[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Not to beat a dead horse, but...
Author Thread
DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/10/2006
Member: #1152
USA
9/4/2012  2:16 PM
mrKnickShot wrote:

man that horse is dead, decayed and fossilized into fuel for my moped.

the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
AUTOADVERT
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
9/4/2012  2:20 PM
infinitilov100 wrote:
tkf wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
VCoug wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
VCoug wrote:
smackeddog wrote:Just as a side note about a point TKF made- the reason we gave 3 year deals to Camby and Felton is that that is the minimum length you can give a player acquired via a sign and trade. Why we gave 3 years to Kidd, I have absolutely no idea though- maybe he agreed to retire after 2 if he's ineffective.

Camby's deal is basically 2 years, with only a small amount guaranteed for the third- like I said it was just done that way because 3yrs is the least we could offer (plus it'll be a nice trade chip in the third year).

According to hoopshype Felton actually has a four year deal.

Yep, the 4th year is a player option, for his security in case he sucks. Basically if he plays as he has for most of his career he'll opt out after the 3rd year, because he'll have been way underpaid for 3 years.

His career averages are 13.4ppg, 6.7apg, 1.3spg, 41% fg, and 33% 3fg. I wouldn't call $4M+/year underpaid.

Your confusing what players are actually worth, with what players actually seem to get- in a world where Jameer Nelson can stink it up and still sign a 3 year deal paying $8mil per year, trust me $4mil for Felton is a bargain! You won't get a cheaper starting caliber point guard for that amount. Pretty much the same as our old favourite Chris Duhon!

I am not a bit Felton fan but that contract was far from over paying.


Overpaying per year? Maybe slightly - I think there are guys on the league min who can give close to what he does. But it's definitely overpaying in total pay - $18 mil is a ton of money to throw at a guy who is average to below average in all phases of the game.

That is arguable (below average). People were crying when he left and stating how great he was - did he get this bad in one year?

Who in the league is at his level making less? Is Jameer Nelson that good?

Was Lin worth 25 million + tax for a guy who played 25 games last year and had a miserable shooting pct when it counted? Who Miami exposed as a ...

I would have paid for Lin and wanted him back but it aint my money.

Felton at 4 per is a good deal. I think he will be good for team chemistry, plays defense and can pass the ball. He just needs to not shoot.

I think the point regarding letting Lin walk is the timing being incredibly bad. I mean we are pretty close to contending for a championship. To get past Miami and then OKC/LA, you are going to need all you can to have a chance. Letting Lin walk in this context makes no sense, especially since it is next to impossible to add talent with the new CBA when you are over the salary cap. Keeping Lin could have been the difference. You pay that tax and go all out. 90% probably won't cut it.

I think and up and coming player like Lin can make the difference and it is worth the risk. Getting a bunch of guys, albeit very good players still, who are near retirement, is probably not in itself, going to put us over the hump, not now anyways. We are one injury away from a nightmare of a season. Consider that and consider Stats health the last two years, not to mention Melo's last year.

yea, I thought we were going all in? why are we worrying about year 3? if this team doesn't get it done this year or next year, time to blow it up anyway.. start shipping out contracts after year 2....

We already saw how Lin played against Miami last season. Lin's eight-turnover performance against the Miami Heat, in which he shot 1-for-11 proves a point. To get past Miami and OKC/LA we need the current group of guys that we now have and not Lin's turnovers. A turnover machine like Lin could have been a huge risk especially come playoffs. I strongly believe that letting Lin go made a lot of sense and was the best thing to do. Lin fans can now watch him play in Houston and please move on with him. We like the old guys as the Lin and Dolan cry babies like call it and I'm looking forward to watching them play defense throughout the season. These defensive players will give us a much better chance of getting over the hump than Lin.

Hello? 30 NBA teams will be one injury away from a nightmare of a season, not just the NY Knicks!

THAT IS absolutely ridiculous... you know that right? so tell me what does it prove?

and while you are at it, tell me what miami blowing us out 3 of the 4 games proves as well... no excuses...

and oh, in that infamous miami game.. carmelo wasn't great either.. he shot 7-20 while Baron davis went 0-7

you guys are hilarious hanging onto one game.. yet you turn around and say, 25 games is not a big enough sample.... LOL.. wow

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

9/4/2012  2:22 PM    LAST EDITED: 9/4/2012  2:25 PM
earthmansurfer wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
VCoug wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
VCoug wrote:
smackeddog wrote:Just as a side note about a point TKF made- the reason we gave 3 year deals to Camby and Felton is that that is the minimum length you can give a player acquired via a sign and trade. Why we gave 3 years to Kidd, I have absolutely no idea though- maybe he agreed to retire after 2 if he's ineffective.

Camby's deal is basically 2 years, with only a small amount guaranteed for the third- like I said it was just done that way because 3yrs is the least we could offer (plus it'll be a nice trade chip in the third year).

According to hoopshype Felton actually has a four year deal.

Yep, the 4th year is a player option, for his security in case he sucks. Basically if he plays as he has for most of his career he'll opt out after the 3rd year, because he'll have been way underpaid for 3 years.

His career averages are 13.4ppg, 6.7apg, 1.3spg, 41% fg, and 33% 3fg. I wouldn't call $4M+/year underpaid.

Your confusing what players are actually worth, with what players actually seem to get- in a world where Jameer Nelson can stink it up and still sign a 3 year deal paying $8mil per year, trust me $4mil for Felton is a bargain! You won't get a cheaper starting caliber point guard for that amount. Pretty much the same as our old favourite Chris Duhon!

I am not a bit Felton fan but that contract was far from over paying.


Overpaying per year? Maybe slightly - I think there are guys on the league min who can give close to what he does. But it's definitely overpaying in total pay - $18 mil is a ton of money to throw at a guy who is average to below average in all phases of the game.

That is arguable (below average). People were crying when he left and stating how great he was - did he get this bad in one year?

Who in the league is at his level making less? Is Jameer Nelson that good?

Was Lin worth 25 million + tax for a guy who played 25 games last year and had a miserable shooting pct when it counted? Who Miami exposed as a ...

I would have paid for Lin and wanted him back but it aint my money.

Felton at 4 per is a good deal. I think he will be good for team chemistry, plays defense and can pass the ball. He just needs to not shoot.

I think the point regarding letting Lin walk is the timing being incredibly bad. I mean we are pretty close to contending for a championship. To get past Miami and then OKC/LA, you are going to need all you can to have a chance. Letting Lin walk in this context makes no sense, especially since it is next to impossible to add talent with the new CBA when you are over the salary cap. Keeping Lin could have been the difference. You pay that tax and go all out. 90% probably won't cut it.

I think and up and coming player like Lin can make the difference and it is worth the risk. Getting a bunch of guys, albeit very good players still, who are near retirement, is probably not in itself, going to put us over the hump, not now anyways. We are one injury away from a nightmare of a season. Consider that and consider Stats health the last two years, not to mention Melo's last year.

While I wanted Lin back badly, he has not proven by any means that he is the difference maker that could have put us over the hump. He had a great stretch against horrible competition and played poorly against winning teams. Could he have gotten better and overcame this? Maybe. But what if he did not pan out? Got injured? What then?

It was a risk and they chose not to risk it. I wish they did risk it.

Reading the articles and financial blogs back then, most of them thought it was a bad idea to bring him back and none of them thought that Dolan had the discipline to refrain. His discipline in the Melo trade was awful.

Not proven? He did more than I have seen any pg in a Knicks uniform do, since I really can't remember (at least not a young cat - maybe as far back as Jackson or Strickland - and I take Lin now over what they showed then - that is saying a lot). You don't let young guys with his speed, skill and IQ walk. You don't. As TKF sad "I thought we were going all in?".

To appreciate Lin you don't look at his stats, though they were very good - you watch him play. It was a thing of beauty to see such a young guy play the most difficult position so well. My eyes, our eyes, didn't lie. With all due respect, if you saw him play and you said you wanted him back so badly - I don't get your post.

Forget about the articles, analysts, etc. Don't try to rationalize stupidity by the owner, analysts, etc. What does your heart say? I'm not going to break Lin down with my mind. He was the best thing to happen to this franchise and we let him walk. I saw it. I witnessed something for 7 games that I thought was impossible. Every game I said "This can't continue". It did. It even went on till the Dallas game when he got hurt, obviously. His play fell off after that and people didn't put 2 and 2 together regarding the slip and the injury, not to mention burn out from playing so many minutes after doing nothing.

Lin was and is special, has the it factor and he is more than likely going to make Dolan feel like a fool.

There is no point in speculating what kind of player he will be. We shall see very soon.

I have a big problem judging him with absolutes as you have since he shot < 35 pct from the field against > .500 competition (factoring in home vs away). That scares me a bit. Has he ever proven that he can break traps against good teams? How about playing good teams on the road?

Playing in the playoffs against Miami would have told us a lot. However, it could have cut his value by 30-60 pct had he failed so if it was his decision, it was a smart one. He was only in a position to lose by playing. I am sure that his people knew this, and if one ignores this glaring fact then they are not being honest with themselves.

As I said, if he does turn out to be a very good PG, I will be very sad that he is not in NY.

I would have been extremely nervous going into the season with him as our only starting caliber PG.

Defense was a big problem too but thats another story.

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
9/4/2012  2:52 PM
newyorknewyork wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:That contract will be looked at as a bargain as Lin makes the allstar team 3yrs in a row and then gets a new 5yr max contract at 100mil and earns every penny of it as a 26yr pg in his prime

Knicks have cap space when he becomes a free agent again.

Yes exactly then we can send shumpert along with 5 future first and second rd picks to houston for jeremy lin who we shoulve just kept in 2012

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
9/4/2012  2:58 PM    LAST EDITED: 9/4/2012  3:00 PM
muhaha wrote:Let's look at it from finacial perspective last year:

- Lin helped Knicks making playoff, 179K (edit: NBA playoff pool for Knicks)
- Two playoff games, attendance: 19,763 x 2 = 39,526 @ $250 (conservative estimation of average price)
MSG raked in 9.8 million for Game 3+4
- MSG shops Linsanity jersey sales ??k
- MSG stocks up 12% during Linsanity, Feb 4-Feb 17, 100 mils for Dolan as majority share (conservative estimation).

Here is something else to consider:
- Knicks FO knew the extent of Lin's injury but didnt reveal until AFTER playoff ticket were mostly sold. With advance of medical technology, any decent hospital could easily diagosed a meniscus tear.
- They annouced, 'Knicks will match any offer up to a billion dollar when sales of 2012-2013 season tickets were in full swing.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For all the money he made from above, Dolan only dished out $762,000.


Was Lin worth 25 million + tax for a guy who played 25 games last year and had a miserable shooting pct when it counted? Who Miami exposed as a ...
a
By saying 25 games is not enough of a sample size...but that one game in Miami....you really made yourself look like an a**!

Good post. Without Lin Knicks dont sniff the playoffs and we win 29 games. Yet we let him walk for NOthingNot making the playoffs with a team of melo and amare at 200mil wouldve been a dister
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
9/4/2012  3:03 PM
So Lin went 1-11 against miami. How many times did melo do that last year. He was 0-11 one game prob against the Bobcats
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

9/4/2012  3:13 PM
gunsnewing wrote:So Lin went 1-11 against miami. How many times did melo do that last year. He was 0-11 one game prob against the Bobcats

I will say this one last time - Lin shot very poorly against > .500 competition. You can harp on Miami if you choose to.

Melo shot 46 pct against > .500 competition while Lin shot 34 pct.

That does not mean that Lin can't learn to play better against these teams, he just has not done it yet.

infinitilov100
Posts: 20362
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2012
Member: #4318

9/4/2012  4:12 PM
Nalod wrote:I think someone finally got thru to Dolan that the Myan calander is not correct and explained what the new tax means to him.

Now fans care that Dolan cares. ITs all very nice. Maybe we should have run a labor day "telethon" to help them keep LIn and raise the money thru donations.

Not a bad idea Nalod. We could then trade him for Chris Paul.

GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
9/4/2012  4:31 PM
mrKnickShot wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:So Lin went 1-11 against miami. How many times did melo do that last year. He was 0-11 one game prob against the Bobcats

I will say this one last time - Lin shot very poorly against > .500 competition. You can harp on Miami if you choose to.

Melo shot 46 pct against > .500 competition while Lin shot 34 pct.

That does not mean that Lin can't learn to play better against these teams, he just has not done it yet.

Jeremy Lin: 2nd year player, possibly league average starting PG, possibly very good backup, $8.33M average salary. Role: POINT GUARD

Carmelo Anthony: One of the best scorers in the league, possibly one of the best of this era of the NBA, 7th highest paid player in the entire league at an average of 21.49M. ROLE: BUCKET GETTER/FRANCHISE PLAYER/SUPERSTAR

Why are we comparing these two players again?

This doesn't apply to you specifically mrKS and it's already been said in this thread but you can NOT use the small sample size argument to diminish the numbers Lin was putting up and then use 1 game in Miami to make any kind of point about his game.

One could then turn right around and use only his games against Dallas and the Lakers to project him as the best thing since sliced bread.

Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

9/4/2012  4:52 PM
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:So Lin went 1-11 against miami. How many times did melo do that last year. He was 0-11 one game prob against the Bobcats

I will say this one last time - Lin shot very poorly against > .500 competition. You can harp on Miami if you choose to.

Melo shot 46 pct against > .500 competition while Lin shot 34 pct.

That does not mean that Lin can't learn to play better against these teams, he just has not done it yet.

Jeremy Lin: 2nd year player, possibly league average starting PG, possibly very good backup, $8.33M average salary. Role: POINT GUARD

Carmelo Anthony: One of the best scorers in the league, possibly one of the best of this era of the NBA, 7th highest paid player in the entire league at an average of 21.49M. ROLE: BUCKET GETTER/FRANCHISE PLAYER/SUPERSTAR

Why are we comparing these two players again?

This doesn't apply to you specifically mrKS and it's already been said in this thread but you can NOT use the small sample size argument to diminish the numbers Lin was putting up and then use 1 game in Miami to make any kind of point about his game.

One could then turn right around and use only his games against Dallas and the Lakers to project him as the best thing since sliced bread.

I am not sure where you are going with your statements/arguments.

I never compared Lin to Melo - the Melo-haters do that. Its an alarmingly silly comparison. The Dallas and Laker games were road games for those teams and they are/were both .400 road teams. Hardly stiff competition.

My point was that regardless of sample size, Lin has not proven that he can be successful against the good teams. He does look like he has the potential to be a good player.

The Miami game just showed other teams that if you trap him high, it gives him a lot of trouble. After that game, teams game planned for him differently.

Lin vs. > .500 competition he shot 45-125 which is 36.0 pct. >.500 team means that they have a greater than .500 record either at home if the game is in their building, or if the game was in NY, the team had a > .500 road record.

infinitilov100
Posts: 20362
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2012
Member: #4318

9/4/2012  5:04 PM
earthmansurfer wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
VCoug wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
VCoug wrote:
smackeddog wrote:Just as a side note about a point TKF made- the reason we gave 3 year deals to Camby and Felton is that that is the minimum length you can give a player acquired via a sign and trade. Why we gave 3 years to Kidd, I have absolutely no idea though- maybe he agreed to retire after 2 if he's ineffective.

Camby's deal is basically 2 years, with only a small amount guaranteed for the third- like I said it was just done that way because 3yrs is the least we could offer (plus it'll be a nice trade chip in the third year).

According to hoopshype Felton actually has a four year deal.

Yep, the 4th year is a player option, for his security in case he sucks. Basically if he plays as he has for most of his career he'll opt out after the 3rd year, because he'll have been way underpaid for 3 years.

His career averages are 13.4ppg, 6.7apg, 1.3spg, 41% fg, and 33% 3fg. I wouldn't call $4M+/year underpaid.

Your confusing what players are actually worth, with what players actually seem to get- in a world where Jameer Nelson can stink it up and still sign a 3 year deal paying $8mil per year, trust me $4mil for Felton is a bargain! You won't get a cheaper starting caliber point guard for that amount. Pretty much the same as our old favourite Chris Duhon!

I am not a bit Felton fan but that contract was far from over paying.


Overpaying per year? Maybe slightly - I think there are guys on the league min who can give close to what he does. But it's definitely overpaying in total pay - $18 mil is a ton of money to throw at a guy who is average to below average in all phases of the game.

That is arguable (below average). People were crying when he left and stating how great he was - did he get this bad in one year?

Who in the league is at his level making less? Is Jameer Nelson that good?

Was Lin worth 25 million + tax for a guy who played 25 games last year and had a miserable shooting pct when it counted? Who Miami exposed as a ...

I would have paid for Lin and wanted him back but it aint my money.

Felton at 4 per is a good deal. I think he will be good for team chemistry, plays defense and can pass the ball. He just needs to not shoot.

I think the point regarding letting Lin walk is the timing being incredibly bad. I mean we are pretty close to contending for a championship. To get past Miami and then OKC/LA, you are going to need all you can to have a chance. Letting Lin walk in this context makes no sense, especially since it is next to impossible to add talent with the new CBA when you are over the salary cap. Keeping Lin could have been the difference. You pay that tax and go all out. 90% probably won't cut it.

I think and up and coming player like Lin can make the difference and it is worth the risk. Getting a bunch of guys, albeit very good players still, who are near retirement, is probably not in itself, going to put us over the hump, not now anyways. We are one injury away from a nightmare of a season. Consider that and consider Stats health the last two years, not to mention Melo's last year.

While I wanted Lin back badly, he has not proven by any means that he is the difference maker that could have put us over the hump. He had a great stretch against horrible competition and played poorly against winning teams. Could he have gotten better and overcame this? Maybe. But what if he did not pan out? Got injured? What then?

It was a risk and they chose not to risk it. I wish they did risk it.

Reading the articles and financial blogs back then, most of them thought it was a bad idea to bring him back and none of them thought that Dolan had the discipline to refrain. His discipline in the Melo trade was awful.

Not proven? He did more than I have seen any pg in a Knicks uniform do, since I really can't remember (at least not a young cat - maybe as far back as Jackson or Strickland - and I take Lin now over what they showed then - that is saying a lot). You don't let young guys with his speed, skill and IQ walk. You don't. As TKF sad "I thought we were going all in?".

To appreciate Lin you don't look at his stats, though they were very good - you watch him play. It was a thing of beauty to see such a young guy play the most difficult position so well. My eyes, our eyes, didn't lie. With all due respect, if you saw him play and you said you wanted him back so badly - I don't get your post.

Forget about the articles, analysts, etc. Don't try to rationalize stupidity by the owner, analysts, etc. What does your heart say? I'm not going to break Lin down with my mind. He was the best thing to happen to this franchise and we let him walk. I saw it. I witnessed something for 7 games that I thought was impossible. Every game I said "This can't continue". It did. It even went on till the Dallas game when he got hurt, obviously. His play fell off after that and people didn't put 2 and 2 together regarding the slip and the injury, not to mention burn out from playing so many minutes after doing nothing.

Lin was and is special, has the it factor and he is more than likely going to make Dolan feel like a fool.

/quote]

Why is it that when cry babies don't get their way they wish the worst for the Knicks?

infinitilov100
Posts: 20362
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2012
Member: #4318

9/4/2012  5:14 PM
Panos wrote:Not sure if I missed this, but can someone explain to me why, if Houston wanted Lin so badly, the Knicks didn't match the offer and trade him to them in exchange for something, even some picks? Why is it every time we sign a free agent we need to give something up to do it, but couldn't get anything in return for such a hot commodity as Lin?

I love that fact the Lin's contract only cost $700,000. I think the Knicks will be the proven winner in the Lin sweepstakes.
infinitilov100
Posts: 20362
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2012
Member: #4318

9/4/2012  5:15 PM
Caseloads wrote:houston didn't want him that badly and will likely trade him for something.

don't know why we didn't match him and trade him to a team under the cap other than knicks called around and no one wanted him.

Houston thought the Knicks was going to match. They know that he's not worth that type of money.

infinitilov100
Posts: 20362
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2012
Member: #4318

9/4/2012  5:16 PM
Mray20 wrote:
Caseloads wrote:houston didn't want him that badly and will likely trade him for something.

don't know why we didn't match him and trade him to a team under the cap other than knicks called around and no one wanted him.


That contract would have been untradeable because of that 3rd year at 14 mil everyone knows he's not worth that and the Knicks already have an untradeable contract with Amare they didn't want another one

+1

infinitilov100
Posts: 20362
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2012
Member: #4318

9/4/2012  5:18 PM
Nalod wrote:No, the Little man is growing up!

Nalod did you just gave Dolan credit? Someone's using Nalod's account. This is an imposter!

GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
9/4/2012  5:20 PM    LAST EDITED: 9/4/2012  5:22 PM
mrKnickShot wrote:
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:So Lin went 1-11 against miami. How many times did melo do that last year. He was 0-11 one game prob against the Bobcats

I will say this one last time - Lin shot very poorly against > .500 competition. You can harp on Miami if you choose to.

Melo shot 46 pct against > .500 competition while Lin shot 34 pct.

That does not mean that Lin can't learn to play better against these teams, he just has not done it yet.

Jeremy Lin: 2nd year player, possibly league average starting PG, possibly very good backup, $8.33M average salary. Role: POINT GUARD

Carmelo Anthony: One of the best scorers in the league, possibly one of the best of this era of the NBA, 7th highest paid player in the entire league at an average of 21.49M. ROLE: BUCKET GETTER/FRANCHISE PLAYER/SUPERSTAR

Why are we comparing these two players again?

This doesn't apply to you specifically mrKS and it's already been said in this thread but you can NOT use the small sample size argument to diminish the numbers Lin was putting up and then use 1 game in Miami to make any kind of point about his game.

One could then turn right around and use only his games against Dallas and the Lakers to project him as the best thing since sliced bread.

I am not sure where you are going with your statements/arguments.

I never compared Lin to Melo - the Melo-haters do that. Its an alarmingly silly comparison. The Dallas and Laker games were road games for those teams and they are/were both .400 road teams. Hardly stiff competition.

My point was that regardless of sample size, Lin has not proven that he can be successful against the good teams. He does look like he has the potential to be a good player.

The Miami game just showed other teams that if you trap him high, it gives him a lot of trouble. After that game, teams game planned for him differently.

Lin vs. > .500 competition he shot 45-125 which is 36.0 pct. >.500 team means that they have a greater than .500 record either at home if the game is in their building, or if the game was in NY, the team had a > .500 road record.

Came in mid thread so I could be wrong but I thought you compared Melo's shooting %age against +.500 teams and Lin's shooting %age against +.500 teams. Not really trying to argue with you or anything I just find it crazy in general when anyone (Melo hater/lover/whatever) compare the two. Maybe Knicks fans are uniquely crazy as I don't think any you'll find Lakers fans comparing Kobe's shooting #s to Ramon Sessions or Durant to Eric Maynor.

My point was that regardless of sample size, Lin has not proven that he can be successful against the good teams

I don't know what your definition of "prove" is or what your definition of "good team" is. How many games does it take for a player to "prove" something? The Lakers won their division and won 41 games for the 3rd best record in the West. Either way it's pointless to define what "proof" is and what a "good team" is as I'm sure everyone has different standards.

The fact is Lin only played 35 games for the Knicks. He only played more than 30 minutes for 20 games. I will agree that whatever conclusions people reached about Lin, good or bad, were based on not much.

I do find it kind of odd that there are people who seem to be glad to be rid of him. Is it arguing just for the sake of sticking it to annoying Lin nut huggers? I think most of us during Linsanity if asked if we wanted him back would've all said hell yeah why the F not? There's this weird revisionist history going on to villify the kid. Even when you say oh the Lakers and Mavs aren't exactly stiff competition, I'm sure you have to remember the beginning of the season when with our 2 superstars we LOST to:

The Lakers
Warriors
Bobcats
Raptors
Suns
Bucks
Cavs

The NBA is a man's league and every W is earned. If people are pooh poohing Linsanity because of the teams we played during that stretch then what do those same people have to say about us getting beaten by these crappy teams WITH Melo and Amare?? Where is the consistency? If it's such a cakewalk to beat the Mavs, Lakers how the hell did we lose to the Warriors, Bobcats, and Raptors? I have no idea whether Lin is the 2nd coming of Chris Paul(probably not), a decent backup (pretty likely) or a complete fluke who stumbled his way into the NBA (not likely) but if arguments are going to be made it would be nice if people were LOGICAL and CONSISTENT in making their points.

I mean the Knicks were not good by any stretch of the imagination last season. We had 2 decent stretches Linsanity and Melo playing out of his mind and yet somehow this board has become populated by people who enjoy ****ting on both of those guys.

So again not to target you specifically mrKnickShot but it just kills my will to keep reading these forums due to people just being illogical/inconsistent and the need to poop on Lin or Melo. Really we should all be pooping on Amare, Toney Douglas, and James Dolan for creating a culture where you can do something like sign Jerome James and Jared Jefferies to those horrible contracts, make the Eddy Curry move and still have a job.

Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
infinitilov100
Posts: 20362
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2012
Member: #4318

9/4/2012  5:20 PM
Mray20 wrote:A large expiring contract to trade for what? A player who's making 14 mil plus who probably has a bad contract a team is willing to dump on the Knicks, the Isiah era is over that day is dead.

infinitilov100
Posts: 20362
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2012
Member: #4318

9/4/2012  5:22 PM
NUPE wrote:
MS wrote:It think it's important to look at the money the Knicks gave out this year.

Jason Kidd was medicore last year. We gave him a 3 year deal (3MM)in the last year, Camby the same for (3MM) Novak was barely a rotation player until last year he got 4 years at (4MM) per. Chances are Camby and Kidd are going to be non factors in year 3 of their deals which is where Lin's additional 6MM and the smear campaign took place.

A lot of "what if's", "maybes", and assumptions in your post. You also neglect to consider whether Lin would actually be worth the extra 6 million 3 years from now... The fact is, most sensible people don't believe Lin is worth the contract. Now, I wish Lin the best but I am quite tired of having to hear about him. It's like the Knicks did not win the mass majority of their games to close out the season WITHOUT Lin against stiffer competition than Lin faces during Linsanity.....

I think it's a fluke!

infinitilov100
Posts: 20362
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2012
Member: #4318

9/4/2012  5:24 PM
MS wrote:Should also be taken into account, that the Knicks sucked last season and were on the verge of imploding until Lin infused life back into a fan base that was about to explode, ended the cable dispute and got the team back on track. Melo may have carried the team for the final month, but Lin brought them back fromn the dead. With that came leverage from the biggest joke franchise out there to justify a second straight raise of season tickets for 1 playoff win. Business decision or not. You just spent 10 years winning less games then the New Jersey Nets, put your fan base through, Scott Layden, Isiah Thomas, Stephon Marbury and Eddy Curry. Pay the tax. The organization was quoted saying they would match anything up to a billion was an extra 15MM.

Again Lin's fluke-like 20 plus games were played against some way below .500 teams...

infinitilov100
Posts: 20362
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2012
Member: #4318

9/4/2012  5:28 PM
Nalod wrote:
We told Lin to go out and get an offer and we'd match.

Rockets called our bluff. We folded. At least Grunny was not gasping in the closet!

Don't blame Grunny one bit.

Not to beat a dead horse, but...

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy