What you hope is that he does the little things like he's doing now so the team isn't hurt by his lack of D and inefficient scoring. That's been the good thing so far is that he's really fighting hard on D now. I hope it continues.

What have the Knicks won?

What has Melo won?

you mean, besides the Olympics and the NCAA Tournament?

Great; all we have to do now is either surround him with 11 other Olympians or start playing college teams!

ugh. seriously? what part of anything melo did tonight was not indicative of winning basketball. dude played a team game, defended and won a big game on the road. he let lin take over when lin was cooking.

You're asking me about tonight? Wrong discussion - the topic is what Melo has won in his career. There were some good and bad things from him tonight but it's myopic to spend much time analyzing one game.

oh, okay, what's his career winning percentage then?

My guess is somewhere in the .500s in the regular season and .300s in the playoffs.

Send Closking!

loweyecue wrote:

holfresh wrote:

loweyecue wrote:

holfresh wrote:

nixluva wrote:

Syniko wrote:I don't pay attention to Melo anymore with or without the ball. My focus is on Lin/Novak/J.R/Chandler/Shump/JJ and Landry. Couldn't care any less if Melo gets traded from the Knicks. If Melo goes, so will Stephen A. Smith. Anyway, we're stuck with Melo so I guess I'll just have to cheer for him.

IMO the Knicks already proved they could win without Melo. I'm glad that he's finally pitching in on D, but really the team has a better record without him and even stat wise they play better without him. My main reason for wanting Melo was his crunchtime shot making, not his middle of the game effectiveness. He's always been a very inefficient scorer. What you hope is that he does the little things like he's doing now so the team isn't hurt by his lack of D and inefficient scoring. That's been the good thing so far is that he's really fighting hard on D now. I hope it continues.

What have the Knicks won?

What has Melo won?

All the hate has become tiresome...Start a hate tread and post there...It's old..

Are you suggesting I hate Melo or you hate the Knicks?
If you don't like my posts don't read them.

Bonn1997 wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:

loweyecue wrote:

holfresh wrote:

loweyecue wrote:

holfresh wrote:

nixluva wrote:

Syniko wrote:I don't pay attention to Melo anymore with or without the ball. My focus is on Lin/Novak/J.R/Chandler/Shump/JJ and Landry. Couldn't care any less if Melo gets traded from the Knicks. If Melo goes, so will Stephen A. Smith. Anyway, we're stuck with Melo so I guess I'll just have to cheer for him.

IMO the Knicks already proved they could win without Melo. I'm glad that he's finally pitching in on D, but really the team has a better record without him and even stat wise they play better without him. My main reason for wanting Melo was his crunchtime shot making, not his middle of the game effectiveness. He's always been a very inefficient scorer. What you hope is that he does the little things like he's doing now so the team isn't hurt by his lack of D and inefficient scoring. That's been the good thing so far is that he's really fighting hard on D now. I hope it continues.

What have the Knicks won?

What has Melo won?

All the hate has become tiresome...Start a hate tread and post there...It's old..

Are you suggesting I hate Melo or you hate the Knicks?
If you don't like my posts don't read them.

I think you hate that the Knicks are winning without your coach.

This is borderline trollish. I have not seen one indication that Lowey is upset the team is winning or has ever been happy when the team loses. Where's your evidence?