[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

I'm not a long term buyer of RJ's high level potential/talent
Author Thread
Philc1
Posts: 28286
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897

10/12/2022  11:27 AM
Kemet wrote:RJ Barrett's low IQ has been a star performer vs Lottery teams the past 3 seasons .. In Barrett's 4th season we will see if Barrett has stepped-up his performance vs .500 teams to a winning performance on both sides of the court !!!


Says hi
AUTOADVERT
Nalod
Posts: 71068
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
10/12/2022  1:37 PM

Same game.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
10/12/2022  9:14 PM
Nalod wrote:

Same game.

You and I will never be on the same page on this one. Julius f’ed up pretty bad doing that thumbs down aka f-u.

“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
10/12/2022  9:16 PM
Allanfan20 wrote:
Nalod wrote:

Same game.

You and I will never be on the same page on this one. Julius f’ed up pretty bad doing that thumbs down aka f-u.

But yes, most of the team was playing awful that entire game including RJ and Julius.

“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
technomaster
Posts: 23346
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2003
Member: #426
USA
10/12/2022  10:26 PM    LAST EDITED: 10/13/2022  1:20 PM
Something about RJ's game seems a little mechanical or rehearsed - I'm not sure how to explain it. He's practiced his moves. Maybe he has practiced them so much that it's almost like he's telegraphing what he's doing. Maybe it's as if he's missing some fluidity in how he mixes things up on his finishes. Maybe that's a bit of what they mean when they say he doesn't have a great sense of touch near the basket.

I do think he's made himself into a darned good player. At this phase in his career, what do we think - a 3rd or 4th best player on a finals caliber team? I think he can continue to nudge his way up.

I like a good Paul Pierce season as target upside for RJ. RJ has already more or less matched the likes of Rudy Gay, Caron Butler, and even Danny Granger in his age 21 season. Those guys were all pretty good players. Pierce transcended those other guys because of his plus playmaking skills. (he regularly averaged 4-5apg - the others were in that 2-3 range). RJ is basically a 3apg sort of player, nothing remarkable for a wing.

The two key things to watch for in his development this year:
* better finishing near the basket, and thus, increasing his overall FG% and eFG. He's been very poor throughout his career thus far (I do think his excuse of throwing balls against the glass on purpose because Mitch is around is a novel explanation, though!). He needs to nudge his eFG stat to .500 and beyond. He finished year 2 at .499 (almost!) and took a step back last year. I think his FT%/3pt% are passable and will fluctuate given that he didn't enter the NBA as a pure shooter. But his poor finishing at the rim basically cost him about $50m.

* becoming a better playmaker (let's get up to 3.5 to 4apg - you now have a few more weapons that can shoot in Brunson at PG and iHart)

“That was two, two from the heart.” - John Starks
GustavBahler
Posts: 42686
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

10/13/2022  7:02 AM
RJ's progress hasnt been meteoric. More "slow and steady". Nothing wrong with that. Not a bad thing. Requires more patience from fans though.
Nalod
Posts: 71068
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
10/13/2022  8:28 AM
RJ strength is in his fundamentals than an athletic ability to improvise. Is one better than the other? If you have both, like Kobe then it all comes together and its phenom. RJ is strong that dominates over a lose twitch type of build. The jumper is becoming rock solid. I can see a Joe Johnson type of delivery going forward. Strong kid who could shoot over opponents with solid stroke and foundation of form. The drives are coming along really nice.
Cam is the opposite. Loose delivery and very wirey. No two shots are the same. He falls back on his jumper and his drives from quickness and length.
Knicks paid RJ for a reason. he will be handfull for teams going foward.
KnickDanger
Posts: 24375
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/30/2017
Member: #7578

10/13/2022  11:35 AM
GustavBahler wrote:RJ's progress hasnt been meteoric. More "slow and steady". Nothing wrong with that. Not a bad thing. Requires more patience from fans though.

Hahahahahaha!

Philc1
Posts: 28286
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897

10/14/2022  8:06 AM
KnickDanger wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:RJ's progress hasnt been meteoric. More "slow and steady". Nothing wrong with that. Not a bad thing. Requires more patience from fans though.

Hahahahahaha!

It’s wierd. Tyrese Halliburton is the greatest pg ever despite his teams losing and never making the playoffs. The Knicks made the playoffs and, while they missed the playoffs last year still won 37 games just a couple years after having the NBA’s worst record, — RJ must suck!

Nalod
Posts: 71068
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
10/14/2022  9:09 AM
Philc1 wrote:
KnickDanger wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:RJ's progress hasnt been meteoric. More "slow and steady". Nothing wrong with that. Not a bad thing. Requires more patience from fans though.

Hahahahahaha!

It’s wierd. Tyrese Halliburton is the greatest pg ever despite his teams losing and never making the playoffs. The Knicks made the playoffs and, while they missed the playoffs last year still won 37 games just a couple years after having the NBA’s worst record, — RJ must suck!

Who started 63 games at PG the year we were 4th seed?
Not Tyrese!

GustavBahler
Posts: 42686
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

10/19/2022  10:59 PM
RJ is no quitter. Confident that he will review film, work on his game, and play smarter.
martin
Posts: 75997
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
10/26/2022  11:04 PM
Yeah I’m doubling down. I wanna be so wrong but RJ misses layup after layup after completely wide open 3. He just don’t got it.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
GustavBahler
Posts: 42686
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

10/26/2022  11:31 PM
martin wrote:Yeah I’m doubling down. I wanna be so wrong but RJ misses layup after layup after completely wide open 3. He just don’t got it.

I believe RJ's inability to use the glass is fixable. RJ treats using the glass as a bailout, instead of a weapon to neutralize a bigger defender. There is no aim that I can see, he just throws it up there and hopes it goes in.

I hope he devotes some running and standing drills focusing only on using the glass. Making those layups should carry over to shooting, when his confidence improves.

This is fixable, its a matter of RJ devoting the time exclusively to fixing it.

martin
Posts: 75997
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
10/31/2022  8:50 AM
That feels like a punch to the nutsack

https://www.postingandtoasting.com/2022/10/30/23431783/cavaliers-121-knicks-108-im-mad

Here, not counting last summer’s draft, are the last 10 players chosen third in the draft: Bradley Beal; Otto Porter Jr; Joel Embiid; Jahlil Okafor; Jaylen Brown; Jayson Tatum; Luka Dončić; RJ; LaMelo Ball; Mobley. Three of those names have been MVP-level. Seven have been All-Star level. The other three have been Porter, Okafor and Barrett.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
martin
Posts: 75997
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/7/2022  8:15 AM
Yikes

https://knicksfilmschool.substack.com/p/bombs-away

Barrett is the obvious choice because he shot at least 50 percent in each game - a massive accomplishment for him given his efficiency issues. How massive is it? The last time he made at least half of his shots in consecutive outings was games 41 and 42 of last season. The last time he did it in consecutive games while attempting at least 15 field goals in each was games 5 and 6 a year ago.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39746
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

11/7/2022  8:28 AM
martin wrote:Yikes

https://knicksfilmschool.substack.com/p/bombs-away

Barrett is the obvious choice because he shot at least 50 percent in each game - a massive accomplishment for him given his efficiency issues. How massive is it? The last time he made at least half of his shots in consecutive outings was games 41 and 42 of last season. The last time he did it in consecutive games while attempting at least 15 field goals in each was games 5 and 6 a year ago.

Thought this was interesting as well:

Defensively is where the drop off is supposed to come with Brunson, and while the defense has been 8.1 points per 100 possessions stingier when Brunson sits, that number is a bit deceiving. The on/off stats paint Evan Fournier (10.5 more points given up per 100 possessions when he plays) and Julius Randle (a whopping 12.2 / 100; more on that below) as the real culprits. And sure enough, when Brunson has played without Fournier, the Knicks have defended at a top-six rate, giving up 108.5 points in 280 possessions3.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
martin
Posts: 75997
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/7/2022  8:36 AM    LAST EDITED: 11/7/2022  8:50 AM
BigDaddyG wrote:
martin wrote:Yikes

https://knicksfilmschool.substack.com/p/bombs-away

Barrett is the obvious choice because he shot at least 50 percent in each game - a massive accomplishment for him given his efficiency issues. How massive is it? The last time he made at least half of his shots in consecutive outings was games 41 and 42 of last season. The last time he did it in consecutive games while attempting at least 15 field goals in each was games 5 and 6 a year ago.

Thought this was interesting as well:

Defensively is where the drop off is supposed to come with Brunson, and while the defense has been 8.1 points per 100 possessions stingier when Brunson sits, that number is a bit deceiving. The on/off stats paint Evan Fournier (10.5 more points given up per 100 possessions when he plays) and Julius Randle (a whopping 12.2 / 100; more on that below) as the real culprits. And sure enough, when Brunson has played without Fournier, the Knicks have defended at a top-six rate, giving up 108.5 points in 280 possessions3.

I don't yet think Brunson has the communication and rotations down yet, but he tries and he is smart. Same deal with Cam, I think familiarity is just the issue. He can FLY around and his length is really nice.

We all know Fournier sucks and should be out of rotation as soon as Grimes is back full.

I do think they are sticking RJ with particular assignments at his or coaching staff or both requests, just to learn and develop. He doesn't fly around and would be better suited to guard stronger players who pound you.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
HofstraBBall
Posts: 27947
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 11/21/2015
Member: #6192

11/7/2022  11:37 AM
martin wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
martin wrote:Yikes

https://knicksfilmschool.substack.com/p/bombs-away

Barrett is the obvious choice because he shot at least 50 percent in each game - a massive accomplishment for him given his efficiency issues. How massive is it? The last time he made at least half of his shots in consecutive outings was games 41 and 42 of last season. The last time he did it in consecutive games while attempting at least 15 field goals in each was games 5 and 6 a year ago.

Thought this was interesting as well:

Defensively is where the drop off is supposed to come with Brunson, and while the defense has been 8.1 points per 100 possessions stingier when Brunson sits, that number is a bit deceiving. The on/off stats paint Evan Fournier (10.5 more points given up per 100 possessions when he plays) and Julius Randle (a whopping 12.2 / 100; more on that below) as the real culprits. And sure enough, when Brunson has played without Fournier, the Knicks have defended at a top-six rate, giving up 108.5 points in 280 possessions3.

I don't yet think Brunson has the communication and rotations down yet, but he tries and he is smart. Same deal with Cam, I think familiarity is just the issue. He can FLY around and his length is really nice.

We all know Fournier sucks and should be out of rotation as soon as Grimes is back full.

I do think they are sticking RJ with particular assignments at his or coaching staff or both requests, just to learn and develop. He doesn't fly around and would be better suited to guard stronger players who pound you.

We all knew EF was not a good defender. Some of us only expected him to hit threes.
Don't think JB is good defensively either. Important to manage expectations.

Grimes healthy and "living up to perceived ceiling" should be better than Cam or EF. But that is yet to happen. Cam seems like a good SF back up. He is a good defender and can spell that on second unit. Agree that RJ gets the best player assignment often. I am curious to see a lineup of Randle, Obi, Cam, RJ and IQ. Especially against teams like Boston. Think we would do a better job guarding the stripe.

'Knicks focus should be on players that have grown up playing soccer or cricket' - Triplethreat 8/28/2020
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39746
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

11/18/2022  7:22 AM    LAST EDITED: 11/18/2022  7:45 AM
Is this what McCarthy meant by "The Red Scare"?
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
11/18/2022  7:51 AM
RJ is nowhere near the level of athlete that Iggy was. I like RJ but Iggy was also a pretty nasty passer and crazy IQ.

Maybe the problem is both RJ and Knicks fans want him to be Jimmy Butler when he might be better of being a super PJ Tucker. His only plus thing right now seems to be strength and work ethic.

Would the Knicks be better off if RJ focused on defending the hell out of everyone and hitting corner threes instead of trying to create off the bounce and forcing shots while missing open teammates?

At this point there are multiple players who are better at scoring than RJ

Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
I'm not a long term buyer of RJ's high level potential/talent

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy