TKF.... you've done a masterful job of cahnging the conversation away from Bush's failures to O'Reilly...
If I didn't know any better I would have thought you were actually in this administration.
Anyway... The point of this thread does not have anything to do with O'Reilly...
NYCvector, let's be fair to TKF, though I apparently agree with him on virtually nothing so far. This thread is over 300 posts and has touched on so many things...threads are like the wind, they go where they will and cannot be regimented.
this will be my final post on this issue
Second time you've said that. (Before you accuse me of not supporting with facts:)
but I am done with this,
***
bluff? all I said is why should I provide proof when you haven't, especially with the michael jackson quote.. come on man.
You know what I am talking about, prior to refusing to support your point because of "The Michael Jackson Quote" You wrote:
I can go and get a list of islamic terrorist that went to hospitals in Iraq were harbored there, treated there and realeased, but I have the feeling that by doing that it won't change how you feel.
Once I asked you to do so if you can, you retreated into "You didn't so why should I?" even though I have supported the MJ claim far better than you have ANY of what you have said.
we all can provide links to articles supporting and trashing O'reilly, but next we will have to spend 10 pages arguing the credibilit of the writers of those articles, I am not interested in that...
Any argument rather than support your point?
As far as marriage vows go, I guess every divorcee who vowed to stay together until death them do part, are all liars I guess? Ok if that is how you feel, I guess O'reilly is a liar(rolling eyes) whatever..
First of all, cheating on your spouse does make you a liar, no matter how common human weakness is.
Second, when you take others to task for the same weaknesses you share, you are a hypocrite AND a liar. (O'Reilly did this.) It is like calling someone else a theif while you are robbing a bank. Jerry Falwell did this in the 80's with his own cheating scandal.
Next you trivailize his work against child molesters and crooked and irresponsible judges, heck at least he is doing that instead of looking for some story that is purely sensationalism. I applaud his work in that area..
I have not trivialized his plethora of good works at all, please show me where I have. I have dissed him plenty though.
As far as his ability to speak on morals. remember the man was ACCUSED!! not convicted, other than that he has a clean record in the morality dept, unless you have proof otherwise. He was accused and the accuser too money to go away.
Holy Spin Job Batman! He got beat. The transcripts will one day surface. On that day you will say: "Have they been authenticated by the Smithsonian?"
Who is really the bad guy here?
O'Reilly the sexual harrasser.
call him what you want, he claims to be for the people, I think he is, he claims to be fair, I think he is,
and you don't want to read, see or hear anything different!
he also claims to look out for children and the common man, and he has done that, I have given you examples of that, but you trivialize them.
One example you have given, and a vague one at that. Now please, again, show me where I trivialized it.
Again he attacks issues that no one seems to want to touch,
Such as?
he holds people responsible,
Except himself. Oh! And Bush and the rest of the boyz at the top of the current administration.
he expects people to be accountable and I like that.
Except himself. Oh! And Bush and the rest of the boyz at the top of the current administration.
right wing or not he does have high standards
Such as? Higher than who?
and if your only rebuttle to that is a accusation which went away with some money, then I say that is weak, and doesn't hold water any longer....
So as long as he can buy his way out of his problems, he will always have your support I guess.
***
Once again, Bill O'Reilly is not a monster. But he is a person in a position of power due to the popularity of his show. He has done some good with that power. On the other hand, he has shown little by little that he he does not hold himself to the very standards of morals(Clinton) and guilt(Jackson) that he himself put forth.
He also has been revealed as a tool of the right. How? He was all over the Clinton administration during the most prosperous and safest time in America's history for anything he could find (Including carnal morals.). Yet, he continually makes excuses for the disaster that is the Bush administration.
Nuff said on "B.O." reilly.
oohah
[Edited by - oohah on 09-08-2005 5:24 PM]