Welpee wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:

martin wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:What a scam with the woman Brazille. HRC shouldve done the right thing and said no. CNN shouldve outed this lady two weeks ago Absolute scam.

BRIGGS you keep posting utter crap without any sources or point of reference or anything.

If you would like to add to the discourse, please do so. Your freakouts aren't even entertaining any more.

You continue to back a sexual predator and then make light of it while in contrast post the above?

CNN employed the campaign manger for TRUMP while that campaign manager was still on the Trump payroll. What is your take on that type of arrangement?

As far as I can see I dont see Corey on TV getting jobbed for giving Donald Trump the questions to the debates. But I certainly see Donna lying like a rug. Why didnt CNN let you know 2 weeks ago she was canned? Its all a scam my friend. I like Bill Clinton--but Bill Clinton is much more sexual predator than Mr Trump--that is reasonable fair given that three women said he raped them(Clinton) The worst I heard from trump is a kiss which is normal in most countries. When I was younger Im sure I grabbed a few asses--but I am not sexual predator!~:)

That's because wikileaks is only hacking the democrats. You honestly think if they had a change of heart and started hacking republicans and people associated with Trump all they would find is emails about this weekend's football games?

Exactly. Wikileaks can't leak a face-to-face conversation on Trump Force One at 10,000 feet.

This has all revealed the advantage of old schoolers like Trump who didn't computerize their communication to the degree Clinton and her staff did and rely more on face-to-face and phone calls. The new electronic vectors are easier access points now than bugging a phone or office. Only aspect that Trump computerized was his PR using Twitter, and look how far that has taken him.

reub wrote:Michelle Obama has deleted all her tweets mentioning Crooked Hillary. I believe she's toast.

The word gullible is written on the ceiling.

Come on, do a little research before you post this stuff.

Maybe this is Clintons "Bring out the Kraken" moment, or her "Doomsday" bomb.
I suppose as long as she is winning, this need not be bought out.

But.......Bill clinton has been on Jeffery Epstein's jet numerous times. NO, he is not being accused of anything, but he has accepted gifts from Pedophile Epstein. Thus, the deflection would also taint Bill.
The guilt by association when blasted thru the media would imply Bill has something to hide. Epstein got a very light sentance in a deal shroud in secrecy and involved payments to the many of the girls.
There were few instances where no secret service was on the plane. Obviously dot connectors would have to assume Bill was doing young girls on all the flights. There is no link that he was every at "orgy island".
How strong is trumps case? I don't know.
Maybe the cross examiner can get him to brag about it, like when the Jack Nickolson character in a "Few Good Men" lost it on the witness stand.

In June, the former Western intelligence officer—who spent almost two decades on Russian intelligence matters and who now works with a US firm that gathers information on Russia for corporate clients—was assigned the task of researching Trump's dealings in Russia and elsewhere, according to the former spy and his associates in this American firm. This was for an opposition research project originally financed by a Republican client critical of the celebrity mogul. (Before the former spy was retained, the project's financing switched to a client allied with Democrats.) "It started off as a fairly general inquiry," says the former spook, who asks not to be identified. But when he dug into Trump, he notes, he came across troubling information indicating connections between Trump and the Russian government. According to his sources, he says, "there was an established exchange of information between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin of mutual benefit."

This was, the former spy remarks, "an extraordinary situation." He regularly consults with US government agencies on Russian matters, and near the start of July on his own initiative—without the permission of the US company that hired him—he sent a report he had written for that firm to a contact at the FBI, according to the former intelligence officer and his American associates, who asked not to be identified. (He declines to identify the FBI contact.) The former spy says he concluded that the information he had collected on Trump was "sufficiently serious" to share with the FBI.

Mother Jones has reviewed that report and other memos this former spy wrote. The first memo, based on the former intelligence officer's conversations with Russian sources, noted, "Russian regime has been cultivating, supporting and assisting TRUMP for at least 5 years. Aim, endorsed by PUTIN, has been to encourage splits and divisions in western alliance." It maintained that Trump "and his inner circle have accepted a regular flow of intelligence from the Kremlin, including on his Democratic and other political rivals." It claimed that Russian intelligence had "compromised" Trump during his visits to Moscow and could "blackmail him." It also reported that Russian intelligence had compiled a dossier on Hillary Clinton based on "bugged conversations she had on various visits to Russia and intercepted phone calls."

The former intelligence officer says the response from the FBI was "shock and horror." The FBI, after receiving the first memo, did not immediately request additional material, according to the former intelligence officer and his American associates. Yet in August, they say, the FBI asked him for all information in his possession and for him to explain how the material had been gathered and to identify his sources. The former spy forwarded to the bureau several memos—some of which referred to members of Trump's inner circle. After that point, he continued to share information with the FBI. "It's quite clear there was or is a pretty substantial inquiry going on," he says.

"This is something of huge significance, way above party politics," the former intelligence officer comments. "I think [Trump's] own party should be aware of this stuff as well."

Nalod wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:Trump now leading in 4 key battle grounds--it will be all over by next week. She has no ammo left --shot it all.

what polls are you referencing?

He and Guns are still stuck on the Fox adrenaline rush.

BRIGGS never posts any references or sources for anything.

Or, signs on the lawn. How is CT doing?

BRIGGS wrote:For all you really smart guys following Hillary--a really smart lady just washed her hands of her--name Michelle Obama(who i love) It wasnt that hard to get guys--this lady is CRIMINALLY corrupt. Take off the Democratic hats and see that this lady runs an organized crime ring and is criminally corrupt

we literally don't know what you are talking about cause you don't give a point of reference.

BRIGGS wrote:For all you really smart guys following Hillary--a really smart lady just washed her hands of her--name Michelle Obama(who i love) It wasnt that hard to get guys--this lady is CRIMINALLY corrupt. Take off the Democratic hats and see that this lady runs an organized crime ring and is criminally corrupt

Twitter talking points. You and reub following the same hashtags?

"YourNewsWire" is not winning a Pulitzer, homie. Debunked already.