[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Knicks can WIN with Bargnani Starting at PF
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 17 of 17 « First‹ Previous 15  16  17 
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
4/30/2014  10:17 AM
although I have very little confidence Bargs can be a useful NBA contributor at this point. He only seems to play well at the Garden when he's not playig for the Knicks and Gallinari are guarding him
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
AUTOADVERT
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
4/30/2014  11:24 AM
Are we going down this road again?
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/30/2014  11:31 AM
babyKnicks wrote:I'm willing to roll the dice with the same roster, a healthy team going into training camp, new coach and new philosophy.

50 wins.


The last thing I want is to have to see this $hit roster for another season
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
4/30/2014  1:22 PM
Well at least other uses for Bargs are coming up instead of the now-useless "spread the floor on Hibbert" playoff scenario...

I believe we've seen enough to know this situation isn't turning around here. Or do we need to see more? A 5-0 run and a great dunk attempt lowlight!


This is the second almost over-a-year-old thread bump!
jameskpolk! Have you perfected the google UK search thread function?
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/30/2014  3:19 PM
Does anyone expect him to last more than half a season anyway?
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
4/30/2014  4:56 PM
We've only got to worry about Bargs, Tyson and STAT one more year. I think it's been established that a coach needs to have a clear notion of how to use players or else you get a mess. Woodson was HORRID in figuring out how to use a player like Bargs. It made no sense to force it if he didn't have a clear idea of how it should work and when the team was losing games. Once Tyson went down and Bargs moved to C it became clear that Bargs is no longer a perimeter PF. He should be used as a C and in the PnP game.
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
4/30/2014  4:58 PM
nixluva wrote:We've only got to worry about Bargs, Tyson and STAT one more year. I think it's been established that a coach needs to have a clear notion of how to use players or else you get a mess. Woodson was HORRID in figuring out how to use a player like Bargs. It made no sense to force it if he didn't have a clear idea of how it should work and when the team was losing games. Once Tyson went down and Bargs moved to C it became clear that Bargs is no longer a perimeter PF. He should be used as a C and in the PnP game.

Hopefully Tyson is moved for something this offseason.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451
4/30/2014  5:06 PM
nixluva wrote:We've only got to worry about Bargs, Tyson and STAT one more year. I think it's been established that a coach needs to have a clear notion of how to use players or else you get a mess. Woodson was HORRID in figuring out how to use a player like Bargs. It made no sense to force it if he didn't have a clear idea of how it should work and when the team was losing games. Once Tyson went down and Bargs moved to C it became clear that Bargs is no longer a perimeter PF. He should be used as a C and in the PnP game.
Gotta give teh raptors credit. NOBODY wanted to give up anything for Bargnani until The Knicks gave up multiple picks including a 1st round pick for him. Toronto is now a playoff team and will get better. Draft picks are important
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
4/30/2014  6:27 PM
StarksEwing1 wrote:
nixluva wrote:We've only got to worry about Bargs, Tyson and STAT one more year. I think it's been established that a coach needs to have a clear notion of how to use players or else you get a mess. Woodson was HORRID in figuring out how to use a player like Bargs. It made no sense to force it if he didn't have a clear idea of how it should work and when the team was losing games. Once Tyson went down and Bargs moved to C it became clear that Bargs is no longer a perimeter PF. He should be used as a C and in the PnP game.
Gotta give teh raptors credit. NOBODY wanted to give up anything for Bargnani until The Knicks gave up multiple picks including a 1st round pick for him. Toronto is now a playoff team and will get better. Draft picks are important

Are you suggesting the raptors are better because they subtracted Bargs from their roster? Novak doesn't play but he might be a better locker room fit.

I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
4/30/2014  6:34 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
nixluva wrote:We've only got to worry about Bargs, Tyson and STAT one more year. I think it's been established that a coach needs to have a clear notion of how to use players or else you get a mess. Woodson was HORRID in figuring out how to use a player like Bargs. It made no sense to force it if he didn't have a clear idea of how it should work and when the team was losing games. Once Tyson went down and Bargs moved to C it became clear that Bargs is no longer a perimeter PF. He should be used as a C and in the PnP game.
Gotta give teh raptors credit. NOBODY wanted to give up anything for Bargnani until The Knicks gave up multiple picks including a 1st round pick for him. Toronto is now a playoff team and will get better. Draft picks are important

Are you suggesting the raptors are better because they subtracted Bargs from their roster? Novak doesn't play but he might be a better locker room fit.

I am sure that Toronto would have played better last year if they just benched Bargs just like we did better when he sat. He was/is a net negative on both teams.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
4/30/2014  6:54 PM
I'm curious what Phil intends to do with Bargs. Does he feel he can get thru to Bargs or does he wish to find a way to get rid of him? There is talent there but can Phil and the coaches help him to fix the bad areas and enhance his talent? Do they even want to expend the energy to try?
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451
4/30/2014  6:56 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
nixluva wrote:We've only got to worry about Bargs, Tyson and STAT one more year. I think it's been established that a coach needs to have a clear notion of how to use players or else you get a mess. Woodson was HORRID in figuring out how to use a player like Bargs. It made no sense to force it if he didn't have a clear idea of how it should work and when the team was losing games. Once Tyson went down and Bargs moved to C it became clear that Bargs is no longer a perimeter PF. He should be used as a C and in the PnP game.
Gotta give teh raptors credit. NOBODY wanted to give up anything for Bargnani until The Knicks gave up multiple picks including a 1st round pick for him. Toronto is now a playoff team and will get better. Draft picks are important

Are you suggesting the raptors are better because they subtracted Bargs from their roster? Novak doesn't play but he might be a better locker room fit.

No there are a lot of other factors why toronto is better. My point is that they were able take a disappointing and injury prone 1st overall pick who didnt have many suitors and get multiple picks including a first rounder
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
4/30/2014  8:29 PM
nixluva wrote:I'm curious what Phil intends to do with Bargs. Does he feel he can get thru to Bargs or does he wish to find a way to get rid of him? There is talent there but can Phil and the coaches help him to fix the bad areas and enhance his talent? Do they even want to expend the energy to try?

It will be interesting. I liked Bargs at the 5. Also, what is up with his elbow. That was a nasty injury.

I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
4/30/2014  9:08 PM
Bargs/Felton for Bropez works. Bropez for Tyson works straight up.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/30/2014  11:03 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
nixluva wrote:We've only got to worry about Bargs, Tyson and STAT one more year. I think it's been established that a coach needs to have a clear notion of how to use players or else you get a mess. Woodson was HORRID in figuring out how to use a player like Bargs. It made no sense to force it if he didn't have a clear idea of how it should work and when the team was losing games. Once Tyson went down and Bargs moved to C it became clear that Bargs is no longer a perimeter PF. He should be used as a C and in the PnP game.
Gotta give teh raptors credit. NOBODY wanted to give up anything for Bargnani until The Knicks gave up multiple picks including a 1st round pick for him. Toronto is now a playoff team and will get better. Draft picks are important

Are you suggesting the raptors are better because they subtracted Bargs from their roster? Novak doesn't play but he might be a better locker room fit.


I'm sure that's one of the many factors. Giving Bargs 30 min per night would have interfered with being a .600 team.
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
5/1/2014  8:53 AM
CrushAlot wrote:Bargs/Felton for Bropez works. Bropez for Tyson works straight up.

You can't get dimes from the bench in a suit.
What trade site did you use? NBAIslandofMisfitToys.com? Bropez may be the only center in the Least that actually plays less than FluTyson.

The Russian is not so stupid. Neither is Phil, even though Bropez passing out of the Triangle sounds really nice.
Page 17 of 17 « First‹ Previous 15  16  17 
« Reply To Topic
Knicks can WIN with Bargnani Starting at PF
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy