[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

ALL BALL: Official Draft General Discussion
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 16 of 22 « First‹ Previous 14  15  16  17  18 Next ›Last »
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
6/28/2005  9:42 PM
Briggs was right about nate.... He was valued in this draft..
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
AUTOADVERT
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
6/28/2005  9:44 PM
I wanted height with that pick but lets see what happens with 30 before we kill Isiah...
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
SKY
Posts: 20356
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2004
Member: #687
USA
6/28/2005  9:45 PM
Nate at 21 is kinda high, but I like him a lot!!!!!

If we could snatch Taft/Simien/Gomes with #30, I'll be happy!
Ira
Posts: 24688
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
6/28/2005  9:48 PM
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/draft?analysis=1

21. Pho - Nate Robinson, PG: Now we know why there was a delay in the Q. Richardson-Kurt Thomas deal. Nate Robinson is the Suns' pick, but he is headed to the Knicks eventually. He isn't a pure point, but he will electrify the Garden crowds at the very least. At 5-8, Robinson is a water bug of an athlete. He'll also allow Stephon Marbury to play off the ball a little bit. It's a very intriguing move by Isiah Thomas, who was an awful good small guard himself. And the Knicks get to keep Channing Frye, who is NOT included in the deal. Once again a source was "mostly correct." We'll take it, though. - 9:40 pm EDT
firefly
Posts: 23229
Alba Posts: 17
Joined: 7/26/2004
Member: #721
United Kingdom
6/28/2005  9:48 PM
I dont think you guys are realizing what Isiahs doing here. If we pick up Blatche, Petro or god willing Taft at the 30, we will be stacked at every position for the next 5 years. Hes played this perfectly so far. If Chad doesnt give him an A tomorrow i will be dissapointed
Some men see things as they are and ask why. I dream things that never were and ask why not?
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
6/28/2005  9:51 PM
So far I give Isiah a C-.

We now have the smallest backcourt in the NBA.

Q. Rich - 6'4"
J. Crawford - 6'5"
S. Marbury - 6'1"
N. Robinson - 5'9"

We're going to get murdered on the defensive end of things. You can't win without height in the NBA. This team is built to draw in fans, not to win.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
firefly
Posts: 23229
Alba Posts: 17
Joined: 7/26/2004
Member: #721
United Kingdom
6/28/2005  9:51 PM
Denver got Jack, Sacto took Francisco Garcia
Some men see things as they are and ask why. I dream things that never were and ask why not?
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
6/28/2005  9:52 PM
I like the Nate pick and I will love it if we can get a good big man prospect at 30 which could be Zeke's plan. We'll see what happens.
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
SKY
Posts: 20356
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2004
Member: #687
USA
6/28/2005  9:53 PM
I like Nate but I'm suprised that Isiah didn't go with Jack considering what he bring to the table - DEFENSE. What do you think?
firefly
Posts: 23229
Alba Posts: 17
Joined: 7/26/2004
Member: #721
United Kingdom
6/28/2005  9:53 PM
Posted by Solace:

So far I give Isiah a C-.

We now have the smallest backcourt in the NBA.

Q. Rich - 6'4"
J. Crawford - 6'5"
S. Marbury - 6'1"
N. Robinson - 5'9"

We're going to get murdered on the defensive end of things. You can't win without height in the NBA. This team is built to draw in fans, not to win.

Q-rich is nearer 6'6", and plays moch bigger then that.

Also, he will spend alot of time at SF

Thirdly, Nate is a GREAT defender, even at 5'9"
Some men see things as they are and ask why. I dream things that never were and ask why not?
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
6/28/2005  9:53 PM
Posted by SKY:

I like Nate but I'm suprised that Isiah didn't go with Jack considering what he bring to the table - DEFENSE. What do you think?

I agree. If we were going with a guard, I'd rather go with a defensive one in Jack.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
6/28/2005  9:54 PM
Petro, Taft, Blatche, Morris still available at 30. Interesting. Robinson will be a Garden favorite.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
firefly
Posts: 23229
Alba Posts: 17
Joined: 7/26/2004
Member: #721
United Kingdom
6/28/2005  9:55 PM
Big question now. At 30, do we go BPA, or hight? For example, if Monta Ellis is available, and Taft and Blatche are gone, do we take Petro, or Ellis, who has a chance to be a star in the league?
Some men see things as they are and ask why. I dream things that never were and ask why not?
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
6/28/2005  9:56 PM
Posted by Solace:
Posted by SKY:

I like Nate but I'm suprised that Isiah didn't go with Jack considering what he bring to the table - DEFENSE. What do you think?

I agree. If we were going with a guard, I'd rather go with a defensive one in Jack.









I don't get this, Nate is a very good defensive guard.
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
6/28/2005  9:57 PM
I like Taft, but if that the Euro kid Martynas (I know I butchering his name) is available we can put him in Europe for a couple of years.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
firefly
Posts: 23229
Alba Posts: 17
Joined: 7/26/2004
Member: #721
United Kingdom
6/28/2005  9:59 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:

I like Taft, but if that the Euro kid Martynas (I know I butchering his name) is available we can put him in Europe for a couple of years.

You actually got it just right, and, to me he looks like another, skinnier Sundov. i.e. not enough skills and too weak to make an impact at C
Some men see things as they are and ask why. I dream things that never were and ask why not?
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
6/28/2005  9:59 PM
Posted by s3231:
Posted by Solace:
Posted by SKY:

I like Nate but I'm suprised that Isiah didn't go with Jack considering what he bring to the table - DEFENSE. What do you think?

I agree. If we were going with a guard, I'd rather go with a defensive one in Jack.









I don't get this, Nate is a very good defensive guard.

Good defensive skills in a small body. He's a liability, because EVERY single guard in the NBA (excluding Boykins) will be able to shoot over him. His defensive skills are good, but his overall defensive ability is subpar because of his height problem.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
6/28/2005  9:59 PM
Petro gone. Martynas still on the board.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
firefly
Posts: 23229
Alba Posts: 17
Joined: 7/26/2004
Member: #721
United Kingdom
6/28/2005  10:02 PM
Posted by Solace:

Petro gone. Martynas still on the board.

And Taft!
Some men see things as they are and ask why. I dream things that never were and ask why not?
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
6/28/2005  10:03 PM
Posted by firefly:
Posted by Solace:

Petro gone. Martynas still on the board.

And Taft!

Taft sucks. I'd take TMS with that pick over Taft. If we take Taft, I'd downgrading Isiah to a D.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
Page 16 of 22 « First‹ Previous 14  15  16  17  18 Next ›Last »
« Reply To Topic
ALL BALL: Official Draft General Discussion
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy