GustavBahler wrote:http://www.msnewsnow.com/story/33592564/church-in-greenville-burned-and-spray-painted-vote-trump

GREENVILLE, MS (Mississippi News Now) -
Tuesday night after 11 p.m. authorities responded to a call about a church burning in Greenville.

A local black church, Hopewell M.B. Church, was not only burned but also vandalized with the words "Vote Trump" spray painted on the side of the building. Mayor Errick D. Simmons, Greenville Fire Chief, Washington County Sheriff and other local state and federal law enforcement agencies are holding a press conference Wednesday at 10:30 a.m.

Smells like a set-up... Let's burn a church and sign our name to it.

Probably paid for by the Clinton campaign.

DrAlphaeus wrote:It even duped Nalod, because the press on the web is not like the dead tree press. Not as easy as putting the morning edition next to the evening edition and seeing the changes right before your eyes. This ForexLive ******* just hit the "edit" button on his post to not look like a total dirtbag. I don't even think its a totally cynical "let me make money off these Trump rubes" because it looks like he gets high on his own supply. The real rubes are NASDAQ for associating with this clown.

Yes

Bonn1997 wrote:

Vmart wrote:

martin wrote:

DrAlphaeus wrote:It even duped Nalod, because the press on the web is not like the dead tree press. Not as easy as putting the morning edition next to the evening edition and seeing the changes right before your eyes. This ForexLive ******* just hit the "edit" button on his post to not look like a total dirtbag. I don't even think its a totally cynical "let me make money off these Trump rubes" because it looks like he gets high on his own supply. The real rubes are NASDAQ for associating with this clown.

The content of the article didn't dupe Nalod, just the updates created a new slant on the post.

The content of the article duped BRIGGS. 6th graders with a Twitter account can dupe BRIGGS and half the people voting for Trump.

This look isn't good for you Martin.

Briggs is posting absurd statements that he's not fact checking and that shouldn't sound plausible to someone with basic critical thinking skills. I'm glad Martin is calling him out.

BRIGGS has a bunch of issues, but that article wasn't from "MiltiaPrepperNewsDaily.net" or anything. It was friggin' NASDAQ.com. Sure he didn't read it clearly because he was drunk on Trump kook-aid or Allanfan'd... so my issue is more with the fact this clickbait has the implicit backing of the second largest stock market. What the hell does Michelle Obama's Twitter have to do with the foreign currency market? Sure BRIGGS should have seen that, but I'm pointing the finger at the hosers who put this clickbait up.

DrAlphaeus wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

Vmart wrote:

martin wrote:

DrAlphaeus wrote:It even duped Nalod, because the press on the web is not like the dead tree press. Not as easy as putting the morning edition next to the evening edition and seeing the changes right before your eyes. This ForexLive ******* just hit the "edit" button on his post to not look like a total dirtbag. I don't even think its a totally cynical "let me make money off these Trump rubes" because it looks like he gets high on his own supply. The real rubes are NASDAQ for associating with this clown.

The content of the article didn't dupe Nalod, just the updates created a new slant on the post.

The content of the article duped BRIGGS. 6th graders with a Twitter account can dupe BRIGGS and half the people voting for Trump.

This look isn't good for you Martin.

Briggs is posting absurd statements that he's not fact checking and that shouldn't sound plausible to someone with basic critical thinking skills. I'm glad Martin is calling him out.

BRIGGS has a bunch of issues, but that article wasn't from "MiltiaPrepperNewsDaily.net" or anything. It was friggin' NASDAQ.com. Sure he didn't read it clearly because he was drunk on Trump kook-aid or Allanfan'd... so my issue is more with the fact this clickbait has the implicit backing of the second largest stock market. What the hell does Michelle Obama's Twitter have to do with the foreign currency market? Sure BRIGGS should have seen that, but I'm pointing the finger at the hosers who put this clickbait up.

Generally, the source for all of that was Hannity and some fringe websites. BRIGGS surely saw more than just the NASDAQ article but that was what he posted cause it would have seemed the most legitimate. Not so.

We all have Google and some other very easy tools at our own hands. Many were already telling BRIGGS that this particular story was debunked. A middle schooler could have told you that something was smelly.

It's starts at the source.

Bonn1997 wrote:

DrAlphaeus wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

Vmart wrote:

martin wrote:

DrAlphaeus wrote:It even duped Nalod, because the press on the web is not like the dead tree press. Not as easy as putting the morning edition next to the evening edition and seeing the changes right before your eyes. This ForexLive ******* just hit the "edit" button on his post to not look like a total dirtbag. I don't even think its a totally cynical "let me make money off these Trump rubes" because it looks like he gets high on his own supply. The real rubes are NASDAQ for associating with this clown.

The content of the article didn't dupe Nalod, just the updates created a new slant on the post.

The content of the article duped BRIGGS. 6th graders with a Twitter account can dupe BRIGGS and half the people voting for Trump.

This look isn't good for you Martin.

Briggs is posting absurd statements that he's not fact checking and that shouldn't sound plausible to someone with basic critical thinking skills. I'm glad Martin is calling him out.

BRIGGS has a bunch of issues, but that article wasn't from "MiltiaPrepperNewsDaily.net" or anything. It was friggin' NASDAQ.com. Sure he didn't read it clearly because he was drunk on Trump kook-aid or Allanfan'd... so my issue is more with the fact this clickbait has the implicit backing of the second largest stock market. What the hell does Michelle Obama's Twitter have to do with the foreign currency market? Sure BRIGGS should have seen that, but I'm pointing the finger at the hosers who put this clickbait up.

Oh I agree with that.
But Briggs also 90% of the time doesn't even post a link to his information.

No doubt. And what galls me the most is much like that article, when caught looking stupid, folks like BRIGGS don't have the humility or honesty to acknowledge the mistake and retract. It's just on to the next debunkable meme du jour.

GustavBahler wrote:

gr33d wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:http://www.msnewsnow.com/story/33592564/church-in-greenville-burned-and-spray-painted-vote-trump

GREENVILLE, MS (Mississippi News Now) -
Tuesday night after 11 p.m. authorities responded to a call about a church burning in Greenville.

A local black church, Hopewell M.B. Church, was not only burned but also vandalized with the words "Vote Trump" spray painted on the side of the building. Mayor Errick D. Simmons, Greenville Fire Chief, Washington County Sheriff and other local state and federal law enforcement agencies are holding a press conference Wednesday at 10:30 a.m.

Smells like a set-up... Let's burn a church and sign our name to it.

Probably paid for by the Clinton campaign.

Maybe you havent been paying attention, but Trump has white nationalists making robocalls for him, campaigning for him. Some of his closest advisors have ties to the white power movement. Burning black churches is what they do. I dont make excuses for Trump or Clinton. They both suck.

Wasn't saying it didn't happen... But who leaves their wallet at a crime scene?

Vote Trump, does nothing but give ammunition to the other campaign.

gr33d wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

gr33d wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:http://www.msnewsnow.com/story/33592564/church-in-greenville-burned-and-spray-painted-vote-trump

GREENVILLE, MS (Mississippi News Now) -
Tuesday night after 11 p.m. authorities responded to a call about a church burning in Greenville.

A local black church, Hopewell M.B. Church, was not only burned but also vandalized with the words "Vote Trump" spray painted on the side of the building. Mayor Errick D. Simmons, Greenville Fire Chief, Washington County Sheriff and other local state and federal law enforcement agencies are holding a press conference Wednesday at 10:30 a.m.

Smells like a set-up... Let's burn a church and sign our name to it.

Probably paid for by the Clinton campaign.

Maybe you havent been paying attention, but Trump has white nationalists making robocalls for him, campaigning for him. Some of his closest advisors have ties to the white power movement. Burning black churches is what they do. I dont make excuses for Trump or Clinton. They both suck.

Wasn't saying it didn't happen... But who leaves their wallet at a crime scene?

Vote Trump, does nothing but give ammunition to the other campaign.

Its rural Mississippi, I doubt they consulted with a political strategist first. As for who leaves a wallet a crime scene, sounds like something someone who would paint a "Vote Trump" sign after burning a black church would do. Someone who doesn't think ahead. Lots of stories online about criminals doing that during burglaries, hold ups, etc.. If that did happen.

Clinton has close to 100 percent of the black vote. I dont put it past the Clinton campaign to use dirty tricks, like with those debate questions. But this one would give them little political advantage vs a hell of a lot of risk if it were discovered. Probably dont want any more visits from the FBI. It just wouldnt be worth it to them IMO. They would rather release dirt on Trump himself.

meloshouldgo wrote:

holfresh wrote:

meloshouldgo wrote:

holfresh wrote:

meloshouldgo wrote:Here you go Bonnie, Clinton'S much vaunted improved economy in terms of median weekly wage data. From start to end it went up by about $22, for a whopping increase of a $1100 a year.

The median wage at the end of Clinton's 8 years was $17,784
That means half the working population made less than that a year. Some middle class, huh?

The average median household income increased 14.2% between 1992 and 2000...From 2000 to 2015 it decreased -2.4%

Link?

https://www.statista.com/statistics/200838/median-household-income-in-the-united-states/

This data isn't inflation adusted as far as I can tell. Can't spend too much time on it at work. My data was in 1982 dollars yours is much later. I will try to find inflation adjusted data using later dollars but I have much more faith in federal reserve data that I used on that graph of median wages.

Doesn't make a difference if it's inflation adjusted because the change is expressed in percentages...CPI adjusted would yield the same data...

gr33d wrote:

martin wrote:Meanwhile, no taxes from Trump, rape trial coming up, 6 bankruptcies filed, no taxes payed in a scheme that may be worthy of investigations, probable ties to Russia, sexual assault victims coming forward, on tape showing us his sexual predator ways.

What am I missing?

What's missing would be a side-by-side comparison of shenanigans by both parties.

it would be very lopsided. And indeed even a side-by-side is really unnecessary, the above stands alone is very ****ing scary.

Bonn1997 wrote:

meloshouldgo wrote:Here you go Bonnie, Clinton'S much vaunted improved economy in terms of median weekly wage data. From start to end it went up by about $22, for a whopping increase of a $1100 a year.

The median wage at the end of Clinton's 8 years was $17,784
That means half the working population made less than that a year. Some middle class, huh?

That's CPI adjusted #s. So, if I understand that right, middle class income went up at about an 8% faster rate than the cost of goods.

It means Nominal Median wage increase - COGS inflation for the same period was about 6.8% for the full 8 years, not 6.8% annualy. So if COGS inflation had been 2% then the nominal wage would have shown a 8.8% increase.

Oops, doesn't blow up enough, short email, just look here. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/43150
Someone giving someone else a heads up.