Panos wrote:

blkexec wrote:Before this turns into the 20th RJ hate thread, lets bring this back to Josh Hart.

My favorite player is John Starks and Josh Hart is the closest you can get to Starks.

Streaky shooter but gives 110% effort when on the floor.

Josh represent NY basketball in it's purest form.

I see more Latrell Sprewell. Josh is very fast, and tough as nails. Also has that chip on the shoulder that Latrell had.

I can see that. He definitely has some Sprewell in him, especially in the open court when he's playing downhill. I agree. Guess I'm just trying to find my Starks replacement. Also I don't remember is Sprewell was known for defense, but their enery and momentum plays has a similar impact on the team. I agree with that.

EwingsGlass wrote:

Knickoftime wrote:Think it was a good trade. Optimistic about his fit/impact.

But can we give it a couple of months.

Anyone remember 'Quivers'?

Let's just wait ... for once.

What topic of conversation do you prefer to chatting about our newest player?

Let's see. We're not supposed to talk about RJ. Don't talk about Josh Hart.
Are the crocuses coming up yet?

Panos wrote:

EwingsGlass wrote:

Knickoftime wrote:Think it was a good trade. Optimistic about his fit/impact.

But can we give it a couple of months.

Anyone remember 'Quivers'?

Let's just wait ... for once.

What topic of conversation do you prefer to chatting about our newest player?

Let's see. We're not supposed to talk about RJ. Don't talk about Josh Hart.
Are the crocuses coming up yet?

So, genuinely asking.

Is there actual confusion about the difference between talking about a player and talking definitely about how that player is going to impact the Knicks for the next 1 to 4 years?

Are those the same thing?

I know this is a Knicks board, but is it okay to talk about how Cam Thomas is better than Kyrie Irving already better than anyone on the KNicks roster?

fishmike wrote:

Knickoftime wrote:

Panos wrote:

EwingsGlass wrote:

Knickoftime wrote:Think it was a good trade. Optimistic about his fit/impact.

But can we give it a couple of months.

Anyone remember 'Quivers'?

Let's just wait ... for once.

What topic of conversation do you prefer to chatting about our newest player?

Let's see. We're not supposed to talk about RJ. Don't talk about Josh Hart.
Are the crocuses coming up yet?

So, genuinely asking.

Is there actual confusion about the difference between talking about a player and talking definitely about how that player is going to impact the Knicks for the next 1 to 4 years?

Are those the same thing?

I know this is a Knicks board, but is it okay to talk about how Cam Thomas is better than Kyrie Irving already better than anyone on the KNicks roster?

did Austin Rivers have Josh Hart's track record? Josh Hart has been a very good player for a few years now. He was traded for Anthony Davis and CJ McCollum. He's played well everywhere he's been.

So genuinely asking... what the phuck does Josh Hart have to do with Austin Rivers?

What factors would you look at when considering if a new player is a good long term fit?

Possibly...
Fits into a system run by the coach who appears entrenched in this role
Fits in with current long term pieces the FO have extended or resigned (Mitch/Jules/Brunson/RJ... does Hart's game appear to be a good fit with these players?)
Age fits with current roster/timeline

Looks like Josh Hart has many of the attributes that would make him a good long term fit.

Also my crocuses are coming up and it sucks. One frost and they are dead. Its freeakin Feb. There's been no winter... its been 4 months of November

Josh Hart humorously told the story about how he scored 20 points a game his first two games with the Trailbalzers, who who was scoring 10 pts a game at 30% from three.

I'm just a longview guy. If Hart bounced around because he just never found his NBA glass slipper, AWESOME (for the Knicks).

Pro sports just teaches me to wait until the honeymoon is over, then you'll see what's what.

Knickoftime wrote:

fishmike wrote:

Knickoftime wrote:

Panos wrote:

EwingsGlass wrote:

Knickoftime wrote:Think it was a good trade. Optimistic about his fit/impact.

But can we give it a couple of months.

Anyone remember 'Quivers'?

Let's just wait ... for once.

What topic of conversation do you prefer to chatting about our newest player?

Let's see. We're not supposed to talk about RJ. Don't talk about Josh Hart.
Are the crocuses coming up yet?

So, genuinely asking.

Is there actual confusion about the difference between talking about a player and talking definitely about how that player is going to impact the Knicks for the next 1 to 4 years?

Are those the same thing?

I know this is a Knicks board, but is it okay to talk about how Cam Thomas is better than Kyrie Irving already better than anyone on the KNicks roster?

did Austin Rivers have Josh Hart's track record? Josh Hart has been a very good player for a few years now. He was traded for Anthony Davis and CJ McCollum. He's played well everywhere he's been.

So genuinely asking... what the phuck does Josh Hart have to do with Austin Rivers?

What factors would you look at when considering if a new player is a good long term fit?

Possibly...
Fits into a system run by the coach who appears entrenched in this role
Fits in with current long term pieces the FO have extended or resigned (Mitch/Jules/Brunson/RJ... does Hart's game appear to be a good fit with these players?)
Age fits with current roster/timeline

Looks like Josh Hart has many of the attributes that would make him a good long term fit.

Also my crocuses are coming up and it sucks. One frost and they are dead. Its freeakin Feb. There's been no winter... its been 4 months of November

Josh Hart humorously told the story about how he scored 20 points a game his first two games with the Trailbalzers, who who was scoring 10 pts a game at 30% from three.

I'm just a longview guy. If Hart bounced around because he just never found his NBA glass slipper, AWESOME (for the Knicks).

Pro sports just teaches me to wait until the honeymoon is over, then you'll see what's what.

IF we make a deal that included youngers Hart is the perfect guy to reload with and bring back (opt out/resign)

Hart is Starks? Spree? To me he has none of the flair of those two. I see a lunch bucket worker with a not so pretty jumper that goes in enough. Quick step to the basket and strong. His defense is very good. Very close to OG which should cost less in salary.

martin wrote:I don't watch other teams at all but this guy is the perfect 6th man