mrKnickShot wrote:GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:gunsnewing wrote:So Lin went 1-11 against miami. How many times did melo do that last year. He was 0-11 one game prob against the Bobcats
I will say this one last time - Lin shot very poorly against > .500 competition. You can harp on Miami if you choose to.
Melo shot 46 pct against > .500 competition while Lin shot 34 pct.
That does not mean that Lin can't learn to play better against these teams, he just has not done it yet.
Jeremy Lin: 2nd year player, possibly league average starting PG, possibly very good backup, $8.33M average salary. Role: POINT GUARD
Carmelo Anthony: One of the best scorers in the league, possibly one of the best of this era of the NBA, 7th highest paid player in the entire league at an average of 21.49M. ROLE: BUCKET GETTER/FRANCHISE PLAYER/SUPERSTAR
Why are we comparing these two players again?
This doesn't apply to you specifically mrKS and it's already been said in this thread but you can NOT use the small sample size argument to diminish the numbers Lin was putting up and then use 1 game in Miami to make any kind of point about his game.
One could then turn right around and use only his games against Dallas and the Lakers to project him as the best thing since sliced bread.
I am not sure where you are going with your statements/arguments.
I never compared Lin to Melo - the Melo-haters do that. Its an alarmingly silly comparison. The Dallas and Laker games were road games for those teams and they are/were both .400 road teams. Hardly stiff competition.
My point was that regardless of sample size, Lin has not proven that he can be successful against the good teams. He does look like he has the potential to be a good player.
The Miami game just showed other teams that if you trap him high, it gives him a lot of trouble. After that game, teams game planned for him differently.
Lin vs. > .500 competition he shot 45-125 which is 36.0 pct. >.500 team means that they have a greater than .500 record either at home if the game is in their building, or if the game was in NY, the team had a > .500 road record.
Came in mid thread so I could be wrong but I thought you compared Melo's shooting %age against +.500 teams and Lin's shooting %age against +.500 teams. Not really trying to argue with you or anything I just find it crazy in general when anyone (Melo hater/lover/whatever) compare the two. Maybe Knicks fans are uniquely crazy as I don't think any you'll find Lakers fans comparing Kobe's shooting #s to Ramon Sessions or Durant to Eric Maynor.
My point was that regardless of sample size, Lin has not proven that he can be successful against the good teams
I don't know what your definition of "prove" is or what your definition of "good team" is. How many games does it take for a player to "prove" something? The Lakers won their division and won 41 games for the 3rd best record in the West. Either way it's pointless to define what "proof" is and what a "good team" is as I'm sure everyone has different standards.
The fact is Lin only played 35 games for the Knicks. He only played more than 30 minutes for 20 games. I will agree that whatever conclusions people reached about Lin, good or bad, were based on not much.
I do find it kind of odd that there are people who seem to be glad to be rid of him. Is it arguing just for the sake of sticking it to annoying Lin nut huggers? I think most of us during Linsanity if asked if we wanted him back would've all said hell yeah why the F not? There's this weird revisionist history going on to villify the kid. Even when you say oh the Lakers and Mavs aren't exactly stiff competition, I'm sure you have to remember the beginning of the season when with our 2 superstars we LOST to:
The Lakers
Warriors
Bobcats
Raptors
Suns
Bucks
Cavs
The NBA is a man's league and every W is earned. If people are pooh poohing Linsanity because of the teams we played during that stretch then what do those same people have to say about us getting beaten by these crappy teams WITH Melo and Amare?? Where is the consistency? If it's such a cakewalk to beat the Mavs, Lakers how the hell did we lose to the Warriors, Bobcats, and Raptors? I have no idea whether Lin is the 2nd coming of Chris Paul(probably not), a decent backup (pretty likely) or a complete fluke who stumbled his way into the NBA (not likely) but if arguments are going to be made it would be nice if people were LOGICAL and CONSISTENT in making their points.
I mean the Knicks were not good by any stretch of the imagination last season. We had 2 decent stretches Linsanity and Melo playing out of his mind and yet somehow this board has become populated by people who enjoy ****ting on both of those guys.
So again not to target you specifically mrKnickShot but it just kills my will to keep reading these forums due to people just being illogical/inconsistent and the need to poop on Lin or Melo. Really we should all be pooping on Amare, Toney Douglas, and James Dolan for creating a culture where you can do something like sign Jerome James and Jared Jefferies to those horrible contracts, make the Eddy Curry move and still have a job.
Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please