https://www.facebook.com/LateNightSeth/videos/752515804899101/

gunsnewing wrote:The Clinton-Attorney General Loretta Lynch relationship alone should be enough to keep Hillary far away from Washington. Even Kardashian watchers should know better

The relationship???..Did something happen??..I'm going to assume nothing happen other than the meet on the tarmac with Bill Clinton..You are more concerned about that than Putin's and Trump's bromance...

holfresh wrote:

gunsnewing wrote:The Clinton-Attorney General Loretta Lynch relationship alone should be enough to keep Hillary far away from Washington. Even Kardashian watchers should know better

The relationship???..Did something happen??..I'm going to assume nothing happen other than the meet on the tarmac with Bill Clinton..You are more concerned about that than Putin's and Trump's bromance...

Not sure, but maybe he is talking about Bill Clinton miraculously bumping into Lynch at the airport, which is now a lawsuit.
ACLJ Sues Justice Dept. Over Bill Clinton-Loretta Lynch Meeting on Airport Tarmac http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/law-justice-freedom-of/2016/11/02/id/756723/

And most recently there is the relationship that GoNyGoNyGo clearly pointed out between Podesta and Kadzik.

GoNyGoNyGo wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:
Again, what law did Podesta or Kadzik break?

Inviting him to dinner? No law was broken.

When leaking info to Podesta about the DOJ investigation into the emails, i am not sure if a law was broken.

You seem to be getting hung up thinking the emails are full of crimes being committed, and if not, they are worthless.

In this case, the emails do not necessarily show laws broken. What they DO show is that Podesta and Kadzik have a history.

-They went to college together (Georgetown Law)
-They have dinner together
-KAdzik kept Podesta "out of jail" as per Podesta's email.
-Kadzik was Podesta's lawyer during the Lewinsky scandal
-They worked on the Marc Rich pardon together (another scandal of the WJC administration). - not in emails this in the FBI released docs about the Rich case
-Kadzik gave Podesta a heads up about the initial email investigation

-Kadzik is now in charge on the latest DOJ investigation into the emails.

Nothing to see here, just two old buddies helping each other out, right?

Sure that is possible but if that is the case, then be ethical and recuse yourself.

They have a long history together. It seems rather obvious to me, that Kadzik is too close to Podesta to be the lead on a case that involves Podesta's boss and Podesta's emails too. Hey but that's me. You can choose to not see it.

But, I would really be wondering just what the FBI found on Huma Abaden's phone, regarding the Weiner "situation", to re-open the investigation into Hillary.
It HAS TO BE BIG. The email stuff is small potato's (for Clinton).

Remember:
Hillary deleted thousands of emails after the State Department asked for them - AFTER! And then she used "Bleach Bit" to clean the servers professionally! But back in July/August Comey said she didn't have bad intent! lol Again, what changed his mind? You can't make this stuff up.

Some of those emails had been categorized as:
68 of 81 remain classified, 8 were top secret, 37 were secret, 36 were confidential.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

And now it comes out that 5 or so foreign intelligence agencies hacked the server. Wow, She can go to prison just on National Security grounds.

ps - Hope you enjoyed the links Bonn.

Bonn1997 wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

holfresh wrote:

gunsnewing wrote:The Clinton-Attorney General Loretta Lynch relationship alone should be enough to keep Hillary far away from Washington. Even Kardashian watchers should know better

The relationship???..Did something happen??..I'm going to assume nothing happen other than the meet on the tarmac with Bill Clinton..You are more concerned about that than Putin's and Trump's bromance...

Not sure, but maybe he is talking about Bill Clinton miraculously bumping into Lynch at the airport, which is now a lawsuit.
ACLJ Sues Justice Dept. Over Bill Clinton-Loretta Lynch Meeting on Airport Tarmac http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/law-justice-freedom-of/2016/11/02/id/756723/

And most recently there is the relationship that GoNyGoNyGo clearly pointed out between Podesta and Kadzik.

GoNyGoNyGo wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:
Again, what law did Podesta or Kadzik break?

Inviting him to dinner? No law was broken.

When leaking info to Podesta about the DOJ investigation into the emails, i am not sure if a law was broken.

You seem to be getting hung up thinking the emails are full of crimes being committed, and if not, they are worthless.

In this case, the emails do not necessarily show laws broken. What they DO show is that Podesta and Kadzik have a history.

