[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Branden jennings just put up 25 in the 3rd Q against GS
Author Thread
earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2005
Member: #858
Germany
11/21/2009  12:14 PM
fishmike wrote:missing Jennings is a massive failure. Knicks had him in twice... TWICE. Bottom line is they didnt like something about him, my guess is it was personal.

In a recent article it was said that a few of the Knicks scouts were VERY VERY high on Jennings. I bet you that is why he was in twice. So, Walsh and D'Antoni wanted to see how good he was. Well, he held his own against another guy the knicks wanted in Evans but they still chose Hill?

I like Hill, but though Hill may shoot great and be an athlete, it's hard to believe we passed on Jennings. As another poster said, with Lebron here we don't need a traditional pg, but is Jennings traditional? He is damn quick, can defend ok for his size but has extremely quick hands so he will just get better on defense, sees the floor great and can pass. His shot is looking ok. I mean do we just want shooters around Lebron? Maybe so, maybe he will be the pg? Can't argue there, but if it doesn't happen with him coming, then we F'd up big... (Though Hill might still be a player, I don't think he can be a superstar like Jennings)

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
AUTOADVERT
martin
Posts: 78490
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/21/2009  12:24 PM
earthmansurfer wrote:
fishmike wrote:missing Jennings is a massive failure. Knicks had him in twice... TWICE. Bottom line is they didnt like something about him, my guess is it was personal.

In a recent article it was said that a few of the Knicks scouts were VERY VERY high on Jennings. I bet you that is why he was in twice. So, Walsh and D'Antoni wanted to see how good he was. Well, he held his own against another guy the knicks wanted in Evans but they still chose Hill?

I like Hill, but though Hill may shoot great and be an athlete, it's hard to believe we passed on Jennings. As another poster said, with Lebron here we don't need a traditional pg, but is Jennings traditional? He is damn quick, can defend ok for his size but has extremely quick hands so he will just get better on defense, sees the floor great and can pass. His shot is looking ok. I mean do we just want shooters around Lebron? Maybe so, maybe he will be the pg? Can't argue there, but if it doesn't happen with him coming, then we F'd up big... (Though Hill might still be a player, I don't think he can be a superstar like Jennings)

why do you find it hard we passed on Jennings given what he produced before the draft?

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/21/2009  1:02 PM
fishmike wrote:missing Jennings is a massive failure. Knicks had him in twice... TWICE. Bottom line is they didnt like something about him, my guess is it was personal.

there was obvious concerns about his personality & maturity level... he's being a good soldier now, maybe because seeing how teams passed on him motivated him to change his ways? who knows... maybe all the stuff about his maturity was overblown to begin with, but after the fiasco that the Knicks went through w/Dinglebury over the years i can't blame them for being paranoid about using a #8 pick on drafting a kid who plays a similar style & may have shown some signs of bringing similar mental baggage as well.

the Knicks royally fugged up by passing on Jennings, i think that's pretty obvious, but they had their reasons & i think those reasons were legitimate.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

11/21/2009  1:10 PM
It just goes to show you how powerful the media is in inflating and deflating a players value.

In America Brandon Jennings would have been a top 3 pick in the draft, but going over to Europe he was taught AND FORCED to learn their style of play and that set him back a whole yr when it came to playing time. Jennings didn't lose anything when he went over to Europe to get paid and not fill the pockets of universities with his magnificent play.

So the media claimed he wasn't any good and everybody believed it. But if I recall that that Euro scout said even Lebron James would have struggled if he would have spent his first yr out of High school playing in Europe even though his skills would have still been intact.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

from jennings developmental coach:


On the other hand, some felt he had been hampered by the system in Europe and thought he would be an outstanding NBA player. Particularly convincing was his development coach, Serbian legend Nenad Trajkovic:

"I promise you. If you brought LeBron James over from high school straight to Europe, we would have messed him up. We demand different things. It is not enough to do something. You must do it correctly. Everyone who comes, young or old, from America, has to adjust. He was able to do it better than most I have seen. One more year in Europe, and he would be a star. I don't know if the NBA feels the same way."

