BRIGGS wrote:djsunyc wrote:2016 voters "what's the worst that can happen?"this debate told me that trump knows he is going to lose and will challenge the results. he will tell his racist army to voter intimidate and cause ruckus.
US is going to look like stock 3rd world footage from election night through christmas.
w/o a women there, there's no "he's putting her in her place" mysoginistic thoughts. what's left was a ranting raving racist lunatic screaming at an old white man.
this was engineered debate by trump.
i hope every single one of you that voted for him or abstained are self reflecting right now and not doubling down.
I believed greatly and I still do in the re industrialization of the United States. I believe greatly and still do in stronger borders. I believe greatly that we should try to make friends with our enemies and I still do. I believed strongly that Hillary Clinton was a poor choice to be President and I still do. If you believe in your mind that voting for Trump meant your some kind of white supremacy’s racist — that’s right it’s in your one mind— completely false. Just your attitude alone that says I need to reflect on my vote makes me happy I voted the way I did— it’s elitist and undemocratic. I think for myself—and if I was wrong— it was my democratically free choice to be wrong— and I don’t need you or anyone else to tell me otherwise.
Like I mentioned I will vote for no one this time — si ply because I don’t care to do so. But believe me this gross viewpoint that I should wear a scarlet letter because of the way I voted is wrong. I’ve listened to obnoxious belligerence for 3-4 years. Democrats( of which I was one) never wanted to say well gosh this guy one— let’s try to meet in the middle and work together for the betterment of all. Nope instead they took a shallow spoiled elitist avenue that resembled a 3 year old who didn’t get his ice cream on time
I 100% respectfully would really appreciate being shown evidence as to how "re industrialization of the United States," is considered viable if you wouldn't mind.
I ask that because I wonder how that is realistic in the face of realities of a late post-industrial society like the U.S and really the world when artificial intelligence and essentially, robots, can do the same work for far less financial cost, far less risk to human life and, let's be real, with no threat to unionize or fight for better rights or wages, etc. This is happening and more than a few well regarded economists and admittedly businesses believe it is going to happen given market demands and the benefits AI will reap.
I genuinely do not wish to sound crass, but that call for bringing back the past reminds me of the idea of bringing back the era of 90's basketball and belief in its tenets even when that style cannot work today.
Yes the U.S. has recognized strengths within a part of its population that benefited from a manufacturing economy -- men who like to "work with their hands", and who generally thrived before information technology and social emotional intelligence became strengths while technology advances -- who now have an understandable sense of getting the bad end of the stick of Darwinism.
This sense has effectively led to the creation of Trump's base, quite a few who are working, straight, "burly," less educated men, and of course those who believe in meritocracy of a certain kind, who I'd argue could be considered to see Trump as actually a kind of social worker, who advocates for this "oppressed" group utilizing a blunt, "social justice" perspective for their rights and their families even if the evidence says this thinking is in trouble.
Capitalism, at its core relates to supply and demand, and profit first, humans second (so benefits are a correlation not necessarily the goal) means anyone who does not step up to changes that the market demands, even if one believes them to be unjust, are at severe risk for destruction and demise.
Remember when MDA was coach of the the Suns and Knicks? Some (like I and others) argued this was the future of the NBA. Others said his style could NEVER win the title. Fast forward to today and 7 seconds or less is slow as hell compared to modern NBA.
Being too caught up in the past without challenging ourselves to be different in thinking is how many businesses and nations have failed in history.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...