Author | Thread |
Clean
Posts: 30311 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 8/22/2004 Member: #743 |
![]() Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: The man is not lying. |
AUTOADVERT |
martin
Posts: 76028 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() Clean wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: On top of that, Knicks also had troubles at the C spot with Mitch taking 50+ games to get in shape and with Noel hurt all season. Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39759 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() martin wrote:Clean wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: In light of the improvements made by other teams in the least, how much do you think Brunson signing measures up? I'd 3-5 more wins, but there are a lot of variables there. I don't put any expectations on Rose at this stage in his career. But I expect Fournier to play better and RJ to make some improvements. IQ and Obi could also play better. I'd also expect this team to need time to gel in the early part of the season. This season could end up going in a number of directions. Maybe they should wait and see what they have before they make drastic changes to the roster? Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
TPercy
Posts: 28010 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/5/2014 Member: #5748 |
![]() BigDaddyG wrote:martin wrote:Clean wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: If Randle rebounds a little and can give us 18-20 pts on solid shooting splits and limited TOs, I think we can see as much as 10-12 more wins. The Future is Bright!
|
Philc1
Posts: 28292 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 9/2/2020 Member: #8897 |
![]() BigDaddyG wrote:martin wrote:Clean wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Best case scenario: 10-15 win improvement and 4th seed
Either way it’s hard to imagine us not being better next year. We have a functional starting pg now who can create passing lanes. Our young core guys have another year of experience |
smackeddog
Posts: 38389 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
![]() Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: This is the correct stance. I think there's a reasonable chance these negotiations fall apart- Ainge has failed to pull off more trades than he has done successful ones. He was so busy trying to 'win' the Gordon Hayward trade with Indiana, he ended up blowing it and having him go to the Hornets rather than get back Miles Turner (who was exactly what they needed at C). But if that happens, it happens. |
smackeddog
Posts: 38389 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
![]() Genuinely embarrassing watching Kellerman here, glad Hahn pushes back on the lame, tired, BS |
Nalod
Posts: 71086 Alba Posts: 155 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
![]() smackeddog wrote: But, Kellerman does sound like some of us too. To the point that DM won't bring a chip...... One thing we might agree on is for Leon to not give up the dowry. |
smackeddog
Posts: 38389 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
![]() Nalod wrote:smackeddog wrote: It's been said a few times on twitter and podcasts, but the Knicks are held to this bizarre, ever changing standard, that goes from "no one wants to sign/ go there", to instantly pivoting to "Ha! Well that doesn't make them an instant contender and is therefore a stupid move. What other non-playoff (or even play in) team has every move they make judged against whether it instantly makes them a championship contender?! Just ridiculous. Seems like we've pretty much set out our stall and boundaries for a deal, and the Jazz will go fishing to see if they can top it, but we've pretty much said what our parameters are and given them a sliding scale to choose from. That's a very reasonable stance, that personally, I think is in tune with most Knick fans- is that what everyone else is finding among their Knick brethren? (ie go for it but don't over pay due to the scars of the Melo trade) |
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39759 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() smackeddog wrote: Sliding scale 😂Was that the true highlight of the off-season for Brock Aller? Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39759 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() Randle gone?!?!?
Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
smackeddog
Posts: 38389 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
![]() BigDaddyG wrote:Randle gone?!?!?Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: This could work: Knicks send out: Randle to Lakers $24mil Lakers then send Westbrook to Knicks ($47mil) Rose to the Nets (who then buy him out, allowing him to sign anywhere he likes, maybe a Bulls reunion) Nets send Kyrie to the Lakers $37mil Seems to work on trade machine, somehow…
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39759 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() smackeddog wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Randle gone?!?!?Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
smackeddog
Posts: 38389 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
![]() BigDaddyG wrote:smackeddog wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Randle gone?!?!?Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: I get it would be to shed salary and we’d buy out Westbrook, (we could even just do Rose and Randle for Westbrook), but we’d essentially be unable to do any deadline trades and be left very thin: PG- Brunson |
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39759 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() smackeddog wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:smackeddog wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Randle gone?!?!?Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Saw another theory that it could be part of a 3-way that allows the utah to move the salary they'd get from the Knicks and perhaps another player to the Lakers. They'd get another first-rounder from the Lakers (in 2030 😂) in the process. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
wargames
Posts: 22833 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/27/2015 Member: #6053 |
![]() smackeddog wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:smackeddog wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Randle gone?!?!?Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: And guess who would own their draft pick… plus Thibs will play that thin bench 42 minutes a night if he can get away with it The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
|
Chandler
Posts: 26774 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 11/26/2015 Member: #6197 |
![]() I don't think we're moving Randle, not unless we get some crazy offer i think the knicks are banking on a rebound and frankly that's probably the smartest approach if you weigh risk/reward. We all got super frustrated with him -- me included big time. But of all Knicks possibilities the idea of Randle returning to all NBA form has the biggest impact for the team -- no matter what you want to do with him. We treat him like an afterthought but let's remember D-Mitchell has not made all NBA. (5)(7)
|