Isabela Soncini

Someone else please post pics.

Let the games begin!!

NYKBocker wrote:

BlueSeats wrote:And Bocker, the call was given to you by Martin. Please make it.

I love boobery, but I think we should keep it clean in the tournament.

Ya done me dirty, Bocker. Done me real dirty.

NYKBocker wrote:

islesfan wrote:Monika Pietrasinska

Not trying to get on my high horse, just looking for honor among thieves.

Anyway...I wont be able to post today and I think one of my girls will be competing. If so, can you link some images for me? This place seems to be as good as any:

http://www.byroncrawford.com/2011/04/rack-radar-angie-varona.html

Thanks

NYKBocker wrote:^ I can't control the rogue GMs. martin has already deleted one over-the-top post. I like the last pic by the way.

Jeez, you'd think I'd posted a bukkake special or a gyno close up. I thought it was just an airbrushed Playboy shot. I think I need to work on sizing my pic posts. It the pics hadn't been so huge, it probably would have been overlooked.

Then again, I believe I'm on martin's Rightwingnut Shit list.
Damn that crack intern Bippity and his poster-specific-search-update function!

BlueSeats wrote:

NYKBocker wrote:

BlueSeats wrote:You set a rule that altered the draft and then broke your own rule on the first day. So much for principled rules fairly applied.

Not trying to get on my high horse, just looking for honor among thieves.

Anyway...I wont be able to post today and I think one of my girls will be competing. If so, can you link some images for me? This place seems to be as good as any:

http://www.byroncrawford.com/2011/04/rack-radar-angie-varona.html

Thanks

My bad. I see what you mean. I copied and pasted the GMs post in the draft and did not proof read it.

Thanks for posting Angie's picks for me, Bocker.

You have a nice little conundrum on your hands now. Last year's tourney winner (Maran) is likely to be dethroned by the 58th pick, Largely because Keeley is showing her formidable nekkid rack. Not really a fair contest if you don't meet fire with fire? Do you uphold your rules or are they already lost to the wind? What about the appropriate NSFW warnings?

How ironic. I'm the guy who tried to push the topples option thru and ended up picking two girls with essentially zero topless shots. And you're the guy who ruled "NO TOPLESS", yet were the first to post them in the tourney, and now may be dethroned because of it.

I hope I'm turning the screw tight enough.

Ahh, you're just trying to prove a point? I thought you were aboard the Team Solace bandwagon.

BlueSeats wrote:

Solace wrote:

BlueSeats wrote:

NYKBocker wrote:

BlueSeats wrote:You set a rule that altered the draft and then broke your own rule on the first day. So much for principled rules fairly applied.

Not trying to get on my high horse, just looking for honor among thieves.

Anyway...I wont be able to post today and I think one of my girls will be competing. If so, can you link some images for me? This place seems to be as good as any:

http://www.byroncrawford.com/2011/04/rack-radar-angie-varona.html

Thanks

My bad. I see what you mean. I copied and pasted the GMs post in the draft and did not proof read it.

Thanks for posting Angie's picks for me, Bocker.

You have a nice little conundrum on your hands now. Last year's tourney winner (Maran) is likely to be dethroned by the 58th pick, Largely because Keeley is showing her formidable nekkid rack. Not really a fair contest if you don't meet fire with fire? Do you uphold your rules or are they already lost to the wind? What about the appropriate NSFW warnings?

How ironic. I'm the guy who tried to push the topples option thru and ended up picking two girls with essentially zero topless shots. And you're the guy who ruled "NO TOPLESS", yet were the first to post them in the tourney, and now may be dethroned because of it.

I hope I'm turning the screw tight enough.

Ahh, you're just trying to prove a point? I thought you were aboard the Team Solace bandwagon.

Oh shuddap! You're the other lying, cheating, scurrilous, opportunistic, two-faced, full of shiet, scallywag.

Solace wrote:

OasisBU wrote:

martin wrote:

scoshin wrote:

BlueSeats wrote:Isn't it wonderful?

It is. I may have to rethink my next selection and pick someone who looks even better naked.

hmmm, let's cap it at topless. Thanks

I think the tournament was better without nudity personally.

I kind of agree. Aren't we voting for the most beautiful woman, not the sluttiest?

Solace wrote:I don't think anyone wants anyone banned from the draft. It's just not an even competition if some of the ladies have naked pictures and some don't. As for what it takes to influence, I respectfully disagree with your opinion that certain styles of pictures won't have heavy influence on who wins. Many of the rounds last year had victories by just 1 or 2 votes. One person saying, "Oooh... boobs.... nipples" changes the result. Just my take, of course.

Solace wrote:Depends on the style of picture of course. It probably was not the right way to phrase it. But if you open Pandora's box, this can degrade pretty quickly. We already saw one or two posts with inklings of possibly picking a different style of woman with the NSFW addition. It clearly has an impact. Anyway, my personal taste is to keep it just a tiny bit classier.

Solace wrote:Just a difference of opinion. It's fair to say that maybe it shouldn't be the line, but it's one we're used to. I agree with SC's concern that it might chase off the few females that do occasionally post here.

Anyway, I agree, let's get back to fun times. Keep the draft going. I still have one more pick.

Then you go and post draft Hazell and post naked boob the first chance you get.

Well, it was obvious the rules changed, so it would be foolish not to use them to my advantage, yes? Why would I handicap myself by not doing something that most everyone (except you) was smart enough to do given the rule change?

I would've preferred without the boobage, but anyway... since we're there, might as well make the best of it.

BlueSeats wrote:

Solace wrote:
Well, it was obvious the rules changed, so it would be foolish not to use them to my advantage, yes? Why would I handicap myself by not doing something that most everyone (except you) was smart enough to do given the rule change?

I would've preferred without the boobage, but anyway... since we're there, might as well make the best of it.

The rules were not changed.

NYKBocker wrote:

BlueSeats wrote:And Bocker, the call was given to you by Martin. Please make it.

I love boobery, but I think we should keep it clean in the tournament.

They just weren't respected by those most adamantly in favor of keeping them.

I agree. I noticed NYKBocker posting boobs and derived I must've misunderstood and that we had boobery. Only when you quoted his post did I realize I read right the first time. But, anyway, whether the official rules or not, seems to be where we are.

Personally, though, I do think you have a valid point, which lead you to drafting someone you would not have drafted otherwise. I would be cool with you getting a replacement pick to make up for it. You seem kinda upset and this should all be in fun.

Solace wrote:

BlueSeats wrote:

Solace wrote:
Well, it was obvious the rules changed, so it would be foolish not to use them to my advantage, yes? Why would I handicap myself by not doing something that most everyone (except you) was smart enough to do given the rule change?

I would've preferred without the boobage, but anyway... since we're there, might as well make the best of it.

The rules were not changed.

NYKBocker wrote:

BlueSeats wrote:And Bocker, the call was given to you by Martin. Please make it.

I love boobery, but I think we should keep it clean in the tournament.

They just weren't respected by those most adamantly in favor of keeping them.

I agree. I noticed NYKBocker posting boobs and derived I must've misunderstood and that we had boobery. Only when you quoted his post did I realize I read right the first time. But, anyway, whether the official rules or not, seems to be where we are.

Personally, though, I do think you have a valid point, which lead you to drafting someone you would not have drafted otherwise. I would be cool with you getting a replacement pick to make up for it. You seem kinda upset and this should all be in fun.

I noticed that the thread is still labeled NSFW. Despite all this pathetic high-brow churn over bare titties.