Posted by JayNYC:
Do I have to be so literal? Ok...I will spell it out....I will not trade a 22 yr old, 6-11, PF/C with inside outside potential and room for growth and development for a 30 yr old All-Star who is past his prime. If you give me a you Amare (BEFORE THE MICROFRACTURE Surgery)-type or Dwight Howard-type, then you can talk about dealing Frye! Can you read between the lines or do I have to spell it out further?
I don't get it.. You won't trade for Kevin Garnett because at 29, he's considered past his prime.. right? Well, Does that mean that A.I, Kobe, Tracy McGrady, Tim Duncan, Dirk Nowitzki would be off limits as well because they are going to be 28 plus?
Just out of curiosity, Do you think that Amare Stoudemire or/Dwight Howard are better than Kevin Garnett even when comparing them prior to knee injury?
[Edited by - JayNYC on 11-23-2005 7:16 PM]
Amare could be a dominant force (mind you he is STILL only 22 and before he went down it was written somewhere he was devleloping a 3pt shot). Howard has that potential.
You have a point about all these elite players at 28 or 29 that is hard to argue BUT I still would prefer to obtain--in no particular order-- Lebron, Wade, Shawn Marion, Arenas, Bosh, Kirilinko, Jermaine, Artest, Amare (if proven healthy) and Howard. A YOUNG dominant player that is markedly better than what we are giving up and will continue to be a star for a long time.
Making a move on KG giving up most of our young talent reminds me of all the moves the Knicks tried to make acquiring 30 yr old players like Glen Rice and McDyess (who granted was unhealthy anyway)and they just failed here. We have a young core here and Channing is the best of the bunch. Normally I hate trading Big for small, but I would definately include Channing in a move for ANY of the guys I just mentioned.
BTW...KG is GOING on 30...
http://www.nba.com/players/
TMAC is going on 27, I'll move frye for him.
Bryant is going on 28, I'll move Frye for him.
Nowitzki is going on 28 in June, I'll take him (hypothetically...I never liked his game)
AI is going on 32...no way.
Duncan is going on 31 and his numbers are decreasing (granted it's still better than ANYONE we have, but there are better options if we are talking hypotheically for this team.
[Edited by - joec32033 on 11-23-2005 10:35 PM]