You guys can give Walsh and Danphoney all the passes to Disney world for A YR, but these guys had a reason to do their homework.

JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
11/21/2009  1:22 PM
I think Lebron's heavy lobbying for Kidd when the Nets made him available indicates he'd prefer playing with a playmaker at pg vs a spot up shooter like he has with Mo.
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
11/21/2009  3:54 PM
fishmike wrote:I wont waste time lamenting about how good other team's players are. Nobody thought Jennings was going to be this ready to play. If they did he would have been a top 3 pick.

If there was no NBA age limit Jennings probably would have been a top3 pick.

lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
11/21/2009  4:25 PM
he's #10 in the mvp rankings:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylt=Av4j1KyaqsCn_w6pHl48zBi8vLYF?slug=nba_com-racetomvp.week3-20091120&prov=nba_com&type=lgns

WHAT A WIFF!

WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
martin
Posts: 78490
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/21/2009  4:36 PM
kam77 wrote:
fishmike wrote:I wont waste time lamenting about how good other team's players are. Nobody thought Jennings was going to be this ready to play. If they did he would have been a top 3 pick.

If there was no NBA age limit Jennings probably would have been a top3 pick.

Jennings wasn't. End of story.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
11/22/2009  8:58 AM
I didn't like Jennings' attitude, baggage, and European shooting percentages. They were all turnoffs. Yet it would appear that was all bullcrap so far. Watching him light everyone up, watching a broken down Bucks team have a great record, while Jordan Hill worries about dying his dread tips? Yeah, it's not fun to watch.

I still want to see if Jennings continues, if he is a team guy or another Marbury-esque-stat guy, if he can co'exist with good players (even when the Bucks get everyone back) before I think of him as a superstar to be.

We'll see but right now it does not look good at ALL for us (and I don't give a **** what other teams passed on him - just because another team screwed up in not drafting him does NOT MAKE IT OKAY THAT WE SCREWED UP.)

We can't catch a break can we. We have a talented Gallo but he has lower back problems. We have a talented Douglas but he doesn't play because Duhon gives good head to coaches. We watch Jennings torch the league while Jordan Hill fusses with his hair and jokes around.

One big.. MEH.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2005
Member: #858
Germany
11/22/2009  9:13 AM
Cosmic wrote:I didn't like Jennings' attitude, baggage, and European shooting percentages. They were all turnoffs. Yet it would appear that was all bullcrap so far. Watching him light everyone up, watching a broken down Bucks team have a great record, while Jordan Hill worries about dying his dread tips? Yeah, it's not fun to watch.

I still want to see if Jennings continues, if he is a team guy or another Marbury-esque-stat guy, if he can co'exist with good players (even when the Bucks get everyone back) before I think of him as a superstar to be.

We'll see but right now it does not look good at ALL for us (and I don't give a **** what other teams passed on him - just because another team screwed up in not drafting him does NOT MAKE IT OKAY THAT WE SCREWED UP.)

We can't catch a break can we. We have a talented Gallo but he has lower back problems. We have a talented Douglas but he doesn't play because Duhon gives good head to coaches. We watch Jennings torch the league while Jordan Hill fusses with his hair and jokes around.

One big.. MEH.

Good points. The thing that gets me and many others is that by the other pgs being taken by our pick (including Evans, Flynn and Curry) that in a way was a good thing as who was really left? Jennings and that N.C. guy ;-) .

The other thing is, HE WAS SCOUTED BY US AND HEAVY. He was on our board but I bet you that it was Walsh and D'Antoni who wouldn't listen. That recent article posted stated that a few Knicks scouts were heavy on him, so we gave him two workouts, he performs well against Evans and yet we went with Hill? (I like Hill but we needed a pg and bad.)

I wanted Jennings for two reasons: He was the #1 pg to me and he filled a need. I do like Hill as our future center but considering we are going for some max free agents it's a bit odd to not go with who could help now. Oh, Skiles is an ex pg who is tough on players and is playing Jennings as a starter. Wasn't Mike also a pg?..

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
11/22/2009  11:14 AM
Cosmic wrote:I didn't like Jennings' attitude, baggage, and European shooting percentages. They were all turnoffs. Yet it would appear that was all bullcrap so far. Watching him light everyone up, watching a broken down Bucks team have a great record, while Jordan Hill worries about dying his dread tips? Yeah, it's not fun to watch.

I still want to see if Jennings continues, if he is a team guy or another Marbury-esque-stat guy, if he can co'exist with good players (even when the Bucks get everyone back) before I think of him as a superstar to be.

We'll see but right now it does not look good at ALL for us (and I don't give a **** what other teams passed on him - just because another team screwed up in not drafting him does NOT MAKE IT OKAY THAT WE SCREWED UP.)

We can't catch a break can we. We have a talented Gallo but he has lower back problems. We have a talented Douglas but he doesn't play because Duhon gives good head to coaches. We watch Jennings torch the league while Jordan Hill fusses with his hair and jokes around.

One big.. MEH.

Jees this kid is absolutely carrying the Bucks--I mean they are 8-3 with injury problems. I think labeling him a Marbury is unfair--the kid is 19--let him live a little and see who he is. No one is defined by 19 years of age.

RIP Crushalot😞
BigSm00th
Posts: 24504
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2001
Member: #178
USA
11/22/2009  11:14 AM
fishmike wrote:
martin wrote:by all accounts Jennings matured during his time in Europe... that's what I have been reading, even if he did have a not so good playing time statistically. Wonder if he had stayed and played in the NCAA if his scouting and marketability and exposure would have gone UP.

there is no doubt at all. He would have dominated CBB which is certainly catered to his game. He also would have dgone pretty deep into the NCAAs where that tourney is dominated by superior guard play. He would have been a household name and would have been a top 3 pick. Can anyone argue otherwise?

By sticking it to the man and not playing for free in the NCAA he cost himself several millions because of his lower draft position. No way do Thabeet, Harden, Hill, Flynn, Rubio or anyone not named Evans or Griffin get picked before Brandon Jennings. No way.

Jennings going to Europe cost him $7mm EASY over the first 4 years of his NBA career. God forbid the dude goes Shaun Livingston and blows out a gasket. $7mm is a lot of hoegaardens and beans

LOL, are you forgetting that he could paid money to play in Europe? he made $2 mil from under armour and $1.5 from his team in rome. who knows what would've happened in the NCAAs, he could've never gone to class, gotten kicked out of school, and been a 2nd rounder.

#Knickstaps
BigSm00th
Posts: 24504
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2001
Member: #178
USA
11/22/2009  11:26 AM
with regards to this silly psych test, are people forgetting that jennings didn't go to college not because he wanted to make money but because he couldn't pass multiple entrance exams. he's probably not a "test taker" and didn't feel like answering psych questions. why are they giving the guy a psych test? sit down and talk to him for 10 minutes, i'm sure you can draw better conclusions than you could from some scantron test.

donnie walsh's job is to evaluate talent and make the right pick. as orangeblobman and playa and others have reiterated, jennings is a STAR. he's going to be an all-star this year! i hope jordan hill becomes a solid player, i do, but that's his potential, a solid power forward. maybe he'll be putting up 12/10s and protecting the rim. jennings is putting up 25 and 6 this year! shooting 49% from downtown! it is comedy to look of this at anything other than a complete failure. jennings was worked out TWO times by the knicks, my goodness. the knicks are so boring, i really don't think i'm going to watch any more games this year. wake up me up when there is ONE mediocre player on the knicks.

#Knickstaps
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/22/2009  1:41 PM
even if we weren't going to pick Jordan Hill i still don't think we were gonna go after Jennings... i think Jrue Holiday probably woulda been our guy... i had a feeling they wouldn't be interested in Derozan either on draft night.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
11/25/2009  12:30 AM
Slightly off Topic, but I have been debating with Martin and Bitty mostly, whether American basketball should have a minor league and that the NBA age-rule is wrong.

http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/10976/sonny-vaccaro-brandon-jennings-broke-the-mold-part-three


Sonny Vaccaro: Brandon Jennings broke the mold, part three


Last week, basketball insider Sonny Vaccaro explained why he feels defensive about Brandon Jennings, and told the story of how he came to be so involved in Jennings' life and decision to play professionally in Europe for a year before coming to the NBA.

Vaccaro has played a pivotal role in the careers of may top basketball players, from Kobe Bryant to O.J. Mayo. In this third and final installment of the conversation, Vaccaro discusses the future of basketball development. Will Vaccaro be helping many more high-schoolers skip the NCAA to go to Europe? He says European teams and American players have been expressing increasing interest. Or will Brandon Jennings be the example that encourages the NBA to abolish its ban of players straight from high school?

I noticed Brandon Jennings was on the cover of a Spanish basketball magazine recently. I know he was an Under Armour deal ... but is he a marketable personality in Europe?
Yeah, it's funny. I talked to a couple of people. He is, because they're now taking credit for the development of Brandon Jennings, and they should! Isn't that interesting, in a sense.

And I'll tell you something. When I went over there after the season, I talked to people all over Europe. In two particular situations, they're now asking me.

I think I was on trial.

Now it's like, is there anybody else? They all saw the faults of their own bias. They haven't played young kids at a high level in Europe. They punish you. To sit there and play the guy from Penn [Ibrahim Jaaber], who I'm sure is a very nice kid and heck of a player, was insane. They make you pay your dues. And here he was coming into the NBA and doing this.

So now they're coming to me and saying "if you're telling me they can play, I'll tell you he can play for our team."

Very interesting to hear you say that European teams are now more open than ever to your bringing them American high-schoolers. But what about American high-schoolers, are more of them interested in Europe since Brandon joined the NBA?

I can say this: I keep track of everybody that calls me. There are 11 now that have called me. Eight of them were brand new since Brandon. Two of them on the night of Brandon's 55-point game.

I don't think there'll be a lot of people doing it. Obviously, there's Jeremy [Tyler], who's struggling over there because he's not ready to do a lot of things. But he's growing and he did want to go. That's OK, too. He's young.

But what it's done is it has showed it can be done. It just shows you an alternative, Henry, and maybe it can get the rule changed. That would be the grand thing.

And maybe these people would do the right thing with the training and all that.

'Cause really you're talking about an individual, who really didn't want to go to college in the first place, and who is very very talented ... they should have the opportunity to do this! It always befuddled me, all these years, why they blame the kid when basically the NBA owner is the one writing the check to bring these kids to the NBA. These owners are doing it. ...

The problem with David Stern's system -- and I think David is the smartest, and you can quote me on this because I don't have to kiss anybody's ass -- everybody wants to play in the NBA. If you don't you can't ever reach your acclaim. You can't. But the whole point of this is everybody got caught up in [the brawl in] Detroit. And they never forgot Detroit. And then it became an age limit thing.

Well, Brandon was able to overcome it all. He singularly did it.

Let's go back to John Wall, Lance Stephenson and Renardo Sidney. These are the kids who could have gone to Europe -- who had the ability to be professional. They would have been drafted in last year's draft. They may have gotten cut, but they would have gotten drafted. All three had different situations occur during their freshman years in college. Wall had to pay back $800 to his friend who turned out to be an agent. Stephenson wondered if his professionalism had been violated by starring in some video. And Renardo's situation, whatever it is, to the harm of the kid, he still hasn't been allowed to play and we're going into December.

But that whole demeaning thing. ... What Derrick Rose is going through now with that stupid grade on a test he took or didn't take. It's two years after he went to Memphis! It dehumanizes these young people. The public is then told what: that you're a cheater or a liar or not educated.

What the hell do you need that for?

And that's what this system put on these kids.

Our system, academically, is not for everybody.

How many high-schoolers do you expect we'll see go to Europe?
Hopefully, we'll get rid of that rule and it won't matter. I can definitely tell you that there's interest. There's no question about it.

It just befuddles me. If the next collective bargaining agreement does not allow kids to come out, I will then say what I think will happen, which is you're going to get three, four, five a year then. It will happen then. If they say you can't do it. I'm getting up in years and I don't know how many times I can do this crap, but you know that I will be an advocate of getting them over there when they're sophomores. Move the whole families, do it differently, set it up where you can benefit by it.

Brandon Jennings has a chance to be the Spencer Haywood of his generation. To change the rules. Do you have a sense of how likely that is? Any chance they'll abolish the age restriction in collective bargaining?

I have a feeling, a Sonny Vaccaro feeling, that the age limit won't be a factor anymore. I think in collective bargaining, everyone will come to their senses, and allow this to happen.

I have more than just a feeling. I believe totally that something good will happen out of something negative, and we'll go on.

The only way you stop [high-schoolers going professional] is don't draft them. That'll stop it, quick.

But they can play. They're All-Stars.
Yes.

Once they see that these things can happen, that it didn't disrupt the flow of mankind, it'll be accepted. It's fine, there's nothing wrong with it.

The voices of dissent are needed. That's fine. You can't praise everybody for everything. That's good.

I agree that there are people who aren't capable of doing this or have delusions of grandeur. I agree a million percent. But the whole point is, the whole difference, the whole choice is that we're punishing our kids. The Americans. I'm me. I'm American. These are our kids. These are kids we know, and they're being singled out. Everywhere else kids their age can [play professionally].

I love Danilo Gallinari, I know his dad, I was there on draft night.

I saw you stand and clap when all the Knick fans were booing the pick.
Right!

To see him come to the NBA, while an American from Compton was not able to do it ... it just sickened me, and made my resolve stronger.

I don't understand. And I don't understand for the life of me this preoccupation with the NCAA, and the notion that they are the epitome of what you should aspire to be. And there's nothing wrong with it. But when I look at the news and I see coaches doing the most egregious things I have ever seen. They're supposed to be the mentors of young people. It makes me throw up. Their job should be doing the right thing for kids.

I just left Chicago. I just left there! There's a wonderful story about Ben Wilson, the kid who got murdered. He was the #1 player in America in 1984-85, he went to my camp, I got to know him not like I do the kids today, but I knew him. And he got murdered. The story, on the 25th anniversary of his death -- and I talked to him the day before he died -- the story was that nothing has changed academically, in grades or in gangs, in Chicago. Nothing!

That's the point I'm making. To assume, and then to put in print that everybody's qualified academically to go to some of these great universities that they're going to go to is a joke. It's a joke. If the kid doesn't qualify, or if he's put on hold with this clearinghouse s--- ... If he's done all that, who's the one who's put on display? Not the coach or the university that recruited him. Not the high school. Who put him in this position? Do you think kids don't want to be educated today? I mean come on. We weren't born ignorant. We grew to be ignorant.

Brandon Jennings wasn't some anonymous player from Alaska. He was a pretty good player! He was on display. And to hear the people who criticize him ... I don't want to hear about going to skills camp for two days. I don't want to hear about going to play for these great coaches. Don't tell me that's what he needs. Go practice for 12 months a year. Go do that.

Now that you've seen it up close, do you think the European model of basketball development (with players going professional at a young age and training year-round) is better than our university-based system?
I've got a much better understanding. I have my own intellectual understanding of the way they do things, and I believe them! Because there's no bull crap. ... There's no detour in your life. You either are going to be this example, this professional athlete, or you're not and you'll have to find ways to acclimate yourself to other parts of your life.

But it's no different from being a serious student of anything. Preparing yourself to be the best at whatever field they want to go into. So, they do it right.

It's painful. They go running in the mountains. It's much different than going to the island of Hawaii or whatever we do in America for training camp. It's certainly much different than the pitiful way we get kids ready with the twenty hours a week in the NCAA, but I don't even want to get into the college basketball thing.

But basically, I agree with the European model. They're proteges getting ready to be professionals.


********************************
********************************
********************************


oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
11/25/2009  12:32 AM
^^^^ Pay particular attention to how Vaccaro indicts the corruption of the NCAA and how people who can be professionals should not be required to be amateurs in order to finally become professionals, and how Europe allows their athletes to become professionals and earn a living even when they are young.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
OldFan
Posts: 21456
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2003
Member: #446
11/25/2009  6:46 AM
oohah wrote:^^^^ Pay particular attention to how Vaccaro indicts the corruption of the NCAA and how people who can be professionals should not be required to be amateurs in order to finally become professionals, and how Europe allows their athletes to become professionals and earn a living even when they are young.

oohah

I've always had trouble with the fact that college football and basketball are Professional sports for everyone but the athlete. There is a huge amount of money made, big name coaches make big salaries but the players don't get paid.

OldFan
Posts: 21456
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2003
Member: #446
11/25/2009  8:02 AM    LAST EDITED: 11/25/2009  8:05 AM
Cosmic wrote:I didn't like Jennings' attitude, baggage, and European shooting percentages. They were all turnoffs. Yet it would appear that was all bullcrap so far. Watching him light everyone up, watching a broken down Bucks team have a great record, while Jordan Hill worries about dying his dread tips? Yeah, it's not fun to watch.

I still want to see if Jennings continues, if he is a team guy or another Marbury-esque-stat guy, if he can co'exist with good players (even when the Bucks get everyone back) before I think of him as a superstar to be.

We'll see but right now it does not look good at ALL for us (and I don't give a **** what other teams passed on him - just because another team screwed up in not drafting him does NOT MAKE IT OKAY THAT WE SCREWED UP.)

We can't catch a break can we. We have a talented Gallo but he has lower back problems. We have a talented Douglas but he doesn't play because Duhon gives good head to coaches. We watch Jennings torch the league while Jordan Hill fusses with his hair and jokes around.

One big.. MEH.

I disagree with it doesn't matter what other teams think. You're not drafting after the kid after he played in the NBA and showed what he can do. Teams have been working on methods for evaluating drafts for years and work full-time at it. If everyone else saw the kids talent and your team didn't then you're behind the curve. If he's a surprise to everyone that's a different. Jennings was not ranked as a top guard and was picked around where he was expected to go.

Also before the draft Jennings was viewed as a Risk. They are all risks but that term was next to his name more then others. That usually means high upside and lots of downside. Like any gamble it if pays off you look stupid if you didn't make the bet. That does not make your decision not to bet a bad decision. It incorrect to expect teams to always draft the best player - they don't and never will - it's an inexact science. And after two drafts I'm not unhappy with what the new Management has gotten not many team rebuild with draft picks 6 & 8. Gallo, Hill and Douglas are all works in progress that I think have potential.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
11/25/2009  9:54 AM
Kind of gone unnoticed but Steph Curry has been pretty darn good playing PG for GS. He has definitely been a team first player. Also I kind of thought Monta Ells was becoming a Wade type player before he was hurt and I would suggest that he is now healthy and looking a lot like Dwayne Wade part 2.
RIP Crushalot😞
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
11/25/2009  10:25 AM    LAST EDITED: 11/25/2009  10:25 AM
What is this notion that Jennings was not ranked as a top guard? If he was eligible to be drafted out of high school people would've been debating Jennings or Derrick Rose #1. Jennings was a top3 pick before he stepped on italian soil.
lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
Branden jennings just put up 25 in the 3rd Q against GS

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy