MS wrote:8 turnovers on 3-13 coming off of 4-18.

Iggy has a nice motor out there.

Please, when the question of G League comes up for RJ,SEND HIM! None of that, "what is he gonna learn there" crap. Don't make the same mistake we made with Frank.

What makes him talented or special?

martin wrote:For a top 3 pick Barrett looks horrible to me. Horrible defender. Can’t shoot. Bad decision maker. Not explosive. Looks slow.

What makes him talented or special?

see post above.

Chandler wrote:

fitzfarm wrote:Man Knox should sit next game. Going under the screen on multiple possessions vs a guy who only shoots 3’s.... thanks Knox you lost the game tonight with your zero effort defense

That was really disappointing. For all our talk about position-less basketball too

Fiz is not going to give him the same rope he did last season...there's too many FAs signed quite willing to take his mins.

Uptown wrote:

CleaverGreene wrote:

StarksEwing1 wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

StarksEwing1 wrote:

CleaverGreene wrote:

BigDaddyG wrote:

StarksEwing1 wrote:Great Half. Good news for all the main kids. Im a little puzzled why they arent running any plays for RJ other than the first possession. Iggy showing his talent. I think he could be another 2nd round gem

Not quite sure what he is, but the kid is bringing the effort.

Seems like he has to be a 3, though I wish he had quicker feet as a defender. When we got him I wondered if he could play PF, but he's smaller than I thought he was when we got him.

I don't want to get attacked, but he seems like a more confident offensive player than Barrett right now, and more efficient.

He even shows some good passing instincts.

I agree with StarksEwing...he was a steal as a #2. If he had played another year he might have been a late teens #1.

Nobody will attack you. So far Iggy has been tremendous. Barrett has had a better game but is probably still getting over some nerves/rust. I would like them to run more plays for him to get him in a flow

Stop attacking him for not wanting to be attacked, you attacker...

hahaha

Yeah...I'm losing all my confidence.

Iggy does have a little Trier in him, maybe too aggressive on offense at times. Does move better without the ball, though.

Rather have a player who is overly aggressive rather than overly passive...

CrushAlot wrote:Watching the second half on delay. Wooten looks like a keeper. Iggy has been awesome.

Wooten is a bit like a smaller version Mitch on D. Let him play 35MPG at Westchester and work on his offense. Just turned 21 in April. Would definitely keep him at this point.

Chandler wrote:

martin wrote:

fitzfarm wrote:Man Knox should sit next game. Going under the screen on multiple possessions vs a guy who only shoots 3’s.... thanks Knox you lost the game tonight with your zero effort defense

Pretty sure Mitch was not supposed to drop back into the paint. Maybe show a bit on the shooter

Maybe. But those guys played a year together. Either horrible communication or coaching

Or maybe Mitch ****ed up. It’s PnR defense, both players have to know what to do