Bonn1997 wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:Well 2 of the 6 days of the IBD tracking poll (which seems to lean Republican) included this e-mail story, and it has Clinton at +2.5%. It was +4 at one point. No idea what's going to actually happen. I think Hillary is handling this now as well as she could by demanding more information.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/29/clinton-47-trump-45-in-post-abc-tracking-poll/

Looks like Hillaries lead is turning hard, but who really believes these polls, outside of Hillary supporters?
It is pretty clear, all the lies and corruption are taking its toll on Hillary's chances.

NEW PODESTA EMAIL REVEALS STRATEGY FOR RIGGING POLLS BY ‘OVERSAMPLING’
http://www.collective-evolution.com/2016/10/27/new-podesta-email-reveals-strategy-for-rigging-polls-by-oversampling/
There are many more articles written, questioning the validity of the polls.

It is really starting to look like Hillary is not going to win this. Not sure she is even going to stick around for the vote the way things have gone lately.
Best thing for the country might be for her to step down.

You're talking about an e-mail almost ten years old from Podesta?! Politifact rightly called this claim absurd. You can't use oversampling to skew a polling result because the results (in any reputable poll) are adjusted for party affiliation. If a poll had 10% more Democrats, each Democrat's vote is given 10% less weight.

1. Clinton Staff hosts private “off-the-record ****tail party” with 38 “influential” reporters, journalists, editors, and anchors (from 16 different mainstream media outlets including CNN, NBC, CBS, NYT, MSNBC, & more) with the stated goal of “framing the race.”

And it just gets better. These people can't be trusted.

GoNyGoNyGo wrote:Its kind of ironic that HRC wants "ALL" the information released now. Had she not deleted 33000 emails and held back information, she may never had been in the position she is now.

Of course she knows they cant release the info as they are involved in an investigation. Everything we have heard is speculation.

IF there is a connection to Weiner, well then that is just too funny.

Besides the emails are only a small part of it. The CF is the real story here, with all the money laundering and pay for play.

Comey went from most favored son, to most hated for the Dems.

It seems like he is just trying to follow the Rule of law. More evidence surfaced he must look at it.

I will grant you one point, though: Clinton has not defended herself as well as she should have on this issue. I think her team's calculation has been to move off the topic and talk about Trump whenever it comes up, which I think is a miscalculation.

Bonn1997 wrote:

GoNyGoNyGo wrote:Its kind of ironic that HRC wants "ALL" the information released now. Had she not deleted 33000 emails and held back information, she may never had been in the position she is now.

Of course she knows they cant release the info as they are involved in an investigation. Everything we have heard is speculation.

IF there is a connection to Weiner, well then that is just too funny.

Besides the emails are only a small part of it. The CF is the real story here, with all the money laundering and pay for play.

Comey went from most favored son, to most hated for the Dems.

It seems like he is just trying to follow the Rule of law. More evidence surfaced he must look at it.

Comey already said there was no evidence the e-mails were deleted to conceal anything. And just to be clear SHE did not delete the e-mails, as you claim. Her attorneys deleted the personal, non-work-related e-mails. As far as we know, the new e-mails are not ones she sent or received. So she has no way of knowing what's in them, and it's understandable she wants the info. to be released.

I will grant you one point, though: Clinton has not defended herself as well as she should have on this issue. I think her team's calculation has been to move off the topic and talk about Trump whenever it comes up, which I think is a miscalculation.

IN the wikileaks, there is an exchange which noted that HRC "took it upon herself" to delete emails and docs. Yes, her lawyers did much of the deletion, but at whose direction?

All I said, was that it was ironic that she wants ALL the info released, when she DID NOT turn over ALL the info in the first place.

There are also reports that the someone has the 33000 emails and they will be released and that is why Comey has acted.

Once again, as I said, its all speculation.

GoNyGoNyGo wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

GoNyGoNyGo wrote:Its kind of ironic that HRC wants "ALL" the information released now. Had she not deleted 33000 emails and held back information, she may never had been in the position she is now.

Of course she knows they cant release the info as they are involved in an investigation. Everything we have heard is speculation.

IF there is a connection to Weiner, well then that is just too funny.

Besides the emails are only a small part of it. The CF is the real story here, with all the money laundering and pay for play.

Comey went from most favored son, to most hated for the Dems.

It seems like he is just trying to follow the Rule of law. More evidence surfaced he must look at it.

Comey already said there was no evidence the e-mails were deleted to conceal anything. And just to be clear SHE did not delete the e-mails, as you claim. Her attorneys deleted the personal, non-work-related e-mails. As far as we know, the new e-mails are not ones she sent or received. So she has no way of knowing what's in them, and it's understandable she wants the info. to be released.

I will grant you one point, though: Clinton has not defended herself as well as she should have on this issue. I think her team's calculation has been to move off the topic and talk about Trump whenever it comes up, which I think is a miscalculation.

IN the wikileaks, there is an exchange which noted that HRC "took it upon herself" to delete emails and docs. Yes, her lawyers did much of the deletion, but at whose direction?

All I said, was that it was ironic that she wants ALL the info released, when she DID NOT turn over ALL the info in the first place.

There are also reports that the someone has the 33000 emails and they will be released and that is why Comey has acted.

Once again, as I said, its all speculation.

METHODOLOGY – This ABC News/Washington Post poll was conducted by landline and cellular telephone Oct. 24-27, 2016, in English and Spanish, among a random national sample of 1,148 likely voters. Results have a margin of sampling error of 3 points, including the design effect. Partisan divisions are 37-29-29 percent, Democrats-Republicans-independents."

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-29/abc-wapo-effectively-admit-they-tampered-their-polls-hillary-lead-shrinks-2-points

BRIGGS wrote:tens of thousands more emails found? You have to be kidding me--she should step down immediately--this is beyond reasonable. If you vote for Hillary--you vote for someone you or I would be doing 10-15 years for. Ridiculous and not right to all Americans.

earthmansurfer wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:tens of thousands more emails found? You have to be kidding me--she should step down immediately--this is beyond reasonable. If you vote for Hillary--you vote for someone you or I would be doing 10-15 years for. Ridiculous and not right to all Americans.

It is most certainly going to make a difference around election time and appears to be building lately. Her campaign is falling apart before our eyes lately.

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/EastwoodUSA/status/792710114046279680

Why did you include that tweet?

holfresh wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:tens of thousands more emails found? You have to be kidding me--she should step down immediately--this is beyond reasonable. If you vote for Hillary--you vote for someone you or I would be doing 10-15 years for. Ridiculous and not right to all Americans.

It is most certainly going to make a difference around election time and appears to be building lately. Her campaign is falling apart before our eyes lately.

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/EastwoodUSA/status/792710114046279680

..When you gotta to go to Clint Eastwood...

Who I'm certain doesn't have a Twitter account....

earthmansurfer wrote:

DrAlphaeus wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:tens of thousands more emails found? You have to be kidding me--she should step down immediately--this is beyond reasonable. If you vote for Hillary--you vote for someone you or I would be doing 10-15 years for. Ridiculous and not right to all Americans.

It is most certainly going to make a difference around election time and appears to be building lately. Her campaign is falling apart before our eyes lately.

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/EastwoodUSA/status/792710114046279680

Why did you include that tweet?

Was just a lighthearted joke. Old fan of Eastwood. Remember, he was a corruption cleaner upper. Sort of a fitting joke.

Yea but you know that wasn't Clint Eastwood who made the joke but a Twitter imposter, right?

earthmansurfer wrote:

DrAlphaeus wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

DrAlphaeus wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:tens of thousands more emails found? You have to be kidding me--she should step down immediately--this is beyond reasonable. If you vote for Hillary--you vote for someone you or I would be doing 10-15 years for. Ridiculous and not right to all Americans.

It is most certainly going to make a difference around election time and appears to be building lately. Her campaign is falling apart before our eyes lately.

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/EastwoodUSA/status/792710114046279680

Why did you include that tweet?

Was just a lighthearted joke. Old fan of Eastwood. Remember, he was a corruption cleaner upper. Sort of a fitting joke.

Yea but you know that wasn't Clint Eastwood who made the joke but a Twitter imposter, right?

It hadn't crossed my mind. I just thought it a funny statement for Eastwood to make, real or not.
It was not the brunt of my post, it was more like a sig...

Thanks for being honest. Makes me question your ability to discern the veracity of information you see on the internet and share with us. Just saying. You seem like a skeptical questioning guy. Not sure why you missed the lack of a verified check. Let alone, can you really imagine Eastwood tweeting at this ***** generation? Haha