meloshouldgo wrote:Please do not try to humanize breaking the law, it's slippery slope and a dangerous thing to do.
Grifters-in-chief from the WSJ

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-28/meet-grifters-chief-wsj-lashes-out-hillary-scandals

This sort of thing always makes he go 'huh?'

Why would you link to an alt-right pick-up of a Wall Street Journal OP/ED.

Why wouldn't you just link to the WSJ OP/ED??

The thought process confuses me.

Bonn1997 wrote:11 days before the election? The timing of this is absurd. Comey is a lifelong Republican and I bet he had this planned all along. It looks like he was playing chess while everyone else was playing checkers.

This is no better than people claiming Clinton was behind the Access Hollywood video.

Don't draw conclusions because you can think of a theory.

That is EVERYthing wrong with the Trump candidacy.

Be better.

fishmike wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

Knickoftime wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

holfresh wrote:FBI probing new Hillary Clinton emails...

What took them so long?

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/BraddJaffy/status/792049409244663809/photo/1

From what I gathered reading this forum, it appears Clinton and secret world bank illuminati has allowed or directed the FBI to do this.

Good point but at least no "laws" were broken. Hillary is a regular Alice Capone.

You realize she breaks the law and kids in 3rd world countries get funding for food and pharmaceuticals. But you call her Al Capone. You have to work so hard to criminalize her. Your effort is noted.

Does it really take much work to criminalize a person who has openly broken the law? My favorite is the Quid Pro Quo with the FBI, or perhaps it was the obvious murder, I mean suicide, of Vince Foster. (If not there are another 39 or so unfortunate death suicides to choose from.)
It is not personal with her, it is about wanting a better world.

I call her Alice Capone, because neither her nor Al Capone have been convicted of crimes.

It is nice that she has done some good to balance all the bad. Don't let it delude the bad she has done. I'm sure Kissinger has done a lot "to help" the poor as well.
And all the dead people in Libya are probably aware of all the good she has done.

She is not here for us. She serves others.

earthmansurfer wrote:Does it really take much work to criminalize a person who has openly broken the law?

A conviction often helps.

My favorite is the Quid Pro Quo with the FBI,

Which didn't actually occur.

or perhaps it was the obvious murder, I mean suicide, of Vince Foster. (If not there are another 39 or so unfortunate death suicides to choose from.)

Here's a tip EMS, if your news sources has ominous background music, find better ones.

Knickoftime wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

Knickoftime wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:11 days before the election? The timing of this is absurd. Comey is a lifelong Republican and I bet he had this planned all along. It looks like he was playing chess while everyone else was playing checkers.

This is no better than people claiming Clinton was behind the Access Hollywood video.

Don't draw conclusions because you can think of a theory.

That is EVERYthing wrong with the Trump candidacy.

Be better.

11 days before the election a life long Republican decides to investigate the Democratic Presidential candidate. That doesn't raise eyebrows?
I was saying "I bet" like "I think there's a good chance" not that I actually know it, though.

30 days before the election and 11 year old video....

Same wheelhouse.

Weiner was married to Abedin. Abedin is Clinton's closet advisor. New sexting messages did surface several weeks back, after the FBI concluded its Clinton investigation. Weiner was being investigated for possibly inappropriate contact with a minor. His phone logically would have been confiscated.

The chain of events seems perfectly reasonable to me. Unless we won't to go with this is all a big long-tail conspiracy using Weiner (I don't).

The problem with this stuff is it fosters an environment in which just the word "investigation" makes people jump for joy or climb out on a ledge.

This is low-information at work.

Comey's letter makes it clear there is no suspicion or expectation anything pertinent will be found, only that due dilligence must be performed.

A few months ago Comey being a Republican was proof his conclusion was fair. Now its grounds for suspicion?? Can't be both.

We need to be better than this. All of us.

"Investigation" is not a dirty word. We have no idea what will or will not be found.

THAT's what's important today.

Truth is nothing, perception is everything.
There is nothing rational in most people voting.
So this is a big deal.
The problem is there is nothing Trump can do to make perception of him worth from what it is.
Brilliant... isn't it?

arkrud wrote:

Knickoftime wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

Knickoftime wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:11 days before the election? The timing of this is absurd. Comey is a lifelong Republican and I bet he had this planned all along. It looks like he was playing chess while everyone else was playing checkers.

This is no better than people claiming Clinton was behind the Access Hollywood video.

Don't draw conclusions because you can think of a theory.

That is EVERYthing wrong with the Trump candidacy.

Be better.

11 days before the election a life long Republican decides to investigate the Democratic Presidential candidate. That doesn't raise eyebrows?
I was saying "I bet" like "I think there's a good chance" not that I actually know it, though.

30 days before the election and 11 year old video....

Same wheelhouse.

Weiner was married to Abedin. Abedin is Clinton's closet advisor. New sexting messages did surface several weeks back, after the FBI concluded its Clinton investigation. Weiner was being investigated for possibly inappropriate contact with a minor. His phone logically would have been confiscated.

The chain of events seems perfectly reasonable to me. Unless we won't to go with this is all a big long-tail conspiracy using Weiner (I don't).

The problem with this stuff is it fosters an environment in which just the word "investigation" makes people jump for joy or climb out on a ledge.

This is low-information at work.

Comey's letter makes it clear there is no suspicion or expectation anything pertinent will be found, only that due dilligence must be performed.

A few months ago Comey being a Republican was proof his conclusion was fair. Now its grounds for suspicion?? Can't be both.

We need to be better than this. All of us.

"Investigation" is not a dirty word. We have no idea what will or will not be found.

THAT's what's important today.

Truth is nothing, perception is everything.
There is nothing rational in most people voting.
So this is a big deal.
The problem is there is nothing Trump can do to make perception of him worth from what it is.
Brilliant... isn't it?

Not really, no.

Sorry, not a buyer of spiritual nihilism.

Knickoftime wrote:

meloshouldgo wrote:Please do not try to humanize breaking the law, it's slippery slope and a dangerous thing to do.
Grifters-in-chief from the WSJ

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-28/meet-grifters-chief-wsj-lashes-out-hillary-scandals

This sort of thing always makes he go 'huh?'

Why would you link to an alt-right pick-up of a Wall Street Journal OP/ED.

Why wouldn't you just link to the WSJ OP/ED??

The thought process confuses me.

It confuses you because you need to read ulterior motives and complex thought process into a simple act of pasting a link. There's nothing Alt right about zero hedge, any more or less than WSJ. I don't subscribe to WSJ and I just happened on the article I linked to when browsing CNN at work. You could have found the article and posted it very easily if it was so important to you, but chose to respond with this crap instead.

nixluva wrote:Seems like this new email issue is coming from the FBI's investigation of Anthony Weiner! He was apparently sexting an underage girl and they were looking at his Phone I believe. He's the gift that just keeps on giving.

Amazing isn't it?