-They went to college together (Georgetown Law)
-They have dinner together
-KAdzik kept Podesta "out of jail" as per Podesta's email.
-Kadzik was Podesta's lawyer during the Lewinsky scandal
-They worked on the Marc Rich pardon together (another scandal of the WJC administration). - not in emails this in the FBI released docs about the Rich case
-Kadzik gave Podesta a heads up about the initial email investigation

-Kadzik is now in charge on the latest DOJ investigation into the emails.

Nothing to see here, just two old buddies helping each other out, right?

Sure that is possible but if that is the case, then be ethical and recuse yourself.

They have a long history together. It seems rather obvious to me, that Kadzik is too close to Podesta to be the lead on a case that involves Podesta's boss and Podesta's emails too. Hey but that's me. You can choose to not see it.

But, I would really be wondering just what the FBI found on Huma Abaden's phone, regarding the Weiner "situation", to re-open the investigation into Hillary.
It HAS TO BE BIG. The email stuff is small potato's (for Clinton).

Remember:
Hillary deleted thousands of emails after the State Department asked for them - AFTER! And then she used "Bleach Bit" to clean the servers professionally! But back in July/August Comey said she didn't have bad intent! lol Again, what changed his mind? You can't make this stuff up.

Some of those emails had been categorized as:
68 of 81 remain classified, 8 were top secret, 37 were secret, 36 were confidential.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

And now it comes out that 5 or so foreign intelligence agencies hacked the server. Wow, She can go to prison just on National Security grounds.

ps - Hope you enjoyed the links Bonn.

http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/forum.asp?f=2
You're an exception in that you do post links. I'll give you credit for that though they're always one sided stories. Trump has lawsuits against him too. It's not like Hillary is the only one with legal uncertainty.

Just to be clear, the FBI did not characterize this as "re-opening" the case. That's how the Republicans spun it. They're just reading e-mails, after which, I assume they'll decide whether to re-open the case or not.

Yeah but he doesn't acknowledge or accept facts...

holfresh wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

holfresh wrote:

gunsnewing wrote:The Clinton-Attorney General Loretta Lynch relationship alone should be enough to keep Hillary far away from Washington. Even Kardashian watchers should know better

The relationship???..Did something happen??..I'm going to assume nothing happen other than the meet on the tarmac with Bill Clinton..You are more concerned about that than Putin's and Trump's bromance...

Not sure, but maybe he is talking about Bill Clinton miraculously bumping into Lynch at the airport, which is now a lawsuit.
ACLJ Sues Justice Dept. Over Bill Clinton-Loretta Lynch Meeting on Airport Tarmac http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/law-justice-freedom-of/2016/11/02/id/756723/

And most recently there is the relationship that GoNyGoNyGo clearly pointed out between Podesta and Kadzik.

GoNyGoNyGo wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:
Again, what law did Podesta or Kadzik break?

Inviting him to dinner? No law was broken.

When leaking info to Podesta about the DOJ investigation into the emails, i am not sure if a law was broken.

You seem to be getting hung up thinking the emails are full of crimes being committed, and if not, they are worthless.

In this case, the emails do not necessarily show laws broken. What they DO show is that Podesta and Kadzik have a history.

-They went to college together (Georgetown Law)
-They have dinner together
-KAdzik kept Podesta "out of jail" as per Podesta's email.
-Kadzik was Podesta's lawyer during the Lewinsky scandal
-They worked on the Marc Rich pardon together (another scandal of the WJC administration). - not in emails this in the FBI released docs about the Rich case
-Kadzik gave Podesta a heads up about the initial email investigation

-Kadzik is now in charge on the latest DOJ investigation into the emails.

Nothing to see here, just two old buddies helping each other out, right?

Sure that is possible but if that is the case, then be ethical and recuse yourself.

They have a long history together. It seems rather obvious to me, that Kadzik is too close to Podesta to be the lead on a case that involves Podesta's boss and Podesta's emails too. Hey but that's me. You can choose to not see it.

But, I would really be wondering just what the FBI found on Huma Abaden's phone, regarding the Weiner "situation", to re-open the investigation into Hillary.
It HAS TO BE BIG. The email stuff is small potato's (for Clinton).

Remember:
Hillary deleted thousands of emails after the State Department asked for them - AFTER! And then she used "Bleach Bit" to clean the servers professionally! But back in July/August Comey said she didn't have bad intent! lol Again, what changed his mind? You can't make this stuff up.

Some of those emails had been categorized as:
68 of 81 remain classified, 8 were top secret, 37 were secret, 36 were confidential.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

And now it comes out that 5 or so foreign intelligence agencies hacked the server. Wow, She can go to prison just on National Security grounds.

ps - Hope you enjoyed the links Bonn.

http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/forum.asp?f=2
You're an exception in that you do post links. I'll give you credit for that though they're always one sided stories. Trump has lawsuits against him too. It's not like Hillary is the only one with legal uncertainty.

Just to be clear, the FBI did not characterize this as "re-opening" the case. That's how the Republicans spun it. They're just reading e-mails, after which, I assume they'll decide whether to re-open the case or not.

Yeah but he doesn't acknowledge or accept facts...

You mean like you just didn't or do you have a specific example?

earthmansurfer wrote:

holfresh wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

holfresh wrote:

gunsnewing wrote:The Clinton-Attorney General Loretta Lynch relationship alone should be enough to keep Hillary far away from Washington. Even Kardashian watchers should know better

The relationship???..Did something happen??..I'm going to assume nothing happen other than the meet on the tarmac with Bill Clinton..You are more concerned about that than Putin's and Trump's bromance...

Not sure, but maybe he is talking about Bill Clinton miraculously bumping into Lynch at the airport, which is now a lawsuit.
ACLJ Sues Justice Dept. Over Bill Clinton-Loretta Lynch Meeting on Airport Tarmac http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/law-justice-freedom-of/2016/11/02/id/756723/

And most recently there is the relationship that GoNyGoNyGo clearly pointed out between Podesta and Kadzik.

GoNyGoNyGo wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:
Again, what law did Podesta or Kadzik break?

Inviting him to dinner? No law was broken.

When leaking info to Podesta about the DOJ investigation into the emails, i am not sure if a law was broken.

You seem to be getting hung up thinking the emails are full of crimes being committed, and if not, they are worthless.

In this case, the emails do not necessarily show laws broken. What they DO show is that Podesta and Kadzik have a history.

-They went to college together (Georgetown Law)
-They have dinner together
-KAdzik kept Podesta "out of jail" as per Podesta's email.
-Kadzik was Podesta's lawyer during the Lewinsky scandal
-They worked on the Marc Rich pardon together (another scandal of the WJC administration). - not in emails this in the FBI released docs about the Rich case
-Kadzik gave Podesta a heads up about the initial email investigation

-Kadzik is now in charge on the latest DOJ investigation into the emails.

Nothing to see here, just two old buddies helping each other out, right?

Sure that is possible but if that is the case, then be ethical and recuse yourself.

They have a long history together. It seems rather obvious to me, that Kadzik is too close to Podesta to be the lead on a case that involves Podesta's boss and Podesta's emails too. Hey but that's me. You can choose to not see it.

But, I would really be wondering just what the FBI found on Huma Abaden's phone, regarding the Weiner "situation", to re-open the investigation into Hillary.
It HAS TO BE BIG. The email stuff is small potato's (for Clinton).

Remember:
Hillary deleted thousands of emails after the State Department asked for them - AFTER! And then she used "Bleach Bit" to clean the servers professionally! But back in July/August Comey said she didn't have bad intent! lol Again, what changed his mind? You can't make this stuff up.

Some of those emails had been categorized as:
68 of 81 remain classified, 8 were top secret, 37 were secret, 36 were confidential.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

And now it comes out that 5 or so foreign intelligence agencies hacked the server. Wow, She can go to prison just on National Security grounds.

ps - Hope you enjoyed the links Bonn.

http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/forum.asp?f=2
You're an exception in that you do post links. I'll give you credit for that though they're always one sided stories. Trump has lawsuits against him too. It's not like Hillary is the only one with legal uncertainty.

Just to be clear, the FBI did not characterize this as "re-opening" the case. That's how the Republicans spun it. They're just reading e-mails, after which, I assume they'll decide whether to re-open the case or not.

Yeah but he doesn't acknowledge or accept facts...

You mean like you just didn't or do you have a specific example?

Yeah like you claiming Hillary and the US planned the invasion of Libya and ignored the generals and I showed you that it was France and the UK like 3 times and you still claim it was Hillary...

holfresh wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

holfresh wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

holfresh wrote:

gunsnewing wrote:The Clinton-Attorney General Loretta Lynch relationship alone should be enough to keep Hillary far away from Washington. Even Kardashian watchers should know better

The relationship???..Did something happen??..I'm going to assume nothing happen other than the meet on the tarmac with Bill Clinton..You are more concerned about that than Putin's and Trump's bromance...

Not sure, but maybe he is talking about Bill Clinton miraculously bumping into Lynch at the airport, which is now a lawsuit.
ACLJ Sues Justice Dept. Over Bill Clinton-Loretta Lynch Meeting on Airport Tarmac http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/law-justice-freedom-of/2016/11/02/id/756723/

And most recently there is the relationship that GoNyGoNyGo clearly pointed out between Podesta and Kadzik.

GoNyGoNyGo wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:
Again, what law did Podesta or Kadzik break?

Inviting him to dinner? No law was broken.

When leaking info to Podesta about the DOJ investigation into the emails, i am not sure if a law was broken.

You seem to be getting hung up thinking the emails are full of crimes being committed, and if not, they are worthless.

In this case, the emails do not necessarily show laws broken. What they DO show is that Podesta and Kadzik have a history.

-They went to college together (Georgetown Law)
-They have dinner together
-KAdzik kept Podesta "out of jail" as per Podesta's email.
-Kadzik was Podesta's lawyer during the Lewinsky scandal
-They worked on the Marc Rich pardon together (another scandal of the WJC administration). - not in emails this in the FBI released docs about the Rich case
-Kadzik gave Podesta a heads up about the initial email investigation

-Kadzik is now in charge on the latest DOJ investigation into the emails.

Nothing to see here, just two old buddies helping each other out, right?

Sure that is possible but if that is the case, then be ethical and recuse yourself.

They have a long history together. It seems rather obvious to me, that Kadzik is too close to Podesta to be the lead on a case that involves Podesta's boss and Podesta's emails too. Hey but that's me. You can choose to not see it.

But, I would really be wondering just what the FBI found on Huma Abaden's phone, regarding the Weiner "situation", to re-open the investigation into Hillary.
It HAS TO BE BIG. The email stuff is small potato's (for Clinton).

Remember:
Hillary deleted thousands of emails after the State Department asked for them - AFTER! And then she used "Bleach Bit" to clean the servers professionally! But back in July/August Comey said she didn't have bad intent! lol Again, what changed his mind? You can't make this stuff up.

Some of those emails had been categorized as:
68 of 81 remain classified, 8 were top secret, 37 were secret, 36 were confidential.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

And now it comes out that 5 or so foreign intelligence agencies hacked the server. Wow, She can go to prison just on National Security grounds.

ps - Hope you enjoyed the links Bonn.

http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/forum.asp?f=2
You're an exception in that you do post links. I'll give you credit for that though they're always one sided stories. Trump has lawsuits against him too. It's not like Hillary is the only one with legal uncertainty.

Just to be clear, the FBI did not characterize this as "re-opening" the case. That's how the Republicans spun it. They're just reading e-mails, after which, I assume they'll decide whether to re-open the case or not.

Yeah but he doesn't acknowledge or accept facts...

You mean like you just didn't or do you have a specific example?

ACLJ suing??..Whats the big deal, its a conservative christian group..Anyone can sue anyone for anything in America...There needs to be a penalty for wasting the courts or other people's time...Like in the Rose trial, he should automatically award 20% of the cost he had to pay lawyers from the claimant's frivolous case..Lynn and Clinton should countersue for the cost of the initial suit plus the cost of the counter-suit...

And the FBI couldn't have seen anything on the phone/computer because they needed a warrant to search it which they didn't have at the time of the letter to congress...More facts, I don't want to to get tripped up...

Circulation of money justification of job the court system were created not so much for justice but more to get money moving from one pocket to another's.

earthmansurfer wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:
You're an exception in that you do post links. I'll give you credit for that though they're always one sided stories. Trump has lawsuits against him too. It's not like Hillary is the only one with legal uncertainty.

Just to be clear, the FBI did not characterize this as "re-opening" the case. That's how the Republicans spun it. They're just reading e-mails, after which, I assume they'll decide whether to re-open the case or not.

ehehhe, was pulling your chain, but thanks for the credit. Yeah, I remember reading about it not being technically re-opened. Not sure there is really a difference, is there? Unless she gets charged...

And yeah again, I am definitely one sided in that I am more worried about Hillary getting in. That is the norm here actually - one sided. Almost like how half the board was anti-Melo in the past.
My intentions is really trying to do what (might) be best for the Earth, not me, not just the country but people. This election is too important for it to come down to "How does it benefit me and my family?" only. Just a tough situation as I know the corruption is on both sides, I'm just going after what I see the side that is clearly worse.

I am not taking a stab here, but I don't know how Hillary can win this if they either don't exonerate her over the next few days or just get on with prosecution.
This election, thus far in our history, is like nothing I've heard about in (American) politics.

2 - It's not clear to me how much of a *voting* issue this should really be anyway. If Clinton (or Trump) is criminally convicted, then Kaine (or Pence) becomes president. If Hillary is innocent, I'd rather have her as president than Trump or Pence. If Hillary is convicted, I'd still rather have Kaine as president than Trump or Pence. This would be a voting issue if you were concerned about a Kaine presidency and think Trump would be a better president than he would be.

If anyone really cares about the truth and the emails and how this all went down should read the above article.

earthmansurfer wrote:

holfresh wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

holfresh wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

holfresh wrote:

gunsnewing wrote:The Clinton-Attorney General Loretta Lynch relationship alone should be enough to keep Hillary far away from Washington. Even Kardashian watchers should know better

The relationship???..Did something happen??..I'm going to assume nothing happen other than the meet on the tarmac with Bill Clinton..You are more concerned about that than Putin's and Trump's bromance...

Not sure, but maybe he is talking about Bill Clinton miraculously bumping into Lynch at the airport, which is now a lawsuit.
ACLJ Sues Justice Dept. Over Bill Clinton-Loretta Lynch Meeting on Airport Tarmac http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/law-justice-freedom-of/2016/11/02/id/756723/

And most recently there is the relationship that GoNyGoNyGo clearly pointed out between Podesta and Kadzik.

GoNyGoNyGo wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:
Again, what law did Podesta or Kadzik break?

Inviting him to dinner? No law was broken.

When leaking info to Podesta about the DOJ investigation into the emails, i am not sure if a law was broken.

You seem to be getting hung up thinking the emails are full of crimes being committed, and if not, they are worthless.

In this case, the emails do not necessarily show laws broken. What they DO show is that Podesta and Kadzik have a history.

-They went to college together (Georgetown Law)
-They have dinner together
-KAdzik kept Podesta "out of jail" as per Podesta's email.
-Kadzik was Podesta's lawyer during the Lewinsky scandal
-They worked on the Marc Rich pardon together (another scandal of the WJC administration). - not in emails this in the FBI released docs about the Rich case
-Kadzik gave Podesta a heads up about the initial email investigation

-Kadzik is now in charge on the latest DOJ investigation into the emails.

Nothing to see here, just two old buddies helping each other out, right?

Sure that is possible but if that is the case, then be ethical and recuse yourself.

They have a long history together. It seems rather obvious to me, that Kadzik is too close to Podesta to be the lead on a case that involves Podesta's boss and Podesta's emails too. Hey but that's me. You can choose to not see it.

But, I would really be wondering just what the FBI found on Huma Abaden's phone, regarding the Weiner "situation", to re-open the investigation into Hillary.
It HAS TO BE BIG. The email stuff is small potato's (for Clinton).

Remember:
Hillary deleted thousands of emails after the State Department asked for them - AFTER! And then she used "Bleach Bit" to clean the servers professionally! But back in July/August Comey said she didn't have bad intent! lol Again, what changed his mind? You can't make this stuff up.

Some of those emails had been categorized as:
68 of 81 remain classified, 8 were top secret, 37 were secret, 36 were confidential.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

And now it comes out that 5 or so foreign intelligence agencies hacked the server. Wow, She can go to prison just on National Security grounds.

ps - Hope you enjoyed the links Bonn.

http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/forum.asp?f=2
You're an exception in that you do post links. I'll give you credit for that though they're always one sided stories. Trump has lawsuits against him too. It's not like Hillary is the only one with legal uncertainty.

Just to be clear, the FBI did not characterize this as "re-opening" the case. That's how the Republicans spun it. They're just reading e-mails, after which, I assume they'll decide whether to re-open the case or not.

Yeah but he doesn't acknowledge or accept facts...

You mean like you just didn't or do you have a specific example?

Yeah like you claiming Hillary and the US planned the invasion of Libya and ignored the generals and I showed you that it was France and the UK like 3 times and you still claim it was Hillary...

You can't say "it was France and the UK..." and just discount the fact that it was also the US with Hillary's help.
It is well accepted that Hillary was a driving force for the invasion. I'm not putting it all on her, but I'm definitely not giving France "sole credit" either.

But it was France, Lebanon and the U.K. that sponsored UN Security Council resolution 1973. It passed with no objections and 5 (not 3 sorry) abstentions. So what part does that have to play?