[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

OT: Welcome home, Mr. Gates
Author Thread
TheGame
Posts: 26623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
7/27/2009  4:09 PM
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by sebstar:

Oh, and BTW. Here is the Massachusetts interpretation of what constitutes "disorderly conduct" See if Mr. Gates' behavior fits the criteria.

In a 1976 decision, Commonwealth v. Richards, 369 Mass. 443, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts held that the First Amendment prevents application of the disorderly conduct law to language and expressive conduct, even when it is offensive and abusive. The one exception would be language that falls outside the protection of the First Amendment, "fighting words which by their very utterance tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace."


Jury instructions used by the Massachusetts courts spell out three elements that must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt to convict someone of disorderly conduct:

1. The defendant engaged in fighting or threatening, or engaged in violent or tumultuous behavior, or created a hazardous or physically offensive condition by an act that served no legitimate purpose.
2. The defendant’s actions were reasonably likely to affect the public.
3. The defendant either intended to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly created a risk of public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm.

[Edited by - sebstar on 07-27-2009 3:36 PM]

It's right there. In #1. Bolded.
Not sure what else to say I think I've said my point of view on this topic.
It was unfortunate, there were over-reactions on both sides, but the police can't afford to ignore the overreaction of someone they don't know are might believe is a suspect in a call they are responding to - and if that individual reacts more and more abrasively they too have to respond in kind in order to contain the scene.

Again, had Gates acted calmly, this never gets to this point. And, if the usual media suspects didn't try to run with this as an overt act of random, calculated, and purposeful racism at it's worst, we might see what actually transpired here.

But, well, ya know...

Cosmic,

Where are these facts coming from: "contain the scene" What are you talking about? The 58 year old Gates with his walking cane was acting so abrasive that the poor police officers had to arrest him to "contain the scene." You are just making up facts. The facts are that these police knew Gates was the owner of the house (Cowley confirmed that), they tricked Gates into coming out of his house (Gates statement) and as soon as he did they arrested him (Gates statement). They arrested him because they were pissed off about him mouthing off at them. It had nothing to do with "contianing the scene." THat is the point that I am arguing about. If this had been a situation where they did not know who Gates was and put him a police car because he was acting out of control, that is one thing. In this situation, these cops had already determined that he was the owner of the house, and thus, there was no need for them to be there any longer. However, since Gates mouthed off at them, they decided they were going to get their payback. If you don't see the danger in condoning such bahavior, then this country is truly lost. These police officers abused their power, no different than any other public official and they need to be called to task for it. Could Gates have acted differently, sure and I am not saying that he was justified in being upset but to me that is irrelevant because he did not do anything justifying an arrest and that is what troubles me.
Trust the Process
AUTOADVERT
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
7/27/2009  4:34 PM
You act up against the cops you're getting detained.
You act up against the cops when they think they're responding to a crime you're getting detained in a rough manner.
It's just how it is.

Know what? Don't act up and cooler heads will prevail and things will get sorted out without a subsequent crap storm.

It's just the way it is. There's times if I had just shut the hell up and did what the cops said and then calmly told my side of things I probably get let go at the scene and not hauled off to spend the night in the pokey.

Just sayin'....that's how it is.

The cops did not show up, say "OMG BLACK MAN OPEN FIRE!!!" like so many try to act like they did. That's the point here. This isn't a racial case at all. It's the case of a man blowing up at the cops and being detained. There were black cops all over that scene too. Photos document as such and also show him screaming like a retard. I'd have detained him too.

End of story.

But, if you want to believe this is a major case of racial injustice, I mean, I guess that's something that can be interpreted from it, and run with as a cause.

I just don't see it that way not even close.

And, hell, just to piss all of you off LOL, if Rodney King had stayed down? We wouldn't have had these problems. What part of "STAY ON THE F'ING GROUND" don't people understand? Seriously? You're getting clubbed and screamed at to stay down and you keep trying to get up and swing at the cops? Really? My god, I'd club you too!

I guess they enjoy getting clubbed or are so delusional they think they're going to beat up or get away from 25 cops who are surrounding them.

Shake my head....

*runs*
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
7/27/2009  5:08 PM
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by martin:
Posted by sebstar:


The plot thickens...Crowley might have lied. Racial profiling expert, my ass


http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/07/27/gates.arrest/index.html

(CNN) -- The woman who made the 911 call that led to the arrest of Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. never referred to race when she contacted authorities for what she thought was a potential break-in, her attorney told CNN on Monday.
Attorney Wendy Murphy also categorically rejected part of the police report that said her client, Lucia Whalen, talked with Sgt. James Crowley, the arresting officer, at the scene.

"Let me be clear: She never had a conversation with Sgt. Crowley at the scene," Murphy said. "And she never said to any police officer or to anybody 'two black men.' She never used the word 'black.' Period."

She added, "I'm not sure what the police explanation will be. Frankly, I don't care. Her only goal is to make it clear she never described them as black. She never saw their race. ... All she reported was behavior, not skin color."

Calls to the Cambridge Police Department about the issue have not been returned. In the police report, filed by Crowley, he says he spoke with Whalen outside the home before he approached Gates' house.

"She went on to tell me that she observed what appeared to be two black males with backpacks on the porch of Ware Street," the report says. "She told me that her suspicions were aroused when she observed one of the men wedging his shoulder into the door as if he was trying to force entry."

Murphy's comments add yet another layer of intrigue to the July 16 arrest that has prompted heated discussion across the nation on race relations in America.

Murphy also disputed accounts of her client as a white woman in the traditional sense. "The fact is she's olive-skinned and of Portuguese descent. You wouldn't look at her and say necessarily, 'Oh, there's a white woman.' You might think she was Hispanic," Murphy said

wow, what's this world turning into when the woman who called in the 911 report has to retain a lawyer?

When it becomes literally international news and a witch hunt against the police born on media fabricated racial overtones you better believe she had to. She's probably in some moron's cross hairs as we speak.

Nice try, and a predictable one at that...only problem is that her version is confirmed by the 911 call.

Try again.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
awe1028
Posts: 20199
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/4/2009
Member: #2780

7/27/2009  5:58 PM
This incidenct is entirely the fault of the cops. Why? Well up to the point when the cops arrived at Mr. Gates' they acted appropriately; After all they were there to investigate a potential burglary. When they asked for his ID and he furnished it again no problem. But here is where the copos were wrong. Mr Gates asked for the cop's ID in return. The moment he refused he was wrong. By law, Mr. Gates has a right to ask for the ID and again by law the cop must furnish said ID. Therefore each time Mr. Gates asked for his ID and he refused to give it he broke the law.
Looking at the story the cop refused to give his ID and thus broke the law at least four times: thrice inside the residence and once outside on the lawn. If any one should have been arrested it was the cop as he broke the law four times in a very short ti9me frame.

In addition, the cop was at fault for not behaving in a professional manner. Clearly, the cop's refusal to give his ID was an attempt to escalate the situation further. He knew by refusing to give the ID, there was a possibility for escalation and he did it anyway. Some of you have said that Mr. Gates instigated the confrontation. Wrong! If the cop had given the ID as he was supposed to do by law their would be no incident. Remember, Mr. Gates was acting lawfully in asking for the ID. So it was the cop's unlawful and unorofessional action that instigated the incident.

Finally, some have suggested that Mr. Gates should expected to be arrested once he followed the cop asking for the ID. Again, wrong. These cops are civil servants They are there to serve you. Once they had determined that Mr. Gates was an innocent man they should have bent over backwards to apologize to him Instead, they acted arrogantly and disrespectfully. It's unfortunate that we have allowed these cops to get away these abuses of power for so long that we now accept it and think it is okay when they abuse us.
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
7/27/2009  6:01 PM
Posted by awe1028:

Finally, some have suggested that Mr. Gates should expected to be arrested once he followed the cop asking for the ID. Again, wrong.

Welcome Awe.

But again, I just want to clarify for the record that the cop asked Gates to step outside, Gates didnt just simply follow him.

Agree with your post, tho.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
bitty41
Posts: 22316
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 12/3/2006
Member: #1215

7/27/2009  6:14 PM
I don't get why people feel the need to make Officer's Crowley behavior acceptable? Whatever took place in that house or what was said by either party the fact remains that Crowley made an arrest that could not even stand up in court but the so-called perpetrator was released shortly thereafter. Whether you think there was no racism involved or not we are heading down a very slippery slope if police officers can now start making bogus arrests because they don't like what you've said to them.

Don't police officers have enough real criminals to deal with not to mention that there is already a ton of people who already think most cops are racist, egotistical, *******s so was it really necessary to create yet another public spectacle that will only reinforce these ideas? A cop in this type of situation should be the one to take the high road and he should also be able to diffuse an unnecessary hostile situation. Even if that meant he had to walk away. If there was no arrest then Dr. Gates could scream until he's blue in the face but he would have been doing it alone because after the residency was established no need for police involvement End of Story.

Also for people who think it's just Uppity black professors that give cops a hard time when question by them; let me remind you that there are many white people in this country who are just as if not more distrustful of police and government in general. This is not a phenomena restricted to just the black community. If the police rolled up on some of these white militias groups homes I can guarantee you the response what not be friendly.

It is distressing to me some people would condone the police locking up any citizen simply because they don't like what they have said. Remember the Police are suppose to work for the community not the other way around and having a badge/gun does not or rather should not allow you to abuse a person's civil rights simply because they've pissed you off.

For people who are still proclaiming that there was no racism look into the concept of institutional racism. Not every racist act is done by some white guy with a shaved head or with a pointy hat. Some people of the wrong races spend their whole life dealing negative stereotypes. So no just because there hasn't been a cross burned on their front lawn or you've never been beaten down by the cops does not mean you haven't been victim to racial stereotypes. One thing that majority of black people have to contend with their entire life regardless of education, income,having committed no crimes etc (I'm not downplaying racism that other minorities have received) is that you will always be seen as black first and everything else second. So that's why I believe that if Gates had been white the situation would have never escalated because he would not have been questioned as though he might be a potential burglar. He would have been seen as a well dressed elderly man returning from some kind of trip at which point the cop would have asked if there had been any distributances.
awe1028
Posts: 20199
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/4/2009
Member: #2780

7/27/2009  10:20 PM
Thank you Sebstar for the welcome. I reread the story and did not see where the cop told Mr Gates to follow him outside but if he did that would further bolster the argument that Mr Gates was not at fault since he was simply following orders. I'm not sure what point you are trying to make If I have misunderstood the point you were trying to make please enlighten me. Now, I would like to address the issue of racism. Some posters felt that Mr. Gates had an agenda when he uttered the line "if that's how black men are treated in America".

People have to understand where black men are coming from in this country. The history of the US when it comes to race relations in general and police-black relationship in particular as we all know is very poor. From Rodney King to Abner Louima to Amadou Diallo blacks see how they are treated by the police and it is not very pretty. The problem though is not these high profile cases. The fact is many law abiding black people are subjected to these abuses of power by the police every day. Thus, given this history, it is up to the cops if they are at all interested in improving relations with the black community to make sure that when they are dealing with the black community there is no way their actions can be misinterpreted as racism.

Now, unto Gates incident. Why did not the cop give him the Id. The cop must have known that by ignoring his request this would be humiliating and disrespectful. Given the police's history within the black community the cops must know that when they behave like this it could be seen as racism even if that is not the intent. I would then submit to you that Police's insensitivity to these issues in the black community is in itself racism even if as I said earlier that is not the intent.

izybx
Posts: 22366
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 10/16/2006
Member: #1178
USA
7/27/2009  10:28 PM
Posted by sebstar:

Oh, and BTW. Here is the Massachusetts interpretation of what constitutes "disorderly conduct" See if Mr. Gates' behavior fits the criteria.

In a 1976 decision, Commonwealth v. Richards, 369 Mass. 443, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts held that the First Amendment prevents application of the disorderly conduct law to language and expressive conduct, even when it is offensive and abusive. The one exception would be language that falls outside the protection of the First Amendment, "fighting words which by their very utterance tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace."


Jury instructions used by the Massachusetts courts spell out three elements that must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt to convict someone of disorderly conduct:

1. The defendant engaged in fighting or threatening, or engaged in violent or tumultuous behavior, or created a hazardous or physically offensive condition by an act that served no legitimate purpose.
2. The defendant’s actions were reasonably likely to affect the public.
3. The defendant either intended to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly created a risk of public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm.

[Edited by - sebstar on 07-27-2009 3:36 PM]

Um, seems like it fits the criteria. Was that your point?
Beat the Evil Empire. BEAT MIAMI
izybx
Posts: 22366
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 10/16/2006
Member: #1178
USA
7/27/2009  10:29 PM
Posted by TheGame:
Posted by fishmike:
Posted by TheGame:
Posted by izybx:
Posted by TheGame:

This is from an article on CNN:

The issue of whether or not Gates — first in his home and later on his front porch — was in a public place has sparked plenty of debate, including in the blogosphere. Crowley's account of the incident included the detail that "at least seven" passers-by had stopped to rubberneck. Sam Goldberg, author of Boston Criminal Lawyer Blog, thinks the report includes that detail in order to bolster the case that this altercation was playing out publicly. "It's as if he was saying, 'Look, he was really causing a disturbance,'" says Goldberg, a criminal defense attorney at the Cambridge-based firm of Altman & Altman.

Jon Shane, who spent 17 years as a police officer in hardscrabble Newark, N.J., said that had he been the cop called to Gates' house, he would have left Gates and his huffy comments alone once he was sure Gates was the homeowner. He admits he may well have been offended by the professor's alleged bluster, but that's just part of the job, so much so that there's a term in police vernacular devoted to situations like this: contempt of cop.

"In contempt of court, you get loud and abusive in a courtroom, and it's against the law," says Shane, now a professor of criminal justice at John Jay who specializes in police policy and practice. "With contempt of cop, you get loud and nasty and show scorn for a law enforcement officer, but a police officer can't go out and lock you up for disorderly conduct because you were disrespectful toward them." The First Amendment allows you to say pretty much anything to the police. "You could tell them to go f--k themselves," says Shane, "and that's fine."
____

This sums up my point. No police officer should arrest someone for voicing their opinion unless it rises to the point of interfering with the officer doing his job. There is no question these officers knew that Gates lived there and as this officer said, once they determined that, they should have taken their butt on.

Beautiful. You guys want to argue about whether this guy crossed the gray line and locked up a guy for discon then go ahead. Its actually a worthy debate. But what I like about this post is there is no nonsense about how this only happened because the guy is black.

I don't think the initial situation happened because Gates was black. But the decision to arrest him was certainly influenced by the fact he was black. No way those cops arrest Gates if he was a white man who took offense to them being there once they determined it was his house. And, I absolutely will not excuse a police officer abusing their power by unnecessarily wasting all our tax payers dollars by arresting someone, when they know they have no valid basis to arrest them but rather are merely trying to get "payback" because the person was not as nice as the officers thinks he should have been. I guess I should be allowed to conduct a citizens arrest the next time an officer acts like an a-hole to me, because he is not treating me with the respect I think I deserve. If I tried to do that, I would really be arrested and probably charged with assaulting an officer. A police officer who does the same thing should be subjected to no less punishment. These cops should all be suspended for their actions to send a clear message that this type of unprofessional behavior will not be tolerated from the police.
really? because a white guy mouthing off at a cop, making threats and barking at him would NEVER get arrested right?

Here's a news flash fellas. You jaw at a cop long enough you going to get a free ride to the station. If he tells you pipe down I suggest you do it. you can threaten him and cry racism and militant nation or you can drop it walk away and get on with your life. Gates chose the first one.

Is it so hard to believe?

This pisses me off, and I will tell you why. I live in an area of NJ where racial profiling takes place. Its nasty and its a problem. Twice I got pulled over in one paticular town because my passenger was black. We played ball together and he didnt drive. I will spare you the specifics but it was typical profiling BS.

The problem is what Gates did takes attention away from the real problem. Gates comes off like an upitty harvard professor with an axe to grind. He's succeeded in helping people "tune out" accusations of racism in the future. His buddy Obama said the cop was a good man and cooler heads should have prevailed.

If your going to publicly bark racism at someone you better be damn sure your right because thats a nasty thing to say to someone if its not true.

Who said anything about "barking racism" Even the women who called in the 911 call is disputing part of what the officer said (he says he spoke with her and she is now saying that never happened) so I give him zero credibility. Moreover, so what, if Gates said you are a racist cop or you are doing this because I am black. That is his damn opinion. What authority does a cop have to arrest someone from stating an opinion when that comment does not interfere with an investigation, which is the crux of the matter that you seem to keep ignoring. These cops had already determined that this was Gates' house. Thus, they knew there had been no crime, or if there had been one, Gates was not the one who did it. Thus, they had no reason to still be on his property, let alone arrest him. And, no I don't care what I say to a cop, unless I am interfering with an investigation, that cop has no right to arrest me period, especially not out of my own damn house. And if you think they would have done that at all, or as quickly, to a white 58 year old, well-dressed man in that neighborhood, you, as LB put it, are "delusional."

[Edited by - thegame on 27-07-2009 15:44]

No shes is not disputing anything. Her LAWYER is disputing that she MENTIONED RACE. Obvious liability issue if gates sues.
Beat the Evil Empire. BEAT MIAMI
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
7/28/2009  12:49 AM
Posted by izybx:
Posted by sebstar:

Oh, and BTW. Here is the Massachusetts interpretation of what constitutes "disorderly conduct" See if Mr. Gates' behavior fits the criteria.

In a 1976 decision, Commonwealth v. Richards, 369 Mass. 443, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts held that the First Amendment prevents application of the disorderly conduct law to language and expressive conduct, even when it is offensive and abusive. The one exception would be language that falls outside the protection of the First Amendment, "fighting words which by their very utterance tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace."


Jury instructions used by the Massachusetts courts spell out three elements that must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt to convict someone of disorderly conduct:

1. The defendant engaged in fighting or threatening, or engaged in violent or tumultuous behavior, or created a hazardous or physically offensive condition by an act that served no legitimate purpose.
2. The defendant’s actions were reasonably likely to affect the public.
3. The defendant either intended to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly created a risk of public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm.

[Edited by - sebstar on 07-27-2009 3:36 PM]

Um, seems like it fits the criteria. Was that your point?

Gimmie a break, are you really going to interpret an old guy with a cane, getting mad that cops are running up into his house for no good reason as meeting the criteria mentioned above?

It was a ridiculous arrest as evidenced by the fact that the dept. apologized about it as soon as he was released. Now the motivations for which are what we are debating for now, but you have to come to the conclusion that the cop was out of line for arresting Gates.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
7/28/2009  12:52 AM
And again, for all you cats that want to twist facts...her lawyer isnt spinning anything. She did not mention race. I heard the 911 tape. They asked her what race the gentlemen were and she said she couldnt tell and that if she were to guess they might have been Mexican.

Crowley's lying about that. Thats a fact.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
martin
Posts: 75317
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/28/2009  1:27 AM
Posted by sebstar:

And again, for all you cats that want to twist facts...her lawyer isnt spinning anything. She did not mention race. I heard the 911 tape. They asked her what race the gentlemen were and she said she couldnt tell and that if she were to guess they might have been Mexican.

Crowley's lying about that. Thats a fact.

right, but isn't there one more gap? The message passed from 911 people to the police?
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
EnySpree
Posts: 44917
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

7/28/2009  1:31 AM
Yeah so I clicked this thread finally cuz of the curiosity...and somewhere a cat is loosing one of its lives.

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC?t=z5pqPMhdiAZNwzcCGMkiFw&s=09
EnySpree
Posts: 44917
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

7/28/2009  1:46 AM
Posted by bitty41:

I don't get why people feel the need to make Officer's Crowley behavior acceptable? Whatever took place in that house or what was said by either party the fact remains that Crowley made an arrest that could not even stand up in court but the so-called perpetrator was released shortly thereafter. Whether you think there was no racism involved or not we are heading down a very slippery slope if police officers can now start making bogus arrests because they don't like what you've said to them.

This is where I stand with this...

It disturbs me a great deal to have people say "after I read it again and heard the 911 tape and...etc"....

dudes the guy got arrested for being mad at the cops. He lived there. I'm sure he was shouting. It was a bogus call...Officers were doing their jobs...of course they will ask for ID...a proud harvard cat is gonna go nuts...ok the officer is definately going to follow him until the ID is obtained......

now did the officer apologize to the cat? was he rude the whole time? did he leave the property like he was the ****? Did Gates continue to wig out? yeah....should an arrest have been made? no...should the cop have given the ID? yes...all they have to do is show stand still so Gates can copy the shield number and name on his chest...

anyway...it probably wasn't racist, but police all across america and aparently even the ones that patrol Harvard need to be retrained on how to deal with the public...when i was a kid cops talked to the kids. they said good morning to people as they passed them....now they are all miami vice wanna be's that think everyone should be arrested without hesitation for the smallest things.

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC?t=z5pqPMhdiAZNwzcCGMkiFw&s=09
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
7/28/2009  2:02 AM
Posted by martin:
Posted by sebstar:

And again, for all you cats that want to twist facts...her lawyer isnt spinning anything. She did not mention race. I heard the 911 tape. They asked her what race the gentlemen were and she said she couldnt tell and that if she were to guess they might have been Mexican.

Crowley's lying about that. Thats a fact.

right, but isn't there one more gap? The message passed from 911 people to the police?

now what sounds more plausible, the 911 dispatchers completely making up the fact that the suspects were two black males (why on earth would they do that?), or the cop making it up to save his own ass?
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
EnySpree
Posts: 44917
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

7/28/2009  2:08 AM
I wanna vent a story....

the other day i was getting on the train at jamacia center...Cop shouts me out "Yo....YOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!" I look up like what the **** is going on and so did the whole station...he wanted to see my metro card. I work for the MTA and my Id is red and I was outta uniform...so ok he's in his rights to check. As I show it to him...his partner gets into position with her hand on her gun...the guy looks at it, flexes it for like 5 seconds and then gives if back saying..."ok"...and starts to walk away.

The rage that i had inside of me gave me an instant headache. I stared at him to the point he had to stop and turn around. We stared at each other...he made a grin almost laughing and i just turned around and caught my train.

What was wrong with defusing the situation??? Cop could have said, "Sorry bout that sir (or used my job title or said bro or something), have a nice day"...nah I got a measley "ok". Now if I got mad and said to him, "you can't apologize and wish me well? Thats why everyone hates cops"...he probably would say something smart and i probably would get even more upset or maybe in my anger go on a mild rant....now is it within the cops right to arrest me???

If you say yes...then you are lost.

I've gotten stopped putting my cell back in my belt clip by 3 undercover guys with guns drawn...all i can think about is sean bell and my family. again no apology...taught me not to use a belt case for my phone though.

I've had cops come up to a group of my friends and family inside our gate and told us to go inside our houses that we couldn't sit there. we knew they were gonna say something so we got up and closed the gate so they couldn't walk in and start touching stuff. old and young people were out there. of course they argue with us about open beer and such which isn't illegal if you are on your front porch. they walk away after the older people plead with them, but with the ****y swagger they are known for.

just giving my experience....some people can relate and thats why they would side either way. as human beings...I don't understand how anyone can side with the cops on this one...regardless if its racially motivated. People should not get arrested in their own homes for being angry at a cop that more than likely was disrespectful and intruding. If the cop felt threatened then thats another thing. I think this was a case of who's the bigger dickhead.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC?t=z5pqPMhdiAZNwzcCGMkiFw&s=09
martin
Posts: 75317
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/28/2009  2:20 AM
Posted by sebstar:
Posted by martin:
Posted by sebstar:

And again, for all you cats that want to twist facts...her lawyer isnt spinning anything. She did not mention race. I heard the 911 tape. They asked her what race the gentlemen were and she said she couldnt tell and that if she were to guess they might have been Mexican.

Crowley's lying about that. Thats a fact.

right, but isn't there one more gap? The message passed from 911 people to the police?

now what sounds more plausible, the 911 dispatchers completely making up the fact that the suspects were two black males (why on earth would they do that?), or the cop making it up to save his own ass?

didn't say that the 911 dispatchers made something up entirely, but you have already pointed out that the original call-in said they could have been Mexican. Maybe the dispatcher miscommunicated to the police? Maybe the police heard it wrong... who know?
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
izybx
Posts: 22366
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 10/16/2006
Member: #1178
USA
7/28/2009  9:38 AM
Posted by martin:
Posted by sebstar:
Posted by martin:
Posted by sebstar:

And again, for all you cats that want to twist facts...her lawyer isnt spinning anything. She did not mention race. I heard the 911 tape. They asked her what race the gentlemen were and she said she couldnt tell and that if she were to guess they might have been Mexican.

Crowley's lying about that. Thats a fact.

right, but isn't there one more gap? The message passed from 911 people to the police?

now what sounds more plausible, the 911 dispatchers completely making up the fact that the suspects were two black males (why on earth would they do that?), or the cop making it up to save his own ass?

didn't say that the 911 dispatchers made something up entirely, but you have already pointed out that the original call-in said they could have been Mexican. Maybe the dispatcher miscommunicated to the police? Maybe the police heard it wrong... who know?

The police report says that a woman standing in front of the house with a cell phone told Crowley that she was the one that called, and that two male blacks were inside. The womans LAWYER denies this. The dispatcher and 911 tapes both say a possible male hispanic. Crowley is obviously making this up as part of the vast police conspiracy.
Beat the Evil Empire. BEAT MIAMI
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
7/28/2009  10:50 AM
Posted by fishmike:
the ID thing was the root of the problem. The cops HAVE to ID him. They have to. If he's Jesus Christ they have to ID him. Its protocol. If they get a B&E call they have to ID the guy in the house. Gates refused and got hot. Eventually he did, but after getting hot (he admitted all this.)

THEN

He asked the cop for his badge and name. Gates says the cop ignored him and walked away. Here is where the stories dont mix but I say it doesnt matter. If the cop said or did something that got under Gate's skin he should have called the station and asked for the cops ID and made a complaint.

Instead

He lost his cool. He yelled. He screamed. He called the cops racist. He threatened them with the whole "DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM!??!?" mantra. Cops told him to calm down. He didnt. Pop... arrested for disturbing police. These are all confirmed facts and not up for debate.

Cops, good or bad are human. Some have short fuses and others long. Eventually there is a popping point and Gates clearly pushed this guy to his. He doesnt strike me as a guy with a lot of street smarts.

Yeah, I mean, we're definitely losing something with all this, so we just don't know enough of the story.

I think the situation is that Gates went way overboard, and you know I'm prone to do the same thing, and the cops did what they had to do to contain the situation. Poorly handled by both sides but I gotta say - when someone starts going off on the cops - he's getting cuffed and stuffed - and I don't blame them. I've been on the receiving end mad as hell but to be honest I gave them no choice. You can't just let someone go crazy like that and say "Oh, okay sir, our mistake! Have a good night!"

You just can't.

I mean, it's not like they beat him up or anything, so even with that I don't understand the UPROAR this has caused. Poorly handled? Yes. Criminally handled? Not a chance....

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
7/28/2009  10:53 AM
Posted by sebstar:




Nice try, and a predictable one at that...only problem is that her version is confirmed by the 911 call.

Try again.

Predictable? I'm not a racist no matter what you think or how you try to paint me as one. So just drop it already - besides - not for nothing Seb, you come off as a guy who thinks everyone is racist. That's not fair to "everyone" nor to yourself because you work yourself up to unneeded levels over nothing far too often.

Breath deep man, breath deep, there is a VERY logical explanation as to why this situation got a little out of hand, and race has nothing to do with it except for those that WANT it to be about race. In the case of a select few, who insist on fueling the flames each and every time, a non-black man can't even accidentally bump into a black man in a crowded train station without it being an overt act of premeditated racism.

To those who act that way they're part of the problem not the solution of any manner that involves racism. Your Al Sharptons and Jesse Jacksons do their fellow man a great disservice always going way out of line over the most minor of situations.

I guess they, and those like them, have to cure their boredom and vent their misplaced anger somehow. That's fine, but, it does noone any good at all.



http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
OT: Welcome home, Mr. Gates

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy