[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

ESPN: Carmelo Anthony trade talks heat up (Melo to Nets talk here)
Author Thread
Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
9/29/2010  1:32 AM
AnubisADL wrote:The fact that Donnie Walsh, of all people, is commenting on RUMORS tells me all I need to know. Seriously Walsh just shut up. If we start out slow you are just going to look like a fool.

There was ZERO reason to have direct quotes from Walsh when there aren't any direct quotes from a Denver executive saying our assets are undesirable. I can only guess that Walsh made an offer and Denver blew him off and now he is on the defensive.

The only person that needs to shut up is you. You're irritating.

It's quite clear with your crappy insistence on the Melo to Nets deal happening that you want Carmelo to end up elsewhere so you can get on your little pedestal and cry about how Walsh failed the franchise again. You've already advocated guys like Crawford and Randolph and said Isiah was "not that bad" so that clearly tells us all that needs to know about your agenda. Not to mention that you've been banned from another Knicks forum for extreme negativity. Maybe this will be the second.

"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
AUTOADVERT
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34060
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

9/29/2010  3:16 AM
Childs2Dudley wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:The fact that Donnie Walsh, of all people, is commenting on RUMORS tells me all I need to know. Seriously Walsh just shut up. If we start out slow you are just going to look like a fool.

There was ZERO reason to have direct quotes from Walsh when there aren't any direct quotes from a Denver executive saying our assets are undesirable. I can only guess that Walsh made an offer and Denver blew him off and now he is on the defensive.

The only person that needs to shut up is you. You're irritating.

It's quite clear with your crappy insistence on the Melo to Nets deal happening that you want Carmelo to end up elsewhere so you can get on your little pedestal and cry about how Walsh failed the franchise again. You've already advocated guys like Crawford and Randolph and said Isiah was "not that bad" so that clearly tells us all that needs to know about your agenda. Not to mention that you've been banned from another Knicks forum for extreme negativity. Maybe this will be the second.

I wish there was a :STANDING OVATION: emoticon

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
9/29/2010  3:32 AM
joec32033 wrote:
TMS wrote:
joec32033 wrote:Offer Wilson, Eddy, Toney, 2 2nd round picks and $3 mil for Carmelo. If you need to, throw in a guy like Walker or Bukakke(salary permitting).

throw in Andy Rautins & you got yerself a deal!

come on bro.

No deal. Need Rautins for the white guy with crazy hair quota every team has.

Seriously, why compete with ourselves? Offer that and if they come back with a combo of say a base of Randolph Curry and Wilson...so be it.

i think a reasonable offer would be AR or Gallo, Curry, Wilson & both our 2nd rounders... you're talking about a guy who's averaged 25 & 6 over his career & is only 26 years old, just hitting his prime... there's really no use making a silly lowball offer for a guy like Melo... i think Donnie needs to deal in good faith if he expects DEN to consider his offer.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
joec32033
Posts: 30612
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
9/29/2010  6:00 AM    LAST EDITED: 9/29/2010  6:04 AM
TMS wrote:
joec32033 wrote:
TMS wrote:
joec32033 wrote:Offer Wilson, Eddy, Toney, 2 2nd round picks and $3 mil for Carmelo. If you need to, throw in a guy like Walker or Bukakke(salary permitting).

throw in Andy Rautins & you got yerself a deal!

come on bro.

No deal. Need Rautins for the white guy with crazy hair quota every team has.

Seriously, why compete with ourselves? Offer that and if they come back with a combo of say a base of Randolph Curry and Wilson...so be it.

i think a reasonable offer would be AR or Gallo, Curry, Wilson & both our 2nd rounders... you're talking about a guy who's averaged 25 & 6 over his career & is only 26 years old, just hitting his prime... there's really no use making a silly lowball offer for a guy like Melo... i think Donnie needs to deal in good faith if he expects DEN to consider his offer.

I half agree with you in this depending on facts.

First personal opinion. I am not giving Denver everything it wants 100% full, so to speak. A Gallo/AR, Wilson, Curry package is reserved for a guy under contract we have no other way of getting, IMO. Melo really can stick it to Denver if he wants and is that bitter as reported.

Now that was my totally impartial view. IF the rumors are true about Denver ** itting all over us crying tampering, not dealing with us out of spite, and really crapping all over our players...well, Mr. Big Man Denver GM guy...now is the time to tweak you a bit. You want youth? Wil and Toney. You want savings? Lardass and $3 mil. You want picks? Take a couple 2nd rounders that likely will just be outside the bottom of the first-which is likely where any 1st rounder from us will be if we get Melo.

I understand the deal in good faith concept, but I think Donnie needs to teach this yoot a little about how to do the job right.

Now if all the stuff coming out of Denver was just media static, I am good with Donnie dealing this guy a good faith deal to smooth over a bridge.

At this point though, I bet Billy King, Rod Thorn, and Larry Brown want to see this kid bent over a barrel "Pulp Fiction" style in this deal.

~You can't run from who you are.~
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
9/29/2010  7:46 AM
Childs2Dudley wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:The fact that Donnie Walsh, of all people, is commenting on RUMORS tells me all I need to know. Seriously Walsh just shut up. If we start out slow you are just going to look like a fool.

There was ZERO reason to have direct quotes from Walsh when there aren't any direct quotes from a Denver executive saying our assets are undesirable. I can only guess that Walsh made an offer and Denver blew him off and now he is on the defensive.

The only person that needs to shut up is you. You're irritating.

It's quite clear with your crappy insistence on the Melo to Nets deal happening that you want Carmelo to end up elsewhere so you can get on your little pedestal and cry about how Walsh failed the franchise again. You've already advocated guys like Crawford and Randolph and said Isiah was "not that bad" so that clearly tells us all that needs to know about your agenda. Not to mention that you've been banned from another Knicks forum for extreme negativity. Maybe this will be the second.

theres that greek passion - panos has nothing on you. well said.

"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
fishmike
Posts: 53851
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
9/29/2010  7:49 AM
the most reasonable offer is a max contract this summer.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Nalod
Posts: 71208
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
9/29/2010  8:16 AM    LAST EDITED: 9/29/2010  11:13 AM
Donnie was defending his guys as being under valued.

Nothing wrong with that.

scoshin
Posts: 20584
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/23/2004
Member: #568
9/29/2010  9:01 AM
I used to be in favor of giving up one of Gallo/AR + Wilson + whatever other young throw-in they want (Walker? Douglas?), but after Carmelo's recent comments, I get the sense that he's now willing to risk FA if it comes down to it. And if that's the case, the most I would offer is Chandler, Douglas, 2014 1st rounder, the Golden State's 2nd rounders, and cash. And obviously Curry to make the numbers work.

The way I see it is...if Carmelo is really dead set on NY, and we can acquire him without giving up any major asset (Chandler would have to be let go regardless in the summer)...then we can either roll with our new squad of Gallo/Melo/Amare with AR off the bench...OR we can turn our young assets into Chris Paul and have our 3-headed beast. By giving up all or most of our assets in a Melo trade, we're pretty much handicuffed to a team of Melo/Amare with no picks in the foreseeable future. Not a good road to take.

Rookie
Posts: 27049
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 10/15/2008
Member: #2274

9/29/2010  10:11 AM
been meaning to ask...can we sign Melo to a max deal with the cap hold on our young players...gallo, randolf, douglass and chandler...then there's also Az and Turiaf. So considering we do sign Melo...who can we keep under the cap
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34060
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

9/29/2010  10:25 AM
Nalod wrote:Donnie was defending his guys as not being under valued.

Nothing wrong with that.

by the trade deadline, one of either Gallo and AR will be enough to get Melo

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
fishmike
Posts: 53851
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
9/29/2010  10:41 AM
Rookie wrote:been meaning to ask...can we sign Melo to a max deal with the cap hold on our young players...gallo, randolf, douglass and chandler...then there's also Az and Turiaf. So considering we do sign Melo...who can we keep under the cap
Chandler will walk. So will the expiring guys like Curry, Azubuke, etc.

AR, Gallo, Douglas, Walker.. all would come back. Thats the point in NOT trading for Melo now, and certainly NOT at the deadline. If we make as far as the deadline why trade for him them? We will just max him out 4 months later and keep our good young players.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
9/29/2010  11:24 AM
fishmike wrote:
Rookie wrote:been meaning to ask...can we sign Melo to a max deal with the cap hold on our young players...gallo, randolf, douglass and chandler...then there's also Az and Turiaf. So considering we do sign Melo...who can we keep under the cap
Chandler will walk. So will the expiring guys like Curry, Azubuke, etc.

AR, Gallo, Douglas, Walker.. all would come back. Thats the point in NOT trading for Melo now, and certainly NOT at the deadline. If we make as far as the deadline why trade for him them? We will just max him out 4 months later and keep our good young players.

exactly.. i don't get why certain people try and make it out the longer this goes on the worse we are. the fact that melo is in camp with the nuggets is a great sign for us and the longer he stays a nugget, the less chance he agrees to sign an extension with the team he's dealt to when/if he's traded. if melo is dealt at the deadline (and there will be a team that deals for him w/out a guarentee of resigning him) he'll finish out the year with that team and enter FA.

donnie has played this situation absolutely right 100% it's like playing poker with phil ivey.

"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
Moonangie
Posts: 24766
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 7/9/2009
Member: #2788

9/29/2010  11:55 AM    LAST EDITED: 9/29/2010  12:01 PM
Childs2Dudley wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:The fact that Donnie Walsh, of all people, is commenting on RUMORS tells me all I need to know. Seriously Walsh just shut up. If we start out slow you are just going to look like a fool.

There was ZERO reason to have direct quotes from Walsh when there aren't any direct quotes from a Denver executive saying our assets are undesirable. I can only guess that Walsh made an offer and Denver blew him off and now he is on the defensive.

The only person that needs to shut up is you. You're irritating.

It's quite clear with your crappy insistence on the Melo to Nets deal happening that you want Carmelo to end up elsewhere so you can get on your little pedestal and cry about how Walsh failed the franchise again. You've already advocated guys like Crawford and Randolph and said Isiah was "not that bad" so that clearly tells us all that needs to know about your agenda. Not to mention that you've been banned from another Knicks forum for extreme negativity. Maybe this will be the second.

Word. A hearty +1 to that sentiment. Sick of all the crybaby trolling.

TMS wrote:
joec32033 wrote:
TMS wrote:
joec32033 wrote:Offer Wilson, Eddy, Toney, 2 2nd round picks and $3 mil for Carmelo. If you need to, throw in a guy like Walker or Bukakke(salary permitting).

throw in Andy Rautins & you got yerself a deal!

come on bro.

No deal. Need Rautins for the white guy with crazy hair quota every team has.

Seriously, why compete with ourselves? Offer that and if they come back with a combo of say a base of Randolph Curry and Wilson...so be it.

i think a reasonable offer would be AR or Gallo, Curry, Wilson & both our 2nd rounders... you're talking about a guy who's averaged 25 & 6 over his career & is only 26 years old, just hitting his prime... there's really no use making a silly lowball offer for a guy like Melo... i think Donnie needs to deal in good faith if he expects DEN to consider his offer.

I could see both Gallo and AR with similar averages at 26 (that's four and five years from now, respectively) and do so more efficiently than Melo. Not saying I don't want him... I do. But not at the cost of long-term viability.

I still maintain that I would part with Gallo ONLY because he is a bit redundant with Melo and it wouldn't make sense to play him at the 2 or off the bench (i.e., he has too much value for that). But I would rather use him to trade for the third piece (i.e., CP3, Deron, etc.) rather than give him up now for a piece we could have free and clear.

I am starting to lean heavily toward Briggs' idea of waiting until the deadline and if Melo is still on the block, offer Curry, Wilson, $3mil and the second rounders. Nothing more.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
9/29/2010  12:53 PM
Moonangie wrote:
TMS wrote:
i think a reasonable offer would be AR or Gallo, Curry, Wilson & both our 2nd rounders... you're talking about a guy who's averaged 25 & 6 over his career & is only 26 years old, just hitting his prime... there's really no use making a silly lowball offer for a guy like Melo... i think Donnie needs to deal in good faith if he expects DEN to consider his offer.

I could see both Gallo and AR with similar averages at 26 (that's four and five years from now, respectively) and do so more efficiently than Melo. Not saying I don't want him... I do. But not at the cost of long-term viability.

I still maintain that I would part with Gallo ONLY because he is a bit redundant with Melo and it wouldn't make sense to play him at the 2 or off the bench (i.e., he has too much value for that). But I would rather use him to trade for the third piece (i.e., CP3, Deron, etc.) rather than give him up now for a piece we could have free and clear.

I am starting to lean heavily toward Briggs' idea of waiting until the deadline and if Melo is still on the block, offer Curry, Wilson, $3mil and the second rounders. Nothing more.

hoping for Gallo or AR to start averaging 25 & 6 is a fantasy... that would probably be Gallo's absolute top ceiling if that, & there's no chance AR will put up those types of offensive numbers IMO, he's a different kind of player... IMO it would probably make sense to trade Gallo for Melo & keep AR on the roster since he's a more complementary type player to Melo's skillset.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Moonangie
Posts: 24766
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 7/9/2009
Member: #2788

9/29/2010  12:59 PM
TMS wrote:
Moonangie wrote:
TMS wrote:
i think a reasonable offer would be AR or Gallo, Curry, Wilson & both our 2nd rounders... you're talking about a guy who's averaged 25 & 6 over his career & is only 26 years old, just hitting his prime... there's really no use making a silly lowball offer for a guy like Melo... i think Donnie needs to deal in good faith if he expects DEN to consider his offer.

I could see both Gallo and AR with similar averages at 26 (that's four and five years from now, respectively) and do so more efficiently than Melo. Not saying I don't want him... I do. But not at the cost of long-term viability.

I still maintain that I would part with Gallo ONLY because he is a bit redundant with Melo and it wouldn't make sense to play him at the 2 or off the bench (i.e., he has too much value for that). But I would rather use him to trade for the third piece (i.e., CP3, Deron, etc.) rather than give him up now for a piece we could have free and clear.

I am starting to lean heavily toward Briggs' idea of waiting until the deadline and if Melo is still on the block, offer Curry, Wilson, $3mil and the second rounders. Nothing more.

hoping for Gallo or AR to start averaging 25 & 6 is a fantasy... that would probably be Gallo's absolute top ceiling if that, & there's no chance AR will put up those types of offensive numbers IMO, he's a different kind of player... IMO it would probably make sense to trade Gallo for Melo & keep AR on the roster since he's a more complementary type player to Melo's skillset.

I don't know enough about AR's game to back up words about his averages at 26, so I'll retract that part. I think he brings the sort of mixed skillset we desperately need (i.e., length, defensive ability, finishing ability) and so I consider him untouchable.

It would definitely make more sense to trade Gallo (if we must give one of the yoots to land a superstar), but I'd rather trade him for CP3 after he blows up this season. And I didn't necessarily think Gallo would average 25/6, but I could see him doing something like 22/9/4 efficiently, which could be argued is preferable to Melo's current "volume shooter" averages.

One thing Melo has demonstrated that I would want to see from Gallo is the killer instinct and clutch shooting late in the fourth quarter, when the game is on the line. That's something a superstar brings that should never be undervalued, because its a difference maker. But again, I could easily envision Gallo being just that sort of guy at 26yo.

Time will tell.

Nalod
Posts: 71208
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
9/29/2010  1:43 PM
As a Knick fan, I like Gallo. He was our pick, he is our player. I am sad to see DLee go. For 7 years he went from the last pick in the 1st round to an double double all star. Fun to watch the yoots grow up and root for.

I understand why Amare and Him would be redundant and Dlee could bring value, and hence AR is in the picture. An interesting player. An unsual skill set, good personality and I would look forwaerd to seeing him succeed as a knick!

While I respect his game, I can't say I like Melo. Can't say he is a winner, can't say he is a warrior, can't say he is a fun personality, can't say other than his stats what is so great about him.

So why should I be all over him on a trade?

I can say that for the right price, it would be good.

NYK3
Posts: 23572
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/30/2004
Member: #725
USA
9/30/2010  2:01 PM    LAST EDITED: 9/30/2010  2:02 PM
http://twitter.com/csheridanespn

Source tells me the NY Knicks have a deal available to acquire a No. 1 draft pick in 2011 for use in a C.Anthony trade, if talks revived.
5 minutes ago via web

I wasn't born with enough middle fingers!!!
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
9/30/2010  2:22 PM
NYK3 wrote:http://twitter.com/csheridanespn

Source tells me the NY Knicks have a deal available to acquire a No. 1 draft pick in 2011 for use in a C.Anthony trade, if talks revived.
5 minutes ago via web

Nice knowing you Gallo and/or Randolph.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
smackeddog
Posts: 38390
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
9/30/2010  2:34 PM
NYK3 wrote:http://twitter.com/csheridanespn

Source tells me the NY Knicks have a deal available to acquire a No. 1 draft pick in 2011 for use in a C.Anthony trade, if talks revived.
5 minutes ago via web

Denver has been very successful in getting writers to accept that the Knicks have no young players of value, but it's not true at all, and I don't think that it was that hard for Donnie to find a team that would take one of our players for a pick- after all a lot of teams sell them for cash nearer the draft.

Personally, I'd rather have one of our young players than a draft pick if I was Denver- the draft is pretty hit or miss, especially outside of the top ten.

At a guess, I'd say Chandler could get a mid round pick, maybe a combination of Douglas and Walker could get you a latter one. If a trade was done now for Melo it would probably be Gallo plus a 2011 pick (for Chandler) plus our 2014 plus our second rounders. But to be honest I think Denver was just saying they wanted a 2011 pick because they knew we didn't have one- they have no intention of trading him to us unless it's an absolute last resort and will say anything to conceal the fact they're only doing it out of spite.

Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
9/30/2010  5:37 PM
just say no to melo.
ESPN: Carmelo Anthony trade talks heat up (Melo to Nets talk here)

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy