holfresh wrote:

Allanfan20 wrote:

holfresh wrote:Trump rushed off stage by secret service..

I saw this. It was at the beginning of an event in Reno. There is no evidence to support that this was an assassination attempt. Let me say this, while I can't stand Trump at all, him being assassinated would be the worst thing imaginable. I feel that would completely open up Pandora's box as well. I'm glad he's protected and well.

I'm not a Trump supporter but I'm a little concerned for his safety post election if he loses..He stirred up lots of emotions on the campaign trail and lot of nuts out there..He will be a civilian again roaming NY and easily accessible..

He would probably have to lay low for quite awhile.

gunsnewing wrote:I would hope that after Trump wins before planning to assassinate the man would considering getting the hell out of this country. There's nothing the "tolerant" left can do that would surprise me at this point

When you can't win national elections on your policies or getting the most votes, just prevent people from voting and support foreign criminals to influence our elections. Right wingers, such wonderful "Americans." Can't understand the concept of the ends not justifying the means and how the short term benefit of wikileaks is going to potentially have major long term ramifications for a lot of people, including themselves.

I will lose a lot of faith in this country if these folks are allowed to get away with this. Tuesday is going to say a lot about the state of this country.

gunsnewing wrote:^I can maybe buy the argument about not knowing what our future holds and fear of direction. But no one can honestly tell me they are enthusiastic and pleased about the prospects of Hillary Rodham Clinton leading you and I.

holfresh wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

gunsnewing wrote:^I can maybe buy the argument about not knowing what our future holds and fear of direction. But no one can honestly tell me they are enthusiastic and pleased about the prospects of Hillary Rodham Clinton leading you and I.

I am very excited about the possibility of a progressive supreme court.

Along with the Sumpreme Court, I'm excited to have a President that actually believes in Science and economic studies to understand what's really happening to the middle class in terms of wage and job growth..

holfresh wrote:

Welpee wrote:

holfresh wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

gunsnewing wrote:^I can maybe buy the argument about not knowing what our future holds and fear of direction. But no one can honestly tell me they are enthusiastic and pleased about the prospects of Hillary Rodham Clinton leading you and I.

I am very excited about the possibility of a progressive supreme court.

Along with the Sumpreme Court, I'm excited to have a President that actually believes in Science and economic studies to understand what's really happening to the middle class in terms of wage and job growth..

Not to mention a president who actually knows what's she talking about when it comes to foreign affairs and has the intellectual capacity to understand complex matters versus having a "secret plan."

Do mention...How about a president who can embrace how rapidly technology has changed the world in the last 15/20 years and some one who is ready to deal with what will happen in the next 4/8 years..Not some one who thinks the answer is taking the country back to 1960/70s..Trump is on record as saying he doesn't like to read..Bodes well for our future..

Yep - real technology guru who does not even understand how e-mail works and has no slightest idea about cybersecurity.
Of course if her corrupted interest will be in line with some US population groups they will side-benefit from her polices but as soon as it will not be the case they will lose everything and more.
Not to say that Trump is better. Well established corrupter group of politicians may be slightly better that new one. May cost less to the people.

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/DrJillStein/status/795068270198091776

earthmansurfer wrote:

holfresh wrote:

Welpee wrote:

holfresh wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

gunsnewing wrote:^I can maybe buy the argument about not knowing what our future holds and fear of direction. But no one can honestly tell me they are enthusiastic and pleased about the prospects of Hillary Rodham Clinton leading you and I.

I am very excited about the possibility of a progressive supreme court.

Along with the Sumpreme Court, I'm excited to have a President that actually believes in Science and economic studies to understand what's really happening to the middle class in terms of wage and job growth..

Not to mention a president who actually knows what's she talking about when it comes to foreign affairs and has the intellectual capacity to understand complex matters versus having a "secret plan."

Do mention...How about a president who can embrace how rapidly technology has changed the world in the last 15/20 years and some one who is ready to deal with what will happen in the next 4/8 years..Not some one who thinks the answer is taking the country back to 1960/70s..Trump is on record as saying he doesn't like to read..Bodes well for our future..

Speaking of technology, perhaps Hillary needs to learn about her maid printing classified documents.

NY POST - Clinton directed her maid to print out classified materials

As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton routinely asked her maid to print out sensitive government e-mails and documents — including ones containing classified information — from her house in Washington, DC, e-mails and FBI memos show. But the housekeeper lacked the security clearance to handle such material.

http://nypost.com/2016/11/06/clinton-directed-her-maid-to-print-out-classified-materials/